1
0
Fork 0
alistair23-linux/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig

228 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 08:07:57 -06:00
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
menuconfig ARCH_BCM
ARM: use "depends on" for SoC configs instead of "if" after prompt Many ARM sub-architectures use prompts followed by "if" conditional, but it is wrong. Please notice the difference between config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 and config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 These two are *not* equivalent! In the former statement, it is not ARCH_FOO, but its prompt that depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7. So, it is completely valid that ARCH_FOO is selected by another, but ARCH_MULTI_V7 is still disabled. As it is not unmet dependency, Kconfig never warns. This is probably not what you want. The former should be used only when you need to do so, and you really understand what you are doing. (In most cases, it should be wrong!) For enabling/disabling sub-architectures, the latter is always correct. As a good side effect, this commit fixes some entries over 80 columns (mach-imx, mach-integrator, mach-mbevu). [Arnd: I note that there is not really a bug here, according to the discussion that followed, but I can see value in being consistent and in making the lines shorter] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@piap.pl> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2015-11-15 20:06:10 -07:00
bool "Broadcom SoC Support"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6_V7
help
This enables support for Broadcom ARM based SoC chips
if ARCH_BCM
comment "IPROC architected SoCs"
config ARCH_BCM_IPROC
bool
select ARM_GIC
select CACHE_L2X0
select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP
select ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER
select CLKSRC_MMIO
select GPIOLIB
select ARM_AMBA
select PINCTRL
select PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC if PCI
help
This enables support for systems based on Broadcom IPROC architected SoCs.
The IPROC complex contains one or more ARM CPUs along with common
core peripherals. Application specific SoCs are created by adding a
uArchitecture containing peripherals outside of the IPROC complex.
Currently supported SoCs are Cygnus.
config ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS
ARM: use "depends on" for SoC configs instead of "if" after prompt Many ARM sub-architectures use prompts followed by "if" conditional, but it is wrong. Please notice the difference between config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 and config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 These two are *not* equivalent! In the former statement, it is not ARCH_FOO, but its prompt that depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7. So, it is completely valid that ARCH_FOO is selected by another, but ARCH_MULTI_V7 is still disabled. As it is not unmet dependency, Kconfig never warns. This is probably not what you want. The former should be used only when you need to do so, and you really understand what you are doing. (In most cases, it should be wrong!) For enabling/disabling sub-architectures, the latter is always correct. As a good side effect, this commit fixes some entries over 80 columns (mach-imx, mach-integrator, mach-mbevu). [Arnd: I note that there is not really a bug here, according to the discussion that followed, but I can see value in being consistent and in making the lines shorter] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@piap.pl> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2015-11-15 20:06:10 -07:00
bool "Broadcom Cygnus Support"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARCH_BCM_IPROC
help
Enable support for the Cygnus family,
which includes the following variants:
BCM11300, BCM11320, BCM11350, BCM11360,
BCM58300, BCM58302, BCM58303, BCM58305.
config ARCH_BCM_HR2
bool "Broadcom Hurricane 2 SoC support"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARCH_BCM_IPROC
help
Enable support for the Hurricane 2 family,
which includes the following variants:
BCM53342, BCM53343, BCM53344, BCM53346.
config ARCH_BCM_NSP
ARM: use "depends on" for SoC configs instead of "if" after prompt Many ARM sub-architectures use prompts followed by "if" conditional, but it is wrong. Please notice the difference between config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 and config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 These two are *not* equivalent! In the former statement, it is not ARCH_FOO, but its prompt that depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7. So, it is completely valid that ARCH_FOO is selected by another, but ARCH_MULTI_V7 is still disabled. As it is not unmet dependency, Kconfig never warns. This is probably not what you want. The former should be used only when you need to do so, and you really understand what you are doing. (In most cases, it should be wrong!) For enabling/disabling sub-architectures, the latter is always correct. As a good side effect, this commit fixes some entries over 80 columns (mach-imx, mach-integrator, mach-mbevu). [Arnd: I note that there is not really a bug here, according to the discussion that followed, but I can see value in being consistent and in making the lines shorter] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@piap.pl> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2015-11-15 20:06:10 -07:00
bool "Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC Support"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARCH_BCM_IPROC
select ARM_ERRATA_754322
select ARM_ERRATA_775420
select ARM_ERRATA_764369 if SMP
select HAVE_SMP
select THERMAL
select THERMAL_OF
help
Support for Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC.
