deepcrayon
/
stockfish
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

Use move not ttMove in exclude search 

If we arrive until the exclusion search call then
we know that move == ttMove == tte->move()

But using ttMove in search call while, during excluded search
conditions we have used tte->Move()could be a little bit suboptimal.
On the other side using tte->move() also in search call is a bit ugly
so opt for the third choice that is the most clean becasue from the
conditions the reader easily understands that we are talking of ttMove
and that we ant to exclude the move we are evaluating in that moment.

Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
sf_2.3.1_base
Marco Costalba 2009-11-27 15:35:34 +01:00
parent ae6157fcf3
commit 25c22ffe7a
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/search.cpp
View File

@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ namespace {
if (abs(ttValue) < VALUE_KNOWN_WIN)
{
Value excValue = search(pos, ss, ttValue - SingleReplyMargin, depth / 2, ply, false, threadID, ttMove);
Value excValue = search(pos, ss, ttValue - SingleReplyMargin, depth / 2, ply, false, threadID, move);
// If search result is well below the foreseen score of the ttMove then we
// assume ttMove is the only one realistically playable and we extend it.
@ -1485,7 +1485,7 @@ namespace {
if (abs(ttValue) < VALUE_KNOWN_WIN)
{
Value excValue = search(pos, ss, ttValue - SingleReplyMargin, depth / 2, ply, false, threadID, ttMove);
Value excValue = search(pos, ss, ttValue - SingleReplyMargin, depth / 2, ply, false, threadID, move);
// If search result is well below the foreseen score of the ttMove then we
// assume ttMove is the only one realistically playable and we extend it.