package/libexif: security bump to version 0.6.22

- Switch site to github
- Drop patches (already in version)
- Fix the following CVEs:
  - CVE-2020-13114: Time consumption DoS when parsing canon array
    markers
  - CVE-2020-13113: Potential use of uninitialized memory
  - CVE-2020-13112: Various buffer overread fixes due to integer
    overflows in maker notes
  - CVE-2020-0093: read overflow
  - CVE-2020-12767: fixed division by zero

https://github.com/libexif/libexif/releases/tag/libexif-0_6_22-release

Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2020.05.x
Fabrice Fontaine 2020-05-19 20:02:16 +02:00 committed by Yann E. MORIN
parent 78e7807112
commit ca0547ffea
8 changed files with 6 additions and 360 deletions

View File

@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
From 41bd04234b104312f54d25822f68738ba8d7133d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marcus Meissner <marcus@jet.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 23:44:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fixes some (not all) buffer overreads during decoding pentax
makernote entries.
This should fix:
https://sourceforge.net/p/libexif/bugs/125/ CVE-2016-6328
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
---
libexif/pentax/mnote-pentax-entry.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libexif/pentax/mnote-pentax-entry.c b/libexif/pentax/mnote-pentax-entry.c
index d03d159..ea0429a 100644
--- a/libexif/pentax/mnote-pentax-entry.c
+++ b/libexif/pentax/mnote-pentax-entry.c
@@ -425,24 +425,34 @@ mnote_pentax_entry_get_value (MnotePentaxEntry *entry,
case EXIF_FORMAT_SHORT:
{
const unsigned char *data = entry->data;
- size_t k, len = strlen(val);
+ size_t k, len = strlen(val), sizeleft;
+
+ sizeleft = entry->size;
for(k=0; k<entry->components; k++) {
+ if (sizeleft < 2)
+ break;
vs = exif_get_short (data, entry->order);
snprintf (val+len, maxlen-len, "%i ", vs);
len = strlen(val);
data += 2;
+ sizeleft -= 2;
}
}
break;
case EXIF_FORMAT_LONG:
{
const unsigned char *data = entry->data;
- size_t k, len = strlen(val);
+ size_t k, len = strlen(val), sizeleft;
+
+ sizeleft = entry->size;
for(k=0; k<entry->components; k++) {
+ if (sizeleft < 4)
+ break;
vl = exif_get_long (data, entry->order);
snprintf (val+len, maxlen-len, "%li", (long int) vl);
len = strlen(val);
data += 4;
+ sizeleft -= 4;
}
}
break;
@@ -455,5 +465,5 @@ mnote_pentax_entry_get_value (MnotePentaxEntry *entry,
break;
}
- return (val);
+ return val;
}
--
2.20.1

View File

@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
From c39acd1692023b26290778a02a9232c873f9d71a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marcus Meissner <marcus@jet.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 23:38:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] On saving makernotes, make sure the makernote container tags
has a type with 1 byte components.
Fixes (at least):
https://sourceforge.net/p/libexif/bugs/130
https://sourceforge.net/p/libexif/bugs/129
CVE-2017-7544: libexif through 0.6.21 is vulnerable to out-of-bounds heap
read vulnerability in exif_data_save_data_entry function in
libexif/exif-data.c caused by improper length computation of the allocated
data of an ExifMnote entry which can cause denial-of-service or possibly
information disclosure.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
---
libexif/exif-data.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libexif/exif-data.c b/libexif/exif-data.c
index 67df4db..91f4c33 100644
--- a/libexif/exif-data.c
+++ b/libexif/exif-data.c
@@ -255,6 +255,12 @@ exif_data_save_data_entry (ExifData *data, ExifEntry *e,
exif_mnote_data_set_offset (data->priv->md, *ds - 6);
exif_mnote_data_save (data->priv->md, &e->data, &e->size);
e->components = e->size;
+ if (exif_format_get_size (e->format) != 1) {
+ /* e->format is taken from input code,
+ * but we need to make sure it is a 1 byte
+ * entity due to the multiplication below. */
+ e->format = EXIF_FORMAT_UNDEFINED;
+ }
}
}
--
2.20.1

