From fb39f9600d464ce761917c0e787b940097f6024c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Cavallari Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:52:49 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] shm.c: use _Static_assert instead of static_assert for uclibc Both are C11 constructs. The first one is defined by the compiler in gnu11 mode, but the second one should be a macro defined in assert.h The macro exists in glibc >= 2.16 and musl >= 1.1.10 but not in uclibc 1.0.41. It is expected to be present in uclibc 1.0.42. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Cavallari --- src/pulsecore/shm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/pulsecore/shm.c b/src/pulsecore/shm.c index e464f6bce..5220cc90d 100644 --- a/src/pulsecore/shm.c +++ b/src/pulsecore/shm.c @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct shm_marker { }; // Ensure struct is appropriately packed -static_assert(sizeof(struct shm_marker) == 8 * 5, "`struct shm_marker` is not tightly packed"); +_Static_assert(sizeof(struct shm_marker) == 8 * 5, "`struct shm_marker` is not tightly packed"); static inline size_t shm_marker_size(pa_mem_type_t type) { if (type == PA_MEM_TYPE_SHARED_POSIX) -- 2.36.1