Do not consider squares protected by enemy pawns
in mobility evaluation.
This reduces the mobility value by about 15%
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is somewhat taken from Stockfish 1.2 Default,
only the razoring thresold are updated, not the
razoring depth.
At the end razoring is a bit more aggressive. Results
seems slightly positive.
After 999 games +239 =536 -224 Elo +5
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Optimistic razoring settings. It is stronger with
most engines but weaker with someones.
The default is instead more solid and uniform with all
the opponents.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Add also the possibility to razor at ply one.
It is disable dby default but it seems stronger
against Stockfish itself. It is still not clear if
is stronger against other engines. By now leave
disabled.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Less prune at the bottom and at the middle, a bit more
at the top.
After 747 games: +215 =345 -187 +13 elo
Also introduced a vector of margins, now that start to be a lot
it is a more flexible solution.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Because razoring verification after qsearch() cuts more
then 40% of candidates, do not waste a costly qsearch for
nodes at depth one that will be probably discarded anyway
by futility.
Also tight razoring conditions to keep dangerous false
negatives below 0,05%. Still not clear if it is enough.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Bug fix merged from Glaurung 2.2 for search_pv()
Added the same fix also to sp_search_pv() where
was missing.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Is a new evaluation rule that gives bonus in midgame
to the side that has more space behind pawns for its
minor pieces.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Use a margin to compare with beta so that positions
that after the verifying qsearch have gained a lot of points
are not discarded just becasue not above beta.
Also remove the second condition on depth <= OnePly, it
was too risky and added only a 2% more of pruned nodes.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Fix the logic in search_pv and sp_search_pv
An additional issue to consider is that a castle move
is not a capture but destination square is not empty.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead of number of searched nodes use the number of
opponent beta-cutoff occurred under the move subtree.
After 570 games 1+0 we have: +150 =288 -132 (+11 ELO)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Catched counting the nodes searched at
fixed depth. A quick and reliable cross check,
expecially in inflate only patches.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