View File

@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
From 5d28011c40ec86cf52cffad541093d37c263898a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Fandrich <dan@coneharvesters.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:05:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Reduce maximum recursion depth in exif_data_load_data_content
This only needs to be a small, single digit integer for normal files,
and reducing the maximum closer to this reduces the time and space
needed to detect pathological cases.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
---
libexif/exif-data.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libexif/exif-data.c b/libexif/exif-data.c
index 91f4c33..04cdda2 100644
--- a/libexif/exif-data.c
+++ b/libexif/exif-data.c
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ exif_data_load_data_content (ExifData *data, ExifIfd ifd,
if ((((int)ifd) < 0) || ( ((int)ifd) >= EXIF_IFD_COUNT))
return;
- if (recursion_depth > 30) {
+ if (recursion_depth > 12) {
exif_log (data->priv->log, EXIF_LOG_CODE_CORRUPT_DATA, "ExifData",
"Deep recursion detected!");
return;
--
2.20.1

View File

@ -1,120 +0,0 @@
From 6aa11df549114ebda520dde4cdaea2f9357b2c89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Fandrich <dan@coneharvesters.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 16:01:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Improve deep recursion detection in
exif_data_load_data_content.
The existing detection was still vulnerable to pathological cases
causing DoS by wasting CPU. The new algorithm takes the number of tags
into account to make it harder to abuse by cases using shallow recursion
but with a very large number of tags. This improves on commit 5d28011c
which wasn't sufficient to counter this kind of case.
The limitation in the previous fix was discovered by Laurent Delosieres,
Secunia Research at Flexera (Secunia Advisory SA84652) and is assigned
the identifier CVE-2018-20030.
[Peter: drop NEWS change]
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
---
libexif/exif-data.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libexif/exif-data.c b/libexif/exif-data.c
index e35403d..a6f9c94 100644
--- a/libexif/exif-data.c
+++ b/libexif/exif-data.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include <libexif/olympus/exif-mnote-data-olympus.h>
#include <libexif/pentax/exif-mnote-data-pentax.h>
+#include <math.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
@@ -350,6 +351,20 @@ if (data->ifd[(i)]->count) { \
break; \
}
+/*! Calculate the recursion cost added by one level of IFD loading.
+ *
+ * The work performed is related to the cost in the exponential relation
+ * work=1.1**cost
+ */
+static unsigned int
+level_cost(unsigned int n)
+{
+ static const double log_1_1 = 0.09531017980432493;
