1
0
Fork 0
alistair23-linux/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h

10685 lines
247 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (c) 2013-2015, Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. All rights reserved.
*
* This software is available to you under a choice of one of two
* licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU
* General Public License (GPL) Version 2, available from the file
* COPYING in the main directory of this source tree, or the
* OpenIB.org BSD license below:
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
* without modification, are permitted provided that the following
* conditions are met:
*
* - Redistributions of source code must retain the above
* copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
* disclaimer.
*
* - Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
* copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
* disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials
* provided with the distribution.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
* EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
* MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
* NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
* BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN
* ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN
* CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
* SOFTWARE.
*/
#ifndef MLX5_IFC_H
#define MLX5_IFC_H
#include "mlx5_ifc_fpga.h"
enum {
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_COMPLETION_EVENTS = 0x0,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_PATH_MIGRATED_SUCCEEDED = 0x1,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_COMMUNICATION_ESTABLISHED = 0x2,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_SEND_QUEUE_DRAINED = 0x3,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_LAST_WQE_REACHED = 0x13,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_SRQ_LIMIT = 0x14,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_DCT_ALL_CONNECTIONS_CLOSED = 0x1c,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_DCT_ACCESS_KEY_VIOLATION = 0x1d,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_CQ_ERROR = 0x4,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_LOCAL_WQ_CATASTROPHIC_ERROR = 0x5,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_PATH_MIGRATION_FAILED = 0x7,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_PAGE_FAULT_EVENT = 0xc,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_INVALID_REQUEST_LOCAL_WQ_ERROR = 0x10,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_LOCAL_ACCESS_VIOLATION_WQ_ERROR = 0x11,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_LOCAL_SRQ_CATASTROPHIC_ERROR = 0x12,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_INTERNAL_ERROR = 0x8,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_PORT_STATE_CHANGE = 0x9,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_GPIO_EVENT = 0x15,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_REMOTE_CONFIGURATION_PROTOCOL_EVENT = 0x19,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_DOORBELL_BLUEFLAME_CONGESTION_EVENT = 0x1a,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_STALL_VL_EVENT = 0x1b,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_DROPPED_PACKET_LOGGED_EVENT = 0x1f,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_COMMAND_INTERFACE_COMPLETION = 0xa,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_PAGE_REQUEST = 0xb,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_FPGA_ERROR = 0x20,
MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_CODING_FPGA_QP_ERROR = 0x21
};
enum {
MLX5_MODIFY_TIR_BITMASK_LRO = 0x0,
MLX5_MODIFY_TIR_BITMASK_INDIRECT_TABLE = 0x1,
MLX5_MODIFY_TIR_BITMASK_HASH = 0x2,
MLX5_MODIFY_TIR_BITMASK_TUNNELED_OFFLOAD_EN = 0x3
};
enum {
MLX5_SET_HCA_CAP_OP_MOD_GENERAL_DEVICE = 0x0,
MLX5_SET_HCA_CAP_OP_MOD_ODP = 0x2,
MLX5_SET_HCA_CAP_OP_MOD_ATOMIC = 0x3,
MLX5_SET_HCA_CAP_OP_MOD_ROCE = 0x4,
};
enum {
MLX5_SHARED_RESOURCE_UID = 0xffff,
};
enum {
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_SW_ICM = 0x0008,
};
enum {
MLX5_GENERAL_OBJ_TYPES_CAP_SW_ICM = (1ULL << MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_SW_ICM),
MLX5_GENERAL_OBJ_TYPES_CAP_GENEVE_TLV_OPT = (1ULL << 11),
MLX5_GENERAL_OBJ_TYPES_CAP_VIRTIO_NET_Q = (1ULL << 13),
};
enum {
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_GENEVE_TLV_OPT = 0x000b,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_MKEY = 0xff01,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_QP = 0xff02,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_PSV = 0xff03,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_RMP = 0xff04,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_XRC_SRQ = 0xff05,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_RQ = 0xff06,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_SQ = 0xff07,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_TIR = 0xff08,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_TIS = 0xff09,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_DCT = 0xff0a,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_XRQ = 0xff0b,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_RQT = 0xff0e,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_FLOW_COUNTER = 0xff0f,
MLX5_OBJ_TYPE_CQ = 0xff10,
};
enum {
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_HCA_CAP = 0x100,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_ADAPTER = 0x101,
MLX5_CMD_OP_INIT_HCA = 0x102,
MLX5_CMD_OP_TEARDOWN_HCA = 0x103,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ENABLE_HCA = 0x104,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DISABLE_HCA = 0x105,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_PAGES = 0x107,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MANAGE_PAGES = 0x108,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_HCA_CAP = 0x109,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_ISSI = 0x10a,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_ISSI = 0x10b,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_DRIVER_VERSION = 0x10d,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_SF_PARTITION = 0x111,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_SF = 0x113,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DEALLOC_SF = 0x114,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_MKEY = 0x200,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_MKEY = 0x201,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_MKEY = 0x202,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_SPECIAL_CONTEXTS = 0x203,
MLX5_CMD_OP_PAGE_FAULT_RESUME = 0x204,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_MEMIC = 0x205,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DEALLOC_MEMIC = 0x206,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_EQ = 0x301,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_EQ = 0x302,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_EQ = 0x303,
MLX5_CMD_OP_GEN_EQE = 0x304,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_CQ = 0x400,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_CQ = 0x401,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_CQ = 0x402,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_CQ = 0x403,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_QP = 0x500,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_QP = 0x501,
MLX5_CMD_OP_RST2INIT_QP = 0x502,
MLX5_CMD_OP_INIT2RTR_QP = 0x503,
MLX5_CMD_OP_RTR2RTS_QP = 0x504,
MLX5_CMD_OP_RTS2RTS_QP = 0x505,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SQERR2RTS_QP = 0x506,
MLX5_CMD_OP_2ERR_QP = 0x507,
MLX5_CMD_OP_2RST_QP = 0x50a,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_QP = 0x50b,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SQD_RTS_QP = 0x50c,
MLX5_CMD_OP_INIT2INIT_QP = 0x50e,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_PSV = 0x600,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_PSV = 0x601,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_SRQ = 0x700,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_SRQ = 0x701,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_SRQ = 0x702,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ARM_RQ = 0x703,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_XRC_SRQ = 0x705,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_XRC_SRQ = 0x706,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_XRC_SRQ = 0x707,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ARM_XRC_SRQ = 0x708,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_DCT = 0x710,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_DCT = 0x711,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DRAIN_DCT = 0x712,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_DCT = 0x713,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ARM_DCT_FOR_KEY_VIOLATION = 0x714,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_XRQ = 0x717,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_XRQ = 0x718,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_XRQ = 0x719,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ARM_XRQ = 0x71a,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_XRQ_DC_PARAMS_ENTRY = 0x725,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_XRQ_DC_PARAMS_ENTRY = 0x726,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_XRQ_ERROR_PARAMS = 0x727,
MLX5_CMD_OP_RELEASE_XRQ_ERROR = 0x729,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_XRQ = 0x72a,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_ESW_FUNCTIONS = 0x740,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_VPORT_STATE = 0x750,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_VPORT_STATE = 0x751,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_ESW_VPORT_CONTEXT = 0x752,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_ESW_VPORT_CONTEXT = 0x753,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_NIC_VPORT_CONTEXT = 0x754,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_NIC_VPORT_CONTEXT = 0x755,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_ROCE_ADDRESS = 0x760,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_ROCE_ADDRESS = 0x761,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_HCA_VPORT_CONTEXT = 0x762,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_HCA_VPORT_CONTEXT = 0x763,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_HCA_VPORT_GID = 0x764,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_HCA_VPORT_PKEY = 0x765,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_VNIC_ENV = 0x76f,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_VPORT_COUNTER = 0x770,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_Q_COUNTER = 0x771,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DEALLOC_Q_COUNTER = 0x772,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_Q_COUNTER = 0x773,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_MONITOR_COUNTER = 0x774,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ARM_MONITOR_COUNTER = 0x775,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_PP_RATE_LIMIT = 0x780,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_RATE_LIMIT = 0x781,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_SCHEDULING_ELEMENT = 0x782,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_SCHEDULING_ELEMENT = 0x783,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_SCHEDULING_ELEMENT = 0x784,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_SCHEDULING_ELEMENT = 0x785,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_QOS_PARA_VPORT = 0x786,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_QOS_PARA_VPORT = 0x787,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_PD = 0x800,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DEALLOC_PD = 0x801,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_UAR = 0x802,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DEALLOC_UAR = 0x803,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CONFIG_INT_MODERATION = 0x804,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ACCESS_REG = 0x805,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ATTACH_TO_MCG = 0x806,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DETACH_FROM_MCG = 0x807,
MLX5_CMD_OP_GET_DROPPED_PACKET_LOG = 0x80a,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MAD_IFC = 0x50d,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_MAD_DEMUX = 0x80b,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_MAD_DEMUX = 0x80c,
MLX5_CMD_OP_NOP = 0x80d,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_XRCD = 0x80e,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DEALLOC_XRCD = 0x80f,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_TRANSPORT_DOMAIN = 0x816,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DEALLOC_TRANSPORT_DOMAIN = 0x817,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_CONG_STATUS = 0x822,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_CONG_STATUS = 0x823,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_CONG_PARAMS = 0x824,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_CONG_PARAMS = 0x825,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_CONG_STATISTICS = 0x826,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ADD_VXLAN_UDP_DPORT = 0x827,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DELETE_VXLAN_UDP_DPORT = 0x828,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_L2_TABLE_ENTRY = 0x829,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_L2_TABLE_ENTRY = 0x82a,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DELETE_L2_TABLE_ENTRY = 0x82b,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_WOL_ROL = 0x830,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_WOL_ROL = 0x831,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_LAG = 0x840,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_LAG = 0x841,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_LAG = 0x842,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_LAG = 0x843,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_VPORT_LAG = 0x844,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_VPORT_LAG = 0x845,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_TIR = 0x900,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_TIR = 0x901,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_TIR = 0x902,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_TIR = 0x903,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_SQ = 0x904,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_SQ = 0x905,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_SQ = 0x906,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_SQ = 0x907,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_RQ = 0x908,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_RQ = 0x909,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_DELAY_DROP_PARAMS = 0x910,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_RQ = 0x90a,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_RQ = 0x90b,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_RMP = 0x90c,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_RMP = 0x90d,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_RMP = 0x90e,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_RMP = 0x90f,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_TIS = 0x912,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_TIS = 0x913,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_TIS = 0x914,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_TIS = 0x915,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_RQT = 0x916,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_RQT = 0x917,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_RQT = 0x918,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_RQT = 0x919,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_FLOW_TABLE_ROOT = 0x92f,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_FLOW_TABLE = 0x930,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_FLOW_TABLE = 0x931,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_FLOW_TABLE = 0x932,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_FLOW_GROUP = 0x933,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_FLOW_GROUP = 0x934,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_FLOW_GROUP = 0x935,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_FLOW_TABLE_ENTRY = 0x936,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_FLOW_TABLE_ENTRY = 0x937,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DELETE_FLOW_TABLE_ENTRY = 0x938,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_FLOW_COUNTER = 0x939,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DEALLOC_FLOW_COUNTER = 0x93a,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_FLOW_COUNTER = 0x93b,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_FLOW_TABLE = 0x93c,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_PACKET_REFORMAT_CONTEXT = 0x93d,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DEALLOC_PACKET_REFORMAT_CONTEXT = 0x93e,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_PACKET_REFORMAT_CONTEXT = 0x93f,
MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_MODIFY_HEADER_CONTEXT = 0x940,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DEALLOC_MODIFY_HEADER_CONTEXT = 0x941,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_MODIFY_HEADER_CONTEXT = 0x942,
MLX5_CMD_OP_FPGA_CREATE_QP = 0x960,
MLX5_CMD_OP_FPGA_MODIFY_QP = 0x961,
MLX5_CMD_OP_FPGA_QUERY_QP = 0x962,
MLX5_CMD_OP_FPGA_DESTROY_QP = 0x963,
MLX5_CMD_OP_FPGA_QUERY_QP_COUNTERS = 0x964,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_GENERAL_OBJECT = 0xa00,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_GENERAL_OBJECT = 0xa01,
MLX5_CMD_OP_QUERY_GENERAL_OBJECT = 0xa02,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_GENERAL_OBJECT = 0xa03,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_UCTX = 0xa04,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_UCTX = 0xa06,
MLX5_CMD_OP_CREATE_UMEM = 0xa08,
MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_UMEM = 0xa0a,
MLX5_CMD_OP_SYNC_STEERING = 0xb00,
MLX5_CMD_OP_MAX
};
/* Valid range for general commands that don't work over an object */
enum {
MLX5_CMD_OP_GENERAL_START = 0xb00,
MLX5_CMD_OP_GENERAL_END = 0xd00,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_fields_supported_bits {
u8 outer_dmac[0x1];
u8 outer_smac[0x1];
u8 outer_ether_type[0x1];
IB/mlx5: Use IP version matching to classify IP traffic This change adds the ability for flow steering to classify IPv4/6 packets with MPLS tag (Ethertype 0x8847 and 0x8848) as standard IP packets and hit IPv4/6 classifed steering rules. When user added a flow rule with IP classification, driver was implicitly adding ethertype matching to the created rule in order to distinguish between IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. Since IP packets with MPLS tag header have MPLS ethertype, they missed the rule and ended up hitting the default filters. Such behavior prevented from MPLS packets to undergo inbound traffic load balancing flows (if such were defined by configuring RSS) to achieve higher throughput - the way that non-MPLS IP packets performed. Since our device is able to look past the MPLS tag and identify the next protocol we introduce this solution which replaces Ethertype matching by the device's capability to perform IP version parsing and matching in order to distinguish between IPv4 and IPv6. Therefore, whenever a flow with IP spec is added and device support IP version matching, driver will implicitly add IP version matching to the rule (Based on the IP spec type) without Ethertype matching which will cause relevant MPLS tagged packets to hit this rule as well. Otherwise (device doesn't support IP version matching), we fall back to setting Ethertype matching. If the user's filters specify an L2 ethertype and an IP spec the rule will then match both the ethertype and the IP version. The device's support for IP version matching is reported by the device via dedicated capability bit in query_device_cap and named outer/inner_ip_version. Signed-off-by: Ariel Levkovich <lariel@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2017-04-03 04:11:03 -06:00
u8 outer_ip_version[0x1];
u8 outer_first_prio[0x1];
u8 outer_first_cfi[0x1];
u8 outer_first_vid[0x1];
u8 outer_ipv4_ttl[0x1];
u8 outer_second_prio[0x1];
u8 outer_second_cfi[0x1];
u8 outer_second_vid[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_b[0x1];
u8 outer_sip[0x1];
u8 outer_dip[0x1];
u8 outer_frag[0x1];
u8 outer_ip_protocol[0x1];
u8 outer_ip_ecn[0x1];
u8 outer_ip_dscp[0x1];
u8 outer_udp_sport[0x1];
u8 outer_udp_dport[0x1];
u8 outer_tcp_sport[0x1];
u8 outer_tcp_dport[0x1];
u8 outer_tcp_flags[0x1];
u8 outer_gre_protocol[0x1];
u8 outer_gre_key[0x1];
u8 outer_vxlan_vni[0x1];
u8 outer_geneve_vni[0x1];
u8 outer_geneve_oam[0x1];
u8 outer_geneve_protocol_type[0x1];
u8 outer_geneve_opt_len[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1e[0x1];
u8 source_eswitch_port[0x1];
u8 inner_dmac[0x1];
u8 inner_smac[0x1];
u8 inner_ether_type[0x1];
IB/mlx5: Use IP version matching to classify IP traffic This change adds the ability for flow steering to classify IPv4/6 packets with MPLS tag (Ethertype 0x8847 and 0x8848) as standard IP packets and hit IPv4/6 classifed steering rules. When user added a flow rule with IP classification, driver was implicitly adding ethertype matching to the created rule in order to distinguish between IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. Since IP packets with MPLS tag header have MPLS ethertype, they missed the rule and ended up hitting the default filters. Such behavior prevented from MPLS packets to undergo inbound traffic load balancing flows (if such were defined by configuring RSS) to achieve higher throughput - the way that non-MPLS IP packets performed. Since our device is able to look past the MPLS tag and identify the next protocol we introduce this solution which replaces Ethertype matching by the device's capability to perform IP version parsing and matching in order to distinguish between IPv4 and IPv6. Therefore, whenever a flow with IP spec is added and device support IP version matching, driver will implicitly add IP version matching to the rule (Based on the IP spec type) without Ethertype matching which will cause relevant MPLS tagged packets to hit this rule as well. Otherwise (device doesn't support IP version matching), we fall back to setting Ethertype matching. If the user's filters specify an L2 ethertype and an IP spec the rule will then match both the ethertype and the IP version. The device's support for IP version matching is reported by the device via dedicated capability bit in query_device_cap and named outer/inner_ip_version. Signed-off-by: Ariel Levkovich <lariel@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2017-04-03 04:11:03 -06:00