Broadcom Northstar Plus family of SoCs are used for switching control
and management applications as well as residential router/gateway
applications. The SoC features dual core Cortex A9 ARM CPUs,
integrating several peripheral interfaces including multiple Gigabit
Ethernet PHYs, DDR3 memory, PCIE Gen-2, USB 2.0 and USB 3.0, serial and
NAND flash, SATA and several other IO controllers.
config ARCH_BCM_5301X
ARM: use "depends on" for SoC configs instead of "if" after prompt Many ARM sub-architectures use prompts followed by "if" conditional, but it is wrong. Please notice the difference between config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 and config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 These two are *not* equivalent! In the former statement, it is not ARCH_FOO, but its prompt that depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7. So, it is completely valid that ARCH_FOO is selected by another, but ARCH_MULTI_V7 is still disabled. As it is not unmet dependency, Kconfig never warns. This is probably not what you want. The former should be used only when you need to do so, and you really understand what you are doing. (In most cases, it should be wrong!) For enabling/disabling sub-architectures, the latter is always correct. As a good side effect, this commit fixes some entries over 80 columns (mach-imx, mach-integrator, mach-mbevu). [Arnd: I note that there is not really a bug here, according to the discussion that followed, but I can see value in being consistent and in making the lines shorter] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@piap.pl> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2015-11-15 20:06:10 -07:00
bool "Broadcom BCM470X / BCM5301X ARM SoC"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARCH_BCM_IPROC
select ARM_ERRATA_754322
select ARM_ERRATA_775420
select ARM_ERRATA_764369 if SMP
select HAVE_SMP
help
Support for Broadcom BCM470X and BCM5301X SoCs with ARM CPU cores.
This is a network SoC line mostly used in home routers and
wifi access points, its internal name is Northstar.
This includes the following SoC: BCM53010, BCM53011, BCM53012,
BCM53014, BCM53015, BCM53016, BCM53017, BCM53018, BCM4707,
BCM4708 and BCM4709.
Do not confuse this with the BCM4760 which is a totally
different SoC or with the older BCM47XX and BCM53XX based
network SoC using a MIPS CPU, they are supported by arch/mips/bcm47xx
comment "KONA architected SoCs"
config ARCH_BCM_MOBILE
bool
select GPIOLIB
select ARM_ERRATA_754322
select ARM_ERRATA_775420
select ARM_GIC
select GPIO_BCM_KONA
select TICK_ONESHOT
select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
select PINCTRL
select ARCH_BCM_MOBILE_SMP if SMP
select BCM_KONA_TIMER
help
This enables support for systems based on Broadcom mobile SoCs.
config ARCH_BCM_281XX
ARM: use "depends on" for SoC configs instead of "if" after prompt Many ARM sub-architectures use prompts followed by "if" conditional, but it is wrong. Please notice the difference between config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 and config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 These two are *not* equivalent! In the former statement, it is not ARCH_FOO, but its prompt that depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7. So, it is completely valid that ARCH_FOO is selected by another, but ARCH_MULTI_V7 is still disabled. As it is not unmet dependency, Kconfig never warns. This is probably not what you want. The former should be used only when you need to do so, and you really understand what you are doing. (In most cases, it should be wrong!) For enabling/disabling sub-architectures, the latter is always correct. As a good side effect, this commit fixes some entries over 80 columns (mach-imx, mach-integrator, mach-mbevu). [Arnd: I note that there is not really a bug here, according to the discussion that followed, but I can see value in being consistent and in making the lines shorter] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@piap.pl> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2015-11-15 20:06:10 -07:00
bool "Broadcom BCM281XX SoC family"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARCH_BCM_MOBILE
select HAVE_SMP
help
Enable support for the BCM281XX family, which includes
BCM11130, BCM11140, BCM11351, BCM28145 and BCM28155
variants.
config ARCH_BCM_21664
ARM: use "depends on" for SoC configs instead of "if" after prompt Many ARM sub-architectures use prompts followed by "if" conditional, but it is wrong. Please notice the difference between config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 and config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 These two are *not* equivalent! In the former statement, it is not ARCH_FOO, but its prompt that depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7. So, it is completely valid that ARCH_FOO is selected by another, but ARCH_MULTI_V7 is still disabled. As it is not unmet dependency, Kconfig never warns. This is probably not what you want. The former should be used only when you need to do so, and you really understand what you are doing. (In most cases, it should be wrong!) For enabling/disabling sub-architectures, the latter is always correct. As a good side effect, this commit fixes some entries over 80 columns (mach-imx, mach-integrator, mach-mbevu). [Arnd: I note that there is not really a bug here, according to the discussion that followed, but I can see value in being consistent and in making the lines shorter] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@piap.pl> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2015-11-15 20:06:10 -07:00
bool "Broadcom BCM21664 SoC family"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARCH_BCM_MOBILE
select HAVE_SMP
help
Enable support for the BCM21664 family, which includes
BCM21663 and BCM21664 variants.
config ARCH_BCM_23550
bool "Broadcom BCM23550 SoC"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARCH_BCM_MOBILE
select HAVE_SMP
help
Enable support for the BCM23550.
config ARCH_BCM_MOBILE_L2_CACHE
bool "Broadcom mobile SoC level 2 cache support"
depends on ARCH_BCM_281XX || ARCH_BCM_21664
default y
select CACHE_L2X0
select ARCH_BCM_MOBILE_SMC
config ARCH_BCM_MOBILE_SMC
bool
depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE
config ARCH_BCM_MOBILE_SMP
bool
depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE
select HAVE_ARM_SCU
select ARM_ERRATA_764369
help
SMP support for the BCM281XX, BCM21664 and BCM23550 SoC families.