+
+ /* Adding 0.1 protects against the case where n==1 */
+ return ceil(log(n + 0.1)/log_1_1);
+}
+
/*! Load data for an IFD.
*
* \param[in,out] data #ExifData
@@ -357,13 +372,13 @@ if (data->ifd[(i)]->count) { \
* \param[in] d pointer to buffer containing raw IFD data
* \param[in] ds size of raw data in buffer at \c d
* \param[in] offset offset into buffer at \c d at which IFD starts
- * \param[in] recursion_depth number of times this function has been
- * recursively called without returning
+ * \param[in] recursion_cost factor indicating how expensive this recursive
+ * call could be
*/
static void
exif_data_load_data_content (ExifData *data, ExifIfd ifd,
const unsigned char *d,
- unsigned int ds, unsigned int offset, unsigned int recursion_depth)
+ unsigned int ds, unsigned int offset, unsigned int recursion_cost)
{
ExifLong o, thumbnail_offset = 0, thumbnail_length = 0;
ExifShort n;
@@ -378,9 +393,20 @@ exif_data_load_data_content (ExifData *data, ExifIfd ifd,
if ((((int)ifd) < 0) || ( ((int)ifd) >= EXIF_IFD_COUNT))
return;
- if (recursion_depth > 12) {
+ if (recursion_cost > 170) {
+ /*
+ * recursion_cost is a logarithmic-scale indicator of how expensive this
+ * recursive call might end up being. It is an indicator of the depth of
+ * recursion as well as the potential for worst-case future recursive
+ * calls. Since it's difficult to tell ahead of time how often recursion
+ * will occur, this assumes the worst by assuming every tag could end up
+ * causing recursion.
+ * The value of 170 was chosen to limit typical EXIF structures to a
+ * recursive depth of about 6, but pathological ones (those with very
+ * many tags) to only 2.
+ */
exif_log (data->priv->log, EXIF_LOG_CODE_CORRUPT_DATA, "ExifData",
- "Deep recursion detected!");
+ "Deep/expensive recursion detected!");
return;
}
@@ -422,15 +448,18 @@ exif_data_load_data_content (ExifData *data, ExifIfd ifd,
switch (tag) {
case EXIF_TAG_EXIF_IFD_POINTER:
CHECK_REC (EXIF_IFD_EXIF);
- exif_data_load_data_content (data, EXIF_IFD_EXIF, d, ds, o, recursion_depth + 1);
+ exif_data_load_data_content (data, EXIF_IFD_EXIF, d, ds, o,
+ recursion_cost + level_cost(n));
break;
case EXIF_TAG_GPS_INFO_IFD_POINTER:
CHECK_REC (EXIF_IFD_GPS);
- exif_data_load_data_content (data, EXIF_IFD_GPS, d, ds, o, recursion_depth + 1);
+ exif_data_load_data_content (data, EXIF_IFD_GPS, d, ds, o,
+ recursion_cost + level_cost(n));
break;
case EXIF_TAG_INTEROPERABILITY_IFD_POINTER:
CHECK_REC (EXIF_IFD_INTEROPERABILITY);
- exif_data_load_data_content (data, EXIF_IFD_INTEROPERABILITY, d, ds, o, recursion_depth + 1);
+ exif_data_load_data_content (data, EXIF_IFD_INTEROPERABILITY, d, ds, o,
+ recursion_cost + level_cost(n));
break;
case EXIF_TAG_JPEG_INTERCHANGE_FORMAT:
thumbnail_offset = o;
--
2.20.1