u8 inner_ip_version[0x1];
u8 inner_first_prio[0x1];
u8 inner_first_cfi[0x1];
u8 inner_first_vid[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_27[0x1];
u8 inner_second_prio[0x1];
u8 inner_second_cfi[0x1];
u8 inner_second_vid[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_2b[0x1];
u8 inner_sip[0x1];
u8 inner_dip[0x1];
u8 inner_frag[0x1];
u8 inner_ip_protocol[0x1];
u8 inner_ip_ecn[0x1];
u8 inner_ip_dscp[0x1];
u8 inner_udp_sport[0x1];
u8 inner_udp_dport[0x1];
u8 inner_tcp_sport[0x1];
u8 inner_tcp_dport[0x1];
u8 inner_tcp_flags[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_37[0x9];
u8 geneve_tlv_option_0_data[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0x4];
u8 outer_first_mpls_over_udp[0x4];
u8 outer_first_mpls_over_gre[0x4];
u8 inner_first_mpls[0x4];
u8 outer_first_mpls[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_55[0x2];
u8 outer_esp_spi[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_58[0x2];
u8 bth_dst_qp[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_5b[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x18];
u8 metadata_reg_c_7[0x1];
u8 metadata_reg_c_6[0x1];
u8 metadata_reg_c_5[0x1];
u8 metadata_reg_c_4[0x1];
u8 metadata_reg_c_3[0x1];
u8 metadata_reg_c_2[0x1];
u8 metadata_reg_c_1[0x1];
u8 metadata_reg_c_0[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits {
u8 ft_support[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1[0x1];
u8 flow_counter[0x1];
u8 flow_modify_en[0x1];
u8 modify_root[0x1];
u8 identified_miss_table_mode[0x1];
u8 flow_table_modify[0x1];
u8 reformat[0x1];
u8 decap[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_9[0x1];
u8 pop_vlan[0x1];
u8 push_vlan[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_c[0x1];
u8 pop_vlan_2[0x1];
u8 push_vlan_2[0x1];
u8 reformat_and_vlan_action[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x1];
u8 sw_owner[0x1];
u8 reformat_l3_tunnel_to_l2[0x1];
u8 reformat_l2_to_l3_tunnel[0x1];
u8 reformat_and_modify_action[0x1];
u8 ignore_flow_level[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_16[0x1];
u8 table_miss_action_domain[0x1];
u8 termination_table[0x1];
u8 reformat_and_fwd_to_table[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1a[0x6];
u8 termination_table_raw_traffic[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_21[0x1];
u8 log_max_ft_size[0x6];
u8 log_max_modify_header_context[0x8];
u8 max_modify_header_actions[0x8];
u8 max_ft_level[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x18];
u8 log_max_ft_num[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x18];
u8 log_max_destination[0x8];
u8 log_max_flow_counter[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_a8[0x10];
u8 log_max_flow[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_fields_supported_bits ft_field_support;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_fields_supported_bits ft_field_bitmask_support;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits {
u8 send[0x1];
u8 receive[0x1];
u8 write[0x1];
u8 read[0x1];
u8 atomic[0x1];
u8 srq_receive[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_set_lyr_2_4_bits {
u8 smac_47_16[0x20];
u8 smac_15_0[0x10];
u8 ethertype[0x10];
u8 dmac_47_16[0x20];
u8 dmac_15_0[0x10];
u8 first_prio[0x3];
u8 first_cfi[0x1];
u8 first_vid[0xc];
u8 ip_protocol[0x8];
u8 ip_dscp[0x6];
u8 ip_ecn[0x2];
u8 cvlan_tag[0x1];
u8 svlan_tag[0x1];
u8 frag[0x1];
IB/mlx5: Use IP version matching to classify IP traffic This change adds the ability for flow steering to classify IPv4/6 packets with MPLS tag (Ethertype 0x8847 and 0x8848) as standard IP packets and hit IPv4/6 classifed steering rules. When user added a flow rule with IP classification, driver was implicitly adding ethertype matching to the created rule in order to distinguish between IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. Since IP packets with MPLS tag header have MPLS ethertype, they missed the rule and ended up hitting the default filters. Such behavior prevented from MPLS packets to undergo inbound traffic load balancing flows (if such were defined by configuring RSS) to achieve higher throughput - the way that non-MPLS IP packets performed. Since our device is able to look past the MPLS tag and identify the next protocol we introduce this solution which replaces Ethertype matching by the device's capability to perform IP version parsing and matching in order to distinguish between IPv4 and IPv6. Therefore, whenever a flow with IP spec is added and device support IP version matching, driver will implicitly add IP version matching to the rule (Based on the IP spec type) without Ethertype matching which will cause relevant MPLS tagged packets to hit this rule as well. Otherwise (device doesn't support IP version matching), we fall back to setting Ethertype matching. If the user's filters specify an L2 ethertype and an IP spec the rule will then match both the ethertype and the IP version. The device's support for IP version matching is reported by the device via dedicated capability bit in query_device_cap and named outer/inner_ip_version. Signed-off-by: Ariel Levkovich <lariel@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2017-04-03 04:11:03 -06:00
u8 ip_version[0x4];
u8 tcp_flags[0x9];
u8 tcp_sport[0x10];
u8 tcp_dport[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x18];
u8 ttl_hoplimit[0x8];
u8 udp_sport[0x10];
u8 udp_dport[0x10];
union mlx5_ifc_ipv6_layout_ipv4_layout_auto_bits src_ipv4_src_ipv6;
union mlx5_ifc_ipv6_layout_ipv4_layout_auto_bits dst_ipv4_dst_ipv6;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_nvgre_key_bits {
u8 hi[0x18];
u8 lo[0x8];
};
union mlx5_ifc_gre_key_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_nvgre_key_bits nvgre;
u8 key[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_set_misc_bits {
u8 gre_c_present[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1[0x1];
u8 gre_k_present[0x1];
u8 gre_s_present[0x1];
u8 source_vhca_port[0x4];
u8 source_sqn[0x18];
u8 source_eswitch_owner_vhca_id[0x10];
u8 source_port[0x10];
u8 outer_second_prio[0x3];
u8 outer_second_cfi[0x1];
u8 outer_second_vid[0xc];
u8 inner_second_prio[0x3];
u8 inner_second_cfi[0x1];
u8 inner_second_vid[0xc];
u8 outer_second_cvlan_tag[0x1];
u8 inner_second_cvlan_tag[0x1];
u8 outer_second_svlan_tag[0x1];
u8 inner_second_svlan_tag[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_64[0xc];
u8 gre_protocol[0x10];
union mlx5_ifc_gre_key_bits gre_key;
u8 vxlan_vni[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_b8[0x8];
u8 geneve_vni[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_d8[0x7];
u8 geneve_oam[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0xc];
u8 outer_ipv6_flow_label[0x14];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0xc];
u8 inner_ipv6_flow_label[0x14];
u8 reserved_at_120[0xa];
u8 geneve_opt_len[0x6];
u8 geneve_protocol_type[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_140[0x8];
u8 bth_dst_qp[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_160[0x20];
u8 outer_esp_spi[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_1a0[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_mpls_bits {
u8 mpls_label[0x14];
u8 mpls_exp[0x3];
u8 mpls_s_bos[0x1];
u8 mpls_ttl[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_set_misc2_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_mpls_bits outer_first_mpls;
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_mpls_bits inner_first_mpls;
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_mpls_bits outer_first_mpls_over_gre;
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_mpls_bits outer_first_mpls_over_udp;
u8 metadata_reg_c_7[0x20];
u8 metadata_reg_c_6[0x20];
u8 metadata_reg_c_5[0x20];
u8 metadata_reg_c_4[0x20];
u8 metadata_reg_c_3[0x20];
u8 metadata_reg_c_2[0x20];
u8 metadata_reg_c_1[0x20];
u8 metadata_reg_c_0[0x20];
u8 metadata_reg_a[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_1a0[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_set_misc3_bits {
u8 inner_tcp_seq_num[0x20];
u8 outer_tcp_seq_num[0x20];
u8 inner_tcp_ack_num[0x20];
u8 outer_tcp_ack_num[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x8];
u8 outer_vxlan_gpe_vni[0x18];
u8 outer_vxlan_gpe_next_protocol[0x8];
u8 outer_vxlan_gpe_flags[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_b0[0x10];
u8 icmp_header_data[0x20];
u8 icmpv6_header_data[0x20];
u8 icmp_type[0x8];
u8 icmp_code[0x8];
u8 icmpv6_type[0x8];
u8 icmpv6_code[0x8];
u8 geneve_tlv_option_0_data[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_140[0xc0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_pas_bits {
u8 pa_h[0x20];
u8 pa_l[0x14];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_34[0xc];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_uint64_bits {
u8 hi[0x20];
u8 lo[0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_ADS_STAT_RATE_NO_LIMIT = 0x0,
MLX5_ADS_STAT_RATE_2_5GBPS = 0x7,
MLX5_ADS_STAT_RATE_10GBPS = 0x8,
MLX5_ADS_STAT_RATE_30GBPS = 0x9,
MLX5_ADS_STAT_RATE_5GBPS = 0xa,
MLX5_ADS_STAT_RATE_20GBPS = 0xb,
MLX5_ADS_STAT_RATE_40GBPS = 0xc,
MLX5_ADS_STAT_RATE_60GBPS = 0xd,
MLX5_ADS_STAT_RATE_80GBPS = 0xe,
MLX5_ADS_STAT_RATE_120GBPS = 0xf,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ads_bits {
u8 fl[0x1];
u8 free_ar[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_2[0xe];
u8 pkey_index[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x8];
u8 grh[0x1];
u8 mlid[0x7];
u8 rlid[0x10];
u8 ack_timeout[0x5];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_45[0x3];
u8 src_addr_index[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_50[0x4];
u8 stat_rate[0x4];
u8 hop_limit[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x4];
u8 tclass[0x8];
u8 flow_label[0x14];
u8 rgid_rip[16][0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0x4];
u8 f_dscp[0x1];
u8 f_ecn[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_106[0x1];
u8 f_eth_prio[0x1];
u8 ecn[0x2];
u8 dscp[0x6];
u8 udp_sport[0x10];
u8 dei_cfi[0x1];
u8 eth_prio[0x3];
u8 sl[0x4];
{net, IB}/mlx5: Manage port association for multiport RoCE When mlx5_ib_add is called determine if the mlx5 core device being added is capable of dual port RoCE operation. If it is, determine whether it is a master device or a slave device using the num_vhca_ports and affiliate_nic_vport_criteria capabilities. If the device is a slave, attempt to find a master device to affiliate it with. Devices that can be affiliated will share a system image guid. If none are found place it on a list of unaffiliated ports. If a master is found bind the port to it by configuring the port affiliation in the NIC vport context. Similarly when mlx5_ib_remove is called determine the port type. If it's a slave port, unaffiliate it from the master device, otherwise just remove it from the unaffiliated port list. The IB device is registered as a multiport device, even if a 2nd port is not available for affiliation. When the 2nd port is affiliated later the GID cache must be refreshed in order to get the default GIDs for the 2nd port in the cache. Export roce_rescan_device to provide a mechanism to refresh the cache after a new port is bound. In a multiport configuration all IB object (QP, MR, PD, etc) related commands should flow through the master mlx5_core_dev, other commands must be sent to the slave port mlx5_core_mdev, an interface is provide to get the correct mdev for non IB object commands. Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
2018-01-04 08:25:36 -07:00
u8 vhca_port_num[0x8];
u8 rmac_47_32[0x10];
u8 rmac_31_0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_nic_cap_bits {
u8 nic_rx_multi_path_tirs[0x1];
u8 nic_rx_multi_path_tirs_fts[0x1];
u8 allow_sniffer_and_nic_rx_shared_tir[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_3[0x4];
u8 sw_owner_reformat_supported[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 encap_general_header[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_21[0xa];
u8 log_max_packet_reformat_context[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_30[0x6];
u8 max_encap_header_size[0xa];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x1c0];
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits flow_table_properties_nic_receive;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits flow_table_properties_nic_receive_rdma;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits flow_table_properties_nic_receive_sniffer;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits flow_table_properties_nic_transmit;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits flow_table_properties_nic_transmit_rdma;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits flow_table_properties_nic_transmit_sniffer;
u8 reserved_at_e00[0x1200];
u8 sw_steering_nic_rx_action_drop_icm_address[0x40];
u8 sw_steering_nic_tx_action_drop_icm_address[0x40];
u8 sw_steering_nic_tx_action_allow_icm_address[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_20c0[0x5f40];
};
enum {
MLX5_FDB_TO_VPORT_REG_C_0 = 0x01,
MLX5_FDB_TO_VPORT_REG_C_1 = 0x02,
MLX5_FDB_TO_VPORT_REG_C_2 = 0x04,
MLX5_FDB_TO_VPORT_REG_C_3 = 0x08,
MLX5_FDB_TO_VPORT_REG_C_4 = 0x10,
MLX5_FDB_TO_VPORT_REG_C_5 = 0x20,
MLX5_FDB_TO_VPORT_REG_C_6 = 0x40,
MLX5_FDB_TO_VPORT_REG_C_7 = 0x80,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_eswitch_cap_bits {
u8 fdb_to_vport_reg_c_id[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0xd];
u8 fdb_modify_header_fwd_to_table[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_16[0x1];
u8 flow_source[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_18[0x2];
u8 multi_fdb_encap[0x1];
u8 egress_acl_forward_to_vport[0x1];
u8 fdb_multi_path_to_table[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1d[0x3];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x1e0];
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits flow_table_properties_nic_esw_fdb;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits flow_table_properties_esw_acl_ingress;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits flow_table_properties_esw_acl_egress;
u8 reserved_at_800[0x1000];
u8 sw_steering_fdb_action_drop_icm_address_rx[0x40];
u8 sw_steering_fdb_action_drop_icm_address_tx[0x40];
u8 sw_steering_uplink_icm_address_rx[0x40];
u8 sw_steering_uplink_icm_address_tx[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_1900[0x6700];
};
enum {
MLX5_COUNTER_SOURCE_ESWITCH = 0x0,
MLX5_COUNTER_FLOW_ESWITCH = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_e_switch_cap_bits {
u8 vport_svlan_strip[0x1];
u8 vport_cvlan_strip[0x1];
u8 vport_svlan_insert[0x1];
u8 vport_cvlan_insert_if_not_exist[0x1];
u8 vport_cvlan_insert_overwrite[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_5[0x3];
u8 esw_uplink_ingress_acl[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_9[0x10];
u8 esw_functions_changed[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1a[0x1];
u8 ecpf_vport_exists[0x1];
u8 counter_eswitch_affinity[0x1];
u8 merged_eswitch[0x1];
u8 nic_vport_node_guid_modify[0x1];
u8 nic_vport_port_guid_modify[0x1];
u8 vxlan_encap_decap[0x1];
u8 nvgre_encap_decap[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_22[0x1];
u8 log_max_fdb_encap_uplink[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_21[0x3];
u8 log_max_packet_reformat_context[0x5];
u8 reserved_2b[0x6];
u8 max_encap_header_size[0xa];
u8 reserved_at_40[0xb];
u8 log_max_esw_sf[0x5];
u8 esw_sf_base_id[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x7a0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qos_cap_bits {
u8 packet_pacing[0x1];
u8 esw_scheduling[0x1];
u8 esw_bw_share[0x1];
u8 esw_rate_limit[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_4[0x1];
u8 packet_pacing_burst_bound[0x1];
u8 packet_pacing_typical_size[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_7[0x4];
u8 packet_pacing_uid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_c[0x14];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
u8 packet_pacing_max_rate[0x20];
u8 packet_pacing_min_rate[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x10];
u8 packet_pacing_rate_table_size[0x10];
u8 esw_element_type[0x10];
u8 esw_tsar_type[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x10];
u8 max_qos_para_vport[0x10];
u8 max_tsar_bw_share[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_100[0x700];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_debug_cap_bits {
u8 core_dump_general[0x1];
u8 core_dump_qp[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_2[0x7];
u8 resource_dump[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_a[0x16];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x2];
u8 stall_detect[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_23[0x1d];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x7c0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_per_protocol_networking_offload_caps_bits {
u8 csum_cap[0x1];
u8 vlan_cap[0x1];
u8 lro_cap[0x1];
u8 lro_psh_flag[0x1];
u8 lro_time_stamp[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_5[0x2];
u8 wqe_vlan_insert[0x1];
u8 self_lb_en_modifiable[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_9[0x2];
u8 max_lso_cap[0x5];
u8 multi_pkt_send_wqe[0x2];
u8 wqe_inline_mode[0x2];
u8 rss_ind_tbl_cap[0x4];
u8 reg_umr_sq[0x1];
u8 scatter_fcs[0x1];
u8 enhanced_multi_pkt_send_wqe[0x1];
u8 tunnel_lso_const_out_ip_id[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1c[0x2];
u8 tunnel_stateless_gre[0x1];
u8 tunnel_stateless_vxlan[0x1];
u8 swp[0x1];
u8 swp_csum[0x1];
u8 swp_lso[0x1];
u8 cqe_checksum_full[0x1];
u8 tunnel_stateless_geneve_tx[0x1];
u8 tunnel_stateless_mpls_over_udp[0x1];
u8 tunnel_stateless_mpls_over_gre[0x1];
u8 tunnel_stateless_vxlan_gpe[0x1];
u8 tunnel_stateless_ipv4_over_vxlan[0x1];
u8 tunnel_stateless_ip_over_ip[0x1];
u8 insert_trailer[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_2b[0x5];
u8 max_vxlan_udp_ports[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_38[0x6];
u8 max_geneve_opt_len[0x1];
u8 tunnel_stateless_geneve_rx[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 lro_min_mss_size[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x120];
u8 lro_timer_supported_periods[4][0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_200[0x600];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_roce_cap_bits {
u8 roce_apm[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1[0x3];
u8 sw_r_roce_src_udp_port[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_5[0x1b];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x60];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0xc];
u8 l3_type[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_90[0x8];
u8 roce_version[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x10];
u8 r_roce_dest_udp_port[0x10];
u8 r_roce_max_src_udp_port[0x10];
u8 r_roce_min_src_udp_port[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x10];
u8 roce_address_table_size[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0x700];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sync_steering_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sync_steering_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_device_mem_cap_bits {
u8 memic[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1[0x1f];
u8 reserved_at_20[0xb];
u8 log_min_memic_alloc_size[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_30[0x8];
u8 log_max_memic_addr_alignment[0x8];
u8 memic_bar_start_addr[0x40];
u8 memic_bar_size[0x20];
u8 max_memic_size[0x20];
u8 steering_sw_icm_start_address[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_100[0x8];
u8 log_header_modify_sw_icm_size[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_110[0x2];
u8 log_sw_icm_alloc_granularity[0x6];
u8 log_steering_sw_icm_size[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_120[0x20];
u8 header_modify_sw_icm_start_address[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_180[0x680];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_device_event_cap_bits {
u8 user_affiliated_events[4][0x40];
u8 user_unaffiliated_events[4][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_device_virtio_emulation_cap_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x13];
u8 log_doorbell_stride[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_38[0x3];
u8 log_doorbell_bar_size[0x5];
u8 doorbell_bar_offset[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x780];
};
enum {
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_QP_1_BYTE = 0x0,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_QP_2_BYTES = 0x2,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_QP_4_BYTES = 0x4,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_QP_8_BYTES = 0x8,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_QP_16_BYTES = 0x10,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_QP_32_BYTES = 0x20,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_QP_64_BYTES = 0x40,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_QP_128_BYTES = 0x80,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_QP_256_BYTES = 0x100,
};
enum {
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_DC_1_BYTE = 0x1,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_DC_2_BYTES = 0x2,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_DC_4_BYTES = 0x4,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_DC_8_BYTES = 0x8,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_DC_16_BYTES = 0x10,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_DC_32_BYTES = 0x20,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_DC_64_BYTES = 0x40,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_DC_128_BYTES = 0x80,
MLX5_ATOMIC_CAPS_ATOMIC_SIZE_DC_256_BYTES = 0x100,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_atomic_caps_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x40];
u8 atomic_req_8B_endianness_mode[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_42[0x4];
u8 supported_atomic_req_8B_endianness_mode_1[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_47[0x19];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x10];
u8 atomic_operations[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x10];
u8 atomic_size_qp[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x10];
u8 atomic_size_dc[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x720];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_odp_cap_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x40];
u8 sig[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0x1f];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits rc_odp_caps;
struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits uc_odp_caps;
struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits ud_odp_caps;
struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits xrc_odp_caps;
struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits dc_odp_caps;
u8 reserved_at_120[0x6E0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_calc_op {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x9];
u8 op_swap_endianness[0x1];
u8 op_min[0x1];
u8 op_xor[0x1];
u8 op_or[0x1];
u8 op_and[0x1];
u8 op_max[0x1];
u8 op_add[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_vector_calc_cap_bits {
u8 calc_matrix[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1[0x1f];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x8];
u8 max_vec_count[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_30[0xd];
u8 max_chunk_size[0x3];
struct mlx5_ifc_calc_op calc0;
struct mlx5_ifc_calc_op calc1;
struct mlx5_ifc_calc_op calc2;
struct mlx5_ifc_calc_op calc3;
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x720];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_tls_cap_bits {
u8 tls_1_2_aes_gcm_128[0x1];
u8 tls_1_3_aes_gcm_128[0x1];
u8 tls_1_2_aes_gcm_256[0x1];
u8 tls_1_3_aes_gcm_256[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_4[0x1c];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x7e0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ipsec_cap_bits {
u8 ipsec_full_offload[0x1];
u8 ipsec_crypto_offload[0x1];
u8 ipsec_esn[0x1];
u8 ipsec_crypto_esp_aes_gcm_256_encrypt[0x1];
u8 ipsec_crypto_esp_aes_gcm_128_encrypt[0x1];
u8 ipsec_crypto_esp_aes_gcm_256_decrypt[0x1];
u8 ipsec_crypto_esp_aes_gcm_128_decrypt[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_7[0x4];
u8 log_max_ipsec_offload[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 min_log_ipsec_full_replay_window[0x8];
u8 max_log_ipsec_full_replay_window[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_30[0x7d0];
};
enum {
MLX5_WQ_TYPE_LINKED_LIST = 0x0,
MLX5_WQ_TYPE_CYCLIC = 0x1,
MLX5_WQ_TYPE_LINKED_LIST_STRIDING_RQ = 0x2,
MLX5_WQ_TYPE_CYCLIC_STRIDING_RQ = 0x3,
};
enum {
MLX5_WQ_END_PAD_MODE_NONE = 0x0,
MLX5_WQ_END_PAD_MODE_ALIGN = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_GID_TABLE_SIZE_8_GID_ENTRIES = 0x0,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_GID_TABLE_SIZE_16_GID_ENTRIES = 0x1,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_GID_TABLE_SIZE_32_GID_ENTRIES = 0x2,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_GID_TABLE_SIZE_64_GID_ENTRIES = 0x3,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_GID_TABLE_SIZE_128_GID_ENTRIES = 0x4,
};
enum {
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_PKEY_TABLE_SIZE_128_ENTRIES = 0x0,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_PKEY_TABLE_SIZE_256_ENTRIES = 0x1,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_PKEY_TABLE_SIZE_512_ENTRIES = 0x2,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_PKEY_TABLE_SIZE_1K_ENTRIES = 0x3,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_PKEY_TABLE_SIZE_2K_ENTRIES = 0x4,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_PKEY_TABLE_SIZE_4K_ENTRIES = 0x5,
};
enum {
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_PORT_TYPE_IB = 0x0,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_PORT_TYPE_ETHERNET = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_CMDIF_CHECKSUM_DISABLED = 0x0,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_CMDIF_CHECKSUM_INITIAL_STATE = 0x1,
MLX5_CMD_HCA_CAP_CMDIF_CHECKSUM_ENABLED = 0x3,
};
enum {
MLX5_CAP_PORT_TYPE_IB = 0x0,
MLX5_CAP_PORT_TYPE_ETH = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_CAP_UMR_FENCE_STRONG = 0x0,
MLX5_CAP_UMR_FENCE_SMALL = 0x1,
MLX5_CAP_UMR_FENCE_NONE = 0x2,
};
enum {
MLX5_FLEX_PARSER_GENEVE_ENABLED = 1 << 3,
MLX5_FLEX_PARSER_VXLAN_GPE_ENABLED = 1 << 7,
MLX5_FLEX_PARSER_ICMP_V4_ENABLED = 1 << 8,
MLX5_FLEX_PARSER_ICMP_V6_ENABLED = 1 << 9,
};
enum {
MLX5_UCTX_CAP_RAW_TX = 1UL << 0,
MLX5_UCTX_CAP_INTERNAL_DEV_RES = 1UL << 1,
};
#define MLX5_FC_BULK_SIZE_FACTOR 128
enum mlx5_fc_bulk_alloc_bitmask {
MLX5_FC_BULK_128 = (1 << 0),
MLX5_FC_BULK_256 = (1 << 1),
MLX5_FC_BULK_512 = (1 << 2),
MLX5_FC_BULK_1024 = (1 << 3),
MLX5_FC_BULK_2048 = (1 << 4),
MLX5_FC_BULK_4096 = (1 << 5),
MLX5_FC_BULK_8192 = (1 << 6),
MLX5_FC_BULK_16384 = (1 << 7),
};
#define MLX5_FC_BULK_NUM_FCS(fc_enum) (MLX5_FC_BULK_SIZE_FACTOR * (fc_enum))
struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_hca_cap_bits {
{net, IB}/mlx5: Manage port association for multiport RoCE When mlx5_ib_add is called determine if the mlx5 core device being added is capable of dual port RoCE operation. If it is, determine whether it is a master device or a slave device using the num_vhca_ports and affiliate_nic_vport_criteria capabilities. If the device is a slave, attempt to find a master device to affiliate it with. Devices that can be affiliated will share a system image guid. If none are found place it on a list of unaffiliated ports. If a master is found bind the port to it by configuring the port affiliation in the NIC vport context. Similarly when mlx5_ib_remove is called determine the port type. If it's a slave port, unaffiliate it from the master device, otherwise just remove it from the unaffiliated port list. The IB device is registered as a multiport device, even if a 2nd port is not available for affiliation. When the 2nd port is affiliated later the GID cache must be refreshed in order to get the default GIDs for the 2nd port in the cache. Export roce_rescan_device to provide a mechanism to refresh the cache after a new port is bound. In a multiport configuration all IB object (QP, MR, PD, etc) related commands should flow through the master mlx5_core_dev, other commands must be sent to the slave port mlx5_core_mdev, an interface is provide to get the correct mdev for non IB object commands. Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
2018-01-04 08:25:36 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x30];
u8 vhca_id[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 log_max_srq_sz[0x8];
u8 log_max_qp_sz[0x8];
u8 event_cap[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_91[0x7];
u8 prio_tag_required[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_99[0x2];
u8 log_max_qp[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x3];
u8 ece_support[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_a4[0x7];
u8 log_max_srq[0x5];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_b0[0x10];
u8 max_sgl_for_optimized_performance[0x8];
u8 log_max_cq_sz[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_d0[0xb];
u8 log_max_cq[0x5];
u8 log_max_eq_sz[0x8];
u8 relaxed_ordering_write[0x1];
u8 relaxed_ordering_read[0x1];
u8 log_max_mkey[0x6];
u8 reserved_at_f0[0x8];
u8 dump_fill_mkey[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_f9[0x2];
u8 fast_teardown[0x1];
u8 log_max_eq[0x4];
u8 max_indirection[0x8];
u8 fixed_buffer_size[0x1];
u8 log_max_mrw_sz[0x7];
u8 force_teardown[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_111[0x1];
u8 log_max_bsf_list_size[0x6];
u8 umr_extended_translation_offset[0x1];
u8 null_mkey[0x1];
u8 log_max_klm_list_size[0x6];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0xa];
u8 log_max_ra_req_dc[0x6];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_130[0xa];
u8 log_max_ra_res_dc[0x6];
u8 reserved_at_140[0x6];
u8 release_all_pages[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_147[0x2];
u8 roce_accl[0x1];
u8 log_max_ra_req_qp[0x6];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_150[0xa];
u8 log_max_ra_res_qp[0x6];
u8 end_pad[0x1];
u8 cc_query_allowed[0x1];
u8 cc_modify_allowed[0x1];
u8 start_pad[0x1];
u8 cache_line_128byte[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_165[0x4];
u8 rts2rts_qp_counters_set_id[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_16a[0x2];
u8 vnic_env_int_rq_oob[0x1];
u8 sbcam_reg[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_16e[0x1];
u8 qcam_reg[0x1];
u8 gid_table_size[0x10];
u8 out_of_seq_cnt[0x1];
u8 vport_counters[0x1];
u8 retransmission_q_counters[0x1];
u8 debug[0x1];
u8 modify_rq_counter_set_id[0x1];
u8 rq_delay_drop[0x1];
u8 max_qp_cnt[0xa];
u8 pkey_table_size[0x10];
u8 vport_group_manager[0x1];
u8 vhca_group_manager[0x1];
u8 ib_virt[0x1];
u8 eth_virt[0x1];
u8 vnic_env_queue_counters[0x1];
u8 ets[0x1];
u8 nic_flow_table[0x1];
u8 eswitch_manager[0x1];
u8 device_memory[0x1];
u8 mcam_reg[0x1];
u8 pcam_reg[0x1];
u8 local_ca_ack_delay[0x5];
u8 port_module_event[0x1];
IB/mlx5: Expose extended error counters This patch adds below requester and responder side error counters, which will be exposed by hardware counters interface and are supported as part of query Q counters command extension. +---------------------------+-------------------------------------+ | Name | Description | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |resp_local_length_error | Number of times responder detected | | | local length errors | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |resp_cqe_error | Number of CQEs completed with error | | | at responder | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |req_cqe_error | Number of CQEs completed with error | | | at requester | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |req_remote_invalid_request | Number of times requester detected | | | remote invalid request error | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |req_remote_access_error | Number of times requester detected | | | remote access error | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |resp_remote_access_error | Number of times responder detected | | | remote access error | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |resp_cqe_flush_error | Number of CQEs completed with | | | flushed with error at responder | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |req_cqe_flush_error | Number of CQEs completed with | | | flushed with error at requester | +---------------------------+-------------------------------------+ Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2017-06-18 22:19:37 -06:00
u8 enhanced_error_q_counters[0x1];
u8 ports_check[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1b3[0x1];
u8 disable_link_up[0x1];
u8 beacon_led[0x1];
u8 port_type[0x2];
u8 num_ports[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0x1];
u8 pps[0x1];
u8 pps_modify[0x1];
u8 log_max_msg[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_1c8[0x4];
u8 max_tc[0x4];
u8 temp_warn_event[0x1];
u8 dcbx[0x1];
u8 general_notification_event[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1d3[0x2];
u8 fpga[0x1];
u8 rol_s[0x1];
u8 rol_g[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1d8[0x1];
u8 wol_s[0x1];
u8 wol_g[0x1];
u8 wol_a[0x1];
u8 wol_b[0x1];
u8 wol_m[0x1];
u8 wol_u[0x1];
u8 wol_p[0x1];
u8 stat_rate_support[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_1f0[0x1];
u8 pci_sync_for_fw_update_event[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1f2[0x6];
u8 init2_lag_tx_port_affinity[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1fa[0x3];
u8 cqe_version[0x4];
u8 compact_address_vector[0x1];
u8 striding_rq[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_202[0x1];
u8 ipoib_enhanced_offloads[0x1];
u8 ipoib_basic_offloads[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_205[0x1];
u8 repeated_block_disabled[0x1];
u8 umr_modify_entity_size_disabled[0x1];
u8 umr_modify_atomic_disabled[0x1];
u8 umr_indirect_mkey_disabled[0x1];
u8 umr_fence[0x2];
u8 dc_req_scat_data_cqe[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_20d[0x2];
u8 drain_sigerr[0x1];
u8 cmdif_checksum[0x2];
u8 sigerr_cqe[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_213[0x1];
u8 wq_signature[0x1];
u8 sctr_data_cqe[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_216[0x1];
u8 sho[0x1];
u8 tph[0x1];
u8 rf[0x1];
u8 dct[0x1];
u8 qos[0x1];
u8 eth_net_offloads[0x1];
u8 roce[0x1];
u8 atomic[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_21f[0x1];
u8 cq_oi[0x1];
u8 cq_resize[0x1];
u8 cq_moderation[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_223[0x3];
u8 cq_eq_remap[0x1];
u8 pg[0x1];
u8 block_lb_mc[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_229[0x1];
u8 scqe_break_moderation[0x1];
u8 cq_period_start_from_cqe[0x1];
u8 cd[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_22d[0x1];
u8 apm[0x1];
u8 vector_calc[0x1];
u8 umr_ptr_rlky[0x1];
u8 imaicl[0x1];
u8 qp_packet_based[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_233[0x3];
u8 qkv[0x1];
u8 pkv[0x1];
u8 set_deth_sqpn[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_239[0x3];
u8 xrc[0x1];
u8 ud[0x1];
u8 uc[0x1];
u8 rc[0x1];
u8 uar_4k[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_241[0x9];
u8 uar_sz[0x6];
u8 reserved_at_250[0x8];
u8 log_pg_sz[0x8];
u8 bf[0x1];
u8 driver_version[0x1];
u8 pad_tx_eth_packet[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_263[0x8];
u8 log_bf_reg_size[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_270[0x8];
u8 lag_tx_port_affinity[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_279[0x2];
u8 lag_master[0x1];
u8 num_lag_ports[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_280[0x10];
u8 max_wqe_sz_sq[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_2a0[0x10];
u8 max_wqe_sz_rq[0x10];
u8 max_flow_counter_31_16[0x10];
u8 max_wqe_sz_sq_dc[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_2e0[0x7];
u8 max_qp_mcg[0x19];
u8 reserved_at_300[0x10];
u8 flow_counter_bulk_alloc[0x8];
u8 log_max_mcg[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_320[0x3];
u8 log_max_transport_domain[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_328[0x3];
u8 log_max_pd[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_330[0xb];
u8 log_max_xrcd[0x5];
u8 nic_receive_steering_discard[0x1];
u8 receive_discard_vport_down[0x1];
u8 transmit_discard_vport_down[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_343[0x5];
u8 log_max_flow_counter_bulk[0x8];
u8 max_flow_counter_15_0[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_360[0x3];
u8 log_max_rq[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_368[0x3];
u8 log_max_sq[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_370[0x3];
u8 log_max_tir[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_378[0x3];
u8 log_max_tis[0x5];
u8 basic_cyclic_rcv_wqe[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_381[0x2];
u8 log_max_rmp[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_388[0x3];
u8 log_max_rqt[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_390[0x3];
u8 log_max_rqt_size[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_398[0x3];
u8 log_max_tis_per_sq[0x5];
net/mlx5e: Use linear SKB in Striding RQ Current Striding RQ HW feature utilizes the RX buffers so that there is no wasted room between the strides. This maximises the memory utilization. This prevents the use of build_skb() (which requires headroom and tailroom), and demands to memcpy the packets headers into the skb linear part. In this patch, whenever a set of conditions holds, we apply an RQ configuration that allows combining the use of linear SKB on top of a Striding RQ. To use build_skb() with Striding RQ, the following must hold: 1. packet does not cross a page boundary. 2. there is enough headroom and tailroom surrounding the packet. We can satisfy 1 and 2 by configuring: stride size = MTU + headroom + tailoom. This is possible only when: a. (MTU - headroom - tailoom) does not exceed PAGE_SIZE. b. HW LRO is turned off. Using linear SKB has many advantages: - Saves a memcpy of the headers. - No page-boundary checks in datapath. - No filler CQEs. - Significantly smaller CQ. - SKB data continuously resides in linear part, and not split to small amount (linear part) and large amount (fragment). This saves datapath cycles in driver and improves utilization of SKB fragments in GRO. - The fragments of a resulting GRO SKB follow the IP forwarding assumption of equal-size fragments. Some implementation details: HW writes the packets to the beginning of a stride, i.e. does not keep headroom. To overcome this we make sure we can extend backwards and use the last bytes of stride i-1. Extra care is needed for stride 0 as it has no preceding stride. We make sure headroom bytes are available by shifting the buffer pointer passed to HW by headroom bytes. This configuration now becomes default, whenever capable. Of course, this implies turning LRO off. Performance testing: ConnectX-5, single core, single RX ring, default MTU. UDP packet rate, early drop in TC layer: -------------------------------------------- | pkt size | before | after | ratio | -------------------------------------------- | 1500byte | 4.65 Mpps | 5.96 Mpps | 1.28x | | 500byte | 5.23 Mpps | 5.97 Mpps | 1.14x | | 64byte | 5.94 Mpps | 5.96 Mpps | 1.00x | -------------------------------------------- TCP streams: ~20% gain Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2018-02-07 05:41:25 -07:00
u8 ext_stride_num_range[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_3a1[0x2];
u8 log_max_stride_sz_rq[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_3a8[0x3];
u8 log_min_stride_sz_rq[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_3b0[0x3];
u8 log_max_stride_sz_sq[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_3b8[0x3];
u8 log_min_stride_sz_sq[0x5];
u8 hairpin[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_3c1[0x2];
u8 log_max_hairpin_queues[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_3c8[0x3];
u8 log_max_hairpin_wq_data_sz[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_3d0[0x3];
u8 log_max_hairpin_num_packets[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_3d8[0x3];
u8 log_max_wq_sz[0x5];
u8 nic_vport_change_event[0x1];
u8 disable_local_lb_uc[0x1];
u8 disable_local_lb_mc[0x1];
u8 log_min_hairpin_wq_data_sz[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_3e8[0x3];
u8 log_max_vlan_list[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_3f0[0x3];
u8 log_max_current_mc_list[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_3f8[0x3];
u8 log_max_current_uc_list[0x5];
u8 general_obj_types[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_440[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_460[0x3];
u8 log_max_uctx[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_468[0x2];
u8 ipsec_offload[0x1];
u8 log_max_umem[0x5];
u8 max_num_eqs[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_480[0x1];
u8 tls_tx[0x1];
u8 tls_rx[0x1];
u8 log_max_l2_table[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_488[0x8];
u8 log_uar_page_sz[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_4a0[0x20];
Initial roundup of 4.5 merge window patches - Remove usage of ib_query_device and instead store attributes in ib_device struct - Move iopoll out of block and into lib, rename to irqpoll, and use in several places in the rdma stack as our new completion queue polling library mechanism. Update the other block drivers that already used iopoll to use the new mechanism too. - Replace the per-entry GID table locks with a single GID table lock - IPoIB multicast cleanup - Cleanups to the IB MR facility - Add support for 64bit extended IB counters - Fix for netlink oops while parsing RDMA nl messages - RoCEv2 support for the core IB code - mlx4 RoCEv2 support - mlx5 RoCEv2 support - Cross Channel support for mlx5 - Timestamp support for mlx5 - Atomic support for mlx5 - Raw QP support for mlx5 - MAINTAINERS update for mlx4/mlx5 - Misc ocrdma, qib, nes, usNIC, cxgb3, cxgb4, mlx4, mlx5 updates - Add support for remote invalidate to the iSER driver (pushed through the RDMA tree due to dependencies, acknowledged by nab) - Update to NFSoRDMA (pushed through the RDMA tree due to dependencies, acknowledged by Bruce) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJWoSygAAoJELgmozMOVy/dDjsP/2vbTda2MvQfkfkGEZBQdJSg 095RN0gQgCJdg78lAl8yuaK8r4VN/7uefpDtFdudH1I/Pei7X0wxN9R1UzFNG4KR AD53lz92IVPs15328SbPR2kvNWISR9aBFQo3rlElq3Grqlp0EMn2Ou1vtu87rekF aMllxr8Nl0uZhP+eWusOsYpJUUtwirLgRnrAyfqo2UxZh/TMIroT0TCx1KXjVcAg dhDARiZAdu3OgSc6OsWqmH+DELEq6dFVA5F+DDBGAb8bFZqlJc7cuMHWInwNsNXT so4bnEQ835alTbsdYtqs5DUNS8heJTAJP4Uz0ehkTh/uNCcvnKeUTw1c2P/lXI1k 7s33gMM+0FXj0swMBw0kKwAF2d9Hhus9UAN7NwjBuOyHcjGRd5q7SAnfWkvKx000 s9jVW19slb2I38gB58nhjOh8s+vXUArgxnV1+kTia1+bJSR5swvVoWRicRXdF0vh TvLX/BjbSIU73g1TnnLNYoBTV3ybFKQ6bVdQW7fzSTDs54dsI1vvdHXi3bYZCpnL HVwQTZRfEzkvb0AdKbcvf8p/TlaAHem3ODqtO1eHvO4if1QJBSn+SptTEeJVYYdK n4B3l/dMoBH4JXJUmEHB9jwAvYOpv/YLAFIvdL7NFwbqGNsC3nfXFcmkVORB1W3B KEMcM2we4bz+uyKMjEAD =5oO7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dledford/rdma Pull rdma updates from Doug Ledford: "Initial roundup of 4.5 merge window patches - Remove usage of ib_query_device and instead store attributes in ib_device struct - Move iopoll out of block and into lib, rename to irqpoll, and use in several places in the rdma stack as our new completion queue polling library mechanism. Update the other block drivers that already used iopoll to use the new mechanism too. - Replace the per-entry GID table locks with a single GID table lock - IPoIB multicast cleanup - Cleanups to the IB MR facility - Add support for 64bit extended IB counters - Fix for netlink oops while parsing RDMA nl messages - RoCEv2 support for the core IB code - mlx4 RoCEv2 support - mlx5 RoCEv2 support - Cross Channel support for mlx5 - Timestamp support for mlx5 - Atomic support for mlx5 - Raw QP support for mlx5 - MAINTAINERS update for mlx4/mlx5 - Misc ocrdma, qib, nes, usNIC, cxgb3, cxgb4, mlx4, mlx5 updates - Add support for remote invalidate to the iSER driver (pushed through the RDMA tree due to dependencies, acknowledged by nab) - Update to NFSoRDMA (pushed through the RDMA tree due to dependencies, acknowledged by Bruce)" * tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dledford/rdma: (169 commits) IB/mlx5: Unify CQ create flags check IB/mlx5: Expose Raw Packet QP to user space consumers {IB, net}/mlx5: Move the modify QP operation table to mlx5_ib IB/mlx5: Support setting Ethernet priority for Raw Packet QPs IB/mlx5: Add Raw Packet QP query functionality IB/mlx5: Add create and destroy functionality for Raw Packet QP IB/mlx5: Refactor mlx5_ib_qp to accommodate other QP types IB/mlx5: Allocate a Transport Domain for each ucontext net/mlx5_core: Warn on unsupported events of QP/RQ/SQ net/mlx5_core: Add RQ and SQ event handling net/mlx5_core: Export transport objects IB/mlx5: Expose CQE version to user-space IB/mlx5: Add CQE version 1 support to user QPs and SRQs IB/mlx5: Fix data validation in mlx5_ib_alloc_ucontext IB/sa: Fix netlink local service GFP crash IB/srpt: Remove redundant wc array IB/qib: Improve ipoib UD performance IB/mlx4: Advertise RoCE v2 support IB/mlx4: Create and use another QP1 for RoCEv2 IB/mlx4: Enable send of RoCE QP1 packets with IP/UDP headers ...
