Fix also an incredible 3% speed regression by an almost
never called function. I guess this is due to mingw very low
quality standard libraries implementation.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
And also tolerate a 0 value for full move number.
Revert BUG_41 patch, now we set initial King file only
if a castling is possible, so we don't need the fix
anymore in case of correct FEN.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
If we cannot castle castleRightsMask[] could be not valid,
for instance when king initial file is FILE_A as queen rook.
In this case castleRightsMask[] at initialQRFile is different
from the expected (ALL_CASTLES ^ WHITE_OOO).
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
See:
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39327
After 8130 games on QUAD at 20"+0.1
1342 - 1359 - 5429 ELO +0 (+- 4.4)
Tried also version with just king settings changed:
After 5932 games 962 - 1052 - 3918 ELO -5 (+- 5.2)
And with just mobility settings changed:
After 4114 games 618 - 619 - 2877 ELO +0 (+- 5.9)
Frank has tested only 1200 games, but at longer TC and
against many engines, so because PHQ results are not worst
than other combination and not worst than original let's
commit his version.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We miss to account as a capture a promotion capture !
Incredible bug in this critical function that is here
since a long time (b50921fd5c of 21/10/2009 !!)
This patch fixes the bug and readds the faster
move_is_capture_or_promotion() that slightly increases
overall speed.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is now much more modular than before and also we
always send the seldepth when we send the depth, this
avoids to make seldepth disappearing from GUI at the
start of a new iteration.
Print also fails high/low pv lines at high enough
search depths.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Easy, almost trivial simplification, I don't understand
how I missed this before !!
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This trivial change gives an impressive 2,5% speedup !!!!
Also retire one unused move_gives_check() overload.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Restore original behaviour, before root unification and
remove a now useless ugly hack for alpha in multi-pv case.
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is not correct to use an iterator stick on a vector that
is sorted becuase iterator is invalidated in general case.
It happens to work by accident because iterators are implemented
as pointers and so they behave in the same (correct) way then
using array indices, but the latters are the correct thing to use.
Also better document the code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is a fossil from the root_search() era, no more
needed today.
Spotted by Onno
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This avoids search explosion in qsearch for some
patological cases like:
r1n1n1b1/1P1P1P1P/1N1N1N2/2RnQrRq/2pKp3/3BNQbQ/k7/4Bq2 w - - 0 1
After 9078 games 20"+0.1 QUAD:
Mod vs Orig 1413 - 1319 - 6346 ELO +3 (+- 4)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
The trick is to classify more position at first cycle,
so to reduce following work. Speed up is of about 50% !
Also some cleanup while there.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Seems there is no regression so prefer to prune less.
After 8278 games
Mod vs Orig 1246 - 1265 - 5767 +0 ELO (+- 4.2)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We should start from i = 0, it works by accident because
static storage BSFTable[] is init to zero by default.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In case we have more than one promotion move, prefer
the one that captures the biggest piece.
Almost no functional change, anyhow I don't expect any
ELO change, it is just the correct thing to do.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems much worst in number of nodes seacrhed to reach
the depth and anyhow does not give any advantage to the
Onno's oroginal one.
So revert by now and perhaps readd when we find something
clearly better.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Allow to choose among 4096 instances of pseudo-random
sequences instead of the previous 64 so the probability
to find a better sequence increases and actually we have
a much better 64 bit case and we can also use the 64 bit
version of pick_magic() also for 32 bits and althoug sub
optimal, because now we can have more choices results are
even slightly better also for 32 bit.
Use also a faster submask().
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After 12613 games at 20"+0.1 on QUAD
Mod vs Orig 1870 - 1863 - 8880 ELO +0 (+- 3.3)
So no performance change but it is a code semplification
and also is more easy to understand.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Good result for 32 bit case where computation is very fast,
still not satisfying on 64 bit case where the magics seem
a bit harder to get.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Due to a -2% speed penalty. This patch takes the best
of the previous series without the regression due to
introduction of Magic struct.
Speedup against previous revision is of almost 3% !!!!
No functional change both in 32 and 64 bits.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We can calculate them counting the masks bits.
Also small tweak to sliding_attacks()
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Here the idea is to test probcut not only after bad
captures, but after any bad move, i.e. any move that
leaves the opponent with a good capture.
Ported by a patch from Onno, the difference from
original version is that we have moved probcut after
null search.
After 7917 games 4 threads 20"+0.1
Mod vs Orig: 1261 - 1095 - 5561 ELO +7 (+- 4.2) LOS 96%
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