View File

@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
From 75aa73267fdb1e0ebfbc00369e7312bac43d0566 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 09:29:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix CVE-2019-9278
avoid the use of unsafe integer overflow checking constructs (unsigned integer operations cannot overflow, so "u1 + u2 > u1" can be optimized away)
check for the actual sizes, which should also handle the overflows
document other places google patched, but do not seem relevant due to other restrictions
fixes https://github.com/libexif/libexif/issues/26
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
---
libexif/exif-data.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libexif/exif-data.c b/libexif/exif-data.c
index a6f9c94..6332cd1 100644
--- a/libexif/exif-data.c
+++ b/libexif/exif-data.c
@@ -192,9 +192,15 @@ exif_data_load_data_entry (ExifData *data, ExifEntry *entry,
doff = offset + 8;
/* Sanity checks */
- if ((doff + s < doff) || (doff + s < s) || (doff + s > size)) {
+ if (doff >= size) {
exif_log (data->priv->log, EXIF_LOG_CODE_DEBUG, "ExifData",
- "Tag data past end of buffer (%u > %u)", doff+s, size);
+ "Tag starts past end of buffer (%u > %u)", doff, size);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (s > size - doff) {
+ exif_log (data->priv->log, EXIF_LOG_CODE_DEBUG, "ExifData",
+ "Tag data goes past end of buffer (%u > %u)", doff+s, size);
return 0;
}
@@ -315,13 +321,14 @@ exif_data_load_data_thumbnail (ExifData *data, const unsigned char *d,
unsigned int ds, ExifLong o, ExifLong s)
{
/* Sanity checks */
- if ((o + s < o) || (o + s < s) || (o + s > ds) || (o > ds)) {
- exif_log (data->priv->log, EXIF_LOG_CODE_DEBUG, "ExifData",
- "Bogus thumbnail offset (%u) or size (%u).",
- o, s);
+ if (o >= ds) {
+ exif_log (data->priv->log, EXIF_LOG_CODE_DEBUG, "ExifData", "Bogus thumbnail offset (%u).", o);
+ return;
+ }
+ if (s > ds - o) {
+ exif_log (data->priv->log, EXIF_LOG_CODE_DEBUG, "ExifData", "Bogus thumbnail size (%u), max would be %u.", s, ds-o);
return;
}
-
if (data->data)
exif_mem_free (data->priv->mem, data->data);
if (!(data->data = exif_data_alloc (data, s))) {
@@ -947,7 +954,7 @@ exif_data_load_data (ExifData *data, const unsigned char *d_orig,
exif_log (data->priv->log, EXIF_LOG_CODE_DEBUG, "ExifData",
"IFD 0 at %i.", (int) offset);
- /* Sanity check the offset, being careful about overflow */
+ /* ds is restricted to 16 bit above, so offset is restricted too, and offset+8 should not overflow. */
if (offset > ds || offset + 6 + 2 > ds)
return;
@@ -956,6 +963,7 @@ exif_data_load_data (ExifData *data, const unsigned char *d_orig,
/* IFD 1 offset */
n = exif_get_short (d + 6 + offset, data->priv->order);
+ /* offset < 2<<16, n is 16 bit at most, so this op will not overflow */
if (offset + 6 + 2 + 12 * n + 4 > ds)
return;
@@ -964,8 +972,8 @@ exif_data_load_data (ExifData *data, const unsigned char *d_orig,
exif_log (data->priv->log, EXIF_LOG_CODE_DEBUG, "ExifData",
"IFD 1 at %i.", (int) offset);
- /* Sanity check. */
- if (offset > ds || offset + 6 > ds) {
+ /* Sanity check. ds is ensured to be above 6 above, offset is 16bit */
+ if (offset > ds - 6) {
exif_log (data->priv->log, EXIF_LOG_CODE_CORRUPT_DATA,
"ExifData", "Bogus offset of IFD1.");
} else {
--
2.20.1

View File

@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBEXIF
image. The EXIF library allows you to parse an EXIF file
and read the data from those tags.
http://libexif.sf.net
https://libexif.github.io

View File

@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
# Locally computed:
sha256 16cdaeb62eb3e6dfab2435f7d7bccd2f37438d21c5218ec4e58efa9157d4d41a libexif-0.6.21.tar.bz2
sha256 5048f1c8fc509cc636c2f97f4b40c293338b6041a5652082d5ee2cf54b530c56 libexif-0.6.22.tar.xz
sha256 36b6d3fa47916943fd5fec313c584784946047ec1337a78b440e5992cb595f89 COPYING

View File

@ -4,21 +4,13 @@
#
################################################################################
LIBEXIF_VERSION = 0.6.21
LIBEXIF_SOURCE = libexif-$(LIBEXIF_VERSION).tar.bz2
LIBEXIF_SITE = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libexif/libexif/$(LIBEXIF_VERSION)
LIBEXIF_VERSION = 0.6.22
LIBEXIF_SOURCE = libexif-$(LIBEXIF_VERSION).tar.xz
LIBEXIF_SITE = \
https://github.com/libexif/libexif/releases/download/libexif-$(subst .,_,$(LIBEXIF_VERSION))-release
LIBEXIF_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
LIBEXIF_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
LIBEXIF_LICENSE = LGPL-2.1+
LIBEXIF_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING
# 0001-fixes-some-not-all-buffer-overreads-during-decoding-.patch
LIBEXIF_IGNORE_CVES += CVE-2016-6328
# 0002-On-saving-makernotes-make-sure-the-makernote-contain.patch
LIBEXIF_IGNORE_CVES += CVE-2017-7544
# 0004-Improve-deep-recursion-detection-in-exif_data_load_d.patch
LIBEXIF_IGNORE_CVES += CVE-2018-20030
# 0005-fix-CVE-2019-9278.patch
LIBEXIF_IGNORE_CVES += CVE-2019-9278
$(eval $(autotools-package))