2016-01-23 19:45:06 -07:00
u8 device_frequency_mhz[0x20];
u8 device_frequency_khz[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_500[0x20];
u8 num_of_uars_per_page[0x20];
u8 flex_parser_protocols[0x20];
u8 max_geneve_tlv_options[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_568[0x3];
u8 max_geneve_tlv_option_data_len[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_570[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_580[0x33];
u8 log_max_dek[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_5b8[0x4];
u8 mini_cqe_resp_stride_index[0x1];
u8 cqe_128_always[0x1];
u8 cqe_compression_128[0x1];
u8 cqe_compression[0x1];
u8 cqe_compression_timeout[0x10];
u8 cqe_compression_max_num[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_5e0[0x10];
u8 tag_matching[0x1];
u8 rndv_offload_rc[0x1];
u8 rndv_offload_dc[0x1];
u8 log_tag_matching_list_sz[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_5f8[0x3];
u8 log_max_xrq[0x5];
{net, IB}/mlx5: Manage port association for multiport RoCE When mlx5_ib_add is called determine if the mlx5 core device being added is capable of dual port RoCE operation. If it is, determine whether it is a master device or a slave device using the num_vhca_ports and affiliate_nic_vport_criteria capabilities. If the device is a slave, attempt to find a master device to affiliate it with. Devices that can be affiliated will share a system image guid. If none are found place it on a list of unaffiliated ports. If a master is found bind the port to it by configuring the port affiliation in the NIC vport context. Similarly when mlx5_ib_remove is called determine the port type. If it's a slave port, unaffiliate it from the master device, otherwise just remove it from the unaffiliated port list. The IB device is registered as a multiport device, even if a 2nd port is not available for affiliation. When the 2nd port is affiliated later the GID cache must be refreshed in order to get the default GIDs for the 2nd port in the cache. Export roce_rescan_device to provide a mechanism to refresh the cache after a new port is bound. In a multiport configuration all IB object (QP, MR, PD, etc) related commands should flow through the master mlx5_core_dev, other commands must be sent to the slave port mlx5_core_mdev, an interface is provide to get the correct mdev for non IB object commands. Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
2018-01-04 08:25:36 -07:00
u8 affiliate_nic_vport_criteria[0x8];
u8 native_port_num[0x8];
u8 num_vhca_ports[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_618[0x6];
u8 sw_owner_id[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_61f[0x1];
u8 max_num_of_monitor_counters[0x10];
u8 num_ppcnt_monitor_counters[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_640[0x10];
u8 num_q_monitor_counters[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_660[0x20];
u8 sf[0x1];
u8 sf_set_partition[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_682[0x1];
u8 log_max_sf[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_688[0x8];
u8 log_min_sf_size[0x8];
u8 max_num_sf_partitions[0x8];
u8 uctx_cap[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_6c0[0x4];
u8 flex_parser_id_geneve_tlv_option_0[0x4];
u8 flex_parser_id_icmp_dw1[0x4];
u8 flex_parser_id_icmp_dw0[0x4];
u8 flex_parser_id_icmpv6_dw1[0x4];
u8 flex_parser_id_icmpv6_dw0[0x4];
u8 flex_parser_id_outer_first_mpls_over_gre[0x4];
u8 flex_parser_id_outer_first_mpls_over_udp_label[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_6e0[0x10];
u8 sf_base_id[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_700[0x80];
u8 vhca_tunnel_commands[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_7c0[0x40];
};
enum mlx5_flow_destination_type {
MLX5_FLOW_DESTINATION_TYPE_VPORT = 0x0,
MLX5_FLOW_DESTINATION_TYPE_FLOW_TABLE = 0x1,
MLX5_FLOW_DESTINATION_TYPE_TIR = 0x2,
MLX5_FLOW_DESTINATION_TYPE_PORT = 0x99,
MLX5_FLOW_DESTINATION_TYPE_COUNTER = 0x100,
MLX5_FLOW_DESTINATION_TYPE_FLOW_TABLE_NUM = 0x101,
};
enum mlx5_flow_table_miss_action {
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_MISS_ACTION_DEF,
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_MISS_ACTION_FWD,
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_MISS_ACTION_SWITCH_DOMAIN,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dest_format_struct_bits {
u8 destination_type[0x8];
u8 destination_id[0x18];
u8 destination_eswitch_owner_vhca_id_valid[0x1];
u8 packet_reformat[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_22[0xe];
u8 destination_eswitch_owner_vhca_id[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_counter_list_bits {
u8 flow_counter_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_extended_dest_format_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_dest_format_struct_bits destination_entry;
u8 packet_reformat_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
union mlx5_ifc_dest_format_struct_flow_counter_list_auto_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_extended_dest_format_bits extended_dest_format;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_counter_list_bits flow_counter_list;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_param_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_set_lyr_2_4_bits outer_headers;
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_set_misc_bits misc_parameters;
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_set_lyr_2_4_bits inner_headers;
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_set_misc2_bits misc_parameters_2;
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_set_misc3_bits misc_parameters_3;
u8 reserved_at_a00[0x600];
};
enum {
MLX5_RX_HASH_FIELD_SELECT_SELECTED_FIELDS_SRC_IP = 0x0,
MLX5_RX_HASH_FIELD_SELECT_SELECTED_FIELDS_DST_IP = 0x1,
MLX5_RX_HASH_FIELD_SELECT_SELECTED_FIELDS_L4_SPORT = 0x2,
MLX5_RX_HASH_FIELD_SELECT_SELECTED_FIELDS_L4_DPORT = 0x3,
MLX5_RX_HASH_FIELD_SELECT_SELECTED_FIELDS_IPSEC_SPI = 0x4,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rx_hash_field_select_bits {
u8 l3_prot_type[0x1];
u8 l4_prot_type[0x1];
u8 selected_fields[0x1e];
};
enum {
MLX5_WQ_WQ_TYPE_WQ_LINKED_LIST = 0x0,
MLX5_WQ_WQ_TYPE_WQ_CYCLIC = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_WQ_END_PADDING_MODE_END_PAD_NONE = 0x0,
MLX5_WQ_END_PADDING_MODE_END_PAD_ALIGN = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_wq_bits {
u8 wq_type[0x4];
u8 wq_signature[0x1];
u8 end_padding_mode[0x2];
u8 cd_slave[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 hds_skip_first_sge[0x1];
u8 log2_hds_buf_size[0x3];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_24[0x7];
u8 page_offset[0x5];
u8 lwm[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 pd[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x8];
u8 uar_page[0x18];
u8 dbr_addr[0x40];
u8 hw_counter[0x20];
u8 sw_counter[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0xc];
u8 log_wq_stride[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_110[0x3];
u8 log_wq_pg_sz[0x5];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_118[0x3];
u8 log_wq_sz[0x5];
u8 dbr_umem_valid[0x1];
u8 wq_umem_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_122[0x1];
u8 log_hairpin_num_packets[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_128[0x3];
u8 log_hairpin_data_sz[0x5];
net/mlx5e: Use linear SKB in Striding RQ Current Striding RQ HW feature utilizes the RX buffers so that there is no wasted room between the strides. This maximises the memory utilization. This prevents the use of build_skb() (which requires headroom and tailroom), and demands to memcpy the packets headers into the skb linear part. In this patch, whenever a set of conditions holds, we apply an RQ configuration that allows combining the use of linear SKB on top of a Striding RQ. To use build_skb() with Striding RQ, the following must hold: 1. packet does not cross a page boundary. 2. there is enough headroom and tailroom surrounding the packet. We can satisfy 1 and 2 by configuring: stride size = MTU + headroom + tailoom. This is possible only when: a. (MTU - headroom - tailoom) does not exceed PAGE_SIZE. b. HW LRO is turned off. Using linear SKB has many advantages: - Saves a memcpy of the headers. - No page-boundary checks in datapath. - No filler CQEs. - Significantly smaller CQ. - SKB data continuously resides in linear part, and not split to small amount (linear part) and large amount (fragment). This saves datapath cycles in driver and improves utilization of SKB fragments in GRO. - The fragments of a resulting GRO SKB follow the IP forwarding assumption of equal-size fragments. Some implementation details: HW writes the packets to the beginning of a stride, i.e. does not keep headroom. To overcome this we make sure we can extend backwards and use the last bytes of stride i-1. Extra care is needed for stride 0 as it has no preceding stride. We make sure headroom bytes are available by shifting the buffer pointer passed to HW by headroom bytes. This configuration now becomes default, whenever capable. Of course, this implies turning LRO off. Performance testing: ConnectX-5, single core, single RX ring, default MTU. UDP packet rate, early drop in TC layer: -------------------------------------------- | pkt size | before | after | ratio | -------------------------------------------- | 1500byte | 4.65 Mpps | 5.96 Mpps | 1.28x | | 500byte | 5.23 Mpps | 5.97 Mpps | 1.14x | | 64byte | 5.94 Mpps | 5.96 Mpps | 1.00x | -------------------------------------------- TCP streams: ~20% gain Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2018-02-07 05:41:25 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_130[0x4];
u8 log_wqe_num_of_strides[0x4];
u8 two_byte_shift_en[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_139[0x4];
u8 log_wqe_stride_size[0x3];
u8 reserved_at_140[0x4c0];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_pas_bits pas[];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rq_num_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 rq_num[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mac_address_layout_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x10];
u8 mac_addr_47_32[0x10];
u8 mac_addr_31_0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_vlan_layout_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x14];
u8 vlan[0x0c];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cong_control_r_roce_ecn_np_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0xa0];
u8 min_time_between_cnps[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x12];
u8 cnp_dscp[0x6];
IB/mlx5: Add debug control parameters for congestion control This patch adds debug control parameters for congestion control which can be read or written through debugfs. They are for reaction point and notification point nodes. These control parameters are as below: +------------------------------+-----------------------------------------+ | Name | Description | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_clamp_tgt_rate | When set target rate is updated to | | | current rate | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_clamp_tgt_rate_ati | When set update target rate based on | | | timer as well | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_time_reset | time between rate increase if no | | | CNP is received unit in usec | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_byte_reset | Number of bytes between rate inease if | | | no CNP is received | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_threshold | Threshold for reaction point rate | | | control | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_ai_rate | Rate for target rate, unit in Mbps | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_hai_rate | Rate for hyper increase state | | | unit in Mbps | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_min_dec_fac | Minimum factor by which the current | | | transmit rate can be changed when | | | processing a CNP, unit is percerntage | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_min_rate | Minimum value for rate limit, | | | unit in Mbps | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_rate_to_set_on_first_cnp | Rate that is set when first CNP is | | | received, unit is Mbps | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_dce_tcp_g | Used to calculate alpha | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_dce_tcp_rtt | Time between updates of alpha value, | | | unit is usec | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_rate_reduce_monitor_period | Minimum time between consecutive rate | | | reductions | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_initial_alpha_value | Initial value of alpha | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |rp_gd | When CNP is received, flow rate is | | | reduced based on gd, rp_gd is given as | | | log2(rp_gd) | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |np_cnp_dscp | dscp code point for generated cnp | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |np_cnp_prio_mode | 802.1p priority for generated cnp | |------------------------------+-----------------------------------------| |np_cnp_prio | cnp priority mode | +------------------------------+-----------------------------------------+ Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2017-05-30 01:05:15 -06:00
u8 reserved_at_d8[0x4];
u8 cnp_prio_mode[0x1];
u8 cnp_802p_prio[0x3];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x720];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cong_control_r_roce_ecn_rp_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x60];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x4];
u8 clamp_tgt_rate[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_65[0x3];
u8 clamp_tgt_rate_after_time_inc[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_69[0x17];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x20];
u8 rpg_time_reset[0x20];
u8 rpg_byte_reset[0x20];
u8 rpg_threshold[0x20];
u8 rpg_max_rate[0x20];
u8 rpg_ai_rate[0x20];
u8 rpg_hai_rate[0x20];
u8 rpg_gd[0x20];
u8 rpg_min_dec_fac[0x20];
u8 rpg_min_rate[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0xe0];
u8 rate_to_set_on_first_cnp[0x20];
u8 dce_tcp_g[0x20];
u8 dce_tcp_rtt[0x20];
u8 rate_reduce_monitor_period[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_320[0x20];
u8 initial_alpha_value[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_360[0x4a0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cong_control_802_1qau_rp_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x80];
u8 rppp_max_rps[0x20];
u8 rpg_time_reset[0x20];
u8 rpg_byte_reset[0x20];
u8 rpg_threshold[0x20];
u8 rpg_max_rate[0x20];
u8 rpg_ai_rate[0x20];
u8 rpg_hai_rate[0x20];
u8 rpg_gd[0x20];
u8 rpg_min_dec_fac[0x20];
u8 rpg_min_rate[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0x640];
};
enum {
MLX5_RESIZE_FIELD_SELECT_RESIZE_FIELD_SELECT_LOG_CQ_SIZE = 0x1,
MLX5_RESIZE_FIELD_SELECT_RESIZE_FIELD_SELECT_PAGE_OFFSET = 0x2,
MLX5_RESIZE_FIELD_SELECT_RESIZE_FIELD_SELECT_LOG_PAGE_SIZE = 0x4,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_resize_field_select_bits {
u8 resize_field_select[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_bits {
u8 more_dump[0x1];
u8 inline_dump[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_2[0xa];
u8 seq_num[0x4];
u8 segment_type[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 vhca_id[0x10];
u8 index1[0x20];
u8 index2[0x20];
u8 num_of_obj1[0x10];
u8 num_of_obj2[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x20];
u8 device_opaque[0x40];
u8 mkey[0x20];
u8 size[0x20];
u8 address[0x40];
u8 inline_data[52][0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_menu_record_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x4];
u8 num_of_obj2_supports_active[0x1];
u8 num_of_obj2_supports_all[0x1];
u8 must_have_num_of_obj2[0x1];
u8 support_num_of_obj2[0x1];
u8 num_of_obj1_supports_active[0x1];
u8 num_of_obj1_supports_all[0x1];
u8 must_have_num_of_obj1[0x1];
u8 support_num_of_obj1[0x1];
u8 must_have_index2[0x1];
u8 support_index2[0x1];
u8 must_have_index1[0x1];
u8 support_index1[0x1];
u8 segment_type[0x10];
u8 segment_name[4][0x20];
u8 index1_name[4][0x20];
u8 index2_name[4][0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_segment_header_bits {
u8 length_dw[0x10];
u8 segment_type[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_command_segment_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_segment_header_bits segment_header;
u8 segment_called[0x10];
u8 vhca_id[0x10];
u8 index1[0x20];
u8 index2[0x20];
u8 num_of_obj1[0x10];
u8 num_of_obj2[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_error_segment_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_segment_header_bits segment_header;
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 syndrome_id[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 error[8][0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_info_segment_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_segment_header_bits segment_header;
u8 reserved_at_20[0x18];
u8 dump_version[0x8];
u8 hw_version[0x20];
u8 fw_version[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_menu_segment_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_segment_header_bits segment_header;
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 num_of_records[0x10];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_menu_record_bits record[];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_resource_segment_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_segment_header_bits segment_header;
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
u8 index1[0x20];
u8 index2[0x20];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 payload[][0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_terminate_segment_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_segment_header_bits segment_header;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_menu_resource_dump_response_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_info_segment_bits info;
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_command_segment_bits cmd;
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_menu_segment_bits menu;
struct mlx5_ifc_resource_dump_terminate_segment_bits terminate;
};
enum {
MLX5_MODIFY_FIELD_SELECT_MODIFY_FIELD_SELECT_CQ_PERIOD = 0x1,
MLX5_MODIFY_FIELD_SELECT_MODIFY_FIELD_SELECT_CQ_MAX_COUNT = 0x2,
MLX5_MODIFY_FIELD_SELECT_MODIFY_FIELD_SELECT_OI = 0x4,
MLX5_MODIFY_FIELD_SELECT_MODIFY_FIELD_SELECT_C_EQN = 0x8,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_field_select_bits {
u8 modify_field_select[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_field_select_r_roce_np_bits {
u8 field_select_r_roce_np[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_field_select_r_roce_rp_bits {
u8 field_select_r_roce_rp[0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_FIELD_SELECT_802_1QAU_RP_FIELD_SELECT_8021QAURP_RPPP_MAX_RPS = 0x4,
MLX5_FIELD_SELECT_802_1QAU_RP_FIELD_SELECT_8021QAURP_RPG_TIME_RESET = 0x8,
MLX5_FIELD_SELECT_802_1QAU_RP_FIELD_SELECT_8021QAURP_RPG_BYTE_RESET = 0x10,
MLX5_FIELD_SELECT_802_1QAU_RP_FIELD_SELECT_8021QAURP_RPG_THRESHOLD = 0x20,
MLX5_FIELD_SELECT_802_1QAU_RP_FIELD_SELECT_8021QAURP_RPG_MAX_RATE = 0x40,
MLX5_FIELD_SELECT_802_1QAU_RP_FIELD_SELECT_8021QAURP_RPG_AI_RATE = 0x80,
MLX5_FIELD_SELECT_802_1QAU_RP_FIELD_SELECT_8021QAURP_RPG_HAI_RATE = 0x100,
MLX5_FIELD_SELECT_802_1QAU_RP_FIELD_SELECT_8021QAURP_RPG_GD = 0x200,
MLX5_FIELD_SELECT_802_1QAU_RP_FIELD_SELECT_8021QAURP_RPG_MIN_DEC_FAC = 0x400,
MLX5_FIELD_SELECT_802_1QAU_RP_FIELD_SELECT_8021QAURP_RPG_MIN_RATE = 0x800,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_field_select_802_1qau_rp_bits {
u8 field_select_8021qaurp[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_phys_layer_cntrs_bits {
u8 time_since_last_clear_high[0x20];
u8 time_since_last_clear_low[0x20];
u8 symbol_errors_high[0x20];
u8 symbol_errors_low[0x20];
u8 sync_headers_errors_high[0x20];
u8 sync_headers_errors_low[0x20];
u8 edpl_bip_errors_lane0_high[0x20];
u8 edpl_bip_errors_lane0_low[0x20];
u8 edpl_bip_errors_lane1_high[0x20];
u8 edpl_bip_errors_lane1_low[0x20];
u8 edpl_bip_errors_lane2_high[0x20];
u8 edpl_bip_errors_lane2_low[0x20];
u8 edpl_bip_errors_lane3_high[0x20];
u8 edpl_bip_errors_lane3_low[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_corrected_blocks_lane0_high[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_corrected_blocks_lane0_low[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_corrected_blocks_lane1_high[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_corrected_blocks_lane1_low[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_corrected_blocks_lane2_high[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_corrected_blocks_lane2_low[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_corrected_blocks_lane3_high[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_corrected_blocks_lane3_low[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_uncorrectable_blocks_lane0_high[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_uncorrectable_blocks_lane0_low[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_uncorrectable_blocks_lane1_high[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_uncorrectable_blocks_lane1_low[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_uncorrectable_blocks_lane2_high[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_uncorrectable_blocks_lane2_low[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_uncorrectable_blocks_lane3_high[0x20];
u8 fc_fec_uncorrectable_blocks_lane3_low[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_blocks_high[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_blocks_low[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_uncorrectable_blocks_high[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_uncorrectable_blocks_low[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_no_errors_blocks_high[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_no_errors_blocks_low[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_single_error_blocks_high[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_single_error_blocks_low[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_symbols_total_high[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_symbols_total_low[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_symbols_lane0_high[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_symbols_lane0_low[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_symbols_lane1_high[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_symbols_lane1_low[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_symbols_lane2_high[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_symbols_lane2_low[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_symbols_lane3_high[0x20];
u8 rs_fec_corrected_symbols_lane3_low[0x20];
u8 link_down_events[0x20];
u8 successful_recovery_events[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_640[0x180];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_phys_layer_statistical_cntrs_bits {
u8 time_since_last_clear_high[0x20];
u8 time_since_last_clear_low[0x20];
u8 phy_received_bits_high[0x20];
u8 phy_received_bits_low[0x20];
u8 phy_symbol_errors_high[0x20];
u8 phy_symbol_errors_low[0x20];
u8 phy_corrected_bits_high[0x20];
u8 phy_corrected_bits_low[0x20];
u8 phy_corrected_bits_lane0_high[0x20];
u8 phy_corrected_bits_lane0_low[0x20];
u8 phy_corrected_bits_lane1_high[0x20];
u8 phy_corrected_bits_lane1_low[0x20];
u8 phy_corrected_bits_lane2_high[0x20];
u8 phy_corrected_bits_lane2_low[0x20];
u8 phy_corrected_bits_lane3_high[0x20];
u8 phy_corrected_bits_lane3_low[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_200[0x5c0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ib_port_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits {
u8 symbol_error_counter[0x10];
u8 link_error_recovery_counter[0x8];
u8 link_downed_counter[0x8];
u8 port_rcv_errors[0x10];
u8 port_rcv_remote_physical_errors[0x10];
u8 port_rcv_switch_relay_errors[0x10];
u8 port_xmit_discards[0x10];
u8 port_xmit_constraint_errors[0x8];
u8 port_rcv_constraint_errors[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_70[0x8];
u8 link_overrun_errors[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x10];
u8 vl_15_dropped[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x80];
u8 port_xmit_wait[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_per_tc_prio_grp_data_layout_bits {
u8 transmit_queue_high[0x20];
u8 transmit_queue_low[0x20];
u8 no_buffer_discard_uc_high[0x20];
u8 no_buffer_discard_uc_low[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x740];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_per_tc_congest_prio_grp_data_layout_bits {
u8 wred_discard_high[0x20];
u8 wred_discard_low[0x20];
u8 ecn_marked_tc_high[0x20];
u8 ecn_marked_tc_low[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x740];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_per_prio_grp_data_layout_bits {
u8 rx_octets_high[0x20];
u8 rx_octets_low[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
u8 rx_frames_high[0x20];
u8 rx_frames_low[0x20];
u8 tx_octets_high[0x20];
u8 tx_octets_low[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_180[0xc0];
u8 tx_frames_high[0x20];
u8 tx_frames_low[0x20];
u8 rx_pause_high[0x20];
u8 rx_pause_low[0x20];
u8 rx_pause_duration_high[0x20];
u8 rx_pause_duration_low[0x20];
u8 tx_pause_high[0x20];
u8 tx_pause_low[0x20];
u8 tx_pause_duration_high[0x20];
u8 tx_pause_duration_low[0x20];
u8 rx_pause_transition_high[0x20];
u8 rx_pause_transition_low[0x20];
u8 rx_discards_high[0x20];
u8 rx_discards_low[0x20];
u8 device_stall_minor_watermark_cnt_high[0x20];
u8 device_stall_minor_watermark_cnt_low[0x20];
u8 device_stall_critical_watermark_cnt_high[0x20];
u8 device_stall_critical_watermark_cnt_low[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_480[0x340];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_extended_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits {
u8 port_transmit_wait_high[0x20];
u8 port_transmit_wait_low[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x100];
u8 rx_buffer_almost_full_high[0x20];
u8 rx_buffer_almost_full_low[0x20];
u8 rx_buffer_full_high[0x20];
u8 rx_buffer_full_low[0x20];
u8 rx_icrc_encapsulated_high[0x20];
u8 rx_icrc_encapsulated_low[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_200[0x5c0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_3635_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits {
u8 dot3stats_alignment_errors_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_alignment_errors_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_fcs_errors_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_fcs_errors_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_single_collision_frames_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_single_collision_frames_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_multiple_collision_frames_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_multiple_collision_frames_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_sqe_test_errors_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_sqe_test_errors_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_deferred_transmissions_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_deferred_transmissions_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_late_collisions_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_late_collisions_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_excessive_collisions_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_excessive_collisions_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_internal_mac_transmit_errors_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_internal_mac_transmit_errors_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_carrier_sense_errors_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_carrier_sense_errors_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_frame_too_longs_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_frame_too_longs_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_internal_mac_receive_errors_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_internal_mac_receive_errors_low[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_symbol_errors_high[0x20];
u8 dot3stats_symbol_errors_low[0x20];
u8 dot3control_in_unknown_opcodes_high[0x20];
u8 dot3control_in_unknown_opcodes_low[0x20];
u8 dot3in_pause_frames_high[0x20];
u8 dot3in_pause_frames_low[0x20];
u8 dot3out_pause_frames_high[0x20];
u8 dot3out_pause_frames_low[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_400[0x3c0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_2819_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits {
u8 ether_stats_drop_events_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_drop_events_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_octets_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_broadcast_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_broadcast_pkts_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_multicast_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_multicast_pkts_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_crc_align_errors_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_crc_align_errors_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_undersize_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_undersize_pkts_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_oversize_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_oversize_pkts_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_fragments_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_fragments_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_jabbers_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_jabbers_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_collisions_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_collisions_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts64octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts64octets_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts65to127octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts65to127octets_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts128to255octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts128to255octets_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts256to511octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts256to511octets_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts512to1023octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts512to1023octets_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts1024to1518octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts1024to1518octets_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts1519to2047octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts1519to2047octets_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts2048to4095octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts2048to4095octets_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts4096to8191octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts4096to8191octets_low[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts8192to10239octets_high[0x20];
u8 ether_stats_pkts8192to10239octets_low[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_540[0x280];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_2863_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits {
u8 if_in_octets_high[0x20];
u8 if_in_octets_low[0x20];
u8 if_in_ucast_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 if_in_ucast_pkts_low[0x20];
u8 if_in_discards_high[0x20];
u8 if_in_discards_low[0x20];
u8 if_in_errors_high[0x20];
u8 if_in_errors_low[0x20];
u8 if_in_unknown_protos_high[0x20];
u8 if_in_unknown_protos_low[0x20];
u8 if_out_octets_high[0x20];
