buildroot/arch/Config.in

477 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Normal View History

menu "Target options"
config BR2_ARCH_IS_64
bool
config BR2_KERNEL_64_USERLAND_32
bool
config BR2_SOFT_FLOAT
bool
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
config BR2_USE_MMU
bool
choice
prompt "Target Architecture"
default BR2_i386
help
Select the target architecture family to build for.
config BR2_arcle
bool "ARC (little endian)"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
Synopsys' DesignWare ARC Processor Cores are a family of
32-bit CPUs that can be used from deeply embedded to high
performance host applications. Little endian.
config BR2_arceb
bool "ARC (big endian)"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
Synopsys' DesignWare ARC Processor Cores are a family of
32-bit CPUs that can be used from deeply embedded to high
performance host applications. Big endian.
config BR2_arm
bool "ARM (little endian)"
# MMU support is set by the subarchitecture file, arch/Config.in.arm
help
ARM is a 32-bit reduced instruction set computer (RISC)
instruction set architecture (ISA) developed by ARM Holdings.
Little endian.
http://www.arm.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM
config BR2_armeb
bool "ARM (big endian)"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
ARM is a 32-bit reduced instruction set computer (RISC)
instruction set architecture (ISA) developed by ARM Holdings.
Big endian.
http://www.arm.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM
config BR2_aarch64
bool "AArch64 (little endian)"
select BR2_ARCH_IS_64
help
Aarch64 is a 64-bit architecture developed by ARM Holdings.
http://www.arm.com/products/processors/instruction-set-architectures/armv8-architecture.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM
config BR2_aarch64_be
bool "AArch64 (big endian)"
select BR2_ARCH_IS_64
help
Aarch64 is a 64-bit architecture developed by ARM Holdings.
http://www.arm.com/products/processors/instruction-set-architectures/armv8-architecture.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM
config BR2_i386
bool "i386"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
Intel i386 architecture compatible microprocessor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I386
config BR2_m68k
bool "m68k"
# MMU support is set by the subarchitecture file, arch/Config.in.m68k
help
Motorola 68000 family microprocessor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M68k
config BR2_microblazeel
bool "Microblaze AXI (little endian)"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
Soft processor core designed for Xilinx FPGAs from Xilinx. AXI
bus based architecture (little endian)
http://www.xilinx.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblaze
config BR2_microblazebe
bool "Microblaze non-AXI (big endian)"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
Soft processor core designed for Xilinx FPGAs from Xilinx. PLB
bus based architecture (non-AXI, big endian)
http://www.xilinx.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblaze
config BR2_mips
bool "MIPS (big endian)"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
MIPS is a RISC microprocessor from MIPS Technologies. Big
endian.
http://www.mips.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIPS_Technologies
config BR2_mipsel
bool "MIPS (little endian)"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
MIPS is a RISC microprocessor from MIPS Technologies. Little
endian.
http://www.mips.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIPS_Technologies
config BR2_mips64
bool "MIPS64 (big endian)"
select BR2_ARCH_IS_64
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
MIPS is a RISC microprocessor from MIPS Technologies. Big
endian.
http://www.mips.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIPS_Technologies
config BR2_mips64el
bool "MIPS64 (little endian)"
select BR2_ARCH_IS_64
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
MIPS is a RISC microprocessor from MIPS Technologies. Little
endian.
http://www.mips.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIPS_Technologies
config BR2_nios2
bool "Nios II"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
Nios II is a soft core processor from Altera Corporation.
http://www.altera.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nios_II
config BR2_or1k
bool "OpenRISC"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
OpenRISC is a free and open processor for embedded system.
http://openrisc.io
config BR2_powerpc
bool "PowerPC"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
PowerPC is a RISC architecture created by Apple-IBM-Motorola
alliance. Big endian.
http://www.power.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powerpc
config BR2_powerpc64
bool "PowerPC64 (big endian)"
select BR2_ARCH_IS_64
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
PowerPC is a RISC architecture created by Apple-IBM-Motorola
alliance. Big endian.
http://www.power.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powerpc
config BR2_powerpc64le
bool "PowerPC64 (little endian)"
select BR2_ARCH_IS_64
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
PowerPC is a RISC architecture created by Apple-IBM-Motorola
alliance. Little endian.
http://www.power.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powerpc
config BR2_riscv
bool "RISCV"
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_7
help
RISC-V is an open, free Instruction Set Architecture created
by the UC Berkeley Architecture Research group and supported
and promoted by RISC-V Foundation.
https://riscv.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V
config BR2_s390x
bool "s390x"
select BR2_ARCH_IS_64
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
s390x is a big-endian architecture made by IBM.