Provided as an option so SMP support for SoCs of this type
can be disabled for an SMP-enabled kernel.
comment "Other Architectures"
config ARCH_BCM2835
ARM: use "depends on" for SoC configs instead of "if" after prompt Many ARM sub-architectures use prompts followed by "if" conditional, but it is wrong. Please notice the difference between config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 and config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 These two are *not* equivalent! In the former statement, it is not ARCH_FOO, but its prompt that depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7. So, it is completely valid that ARCH_FOO is selected by another, but ARCH_MULTI_V7 is still disabled. As it is not unmet dependency, Kconfig never warns. This is probably not what you want. The former should be used only when you need to do so, and you really understand what you are doing. (In most cases, it should be wrong!) For enabling/disabling sub-architectures, the latter is always correct. As a good side effect, this commit fixes some entries over 80 columns (mach-imx, mach-integrator, mach-mbevu). [Arnd: I note that there is not really a bug here, according to the discussion that followed, but I can see value in being consistent and in making the lines shorter] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@piap.pl> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2015-11-15 20:06:10 -07:00
bool "Broadcom BCM2835 family"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6 || ARCH_MULTI_V7
select GPIOLIB
select ARM_AMBA
select ARM_ERRATA_411920 if ARCH_MULTI_V6
select ARM_TIMER_SP804
select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER if ARCH_MULTI_V7
select TIMER_OF
select BCM2835_TIMER
select PINCTRL
select PINCTRL_BCM2835
select MFD_CORE
help
This enables support for the Broadcom BCM2835 and BCM2836 SoCs.
This SoC is used in the Raspberry Pi and Roku 2 devices.
config ARCH_BCM_53573
bool "Broadcom BCM53573 SoC series support"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARCH_BCM_IPROC
select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
help
BCM53573 series is set of SoCs using ARM Cortex-A7 CPUs with wireless
embedded in the chipset.
This SoC line is mostly used in home routers and is some cheaper
alternative for Northstar family.
The base chip is BCM53573 and there are some packaging modifications
like BCM47189 and BCM47452.
config ARCH_BCM_63XX
ARM: use "depends on" for SoC configs instead of "if" after prompt Many ARM sub-architectures use prompts followed by "if" conditional, but it is wrong. Please notice the difference between config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 and config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 These two are *not* equivalent! In the former statement, it is not ARCH_FOO, but its prompt that depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7. So, it is completely valid that ARCH_FOO is selected by another, but ARCH_MULTI_V7 is still disabled. As it is not unmet dependency, Kconfig never warns. This is probably not what you want. The former should be used only when you need to do so, and you really understand what you are doing. (In most cases, it should be wrong!) For enabling/disabling sub-architectures, the latter is always correct. As a good side effect, this commit fixes some entries over 80 columns (mach-imx, mach-integrator, mach-mbevu). [Arnd: I note that there is not really a bug here, according to the discussion that followed, but I can see value in being consistent and in making the lines shorter] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@piap.pl> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2015-11-15 20:06:10 -07:00
bool "Broadcom BCM63xx DSL SoC"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
depends on MMU
select ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER
select ARM_ERRATA_754322
select ARM_ERRATA_764369 if SMP
select ARM_GIC
select ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER
select CACHE_L2X0
select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP
select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
select HAVE_SMP
help
This enables support for systems based on Broadcom DSL SoCs.
It currently supports the 'BCM63XX' ARM-based family, which includes
the BCM63138 variant.
config ARCH_BRCMSTB
ARM: use "depends on" for SoC configs instead of "if" after prompt Many ARM sub-architectures use prompts followed by "if" conditional, but it is wrong. Please notice the difference between config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 and config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 These two are *not* equivalent! In the former statement, it is not ARCH_FOO, but its prompt that depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7. So, it is completely valid that ARCH_FOO is selected by another, but ARCH_MULTI_V7 is still disabled. As it is not unmet dependency, Kconfig never warns. This is probably not what you want. The former should be used only when you need to do so, and you really understand what you are doing. (In most cases, it should be wrong!) For enabling/disabling sub-architectures, the latter is always correct. As a good side effect, this commit fixes some entries over 80 columns (mach-imx, mach-integrator, mach-mbevu). [Arnd: I note that there is not really a bug here, according to the discussion that followed, but I can see value in being consistent and in making the lines shorter] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@piap.pl> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2015-11-15 20:06:10 -07:00
bool "Broadcom BCM7XXX based boards"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARM_GIC
select ARM_ERRATA_798181 if SMP
select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
select BRCMSTB_L2_IRQ
select BCM7120_L2_IRQ
select ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL
select ZONE_DMA if ARM_LPAE
select SOC_BRCMSTB
select SOC_BUS
help
Say Y if you intend to run the kernel on a Broadcom ARM-based STB
chipset.
This enables support for Broadcom ARM-based set-top box chipsets,
including the 7445 family of chips.
endif