u8 if_out_octets_low[0x20];
u8 if_out_ucast_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 if_out_ucast_pkts_low[0x20];
u8 if_out_discards_high[0x20];
u8 if_out_discards_low[0x20];
u8 if_out_errors_high[0x20];
u8 if_out_errors_low[0x20];
u8 if_in_multicast_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 if_in_multicast_pkts_low[0x20];
u8 if_in_broadcast_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 if_in_broadcast_pkts_low[0x20];
u8 if_out_multicast_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 if_out_multicast_pkts_low[0x20];
u8 if_out_broadcast_pkts_high[0x20];
u8 if_out_broadcast_pkts_low[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_340[0x480];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_802_3_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits {
u8 a_frames_transmitted_ok_high[0x20];
u8 a_frames_transmitted_ok_low[0x20];
u8 a_frames_received_ok_high[0x20];
u8 a_frames_received_ok_low[0x20];
u8 a_frame_check_sequence_errors_high[0x20];
u8 a_frame_check_sequence_errors_low[0x20];
u8 a_alignment_errors_high[0x20];
u8 a_alignment_errors_low[0x20];
u8 a_octets_transmitted_ok_high[0x20];
u8 a_octets_transmitted_ok_low[0x20];
u8 a_octets_received_ok_high[0x20];
u8 a_octets_received_ok_low[0x20];
u8 a_multicast_frames_xmitted_ok_high[0x20];
u8 a_multicast_frames_xmitted_ok_low[0x20];
u8 a_broadcast_frames_xmitted_ok_high[0x20];
u8 a_broadcast_frames_xmitted_ok_low[0x20];
u8 a_multicast_frames_received_ok_high[0x20];
u8 a_multicast_frames_received_ok_low[0x20];
u8 a_broadcast_frames_received_ok_high[0x20];
u8 a_broadcast_frames_received_ok_low[0x20];
u8 a_in_range_length_errors_high[0x20];
u8 a_in_range_length_errors_low[0x20];
u8 a_out_of_range_length_field_high[0x20];
u8 a_out_of_range_length_field_low[0x20];
u8 a_frame_too_long_errors_high[0x20];
u8 a_frame_too_long_errors_low[0x20];
u8 a_symbol_error_during_carrier_high[0x20];
u8 a_symbol_error_during_carrier_low[0x20];
u8 a_mac_control_frames_transmitted_high[0x20];
u8 a_mac_control_frames_transmitted_low[0x20];
u8 a_mac_control_frames_received_high[0x20];
u8 a_mac_control_frames_received_low[0x20];
u8 a_unsupported_opcodes_received_high[0x20];
u8 a_unsupported_opcodes_received_low[0x20];
u8 a_pause_mac_ctrl_frames_received_high[0x20];
u8 a_pause_mac_ctrl_frames_received_low[0x20];
u8 a_pause_mac_ctrl_frames_transmitted_high[0x20];
u8 a_pause_mac_ctrl_frames_transmitted_low[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_4c0[0x300];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pcie_perf_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits {
u8 life_time_counter_high[0x20];
u8 life_time_counter_low[0x20];
u8 rx_errors[0x20];
u8 tx_errors[0x20];
u8 l0_to_recovery_eieos[0x20];
u8 l0_to_recovery_ts[0x20];
u8 l0_to_recovery_framing[0x20];
u8 l0_to_recovery_retrain[0x20];
u8 crc_error_dllp[0x20];
u8 crc_error_tlp[0x20];
u8 tx_overflow_buffer_pkt_high[0x20];
u8 tx_overflow_buffer_pkt_low[0x20];
u8 outbound_stalled_reads[0x20];
u8 outbound_stalled_writes[0x20];
u8 outbound_stalled_reads_events[0x20];
u8 outbound_stalled_writes_events[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_200[0x5c0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_inter_comp_event_bits {
u8 command_completion_vector[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0xc0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_stall_vl_event_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x18];
u8 port_num[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_19[0x3];
u8 vl[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0xa0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_db_bf_congestion_event_bits {
u8 event_subtype[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x8];
u8 congestion_level[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0xa0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_gpio_event_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x60];
u8 gpio_event_hi[0x20];
u8 gpio_event_lo[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_port_state_change_event_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x40];
u8 port_num[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_44[0x1c];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dropped_packet_logged_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0xe0];
};
enum {
MLX5_CQ_ERROR_SYNDROME_CQ_OVERRUN = 0x1,
MLX5_CQ_ERROR_SYNDROME_CQ_ACCESS_VIOLATION_ERROR = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cq_error_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 cqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rdma_page_fault_event_bits {
u8 bytes_committed[0x20];
u8 r_key[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 packet_len[0x10];
u8 rdma_op_len[0x20];
u8 rdma_va[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x5];
u8 rdma[0x1];
u8 write[0x1];
u8 requestor[0x1];
u8 qp_number[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_wqe_associated_page_fault_event_bits {
u8 bytes_committed[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 wqe_index[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 len[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x60];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x5];
u8 rdma[0x1];
u8 write_read[0x1];
u8 requestor[0x1];
u8 qpn[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qp_events_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0xa0];
u8 type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a8[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8];
u8 qpn_rqn_sqn[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dct_events_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0xc0];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8];
u8 dct_number[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_comp_event_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0xc0];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8];
u8 cq_number[0x18];
};
enum {
MLX5_QPC_STATE_RST = 0x0,
MLX5_QPC_STATE_INIT = 0x1,
MLX5_QPC_STATE_RTR = 0x2,
MLX5_QPC_STATE_RTS = 0x3,
MLX5_QPC_STATE_SQER = 0x4,
MLX5_QPC_STATE_ERR = 0x6,
MLX5_QPC_STATE_SQD = 0x7,
MLX5_QPC_STATE_SUSPENDED = 0x9,
};
enum {
MLX5_QPC_ST_RC = 0x0,
MLX5_QPC_ST_UC = 0x1,
MLX5_QPC_ST_UD = 0x2,
MLX5_QPC_ST_XRC = 0x3,
MLX5_QPC_ST_DCI = 0x5,
MLX5_QPC_ST_QP0 = 0x7,
MLX5_QPC_ST_QP1 = 0x8,
MLX5_QPC_ST_RAW_DATAGRAM = 0x9,
MLX5_QPC_ST_REG_UMR = 0xc,
};
enum {
MLX5_QPC_PM_STATE_ARMED = 0x0,
MLX5_QPC_PM_STATE_REARM = 0x1,
MLX5_QPC_PM_STATE_RESERVED = 0x2,
MLX5_QPC_PM_STATE_MIGRATED = 0x3,
};
enum {
MLX5_QPC_OFFLOAD_TYPE_RNDV = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_QPC_END_PADDING_MODE_SCATTER_AS_IS = 0x0,
MLX5_QPC_END_PADDING_MODE_PAD_TO_CACHE_LINE_ALIGNMENT = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_QPC_MTU_256_BYTES = 0x1,
MLX5_QPC_MTU_512_BYTES = 0x2,
MLX5_QPC_MTU_1K_BYTES = 0x3,
MLX5_QPC_MTU_2K_BYTES = 0x4,
MLX5_QPC_MTU_4K_BYTES = 0x5,
MLX5_QPC_MTU_RAW_ETHERNET_QP = 0x7,
};
enum {
MLX5_QPC_ATOMIC_MODE_IB_SPEC = 0x1,
MLX5_QPC_ATOMIC_MODE_ONLY_8B = 0x2,
MLX5_QPC_ATOMIC_MODE_UP_TO_8B = 0x3,
MLX5_QPC_ATOMIC_MODE_UP_TO_16B = 0x4,
MLX5_QPC_ATOMIC_MODE_UP_TO_32B = 0x5,
MLX5_QPC_ATOMIC_MODE_UP_TO_64B = 0x6,
MLX5_QPC_ATOMIC_MODE_UP_TO_128B = 0x7,
MLX5_QPC_ATOMIC_MODE_UP_TO_256B = 0x8,
};
enum {
MLX5_QPC_CS_REQ_DISABLE = 0x0,
MLX5_QPC_CS_REQ_UP_TO_32B = 0x11,
MLX5_QPC_CS_REQ_UP_TO_64B = 0x22,
};
enum {
MLX5_QPC_CS_RES_DISABLE = 0x0,
MLX5_QPC_CS_RES_UP_TO_32B = 0x1,
MLX5_QPC_CS_RES_UP_TO_64B = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qpc_bits {
u8 state[0x4];
u8 lag_tx_port_affinity[0x4];
u8 st[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x3];
u8 pm_state[0x2];
u8 reserved_at_15[0x1];
u8 req_e2e_credit_mode[0x2];
u8 offload_type[0x4];
u8 end_padding_mode[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1e[0x2];
u8 wq_signature[0x1];
u8 block_lb_mc[0x1];
u8 atomic_like_write_en[0x1];
u8 latency_sensitive[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_24[0x1];
u8 drain_sigerr[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_26[0x2];
u8 pd[0x18];
u8 mtu[0x3];
u8 log_msg_max[0x5];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_48[0x1];
u8 log_rq_size[0x4];
u8 log_rq_stride[0x3];
u8 no_sq[0x1];
u8 log_sq_size[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_55[0x6];
u8 rlky[0x1];
u8 ulp_stateless_offload_mode[0x4];
u8 counter_set_id[0x8];
u8 uar_page[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x8];
u8 user_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x3];
u8 log_page_size[0x5];
u8 remote_qpn[0x18];
struct mlx5_ifc_ads_bits primary_address_path;
struct mlx5_ifc_ads_bits secondary_address_path;
u8 log_ack_req_freq[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_384[0x4];
u8 log_sra_max[0x3];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_38b[0x2];
u8 retry_count[0x3];
u8 rnr_retry[0x3];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_393[0x1];
u8 fre[0x1];
u8 cur_rnr_retry[0x3];
u8 cur_retry_count[0x3];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_39b[0x5];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_3a0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_3c0[0x8];
u8 next_send_psn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_3e0[0x8];
u8 cqn_snd[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_400[0x8];
u8 deth_sqpn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_420[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_440[0x8];
u8 last_acked_psn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_460[0x8];
u8 ssn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_480[0x8];
u8 log_rra_max[0x3];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_48b[0x1];
u8 atomic_mode[0x4];
u8 rre[0x1];
u8 rwe[0x1];
u8 rae[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_493[0x1];
u8 page_offset[0x6];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_49a[0x3];
u8 cd_slave_receive[0x1];
u8 cd_slave_send[0x1];
u8 cd_master[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_4a0[0x3];
u8 min_rnr_nak[0x5];
u8 next_rcv_psn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_4c0[0x8];
u8 xrcd[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_4e0[0x8];
u8 cqn_rcv[0x18];
u8 dbr_addr[0x40];
u8 q_key[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_560[0x5];
u8 rq_type[0x3];
u8 srqn_rmpn_xrqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_580[0x8];
u8 rmsn[0x18];
u8 hw_sq_wqebb_counter[0x10];
u8 sw_sq_wqebb_counter[0x10];
u8 hw_rq_counter[0x20];
u8 sw_rq_counter[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_600[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_620[0xf];
u8 cgs[0x1];
u8 cs_req[0x8];
u8 cs_res[0x8];
u8 dc_access_key[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_680[0x3];
u8 dbr_umem_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_684[0xbc];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_roce_addr_layout_bits {
u8 source_l3_address[16][0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x3];
u8 vlan_valid[0x1];
u8 vlan_id[0xc];
u8 source_mac_47_32[0x10];
u8 source_mac_31_0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x14];
u8 roce_l3_type[0x4];
u8 roce_version[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x20];
};
union mlx5_ifc_hca_cap_union_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_hca_cap_bits cmd_hca_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_odp_cap_bits odp_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_atomic_caps_bits atomic_caps;
struct mlx5_ifc_roce_cap_bits roce_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_per_protocol_networking_offload_caps_bits per_protocol_networking_offload_caps;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_nic_cap_bits flow_table_nic_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_eswitch_cap_bits flow_table_eswitch_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_e_switch_cap_bits e_switch_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_vector_calc_cap_bits vector_calc_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_qos_cap_bits qos_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_debug_cap_bits debug_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_fpga_cap_bits fpga_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_tls_cap_bits tls_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_device_mem_cap_bits device_mem_cap;
struct mlx5_ifc_device_virtio_emulation_cap_bits virtio_emulation_cap;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8000];
};
enum {
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_ALLOW = 0x1,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_DROP = 0x2,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST = 0x4,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_COUNT = 0x8,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_PACKET_REFORMAT = 0x10,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_DECAP = 0x20,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_MOD_HDR = 0x40,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_VLAN_POP = 0x80,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH = 0x100,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_VLAN_POP_2 = 0x400,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH_2 = 0x800,
};
enum {
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_FLOW_SOURCE_ANY_VPORT = 0x0,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_FLOW_SOURCE_UPLINK = 0x1,
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_FLOW_SOURCE_LOCAL_VPORT = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_vlan_bits {
u8 ethtype[0x10];
u8 prio[0x3];
u8 cfi[0x1];
u8 vid[0xc];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_context_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_vlan_bits push_vlan;
u8 group_id[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 flow_tag[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 action[0x10];
u8 extended_destination[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_81[0x1];
u8 flow_source[0x2];
u8 reserved_at_84[0x4];
u8 destination_list_size[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 flow_counter_list_size[0x18];
u8 packet_reformat_id[0x20];
u8 modify_header_id[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_vlan_bits push_vlan_2;
u8 reserved_at_120[0xe0];
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_param_bits match_value;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1200[0x600];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
union mlx5_ifc_dest_format_struct_flow_counter_list_auto_bits destination[];
};
enum {
MLX5_XRC_SRQC_STATE_GOOD = 0x0,
MLX5_XRC_SRQC_STATE_ERROR = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_xrc_srqc_bits {
u8 state[0x4];
u8 log_xrc_srq_size[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 wq_signature[0x1];
u8 cont_srq[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_22[0x1];
u8 rlky[0x1];
u8 basic_cyclic_rcv_wqe[0x1];
u8 log_rq_stride[0x3];
u8 xrcd[0x18];
u8 page_offset[0x6];
u8 reserved_at_46[0x1];
u8 dbr_umem_valid[0x1];
u8 cqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 user_index_equal_xrc_srqn[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_81[0x1];
u8 log_page_size[0x6];
u8 user_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8];
u8 pd[0x18];
u8 lwm[0x10];
u8 wqe_cnt[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0x40];
u8 db_record_addr_h[0x20];
u8 db_record_addr_l[0x1e];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_17e[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_180[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_vnic_diagnostic_statistics_bits {
u8 counter_error_queues[0x20];
u8 total_error_queues[0x20];
u8 send_queue_priority_update_flow[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 nic_receive_steering_discard[0x40];
u8 receive_discard_vport_down[0x40];
u8 transmit_discard_vport_down[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_140[0xa0];
u8 internal_rq_out_of_buffer[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_200[0xe00];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits {
u8 packets[0x40];
u8 octets[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_tisc_bits {
u8 strict_lag_tx_port_affinity[0x1];
u8 tls_en[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_2[0x2];
u8 lag_tx_port_affinity[0x04];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x4];
u8 prio[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x100];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0x8];
u8 transport_domain[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_140[0x8];
u8 underlay_qpn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_160[0x8];
u8 pd[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_180[0x380];
};
enum {
MLX5_TIRC_DISP_TYPE_DIRECT = 0x0,
MLX5_TIRC_DISP_TYPE_INDIRECT = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_TIRC_LRO_ENABLE_MASK_IPV4_LRO = 0x1,
MLX5_TIRC_LRO_ENABLE_MASK_IPV6_LRO = 0x2,
};
enum {
MLX5_RX_HASH_FN_NONE = 0x0,
MLX5_RX_HASH_FN_INVERTED_XOR8 = 0x1,
MLX5_RX_HASH_FN_TOEPLITZ = 0x2,
};
enum {
MLX5_TIRC_SELF_LB_BLOCK_BLOCK_UNICAST = 0x1,
MLX5_TIRC_SELF_LB_BLOCK_BLOCK_MULTICAST = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_tirc_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
u8 disp_type[0x4];
u8 tls_en[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_25[0x1b];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x4];
u8 lro_timeout_period_usecs[0x10];
u8 lro_enable_mask[0x4];
u8 lro_max_ip_payload_size[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x8];
u8 inline_rqn[0x18];
u8 rx_hash_symmetric[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_101[0x1];
u8 tunneled_offload_en[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_103[0x5];
u8 indirect_table[0x18];
u8 rx_hash_fn[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_124[0x2];
u8 self_lb_block[0x2];
u8 transport_domain[0x18];
u8 rx_hash_toeplitz_key[10][0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_rx_hash_field_select_bits rx_hash_field_selector_outer;
struct mlx5_ifc_rx_hash_field_select_bits rx_hash_field_selector_inner;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_2c0[0x4c0];
};
enum {
MLX5_SRQC_STATE_GOOD = 0x0,
MLX5_SRQC_STATE_ERROR = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_srqc_bits {
u8 state[0x4];
u8 log_srq_size[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 wq_signature[0x1];
u8 cont_srq[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_22[0x1];
u8 rlky[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_24[0x1];
u8 log_rq_stride[0x3];
u8 xrcd[0x18];
u8 page_offset[0x6];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_46[0x2];
u8 cqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x2];
u8 log_page_size[0x6];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8];
u8 pd[0x18];
u8 lwm[0x10];
u8 wqe_cnt[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0x40];
u8 dbr_addr[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_180[0x80];
};
enum {
MLX5_SQC_STATE_RST = 0x0,
MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY = 0x1,
MLX5_SQC_STATE_ERR = 0x3,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sqc_bits {
u8 rlky[0x1];
u8 cd_master[0x1];
u8 fre[0x1];
u8 flush_in_error_en[0x1];
u8 allow_multi_pkt_send_wqe[0x1];
u8 min_wqe_inline_mode[0x3];
u8 state[0x4];
u8 reg_umr[0x1];
u8 allow_swp[0x1];
u8 hairpin[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_f[0x11];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x8];
u8 user_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 cqn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x8];
u8 hairpin_peer_rq[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x10];
u8 hairpin_peer_vhca[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x50];
u8 packet_pacing_rate_limit_index[0x10];
u8 tis_lst_sz[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_110[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_160[0x8];
u8 tis_num_0[0x18];
struct mlx5_ifc_wq_bits wq;
};
enum {
SCHEDULING_CONTEXT_ELEMENT_TYPE_TSAR = 0x0,
SCHEDULING_CONTEXT_ELEMENT_TYPE_VPORT = 0x1,
SCHEDULING_CONTEXT_ELEMENT_TYPE_VPORT_TC = 0x2,
SCHEDULING_CONTEXT_ELEMENT_TYPE_PARA_VPORT_TC = 0x3,
};
enum {
ELEMENT_TYPE_CAP_MASK_TASR = 1 << 0,
ELEMENT_TYPE_CAP_MASK_VPORT = 1 << 1,
ELEMENT_TYPE_CAP_MASK_VPORT_TC = 1 << 2,
ELEMENT_TYPE_CAP_MASK_PARA_VPORT_TC = 1 << 3,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_scheduling_context_bits {
u8 element_type[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 element_attributes[0x20];
u8 parent_element_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x40];
u8 bw_share[0x20];
u8 max_average_bw[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x120];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rqtc_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0xa0];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x10];
u8 rqt_max_size[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x10];
u8 rqt_actual_size[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x6a0];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
struct mlx5_ifc_rq_num_bits rq_num[];
};
enum {
MLX5_RQC_MEM_RQ_TYPE_MEMORY_RQ_INLINE = 0x0,
MLX5_RQC_MEM_RQ_TYPE_MEMORY_RQ_RMP = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_RQC_STATE_RST = 0x0,
MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY = 0x1,
MLX5_RQC_STATE_ERR = 0x3,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rqc_bits {
u8 rlky[0x1];
u8 delay_drop_en[0x1];
u8 scatter_fcs[0x1];
u8 vsd[0x1];
u8 mem_rq_type[0x4];
u8 state[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c[0x1];
u8 flush_in_error_en[0x1];
u8 hairpin[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_f[0x11];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x8];
u8 user_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 cqn[0x18];
u8 counter_set_id[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_68[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x8];
u8 rmpn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 hairpin_peer_sq[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x10];
u8 hairpin_peer_vhca[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_e0[0xa0];
struct mlx5_ifc_wq_bits wq;
};
enum {
MLX5_RMPC_STATE_RDY = 0x1,
MLX5_RMPC_STATE_ERR = 0x3,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rmpc_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 state[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c[0x14];
u8 basic_cyclic_rcv_wqe[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_21[0x1f];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x140];
struct mlx5_ifc_wq_bits wq;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_nic_vport_context_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x5];
u8 min_wqe_inline_mode[0x3];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x15];
u8 disable_mc_local_lb[0x1];
u8 disable_uc_local_lb[0x1];
u8 roce_en[0x1];
u8 arm_change_event[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_21[0x1a];
u8 event_on_mtu[0x1];
u8 event_on_promisc_change[0x1];
u8 event_on_vlan_change[0x1];
u8 event_on_mc_address_change[0x1];
u8 event_on_uc_address_change[0x1];
{net, IB}/mlx5: Manage port association for multiport RoCE When mlx5_ib_add is called determine if the mlx5 core device being added is capable of dual port RoCE operation. If it is, determine whether it is a master device or a slave device using the num_vhca_ports and affiliate_nic_vport_criteria capabilities. If the device is a slave, attempt to find a master device to affiliate it with. Devices that can be affiliated will share a system image guid. If none are found place it on a list of unaffiliated ports. If a master is found bind the port to it by configuring the port affiliation in the NIC vport context. Similarly when mlx5_ib_remove is called determine the port type. If it's a slave port, unaffiliate it from the master device, otherwise just remove it from the unaffiliated port list. The IB device is registered as a multiport device, even if a 2nd port is not available for affiliation. When the 2nd port is affiliated later the GID cache must be refreshed in order to get the default GIDs for the 2nd port in the cache. Export roce_rescan_device to provide a mechanism to refresh the cache after a new port is bound. In a multiport configuration all IB object (QP, MR, PD, etc) related commands should flow through the master mlx5_core_dev, other commands must be sent to the slave port mlx5_core_mdev, an interface is provide to get the correct mdev for non IB object commands. Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
2018-01-04 08:25:36 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc];
u8 affiliation_criteria[0x4];
u8 affiliated_vhca_id[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0xd0];
u8 mtu[0x10];
u8 system_image_guid[0x40];
u8 port_guid[0x40];
u8 node_guid[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_200[0x140];
u8 qkey_violation_counter[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_350[0x430];
u8 promisc_uc[0x1];
u8 promisc_mc[0x1];
u8 promisc_all[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_783[0x2];
u8 allowed_list_type[0x3];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_788[0xc];
u8 allowed_list_size[0xc];
struct mlx5_ifc_mac_address_layout_bits permanent_address;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_7e0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 current_uc_mac_address[][0x40];
};
enum {
MLX5_MKC_ACCESS_MODE_PA = 0x0,
MLX5_MKC_ACCESS_MODE_MTT = 0x1,
MLX5_MKC_ACCESS_MODE_KLMS = 0x2,
MLX5_MKC_ACCESS_MODE_KSM = 0x3,
MLX5_MKC_ACCESS_MODE_SW_ICM = 0x4,
MLX5_MKC_ACCESS_MODE_MEMIC = 0x5,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mkc_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x1];
u8 free[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_2[0x1];
u8 access_mode_4_2[0x3];
u8 reserved_at_6[0x7];
u8 relaxed_ordering_write[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_e[0x1];
u8 small_fence_on_rdma_read_response[0x1];
u8 umr_en[0x1];
u8 a[0x1];
u8 rw[0x1];
u8 rr[0x1];
u8 lw[0x1];
u8 lr[0x1];
u8 access_mode_1_0[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
u8 mkey_7_0[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 length64[0x1];
u8 bsf_en[0x1];
u8 sync_umr[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_63[0x2];
u8 expected_sigerr_count[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_66[0x1];
u8 en_rinval[0x1];
u8 pd[0x18];
u8 start_addr[0x40];
u8 len[0x40];
u8 bsf_octword_size[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0x80];
u8 translations_octword_size[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0x19];
u8 relaxed_ordering_read[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1d9[0x1];
u8 log_page_size[0x5];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1e0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pkey_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x10];
u8 pkey[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_array128_auto_bits {
u8 array128_auto[16][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_hca_vport_context_bits {
u8 field_select[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0xe0];
u8 sm_virt_aware[0x1];
u8 has_smi[0x1];
u8 has_raw[0x1];
u8 grh_required[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_104[0xc];
u8 port_physical_state[0x4];
u8 vport_state_policy[0x4];
u8 port_state[0x4];
u8 vport_state[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0x20];
u8 system_image_guid[0x40];
u8 port_guid[0x40];
u8 node_guid[0x40];
u8 cap_mask1[0x20];
u8 cap_mask1_field_select[0x20];
u8 cap_mask2[0x20];
u8 cap_mask2_field_select[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x80];
u8 lid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_310[0x4];
u8 init_type_reply[0x4];
u8 lmc[0x3];
u8 subnet_timeout[0x5];
u8 sm_lid[0x10];
u8 sm_sl[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_334[0xc];
u8 qkey_violation_counter[0x10];
u8 pkey_violation_counter[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_360[0xca0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_esw_vport_context_bits {
u8 fdb_to_vport_reg_c[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1[0x2];
u8 vport_svlan_strip[0x1];
u8 vport_cvlan_strip[0x1];
u8 vport_svlan_insert[0x1];
u8 vport_cvlan_insert[0x2];
u8 fdb_to_vport_reg_c_id[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
u8 svlan_cfi[0x1];
u8 svlan_pcp[0x3];
u8 svlan_id[0xc];
u8 cvlan_cfi[0x1];
u8 cvlan_pcp[0x3];
u8 cvlan_id[0xc];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x720];
u8 sw_steering_vport_icm_address_rx[0x40];
u8 sw_steering_vport_icm_address_tx[0x40];
};
enum {
MLX5_EQC_STATUS_OK = 0x0,
MLX5_EQC_STATUS_EQ_WRITE_FAILURE = 0xa,
};
enum {
MLX5_EQC_ST_ARMED = 0x9,
MLX5_EQC_ST_FIRED = 0xa,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_eqc_bits {
u8 status[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_4[0x9];
u8 ec[0x1];
u8 oi[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_f[0x5];
u8 st[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x14];
u8 page_offset[0x6];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_5a[0x6];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x3];
u8 log_eq_size[0x5];
u8 uar_page[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x18];
u8 intr[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x3];
u8 log_page_size[0x5];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c8[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x60];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0x8];
u8 consumer_counter[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_160[0x8];
u8 producer_counter[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_180[0x80];
};
enum {
MLX5_DCTC_STATE_ACTIVE = 0x0,
MLX5_DCTC_STATE_DRAINING = 0x1,
MLX5_DCTC_STATE_DRAINED = 0x2,
};
enum {
MLX5_DCTC_CS_RES_DISABLE = 0x0,
MLX5_DCTC_CS_RES_NA = 0x1,
MLX5_DCTC_CS_RES_UP_TO_64B = 0x2,
};
enum {
MLX5_DCTC_MTU_256_BYTES = 0x1,
MLX5_DCTC_MTU_512_BYTES = 0x2,
MLX5_DCTC_MTU_1K_BYTES = 0x3,
MLX5_DCTC_MTU_2K_BYTES = 0x4,
MLX5_DCTC_MTU_4K_BYTES = 0x5,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dctc_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x4];
u8 state[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x8];
u8 user_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 cqn[0x18];
u8 counter_set_id[0x8];
u8 atomic_mode[0x4];
u8 rre[0x1];
u8 rwe[0x1];
u8 rae[0x1];
u8 atomic_like_write_en[0x1];
u8 latency_sensitive[0x1];
u8 rlky[0x1];
u8 free_ar[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_73[0xd];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x8];
u8 cs_res[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_90[0x3];
u8 min_rnr_nak[0x5];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_98[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 srqn_xrqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8];
u8 pd[0x18];
u8 tclass[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e8[0x4];
u8 flow_label[0x14];
u8 dc_access_key[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0x5];
u8 mtu[0x3];
u8 port[0x8];
u8 pkey_index[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_160[0x8];
u8 my_addr_index[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_170[0x8];
u8 hop_limit[0x8];
u8 dc_access_key_violation_count[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1a0[0x14];
u8 dei_cfi[0x1];
u8 eth_prio[0x3];
u8 ecn[0x2];
u8 dscp[0x6];
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_CQC_STATUS_OK = 0x0,
MLX5_CQC_STATUS_CQ_OVERFLOW = 0x9,
MLX5_CQC_STATUS_CQ_WRITE_FAIL = 0xa,
};
enum {
MLX5_CQC_CQE_SZ_64_BYTES = 0x0,
MLX5_CQC_CQE_SZ_128_BYTES = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_CQC_ST_SOLICITED_NOTIFICATION_REQUEST_ARMED = 0x6,
MLX5_CQC_ST_NOTIFICATION_REQUEST_ARMED = 0x9,