http://www.ibm.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_System/390
config BR2_sh
bool "SuperH"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
SuperH (or SH) is a 32-bit reduced instruction set computer
(RISC) instruction set architecture (ISA) developed by
Hitachi.
http://www.hitachi.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperH
config BR2_sparc
bool "SPARC"
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
# uClibc-ng broken on sparc due to recent gcc changes
# that need to be reverted since gcc 8.4, 9.3 and 10.1.
# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784
# gcc <= 10.x has been removed from Buildroot.
select BR2_ARCH_HAS_NO_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT
help
SPARC (from Scalable Processor Architecture) is a RISC
instruction set architecture (ISA) developed by Sun
Microsystems.
http://www.oracle.com/sun
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparc
config BR2_sparc64
bool "SPARC64"
select BR2_ARCH_IS_64
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
SPARC (from Scalable Processor Architecture) is a RISC
instruction set architecture (ISA) developed by Sun
Microsystems.
http://www.oracle.com/sun
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparc
config BR2_x86_64
bool "x86_64"
select BR2_ARCH_IS_64
arch: rework MMU option handling and move to "Target architecture" menu The MMU option is currently located in the "Toolchain" menu, but it doesn't make sense as it's really architecture related. In addition, the selection of MMU has an impact on the choice of binary format available, which is visible in the architecture menu. Therefore, this commit moves the MMU option into the architecture menu. However, if we simply move it in arch/Config.in, it means that we would have the following order of options: Target architecture Target architecture variant ABI MMU Binary format But really, the MMU option should be right below the Target architecture variant, and the available ABIs derived from that. The variant and ABI are arch-specfic, and defined in the per-arch Config.in fragments; a Kconfig option can have only one prompt defined, even under conditions, and appears at the place in the menu where its prompt was defined. So, there is no (easy) possibility to have a generic option appear where we want it. Since in fact only 2 architectures show a visible prompt for the MMU option (RISC-V and Xtensa), we move this option in arch/Config.in.riscv and arch/Config.in.xtensa. Some walkthrough the commit: - BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY and BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL are removed as they are no longer needed - BR2_USE_MMU becomes a hidden boolean - All the places where we used to select BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY now select BR2_USE_MMU directly. - Introduce BR2_RISCV_USE_MMU and BR2_XTENSA_USE_MMU. - All defconfigs that used "# BR2_USE_MMU is not set" are switched to using the new option. All in all, this simplifies things quite a bit, and allows to have a good option ordering in the Target architecture menu. This commit might raise a concern in terms of backward compatibility with existing configurations. The only configurations that will be broken by this change are RISC-V noMMU (which was very recently introduced) and Xtensa noMMU (which we can probably agree is not such a widely popular configuration). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: - expand further why we need per-arch MMU options ] Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2022-07-26 10:39:51 -06:00
select BR2_USE_MMU
help
x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set (Intel i386
architecture compatible microprocessor).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_64
config BR2_xtensa
bool "Xtensa"
# MMU support is set by the subarchitecture file, arch/Config.in.xtensa
help
Xtensa is a Tensilica processor IP architecture.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xtensa
http://www.tensilica.com/
endchoice
# For some architectures or specific cores, our internal toolchain
# backend is not suitable (like, missing support in upstream gcc, or
# no ChipCo fork exists...)
config BR2_ARCH_HAS_NO_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT
bool
config BR2_ARCH_HAS_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT
bool
default y if !BR2_ARCH_HAS_NO_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT
# The following symbols are selected by the individual
# Config.in.$ARCH files
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8
bool
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9
bool
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_5
bool
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_6
bool
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_5
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_7
bool
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_6
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_8
bool
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_7
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_9
bool
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_8
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_10
bool
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_9
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_11
bool
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_10
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_12
bool
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_11
config BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_13
bool
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_12
# The following string values are defined by the individual
# Config.in.$ARCH files
config BR2_ARCH
string
