deepcrayon
/
stockfish
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

Fix a bogus use of mutex 

Spinlock must be used instead.

Tested for no regression at 15+0.05 th 4:

LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 25928 W: 4303 L: 4190 D: 17435

No functional change.

Resolves #297
pull/297/merge
Marco Costalba 2015-03-17 07:31:45 +01:00 committed by Joona Kiiski
parent a4b2eeea75
commit 2e8552db76
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/search.cpp
View File

@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() {
&& !(this_sp && this_sp->slavesMask.none())
&& !searching)
{
if ( !this_sp
if ( !this_sp
&& !Threads.main()->thinking)
{
std::unique_lock<Mutex> lk(mutex);
@ -1613,12 +1613,12 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() {
// If this thread has been assigned work, launch a search
while (searching)
{
mutex.lock();
spinlock.acquire();
assert(activeSplitPoint);
SplitPoint* sp = activeSplitPoint;
mutex.unlock();
spinlock.release();
Stack stack[MAX_PLY+4], *ss = stack+2; // To allow referencing (ss-2) and (ss+2)
Position pos(*sp->pos, this);