MLX5_CQC_ST_FIRED = 0xa,
};
enum {
MLX5_CQ_PERIOD_MODE_START_FROM_EQE = 0x0,
MLX5_CQ_PERIOD_MODE_START_FROM_CQE = 0x1,
MLX5_CQ_PERIOD_NUM_MODES
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cqc_bits {
u8 status[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_4[0x2];
u8 dbr_umem_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_7[0x1];
u8 cqe_sz[0x3];
u8 cc[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c[0x1];
u8 scqe_break_moderation_en[0x1];
u8 oi[0x1];
u8 cq_period_mode[0x2];
u8 cqe_comp_en[0x1];
u8 mini_cqe_res_format[0x2];
u8 st[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x14];
u8 page_offset[0x6];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_5a[0x6];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x3];
u8 log_cq_size[0x5];
u8 uar_page[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x4];
u8 cq_period[0xc];
u8 cq_max_count[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x18];
u8 c_eqn[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x3];
u8 log_page_size[0x5];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c8[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0x8];
u8 last_notified_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0x8];
u8 last_solicit_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0x8];
u8 consumer_counter[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_160[0x8];
u8 producer_counter[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_180[0x40];
u8 dbr_addr[0x40];
};
union mlx5_ifc_cong_control_roce_ecn_auto_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_cong_control_802_1qau_rp_bits cong_control_802_1qau_rp;
struct mlx5_ifc_cong_control_r_roce_ecn_rp_bits cong_control_r_roce_ecn_rp;
struct mlx5_ifc_cong_control_r_roce_ecn_np_bits cong_control_r_roce_ecn_np;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x800];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_adapter_param_block_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0xc0];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8];
u8 ieee_vendor_id[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x10];
u8 vsd_vendor_id[0x10];
u8 vsd[208][0x8];
u8 vsd_contd_psid[16][0x8];
};
enum {
MLX5_XRQC_STATE_GOOD = 0x0,
MLX5_XRQC_STATE_ERROR = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_XRQC_TOPOLOGY_NO_SPECIAL_TOPOLOGY = 0x0,
MLX5_XRQC_TOPOLOGY_TAG_MATCHING = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_XRQC_OFFLOAD_RNDV = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_tag_matching_topology_context_bits {
u8 log_matching_list_sz[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_4[0xc];
u8 append_next_index[0x10];
u8 sw_phase_cnt[0x10];
u8 hw_phase_cnt[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_xrqc_bits {
u8 state[0x4];
u8 rlkey[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_5[0xf];
u8 topology[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_18[0x4];
u8 offload[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x8];
u8 user_index[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 cqn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_60[0xa0];
struct mlx5_ifc_tag_matching_topology_context_bits tag_matching_topology_context;
u8 reserved_at_180[0x280];
struct mlx5_ifc_wq_bits wq;
};
union mlx5_ifc_modify_field_select_resize_field_select_auto_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_field_select_bits modify_field_select;
struct mlx5_ifc_resize_field_select_bits resize_field_select;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
};
union mlx5_ifc_field_select_802_1_r_roce_auto_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_field_select_802_1qau_rp_bits field_select_802_1qau_rp;
struct mlx5_ifc_field_select_r_roce_rp_bits field_select_r_roce_rp;
struct mlx5_ifc_field_select_r_roce_np_bits field_select_r_roce_np;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
};
union mlx5_ifc_eth_cntrs_grp_data_layout_auto_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_802_3_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits eth_802_3_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_2863_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits eth_2863_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_2819_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits eth_2819_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_3635_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits eth_3635_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_extended_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits eth_extended_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_per_prio_grp_data_layout_bits eth_per_prio_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_per_tc_prio_grp_data_layout_bits eth_per_tc_prio_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_per_tc_congest_prio_grp_data_layout_bits eth_per_tc_congest_prio_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_ib_port_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits ib_port_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_phys_layer_cntrs_bits phys_layer_cntrs;
struct mlx5_ifc_phys_layer_statistical_cntrs_bits phys_layer_statistical_cntrs;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x7c0];
};
union mlx5_ifc_pcie_cntrs_grp_data_layout_auto_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_pcie_perf_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits pcie_perf_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
u8 reserved_at_0[0x7c0];
};
union mlx5_ifc_event_auto_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_comp_event_bits comp_event;
struct mlx5_ifc_dct_events_bits dct_events;
struct mlx5_ifc_qp_events_bits qp_events;
struct mlx5_ifc_wqe_associated_page_fault_event_bits wqe_associated_page_fault_event;
struct mlx5_ifc_rdma_page_fault_event_bits rdma_page_fault_event;
struct mlx5_ifc_cq_error_bits cq_error;
struct mlx5_ifc_dropped_packet_logged_bits dropped_packet_logged;
struct mlx5_ifc_port_state_change_event_bits port_state_change_event;
struct mlx5_ifc_gpio_event_bits gpio_event;
struct mlx5_ifc_db_bf_congestion_event_bits db_bf_congestion_event;
struct mlx5_ifc_stall_vl_event_bits stall_vl_event;
struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_inter_comp_event_bits cmd_inter_comp_event;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0xe0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_health_buffer_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x100];
u8 assert_existptr[0x20];
u8 assert_callra[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0x40];
u8 fw_version[0x20];
u8 hw_id[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0x20];
u8 irisc_index[0x8];
u8 synd[0x8];
u8 ext_synd[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_register_loopback_control_bits {
u8 no_lb[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1[0x7];
u8 port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_vport_tc_element_bits {
u8 traffic_class[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_4[0xc];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_vport_element_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x10];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
};
enum {
TSAR_ELEMENT_TSAR_TYPE_DWRR = 0x0,
TSAR_ELEMENT_TSAR_TYPE_ROUND_ROBIN = 0x1,
TSAR_ELEMENT_TSAR_TYPE_ETS = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_tsar_element_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 tsar_type[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
};
enum {
MLX5_TEARDOWN_HCA_OUT_FORCE_STATE_SUCCESS = 0x0,
MLX5_TEARDOWN_HCA_OUT_FORCE_STATE_FAIL = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_teardown_hca_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x3f];
u8 state[0x1];
};
enum {
MLX5_TEARDOWN_HCA_IN_PROFILE_GRACEFUL_CLOSE = 0x0,
MLX5_TEARDOWN_HCA_IN_PROFILE_FORCE_CLOSE = 0x1,
MLX5_TEARDOWN_HCA_IN_PROFILE_PREPARE_FAST_TEARDOWN = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_teardown_hca_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 profile[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sqerr2rts_qp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sqerr2rts_qp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 opt_param_mask[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_qpc_bits qpc;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_800[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sqd2rts_qp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sqd2rts_qp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 opt_param_mask[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_qpc_bits qpc;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_800[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_roce_address_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_roce_address_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 roce_address_index[0x10];
{net, IB}/mlx5: Manage port association for multiport RoCE When mlx5_ib_add is called determine if the mlx5 core device being added is capable of dual port RoCE operation. If it is, determine whether it is a master device or a slave device using the num_vhca_ports and affiliate_nic_vport_criteria capabilities. If the device is a slave, attempt to find a master device to affiliate it with. Devices that can be affiliated will share a system image guid. If none are found place it on a list of unaffiliated ports. If a master is found bind the port to it by configuring the port affiliation in the NIC vport context. Similarly when mlx5_ib_remove is called determine the port type. If it's a slave port, unaffiliate it from the master device, otherwise just remove it from the unaffiliated port list. The IB device is registered as a multiport device, even if a 2nd port is not available for affiliation. When the 2nd port is affiliated later the GID cache must be refreshed in order to get the default GIDs for the 2nd port in the cache. Export roce_rescan_device to provide a mechanism to refresh the cache after a new port is bound. In a multiport configuration all IB object (QP, MR, PD, etc) related commands should flow through the master mlx5_core_dev, other commands must be sent to the slave port mlx5_core_mdev, an interface is provide to get the correct mdev for non IB object commands. Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
2018-01-04 08:25:36 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_50[0xc];
u8 vhca_port_num[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_roce_addr_layout_bits roce_address;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_mad_demux_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
enum {
MLX5_SET_MAD_DEMUX_IN_DEMUX_MODE_PASS_ALL = 0x0,
MLX5_SET_MAD_DEMUX_IN_DEMUX_MODE_SELECTIVE = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_mad_demux_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x6];
u8 demux_mode[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_68[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_l2_table_entry_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_l2_table_entry_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x60];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x13];
u8 vlan_valid[0x1];
u8 vlan[0xc];
struct mlx5_ifc_mac_address_layout_bits mac_address;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0xc0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_issi_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_issi_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 current_issi[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_hca_cap_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_hca_cap_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
union mlx5_ifc_hca_cap_union_bits capability;
};
enum {
MLX5_SET_FTE_MODIFY_ENABLE_MASK_ACTION = 0x0,
MLX5_SET_FTE_MODIFY_ENABLE_MASK_FLOW_TAG = 0x1,
MLX5_SET_FTE_MODIFY_ENABLE_MASK_DESTINATION_LIST = 0x2,
MLX5_SET_FTE_MODIFY_ENABLE_MASK_FLOW_COUNTERS = 0x3,
MLX5_SET_FTE_MODIFY_ENABLE_MASK_IPSEC_OBJ_ID = 0x4
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_fte_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_fte_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
u8 ignore_flow_level[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_c1[0x17];
u8 modify_enable_mask[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x20];
u8 flow_index[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0xe0];
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_context_bits flow_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rts2rts_qp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rts2rts_qp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 opt_param_mask[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_qpc_bits qpc;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_800[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rtr2rts_qp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rtr2rts_qp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 opt_param_mask[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_qpc_bits qpc;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_800[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rst2init_qp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rst2init_qp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 opt_param_mask[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_qpc_bits qpc;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_800[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_xrq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_xrqc_bits xrq_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_xrq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 xrqn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_xrc_srq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_xrc_srqc_bits xrc_srq_context_entry;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x600];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_xrc_srq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 xrc_srqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_QUERY_VPORT_STATE_OUT_STATE_DOWN = 0x0,
MLX5_QUERY_VPORT_STATE_OUT_STATE_UP = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_vport_state_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x18];
u8 admin_state[0x4];
u8 state[0x4];
};
enum {
MLX5_VPORT_STATE_OP_MOD_VNIC_VPORT = 0x0,
MLX5_VPORT_STATE_OP_MOD_ESW_VPORT = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_arm_monitor_counter_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_arm_monitor_counter_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
enum {
MLX5_QUERY_MONITOR_CNT_TYPE_PPCNT = 0x0,
MLX5_QUERY_MONITOR_CNT_TYPE_Q_COUNTER = 0x1,
};
enum mlx5_monitor_counter_ppcnt {
MLX5_QUERY_MONITOR_PPCNT_IN_RANGE_LENGTH_ERRORS = 0x0,
MLX5_QUERY_MONITOR_PPCNT_OUT_OF_RANGE_LENGTH_FIELD = 0x1,
MLX5_QUERY_MONITOR_PPCNT_FRAME_TOO_LONG_ERRORS = 0x2,
MLX5_QUERY_MONITOR_PPCNT_FRAME_CHECK_SEQUENCE_ERRORS = 0x3,
MLX5_QUERY_MONITOR_PPCNT_ALIGNMENT_ERRORS = 0x4,
MLX5_QUERY_MONITOR_PPCNT_IF_OUT_DISCARDS = 0x5,
};
enum {
MLX5_QUERY_MONITOR_Q_COUNTER_RX_OUT_OF_BUFFER = 0x4,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_monitor_counter_output_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x4];
u8 type[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x8];
u8 counter[0x10];
u8 counter_group_id[0x20];
};
#define MLX5_CMD_SET_MONITOR_NUM_PPCNT_COUNTER_SET1 (6)
#define MLX5_CMD_SET_MONITOR_NUM_Q_COUNTERS_SET1 (1)
#define MLX5_CMD_SET_MONITOR_NUM_COUNTER (MLX5_CMD_SET_MONITOR_NUM_PPCNT_COUNTER_SET1 +\
MLX5_CMD_SET_MONITOR_NUM_Q_COUNTERS_SET1)
struct mlx5_ifc_set_monitor_counter_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 num_of_counters[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_monitor_counter_output_bits monitor_counter[MLX5_CMD_SET_MONITOR_NUM_COUNTER];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_monitor_counter_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_vport_state_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_vnic_env_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_vnic_diagnostic_statistics_bits vport_env;
};
enum {
MLX5_QUERY_VNIC_ENV_IN_OP_MOD_VPORT_DIAG_STATISTICS = 0x0,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_vnic_env_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_vport_counter_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits received_errors;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits transmit_errors;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits received_ib_unicast;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits transmitted_ib_unicast;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits received_ib_multicast;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits transmitted_ib_multicast;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits received_eth_broadcast;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits transmitted_eth_broadcast;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits received_eth_unicast;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits transmitted_eth_unicast;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits received_eth_multicast;
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits transmitted_eth_multicast;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_680[0xa00];
};
enum {
MLX5_QUERY_VPORT_COUNTER_IN_OP_MOD_VPORT_COUNTERS = 0x0,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_vport_counter_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xb];
u8 port_num[0x4];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x60];
u8 clear[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c1[0x1f];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_tis_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_tisc_bits tis_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_tis_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 tisn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_tir_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_tirc_bits tir_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_tir_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 tirn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_srq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_srqc_bits srq_context_entry;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x600];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_srq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 srqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_sq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_sqc_bits sq_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_sq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 sqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_special_contexts_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 dump_fill_mkey[0x20];
u8 resd_lkey[0x20];
u8 null_mkey[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_special_contexts_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_scheduling_element_out_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_scheduling_context_bits scheduling_context;
u8 reserved_at_300[0x100];
};
enum {
SCHEDULING_HIERARCHY_E_SWITCH = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_scheduling_element_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 scheduling_hierarchy[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_48[0x18];
u8 scheduling_element_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x180];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_rqt_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_rqtc_bits rqt_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_rqt_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 rqtn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_rq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_rqc_bits rq_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_rq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 rqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_roce_address_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_roce_addr_layout_bits roce_address;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_roce_address_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 roce_address_index[0x10];
{net, IB}/mlx5: Manage port association for multiport RoCE When mlx5_ib_add is called determine if the mlx5 core device being added is capable of dual port RoCE operation. If it is, determine whether it is a master device or a slave device using the num_vhca_ports and affiliate_nic_vport_criteria capabilities. If the device is a slave, attempt to find a master device to affiliate it with. Devices that can be affiliated will share a system image guid. If none are found place it on a list of unaffiliated ports. If a master is found bind the port to it by configuring the port affiliation in the NIC vport context. Similarly when mlx5_ib_remove is called determine the port type. If it's a slave port, unaffiliate it from the master device, otherwise just remove it from the unaffiliated port list. The IB device is registered as a multiport device, even if a 2nd port is not available for affiliation. When the 2nd port is affiliated later the GID cache must be refreshed in order to get the default GIDs for the 2nd port in the cache. Export roce_rescan_device to provide a mechanism to refresh the cache after a new port is bound. In a multiport configuration all IB object (QP, MR, PD, etc) related commands should flow through the master mlx5_core_dev, other commands must be sent to the slave port mlx5_core_mdev, an interface is provide to get the correct mdev for non IB object commands. Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
2018-01-04 08:25:36 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_50[0xc];
u8 vhca_port_num[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_rmp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_rmpc_bits rmp_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_rmp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 rmpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_qp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
u8 opt_param_mask[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_qpc_bits qpc;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_800[0x80];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_qp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_q_counter_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 rx_write_requests[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x20];
u8 rx_read_requests[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x20];
u8 rx_atomic_requests[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0x20];
u8 rx_dct_connect[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_160[0x20];
u8 out_of_buffer[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1a0[0x20];
u8 out_of_sequence[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_1e0[0x20];
u8 duplicate_request[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_220[0x20];
u8 rnr_nak_retry_err[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_260[0x20];
u8 packet_seq_err[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_2a0[0x20];
u8 implied_nak_seq_err[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_2e0[0x20];
u8 local_ack_timeout_err[0x20];
IB/mlx5: Expose extended error counters This patch adds below requester and responder side error counters, which will be exposed by hardware counters interface and are supported as part of query Q counters command extension. +---------------------------+-------------------------------------+ | Name | Description | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |resp_local_length_error | Number of times responder detected | | | local length errors | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |resp_cqe_error | Number of CQEs completed with error | | | at responder | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |req_cqe_error | Number of CQEs completed with error | | | at requester | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |req_remote_invalid_request | Number of times requester detected | | | remote invalid request error | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |req_remote_access_error | Number of times requester detected | | | remote access error | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |resp_remote_access_error | Number of times responder detected | | | remote access error | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |resp_cqe_flush_error | Number of CQEs completed with | | | flushed with error at responder | |---------------------------+-------------------------------------| |req_cqe_flush_error | Number of CQEs completed with | | | flushed with error at requester | +---------------------------+-------------------------------------+ Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2017-06-18 22:19:37 -06:00
u8 reserved_at_320[0xa0];
u8 resp_local_length_error[0x20];
u8 req_local_length_error[0x20];
u8 resp_local_qp_error[0x20];
u8 local_operation_error[0x20];
u8 resp_local_protection[0x20];
u8 req_local_protection[0x20];
u8 resp_cqe_error[0x20];
u8 req_cqe_error[0x20];
u8 req_mw_binding[0x20];
u8 req_bad_response[0x20];
u8 req_remote_invalid_request[0x20];
u8 resp_remote_invalid_request[0x20];
u8 req_remote_access_errors[0x20];
u8 resp_remote_access_errors[0x20];
u8 req_remote_operation_errors[0x20];
u8 req_transport_retries_exceeded[0x20];
u8 cq_overflow[0x20];
u8 resp_cqe_flush_error[0x20];
u8 req_cqe_flush_error[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_620[0x20];
u8 roce_adp_retrans[0x20];
u8 roce_adp_retrans_to[0x20];
u8 roce_slow_restart[0x20];
u8 roce_slow_restart_cnps[0x20];
u8 roce_slow_restart_trans[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_6e0[0x120];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_q_counter_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x80];
u8 clear[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c1[0x1f];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x18];
u8 counter_set_id[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_pages_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Introduce Mellanox SmartNIC and modify page management logic Mellanox's SmartNIC combines embedded CPU(e.g, ARM) processing power with advanced network offloads to accelerate a multitude of security, networking and storage applications. With the introduction of the SmartNIC, there is a new PCI function called Embedded CPU Physical Function(ECPF). And it's possible for a PF to get its ICM pages from the ECPF PCI function. Driver shall identify if it is running on such a function by reading a bit in the initialization segment. When firmware asks for pages, it would issue a page request event specifying how many pages it requests and for which function. That driver responds with a manage_pages command providing the requested pages along with an indication for which function it is providing these pages. The encoding before this patch was as follows: function_id == 0: pages are requested for the function receiving the EQE. function_id != 0: pages are requested for VF identified by the function_id value A new one bit field in the EQE identifies that pages are requested for the ECPF. The notion of page_supplier can be introduced here and to support that, manage pages and query pages were modified so firmware can distinguish the following cases: 1. Function provides pages for itself 2. PF provides pages for its VF 3. ECPF provides pages to itself 4. ECPF provides pages for another function This distinction is possible through the introduction of the bit "embedded_cpu_function" in query_pages, manage_pages and page request EQE. Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2019-02-12 23:55:35 -07:00
u8 embedded_cpu_function[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 function_id[0x10];
u8 num_pages[0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_QUERY_PAGES_IN_OP_MOD_BOOT_PAGES = 0x1,
MLX5_QUERY_PAGES_IN_OP_MOD_INIT_PAGES = 0x2,
MLX5_QUERY_PAGES_IN_OP_MOD_REGULAR_PAGES = 0x3,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_pages_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Introduce Mellanox SmartNIC and modify page management logic Mellanox's SmartNIC combines embedded CPU(e.g, ARM) processing power with advanced network offloads to accelerate a multitude of security, networking and storage applications. With the introduction of the SmartNIC, there is a new PCI function called Embedded CPU Physical Function(ECPF). And it's possible for a PF to get its ICM pages from the ECPF PCI function. Driver shall identify if it is running on such a function by reading a bit in the initialization segment. When firmware asks for pages, it would issue a page request event specifying how many pages it requests and for which function. That driver responds with a manage_pages command providing the requested pages along with an indication for which function it is providing these pages. The encoding before this patch was as follows: function_id == 0: pages are requested for the function receiving the EQE. function_id != 0: pages are requested for VF identified by the function_id value A new one bit field in the EQE identifies that pages are requested for the ECPF. The notion of page_supplier can be introduced here and to support that, manage pages and query pages were modified so firmware can distinguish the following cases: 1. Function provides pages for itself 2. PF provides pages for its VF 3. ECPF provides pages to itself 4. ECPF provides pages for another function This distinction is possible through the introduction of the bit "embedded_cpu_function" in query_pages, manage_pages and page request EQE. Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2019-02-12 23:55:35 -07:00
u8 embedded_cpu_function[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 function_id[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_nic_vport_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_nic_vport_context_bits nic_vport_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_nic_vport_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x5];
u8 allowed_list_type[0x3];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_68[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_mkey_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_mkc_bits memory_key_mkey_entry;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x600];
u8 bsf0_klm0_pas_mtt0_1[16][0x8];
u8 bsf1_klm1_pas_mtt2_3[16][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_mkey_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 mkey_index[0x18];
u8 pg_access[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_61[0x1f];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_mad_demux_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 mad_dumux_parameters_block[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_mad_demux_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_l2_table_entry_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xa0];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x13];
u8 vlan_valid[0x1];
u8 vlan[0xc];
struct mlx5_ifc_mac_address_layout_bits mac_address;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0xc0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_l2_table_entry_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x60];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x140];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_issi_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 current_issi[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0xa0];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[76][0x8];