core: introduce NORMALIZED_ARCH as non-kernel replacement for KERNEL_ARCH The variable 'KERNEL_ARCH' is actually a normalized version of 'ARCH'/'BR2_ARCH'. For example, 'arcle' and 'arceb' both become 'arc', just as all powerpc variants become 'powerpc'. It is presumably called 'KERNEL_ARCH' because the Linux kernel is typically the first place where support for a new architecture is added, and thus is the entity that defines the normalized name. However, the term 'KERNEL_ARCH' can also be interpreted as 'the architecture used by the kernel', which need not be exactly the same as 'the normalized name for a certain arch'. In particular, for cases where a 64-bit architecture is running a 64-bit kernel but 32-bit userspace. Examples include: * aarch64 architecture, with aarch64 kernel and 32-bit (ARM) userspace * x86_64 architecture, with x86_64 kernel and 32-bit (i386) userspace In such cases, the 'architecture used by the kernel' needs to refer to the 64-bit name (aarch64, x86_64), whereas all userspace applications need to refer the, potentially normalized, 32-bit name. This means that there need to be two different variables: KERNEL_ARCH: the architecture used by the kernel NORMALIZED_ARCH: the normalized name for the current userspace architecture At this moment, both will actually have the same content. But a subsequent patch will add basic support for situations described above, in which KERNEL_ARCH may become overwritten to the 64-bit architecture, while NORMALIZED_ARCH needs to remain the same (32-bit) case. This commit replaces use of KERNEL_ARCH where actually the userspace arch is needed. Places that use KERNEL_ARCH in combination with building of kernel modules are not touched. There may be cases where a package builds both a kernel module as userspace, in which case it may need to know about both KERNEL_ARCH and NORMALIZED_ARCH, for the case where they differ. But this is to be fixed on a per-need basis. Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com> [Arnout: Also rename BR2_KERNEL_ARCH to BR2_NORMALIZED_ARCH] Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
2022-01-15 13:03:00 -07:00
config BR2_NORMALIZED_ARCH
string
config BR2_ENDIAN
string
config BR2_GCC_TARGET_ARCH
string
config BR2_GCC_TARGET_ABI
string
config BR2_GCC_TARGET_NAN
string
config BR2_GCC_TARGET_FP32_MODE
string
config BR2_GCC_TARGET_CPU
string
# The value of this option will be passed as --with-fpu=<value> when
# building gcc (internal backend) or -mfpu=<value> in the toolchain
# wrapper (external toolchain)
config BR2_GCC_TARGET_FPU
string
# The value of this option will be passed as --with-float=<value> when
# building gcc (internal backend) or -mfloat-abi=<value> in the toolchain
# wrapper (external toolchain)
config BR2_GCC_TARGET_FLOAT_ABI
string
# The value of this option will be passed as --with-mode=<value> when
# building gcc (internal backend) or -m<value> in the toolchain
# wrapper (external toolchain)
config BR2_GCC_TARGET_MODE
string
# Must be selected by binary formats that support shared libraries.
config BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED
bool
# Must match the name of the architecture from readelf point of view,
# i.e the "Machine:" field of readelf output. See get_machine_name()
# in binutils/readelf.c for the list of possible values.
config BR2_READELF_ARCH_NAME
string
if BR2_arcle || BR2_arceb
source "arch/Config.in.arc"
endif
if BR2_arm || BR2_armeb || BR2_aarch64 || BR2_aarch64_be
source "arch/Config.in.arm"
endif
if BR2_m68k
source "arch/Config.in.m68k"
endif
if BR2_microblazeel || BR2_microblazebe
source "arch/Config.in.microblaze"
endif
if BR2_mips || BR2_mips64 || BR2_mipsel || BR2_mips64el
source "arch/Config.in.mips"
endif
if BR2_nios2
source "arch/Config.in.nios2"
endif
if BR2_or1k
source "arch/Config.in.or1k"
endif
if BR2_powerpc || BR2_powerpc64 || BR2_powerpc64le
source "arch/Config.in.powerpc"
endif
if BR2_riscv
source "arch/Config.in.riscv"
endif
if BR2_s390x
source "arch/Config.in.s390x"
endif
if BR2_sh
source "arch/Config.in.sh"
endif
if BR2_sparc || BR2_sparc64
source "arch/Config.in.sparc"
endif
if BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64
source "arch/Config.in.x86"
endif
if BR2_xtensa
source "arch/Config.in.xtensa"
endif
# Set up target binary format
choice
prompt "Target Binary Format"
default BR2_BINFMT_ELF if BR2_USE_MMU
default BR2_BINFMT_FLAT
config BR2_BINFMT_ELF
bool "ELF"
depends on BR2_USE_MMU
select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED
help
ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) is a format for libraries
and executables used across different architectures and
operating systems.
config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT
bool "FLAT"
depends on !BR2_USE_MMU
help
FLAT binary is a relatively simple and lightweight executable
format based on the original a.out format. It is widely used
in environment where no MMU is available.
endchoice
# Set up flat binary type
choice
prompt "FLAT Binary type"
default BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_ONE
depends on BR2_BINFMT_FLAT
config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_ONE
bool "One memory region"
help
All segments are linked into one memory region.
config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED
bool "Shared binary"
depends on BR2_m68k
# Even though this really generates shared binaries, there is no libdl
# and dlopen() cannot be used. So packages that require shared
# libraries cannot be built. Therefore, we don't select
# BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED and therefore force BR2_STATIC_LIBS.
# Although this adds -static to the compilation, that's not a problem
# because the -mid-shared-library option overrides it.
help
Allow to load and link indiviual FLAT binaries at run time.
endchoice
endmenu # Target options