u8 supported_issi_dw0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_issi_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_driver_version_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_0[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_1[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_driver_version_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_0[0x10];
u8 reserved_1[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_2[0x40];
u8 driver_version[64][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_hca_vport_pkey_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
struct mlx5_ifc_pkey_bits pkey[];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_hca_vport_pkey_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0xb];
u8 port_num[0x4];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 pkey_index[0x10];
};
enum {
MLX5_HCA_VPORT_SEL_PORT_GUID = 1 << 0,
MLX5_HCA_VPORT_SEL_NODE_GUID = 1 << 1,
MLX5_HCA_VPORT_SEL_STATE_POLICY = 1 << 2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_hca_vport_gid_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 gids_num[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_70[0x10];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
struct mlx5_ifc_array128_auto_bits gid[];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_hca_vport_gid_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0xb];
u8 port_num[0x4];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 gid_index[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_hca_vport_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_hca_vport_context_bits hca_vport_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_hca_vport_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0xb];
u8 port_num[0x4];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_hca_cap_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
union mlx5_ifc_hca_cap_union_bits capability;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_hca_cap_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_function[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 function_id[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_other_hca_cap_bits {
u8 roce[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1[0x27f];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_other_hca_cap_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_other_hca_cap_bits other_capability;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_other_hca_cap_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 function_id[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_other_hca_cap_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_other_hca_cap_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 function_id[0x10];
u8 field_select[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_other_hca_cap_bits other_capability;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_context_bits {
u8 reformat_en[0x1];
u8 decap_en[0x1];
u8 sw_owner[0x1];
u8 termination_table[0x1];
u8 table_miss_action[0x4];
u8 level[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 log_size[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x8];
u8 table_miss_id[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 lag_master_next_table_id[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x60];
u8 sw_owner_icm_root_1[0x40];
u8 sw_owner_icm_root_0[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_flow_table_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x80];
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_context_bits flow_table_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_flow_table_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x140];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_fte_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x1c0];
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_context_bits flow_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_fte_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x40];
u8 flow_index[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0xe0];
};
enum {
MLX5_QUERY_FLOW_GROUP_OUT_MATCH_CRITERIA_ENABLE_OUTER_HEADERS = 0x0,
MLX5_QUERY_FLOW_GROUP_OUT_MATCH_CRITERIA_ENABLE_MISC_PARAMETERS = 0x1,
MLX5_QUERY_FLOW_GROUP_OUT_MATCH_CRITERIA_ENABLE_INNER_HEADERS = 0x2,
MLX5_QUERY_FLOW_GROUP_IN_MATCH_CRITERIA_ENABLE_MISC_PARAMETERS_2 = 0x3,
MLX5_QUERY_FLOW_GROUP_IN_MATCH_CRITERIA_ENABLE_MISC_PARAMETERS_3 = 0x4,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_flow_group_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xa0];
u8 start_flow_index[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0x20];
u8 end_flow_index[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0xa0];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1e0[0x18];
u8 match_criteria_enable[0x8];
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_param_bits match_criteria;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1200[0xe00];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_flow_group_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
u8 group_id[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x120];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_flow_counter_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
struct mlx5_ifc_traffic_counter_bits flow_statistics[];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_flow_counter_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x80];
u8 clear[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_c1[0xf];
u8 num_of_counters[0x10];
u8 flow_counter_id[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_esw_vport_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_esw_vport_context_bits esw_vport_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_esw_vport_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_esw_vport_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_esw_vport_context_fields_select_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x1b];
u8 fdb_to_vport_reg_c_id[0x1];
u8 vport_cvlan_insert[0x1];
u8 vport_svlan_insert[0x1];
u8 vport_cvlan_strip[0x1];
u8 vport_svlan_strip[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_esw_vport_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
struct mlx5_ifc_esw_vport_context_fields_select_bits field_select;
struct mlx5_ifc_esw_vport_context_bits esw_vport_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_eq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_eqc_bits eq_context_entry;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x40];
u8 event_bitmask[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_300[0x580];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_eq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 eq_number[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_packet_reformat_context_in_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x5];
u8 reformat_type[0x3];
u8 reserved_at_8[0xe];
u8 reformat_data_size[0xa];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 reformat_data[2][0x8];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 more_reformat_data[][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_packet_reformat_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0xa0];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
struct mlx5_ifc_packet_reformat_context_in_bits packet_reformat_context[];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_packet_reformat_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 packet_reformat_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0xa0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_packet_reformat_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 packet_reformat_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
enum mlx5_reformat_ctx_type {
MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_L2_TO_VXLAN = 0x0,
MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_L2_TO_NVGRE = 0x1,
MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_L2_TO_L2_TUNNEL = 0x2,
MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_L3_TUNNEL_TO_L2 = 0x3,
MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_L2_TO_L3_TUNNEL = 0x4,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_packet_reformat_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0xa0];
struct mlx5_ifc_packet_reformat_context_in_bits packet_reformat_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_packet_reformat_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_packet_reformat_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 packet_reformat_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_action_in_bits {
u8 action_type[0x4];
u8 field[0xc];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x3];
u8 offset[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_18[0x3];
u8 length[0x5];
u8 data[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_add_action_in_bits {
u8 action_type[0x4];
u8 field[0xc];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 data[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_copy_action_in_bits {
u8 action_type[0x4];
u8 src_field[0xc];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x3];
u8 src_offset[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_18[0x3];
u8 length[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x4];
u8 dst_field[0xc];
u8 reserved_at_30[0x3];
u8 dst_offset[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_38[0x8];
};
union mlx5_ifc_set_add_copy_action_in_auto_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_set_action_in_bits set_action_in;
struct mlx5_ifc_add_action_in_bits add_action_in;
struct mlx5_ifc_copy_action_in_bits copy_action_in;
u8 reserved_at_0[0x40];
};
enum {
MLX5_ACTION_TYPE_SET = 0x1,
MLX5_ACTION_TYPE_ADD = 0x2,
MLX5_ACTION_TYPE_COPY = 0x3,
};
enum {
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_SMAC_47_16 = 0x1,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_SMAC_15_0 = 0x2,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_ETHERTYPE = 0x3,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_DMAC_47_16 = 0x4,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_DMAC_15_0 = 0x5,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_IP_DSCP = 0x6,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_TCP_FLAGS = 0x7,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_TCP_SPORT = 0x8,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_TCP_DPORT = 0x9,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_IP_TTL = 0xa,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_UDP_SPORT = 0xb,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_UDP_DPORT = 0xc,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_SIPV6_127_96 = 0xd,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_SIPV6_95_64 = 0xe,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_SIPV6_63_32 = 0xf,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_SIPV6_31_0 = 0x10,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_DIPV6_127_96 = 0x11,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_DIPV6_95_64 = 0x12,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_DIPV6_63_32 = 0x13,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_DIPV6_31_0 = 0x14,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_SIPV4 = 0x15,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_DIPV4 = 0x16,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_FIRST_VID = 0x17,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_IPV6_HOPLIMIT = 0x47,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_METADATA_REG_A = 0x49,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_METADATA_REG_B = 0x50,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_METADATA_REG_C_0 = 0x51,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_METADATA_REG_C_1 = 0x52,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_METADATA_REG_C_2 = 0x53,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_METADATA_REG_C_3 = 0x54,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_METADATA_REG_C_4 = 0x55,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_METADATA_REG_C_5 = 0x56,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_METADATA_REG_C_6 = 0x57,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_METADATA_REG_C_7 = 0x58,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_TCP_SEQ_NUM = 0x59,
MLX5_ACTION_IN_FIELD_OUT_TCP_ACK_NUM = 0x5B,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_modify_header_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 modify_header_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_modify_header_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 table_type[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_68[0x10];
u8 num_of_actions[0x8];
union mlx5_ifc_set_add_copy_action_in_auto_bits actions[0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_modify_header_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_modify_header_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 modify_header_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_dct_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_dctc_bits dct_context_entry;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x180];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_dct_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 dctn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_cq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_cqc_bits cq_context;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x600];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_cq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 cqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_cong_status_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 enable[0x1];
u8 tag_enable[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_62[0x1e];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_cong_status_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 priority[0x4];
u8 cong_protocol[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_cong_statistics_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 rp_cur_flows[0x20];
u8 sum_flows[0x20];
u8 rp_cnp_ignored_high[0x20];
u8 rp_cnp_ignored_low[0x20];
u8 rp_cnp_handled_high[0x20];
u8 rp_cnp_handled_low[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0x100];
u8 time_stamp_high[0x20];
u8 time_stamp_low[0x20];
u8 accumulators_period[0x20];
u8 np_ecn_marked_roce_packets_high[0x20];
u8 np_ecn_marked_roce_packets_low[0x20];
u8 np_cnp_sent_high[0x20];
u8 np_cnp_sent_low[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_320[0x560];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_cong_statistics_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 clear[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0x1f];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_cong_params_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
union mlx5_ifc_cong_control_roce_ecn_auto_bits congestion_parameters;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_cong_params_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x1c];
u8 cong_protocol[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_adapter_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_query_adapter_param_block_bits query_adapter_struct;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_adapter_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qp_2rst_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qp_2rst_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qp_2err_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qp_2err_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_page_fault_resume_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_page_fault_resume_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 error[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0x4];
u8 page_fault_type[0x3];
u8 wq_number[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x8];
u8 token[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_nop_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_nop_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_vport_state_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_vport_state_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x18];
u8 admin_state[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_7c[0x4];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_tis_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_tis_bitmask_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x1d];
u8 lag_tx_port_affinity[0x1];
u8 strict_lag_tx_port_affinity[0x1];
u8 prio[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_tis_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 tisn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_tis_bitmask_bits bitmask;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_tisc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_tir_bitmask_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x1b];
u8 self_lb_en[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_3c[0x1];
u8 hash[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_3e[0x1];
u8 lro[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_tir_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_tir_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 tirn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_tir_bitmask_bits bitmask;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_tirc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_sq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_sq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 sq_state[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_44[0x4];
u8 sqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 modify_bitmask[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_sqc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_scheduling_element_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x1c0];
};
enum {
MODIFY_SCHEDULING_ELEMENT_IN_MODIFY_BITMASK_BW_SHARE = 0x1,
MODIFY_SCHEDULING_ELEMENT_IN_MODIFY_BITMASK_MAX_AVERAGE_BW = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_scheduling_element_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 scheduling_hierarchy[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_48[0x18];
u8 scheduling_element_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x20];
u8 modify_bitmask[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_scheduling_context_bits scheduling_context;
u8 reserved_at_300[0x100];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_rqt_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rqt_bitmask_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x1f];
u8 rqn_list[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_rqt_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 rqtn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_rqt_bitmask_bits bitmask;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_rqtc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_rq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
enum {
MLX5_MODIFY_RQ_IN_MODIFY_BITMASK_VSD = 1ULL << 1,
MLX5_MODIFY_RQ_IN_MODIFY_BITMASK_SCATTER_FCS = 1ULL << 2,
MLX5_MODIFY_RQ_IN_MODIFY_BITMASK_RQ_COUNTER_SET_ID = 1ULL << 3,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_rq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 rq_state[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_44[0x4];
u8 rqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 modify_bitmask[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_rqc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_rmp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_rmp_bitmask_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x1f];
u8 lwm[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_rmp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 rmp_state[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_44[0x4];
u8 rmpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_rmp_bitmask_bits bitmask;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_rmpc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_nic_vport_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_nic_vport_field_select_bits {
{net, IB}/mlx5: Manage port association for multiport RoCE When mlx5_ib_add is called determine if the mlx5 core device being added is capable of dual port RoCE operation. If it is, determine whether it is a master device or a slave device using the num_vhca_ports and affiliate_nic_vport_criteria capabilities. If the device is a slave, attempt to find a master device to affiliate it with. Devices that can be affiliated will share a system image guid. If none are found place it on a list of unaffiliated ports. If a master is found bind the port to it by configuring the port affiliation in the NIC vport context. Similarly when mlx5_ib_remove is called determine the port type. If it's a slave port, unaffiliate it from the master device, otherwise just remove it from the unaffiliated port list. The IB device is registered as a multiport device, even if a 2nd port is not available for affiliation. When the 2nd port is affiliated later the GID cache must be refreshed in order to get the default GIDs for the 2nd port in the cache. Export roce_rescan_device to provide a mechanism to refresh the cache after a new port is bound. In a multiport configuration all IB object (QP, MR, PD, etc) related commands should flow through the master mlx5_core_dev, other commands must be sent to the slave port mlx5_core_mdev, an interface is provide to get the correct mdev for non IB object commands. Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
2018-01-04 08:25:36 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x12];
u8 affiliation[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_13[0x1];
u8 disable_uc_local_lb[0x1];
u8 disable_mc_local_lb[0x1];
u8 node_guid[0x1];
u8 port_guid[0x1];
u8 min_inline[0x1];
u8 mtu[0x1];
u8 change_event[0x1];
u8 promisc[0x1];
u8 permanent_address[0x1];
u8 addresses_list[0x1];
u8 roce_en[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1f[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_nic_vport_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_nic_vport_field_select_bits field_select;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x780];
struct mlx5_ifc_nic_vport_context_bits nic_vport_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_hca_vport_context_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_hca_vport_context_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0xb];
u8 port_num[0x4];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_hca_vport_context_bits hca_vport_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_cq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
enum {
MLX5_MODIFY_CQ_IN_OP_MOD_MODIFY_CQ = 0x0,
MLX5_MODIFY_CQ_IN_OP_MOD_RESIZE_CQ = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_cq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 cqn[0x18];
union mlx5_ifc_modify_field_select_resize_field_select_auto_bits modify_field_select_resize_field_select;
struct mlx5_ifc_cqc_bits cq_context;
u8 reserved_at_280[0x60];
u8 cq_umem_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_2e1[0x1f];
u8 reserved_at_300[0x580];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_cong_status_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_cong_status_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 priority[0x4];
u8 cong_protocol[0x4];
u8 enable[0x1];
u8 tag_enable[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_62[0x1e];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_cong_params_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_cong_params_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x1c];
u8 cong_protocol[0x4];
union mlx5_ifc_field_select_802_1_r_roce_auto_bits field_select;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x80];
union mlx5_ifc_cong_control_roce_ecn_auto_bits congestion_parameters;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_manage_pages_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 output_num_entries[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
enum {
MLX5_MANAGE_PAGES_IN_OP_MOD_ALLOCATION_FAIL = 0x0,
MLX5_MANAGE_PAGES_IN_OP_MOD_ALLOCATION_SUCCESS = 0x1,
MLX5_MANAGE_PAGES_IN_OP_MOD_HCA_RETURN_PAGES = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_manage_pages_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Introduce Mellanox SmartNIC and modify page management logic Mellanox's SmartNIC combines embedded CPU(e.g, ARM) processing power with advanced network offloads to accelerate a multitude of security, networking and storage applications. With the introduction of the SmartNIC, there is a new PCI function called Embedded CPU Physical Function(ECPF). And it's possible for a PF to get its ICM pages from the ECPF PCI function. Driver shall identify if it is running on such a function by reading a bit in the initialization segment. When firmware asks for pages, it would issue a page request event specifying how many pages it requests and for which function. That driver responds with a manage_pages command providing the requested pages along with an indication for which function it is providing these pages. The encoding before this patch was as follows: function_id == 0: pages are requested for the function receiving the EQE. function_id != 0: pages are requested for VF identified by the function_id value A new one bit field in the EQE identifies that pages are requested for the ECPF. The notion of page_supplier can be introduced here and to support that, manage pages and query pages were modified so firmware can distinguish the following cases: 1. Function provides pages for itself 2. PF provides pages for its VF 3. ECPF provides pages to itself 4. ECPF provides pages for another function This distinction is possible through the introduction of the bit "embedded_cpu_function" in query_pages, manage_pages and page request EQE. Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2019-02-12 23:55:35 -07:00
u8 embedded_cpu_function[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 function_id[0x10];
u8 input_num_entries[0x20];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mad_ifc_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 response_mad_packet[256][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mad_ifc_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 remote_lid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_50[0x8];
u8 port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 mad[256][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_init_hca_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_init_hca_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 sw_owner_id[4][0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_init2rtr_qp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_init2rtr_qp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 opt_param_mask[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_qpc_bits qpc;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_800[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_init2init_qp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_init2init_qp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 opt_param_mask[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_qpc_bits qpc;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_800[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_get_dropped_packet_log_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 packet_headers_log[128][0x8];
u8 packet_syndrome[64][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_get_dropped_packet_log_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_gen_eqe_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 eq_number[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 eqe[64][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_gen_eq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_enable_hca_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_enable_hca_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 embedded_cpu_function[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 function_id[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_drain_dct_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_drain_dct_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 dctn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_disable_hca_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_disable_hca_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 embedded_cpu_function[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 function_id[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_detach_from_mcg_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_detach_from_mcg_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 multicast_gid[16][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_xrq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_xrq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 xrqn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_xrc_srq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_xrc_srq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 xrc_srqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_tis_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_tis_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 tisn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_tir_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_tir_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 tirn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_srq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_srq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 srqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_sq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_sq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 sqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_scheduling_element_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x1c0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_scheduling_element_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 scheduling_hierarchy[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_48[0x18];
u8 scheduling_element_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x180];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_rqt_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_rqt_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 rqtn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_rq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_rq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 rqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_delay_drop_params_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 delay_drop_timeout[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_delay_drop_params_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_rmp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_rmp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 rmpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_qp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_qp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_psv_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_psv_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 psvn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_mkey_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_mkey_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 mkey_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_flow_table_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_flow_table_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x140];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_flow_group_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_flow_group_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
u8 group_id[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x120];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_eq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_eq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 eq_number[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_dct_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_dct_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 dctn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_cq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_cq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 cqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_delete_vxlan_udp_dport_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_delete_vxlan_udp_dport_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 vxlan_udp_port[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_delete_l2_table_entry_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_delete_l2_table_entry_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x60];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x140];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_delete_fte_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_delete_fte_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x40];
u8 flow_index[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0xe0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_xrcd_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_xrcd_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 xrcd[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_uar_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_uar_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 uar[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_transport_domain_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_transport_domain_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 transport_domain[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_q_counter_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_q_counter_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 counter_set_id[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_pd_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_pd_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 pd[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_flow_counter_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_flow_counter_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 flow_counter_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_xrq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 xrqn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_xrq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_xrqc_bits xrq_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_xrc_srq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 xrc_srqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_xrc_srq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_xrc_srqc_bits xrc_srq_context_entry;
u8 reserved_at_280[0x60];
u8 xrc_srq_umem_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_2e1[0x1f];
u8 reserved_at_300[0x580];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_tis_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 tisn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_tis_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_tisc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_tir_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 icm_address_63_40[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 icm_address_39_32[0x8];
u8 tirn[0x18];
u8 icm_address_31_0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_tir_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_tirc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_srq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 srqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_srq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_srqc_bits srq_context_entry;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x600];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_sq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 sqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_sq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_sqc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_scheduling_element_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 scheduling_element_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x160];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_scheduling_element_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 scheduling_hierarchy[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_48[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_60[0xa0];
struct mlx5_ifc_scheduling_context_bits scheduling_context;
u8 reserved_at_300[0x100];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_rqt_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 rqtn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_rqt_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_rqtc_bits rqt_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_rq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 rqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_rq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_rqc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_rmp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 rmpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_rmp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc0];
struct mlx5_ifc_rmpc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_qp_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
u8 ece[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_qp_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 opt_param_mask[0x20];
u8 ece[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_qpc_bits qpc;
u8 reserved_at_800[0x60];
u8 wq_umem_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_861[0x1f];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_psv_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x8];
u8 psv0_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 psv1_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8];
u8 psv2_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x8];
u8 psv3_index[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_psv_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 num_psv[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_44[0x4];
u8 pd[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_mkey_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 mkey_index[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_mkey_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 pg_access[0x1];
u8 mkey_umem_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_62[0x1e];
struct mlx5_ifc_mkc_bits memory_key_mkey_entry;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x80];
u8 translations_octword_actual_size[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_320[0x560];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 klm_pas_mtt[][0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE_NIC_RX = 0x0,
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE_NIC_TX = 0x1,
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE_ESW_EGRESS_ACL = 0x2,
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE_ESW_INGRESS_ACL = 0x3,
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE_FDB = 0X4,
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE_SNIFFER_RX = 0X5,
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE_SNIFFER_TX = 0X6,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_flow_table_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 icm_address_63_40[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 icm_address_39_32[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
u8 icm_address_31_0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_flow_table_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_context_bits flow_table_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_flow_group_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 group_id[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_CREATE_FLOW_GROUP_IN_MATCH_CRITERIA_ENABLE_OUTER_HEADERS = 0x0,
MLX5_CREATE_FLOW_GROUP_IN_MATCH_CRITERIA_ENABLE_MISC_PARAMETERS = 0x1,
MLX5_CREATE_FLOW_GROUP_IN_MATCH_CRITERIA_ENABLE_INNER_HEADERS = 0x2,
MLX5_CREATE_FLOW_GROUP_IN_MATCH_CRITERIA_ENABLE_MISC_PARAMETERS_2 = 0x3,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_flow_group_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
u8 source_eswitch_owner_vhca_id_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_c1[0x1f];
u8 start_flow_index[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0x20];
u8 end_flow_index[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0xa0];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1e0[0x18];
u8 match_criteria_enable[0x8];
struct mlx5_ifc_fte_match_param_bits match_criteria;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1200[0xe00];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_eq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 eq_number[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_eq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_eqc_bits eq_context_entry;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x40];
u8 event_bitmask[4][0x40];
u8 reserved_at_3c0[0x4c0];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_dct_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 dctn[0x18];
u8 ece[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_dct_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_dctc_bits dct_context_entry;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_280[0x180];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_cq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 cqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_cq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_cqc_bits cq_context;
u8 reserved_at_280[0x60];
u8 cq_umem_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_2e1[0x59f];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 pas[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_config_int_moderation_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x4];
u8 min_delay[0xc];
u8 int_vector[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_CONFIG_INT_MODERATION_IN_OP_MOD_WRITE = 0x0,
MLX5_CONFIG_INT_MODERATION_IN_OP_MOD_READ = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_config_int_moderation_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x4];
u8 min_delay[0xc];
u8 int_vector[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_attach_to_mcg_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_attach_to_mcg_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 multicast_gid[16][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_arm_xrq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_arm_xrq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 xrqn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 lwm[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_arm_xrc_srq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
enum {
MLX5_ARM_XRC_SRQ_IN_OP_MOD_XRC_SRQ = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_arm_xrc_srq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 xrc_srqn[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 lwm[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_arm_rq_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
enum {
MLX5_ARM_RQ_IN_OP_MOD_SRQ = 0x1,
MLX5_ARM_RQ_IN_OP_MOD_XRQ = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_arm_rq_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 srq_number[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 lwm[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_arm_dct_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_arm_dct_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 dct_number[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_xrcd_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 xrcd[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_xrcd_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_uar_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 uar[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_uar_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_transport_domain_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 transport_domain[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_transport_domain_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_q_counter_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 counter_set_id[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_q_counter_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_pd_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 pd[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_pd_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_flow_counter_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 flow_counter_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_flow_counter_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x38];
u8 flow_counter_bulk[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_add_vxlan_udp_dport_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_add_vxlan_udp_dport_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 vxlan_udp_port[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_pp_rate_limit_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_pp_rate_limit_context_bits {
u8 rate_limit[0x20];
u8 burst_upper_bound[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 typical_packet_size[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x120];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_pp_rate_limit_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 rate_limit_index[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_set_pp_rate_limit_context_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_access_register_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 register_data[][0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_ACCESS_REGISTER_IN_OP_MOD_WRITE = 0x0,
MLX5_ACCESS_REGISTER_IN_OP_MOD_READ = 0x1,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_access_register_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 register_id[0x10];
u8 argument[0x20];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 register_data[][0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sltp_reg_bits {
u8 status[0x4];
u8 version[0x4];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 pnat[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_12[0x2];
u8 lane[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x7];
u8 polarity[0x1];
u8 ob_tap0[0x8];
u8 ob_tap1[0x8];
u8 ob_tap2[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0xc];
u8 ob_preemp_mode[0x4];
u8 ob_reg[0x8];
u8 ob_bias[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_slrg_reg_bits {
u8 status[0x4];
u8 version[0x4];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 pnat[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_12[0x2];
u8 lane[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x8];
u8 time_to_link_up[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_30[0xc];
u8 grade_lane_speed[0x4];
u8 grade_version[0x8];
u8 grade[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x4];
u8 height_grade_type[0x4];
u8 height_grade[0x18];
u8 height_dz[0x10];
u8 height_dv[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x10];
u8 height_sigma[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x4];
u8 phase_grade_type[0x4];
u8 phase_grade[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0x8];
u8 phase_eo_pos[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_110[0x8];
u8 phase_eo_neg[0x8];
u8 ffe_set_tested[0x10];
u8 test_errors_per_lane[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pvlc_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x1c];
u8 vl_hw_cap[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x1c];
u8 vl_admin[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x1c];
u8 vl_operational[0x4];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pude_reg_bits {
u8 swid[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x4];
u8 admin_status[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x4];
u8 oper_status[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ptys_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x1];
u8 an_disable_admin[0x1];
u8 an_disable_cap[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_3[0x5];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0xd];
u8 proto_mask[0x3];
u8 an_status[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_24[0xc];
u8 data_rate_oper[0x10];
u8 ext_eth_proto_capability[0x20];
u8 eth_proto_capability[0x20];
u8 ib_link_width_capability[0x10];
u8 ib_proto_capability[0x10];
u8 ext_eth_proto_admin[0x20];
u8 eth_proto_admin[0x20];
u8 ib_link_width_admin[0x10];
u8 ib_proto_admin[0x10];
u8 ext_eth_proto_oper[0x20];
u8 eth_proto_oper[0x20];
u8 ib_link_width_oper[0x10];
u8 ib_proto_oper[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_160[0x1c];
u8 connector_type[0x4];
u8 eth_proto_lp_advertise[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1a0[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mlcr_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x20];
u8 beacon_duration[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 beacon_remain[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ptas_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
u8 algorithm_options[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_30[0x4];
u8 repetitions_mode[0x4];
u8 num_of_repetitions[0x8];
u8 grade_version[0x8];
u8 height_grade_type[0x4];
u8 phase_grade_type[0x4];
u8 height_grade_weight[0x8];
u8 phase_grade_weight[0x8];
u8 gisim_measure_bits[0x10];
u8 adaptive_tap_measure_bits[0x10];
u8 ber_bath_high_error_threshold[0x10];
u8 ber_bath_mid_error_threshold[0x10];
u8 ber_bath_low_error_threshold[0x10];
u8 one_ratio_high_threshold[0x10];
u8 one_ratio_high_mid_threshold[0x10];
u8 one_ratio_low_mid_threshold[0x10];
u8 one_ratio_low_threshold[0x10];
u8 ndeo_error_threshold[0x10];
u8 mixer_offset_step_size[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_110[0x8];
u8 mix90_phase_for_voltage_bath[0x8];
u8 mixer_offset_start[0x10];
u8 mixer_offset_end[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0x15];
u8 ber_test_time[0xb];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pspa_reg_bits {
u8 swid[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 sub_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pqdr_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x5];
u8 prio[0x3];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x6];
u8 mode[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 min_threshold[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 max_threshold[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x10];
u8 mark_probability_denominator[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ppsc_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x60];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x1c];
u8 wrps_admin[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x1c];
u8 wrps_status[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8];
u8 up_threshold[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_d0[0x8];
u8 down_threshold[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_100[0x1c];
u8 srps_admin[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_120[0x1c];
u8 srps_status[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pplr_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x8];
u8 lb_cap[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_30[0x8];
u8 lb_en[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pplm_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
u8 port_profile_mode[0x8];
u8 static_port_profile[0x8];
u8 active_port_profile[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_58[0x8];
u8 retransmission_active[0x8];
u8 fec_mode_active[0x18];
u8 rs_fec_correction_bypass_cap[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_84[0x8];
u8 fec_override_cap_56g[0x4];
u8 fec_override_cap_100g[0x4];
u8 fec_override_cap_50g[0x4];
u8 fec_override_cap_25g[0x4];
u8 fec_override_cap_10g_40g[0x4];
u8 rs_fec_correction_bypass_admin[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_a4[0x8];
u8 fec_override_admin_56g[0x4];
u8 fec_override_admin_100g[0x4];
u8 fec_override_admin_50g[0x4];
u8 fec_override_admin_25g[0x4];
u8 fec_override_admin_10g_40g[0x4];
u8 fec_override_cap_400g_8x[0x10];
u8 fec_override_cap_200g_4x[0x10];
u8 fec_override_cap_100g_2x[0x10];
u8 fec_override_cap_50g_1x[0x10];
u8 fec_override_admin_400g_8x[0x10];
u8 fec_override_admin_200g_4x[0x10];
u8 fec_override_admin_100g_2x[0x10];
u8 fec_override_admin_50g_1x[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ppcnt_reg_bits {
u8 swid[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 pnat[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_12[0x8];
u8 grp[0x6];
u8 clr[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_21[0x1c];
u8 prio_tc[0x3];
union mlx5_ifc_eth_cntrs_grp_data_layout_auto_bits counter_set;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mpein_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x2];
u8 depth[0x6];
u8 pcie_index[0x8];
u8 node[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_18[0x8];
u8 capability_mask[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 link_width_enabled[0x8];
u8 link_speed_enabled[0x10];
u8 lane0_physical_position[0x8];
u8 link_width_active[0x8];
u8 link_speed_active[0x10];
u8 num_of_pfs[0x10];
u8 num_of_vfs[0x10];
u8 bdf0[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_b0[0x10];
u8 max_read_request_size[0x4];
u8 max_payload_size[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_c8[0x5];
u8 pwr_status[0x3];
u8 port_type[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_d4[0xb];
u8 lane_reversal[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x14];
u8 pci_power[0xc];
u8 reserved_at_100[0x20];
u8 device_status[0x10];
u8 port_state[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_138[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_140[0x10];
u8 receiver_detect_result[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_160[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mpcnt_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 pcie_index[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0xa];
u8 grp[0x6];
u8 clr[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_21[0x1f];
union mlx5_ifc_pcie_cntrs_grp_data_layout_auto_bits counter_set;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ppad_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x3];
u8 single_mac[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_4[0x4];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 mac_47_32[0x10];
u8 mac_31_0[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pmtu_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 max_mtu[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_30[0x10];
u8 admin_mtu[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_50[0x10];
u8 oper_mtu[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_70[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pmpr_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 module[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x18];
u8 attenuation_5g[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 attenuation_7g[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x18];
u8 attenuation_12g[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pmpe_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 module[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0xc];
u8 module_status[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pmpc_reg_bits {
u8 module_state_updated[32][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pmlpn_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x4];
u8 mlpn_status[0x4];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 e[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_21[0x1f];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pmlp_reg_bits {
u8 rxtx[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1[0x7];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 width[0x8];
u8 lane0_module_mapping[0x20];
u8 lane1_module_mapping[0x20];
u8 lane2_module_mapping[0x20];
u8 lane3_module_mapping[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x160];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pmaos_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 module[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x4];
u8 admin_status[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x4];
u8 oper_status[0x4];
u8 ase[0x1];
u8 ee[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_22[0x1c];
u8 e[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_plpc_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x4];
u8 profile_id[0xc];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x4];
u8 proto_mask[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 lane_speed[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x17];
u8 lpbf[0x1];
u8 fec_mode_policy[0x8];
u8 retransmission_capability[0x8];
u8 fec_mode_capability[0x18];
u8 retransmission_support_admin[0x8];
u8 fec_mode_support_admin[0x18];
u8 retransmission_request_admin[0x8];
u8 fec_mode_request_admin[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_plib_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 ib_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_plbf_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0xd];
u8 lbf_mode[0x3];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pipg_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 dic[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_21[0x19];
u8 ipg[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_3e[0x2];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pifr_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0xe0];
u8 port_filter[8][0x20];
u8 port_filter_update_en[8][0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pfcc_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0xb];
u8 ppan_mask_n[0x1];
u8 minor_stall_mask[0x1];
u8 critical_stall_mask[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1e[0x2];
u8 ppan[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_24[0x4];
u8 prio_mask_tx[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_30[0x8];
u8 prio_mask_rx[0x8];
u8 pptx[0x1];
u8 aptx[0x1];
u8 pptx_mask_n[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_43[0x5];
u8 pfctx[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_50[0x10];
u8 pprx[0x1];
u8 aprx[0x1];
u8 pprx_mask_n[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_63[0x5];
u8 pfcrx[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_70[0x10];
u8 device_stall_minor_watermark[0x10];
u8 device_stall_critical_watermark[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pelc_reg_bits {
u8 op[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_4[0x4];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 op_admin[0x8];
u8 op_capability[0x8];
u8 op_request[0x8];
u8 op_active[0x8];
u8 admin[0x40];
u8 capability[0x40];
u8 request[0x40];
u8 active[0x40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_140[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_peir_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0xc];
u8 error_count[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_30[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xc];
u8 lane[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_50[0x8];
u8 error_type[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mpegc_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x30];
u8 field_select[0x10];
u8 tx_overflow_sense[0x1];
u8 mark_cqe[0x1];
u8 mark_cnp[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_43[0x1b];
u8 tx_lossy_overflow_oper[0x2];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x100];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pcam_enhanced_features_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x68];
u8 fec_50G_per_lane_in_pplm[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_69[0x4];
u8 rx_icrc_encapsulated_counter[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_6e[0x4];
u8 ptys_extended_ethernet[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_73[0x3];
u8 pfcc_mask[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_77[0x3];
u8 per_lane_error_counters[0x1];
u8 rx_buffer_fullness_counters[0x1];
u8 ptys_connector_type[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_7d[0x1];
u8 ppcnt_discard_group[0x1];
u8 ppcnt_statistical_group[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pcam_regs_5000_to_507f_bits {
u8 port_access_reg_cap_mask_127_to_96[0x20];
u8 port_access_reg_cap_mask_95_to_64[0x20];
u8 port_access_reg_cap_mask_63_to_36[0x1c];
u8 pplm[0x1];
u8 port_access_reg_cap_mask_34_to_32[0x3];
u8 port_access_reg_cap_mask_31_to_13[0x13];
u8 pbmc[0x1];
u8 pptb[0x1];
u8 port_access_reg_cap_mask_10_to_09[0x2];
u8 ppcnt[0x1];
u8 port_access_reg_cap_mask_07_to_00[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pcam_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 feature_group[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 access_reg_group[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
union {
struct mlx5_ifc_pcam_regs_5000_to_507f_bits regs_5000_to_507f;
u8 reserved_at_0[0x80];
} port_access_reg_cap_mask;
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x80];
union {
struct mlx5_ifc_pcam_enhanced_features_bits enhanced_features;
u8 reserved_at_0[0x80];
} feature_cap_mask;
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0xc0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcam_enhanced_features_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x6e];
u8 pci_status_and_power[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_6f[0x5];
u8 mark_tx_action_cnp[0x1];
u8 mark_tx_action_cqe[0x1];
u8 dynamic_tx_overflow[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_77[0x4];
u8 pcie_outbound_stalled[0x1];
u8 tx_overflow_buffer_pkt[0x1];
u8 mtpps_enh_out_per_adj[0x1];
u8 mtpps_fs[0x1];
u8 pcie_performance_group[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcam_access_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x1c];
u8 mcda[0x1];
u8 mcc[0x1];
u8 mcqi[0x1];
u8 mcqs[0x1];
u8 regs_95_to_87[0x9];
u8 mpegc[0x1];
u8 regs_85_to_68[0x12];
u8 tracer_registers[0x4];
u8 regs_63_to_32[0x20];
u8 regs_31_to_0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcam_access_reg_bits1 {
u8 regs_127_to_96[0x20];
u8 regs_95_to_64[0x20];
u8 regs_63_to_32[0x20];
u8 regs_31_to_0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcam_access_reg_bits2 {
u8 regs_127_to_99[0x1d];
u8 mirc[0x1];
u8 regs_97_to_96[0x2];
u8 regs_95_to_64[0x20];
u8 regs_63_to_32[0x20];
u8 regs_31_to_0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcam_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 feature_group[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 access_reg_group[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
union {
struct mlx5_ifc_mcam_access_reg_bits access_regs;
struct mlx5_ifc_mcam_access_reg_bits1 access_regs1;
struct mlx5_ifc_mcam_access_reg_bits2 access_regs2;
u8 reserved_at_0[0x80];
} mng_access_reg_cap_mask;
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x80];
union {
struct mlx5_ifc_mcam_enhanced_features_bits enhanced_features;
u8 reserved_at_0[0x80];
} mng_feature_cap_mask;
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qcam_access_reg_cap_mask {
u8 qcam_access_reg_cap_mask_127_to_20[0x6C];
u8 qpdpm[0x1];
u8 qcam_access_reg_cap_mask_18_to_4[0x0F];
u8 qdpm[0x1];
u8 qpts[0x1];
u8 qcap[0x1];
u8 qcam_access_reg_cap_mask_0[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qcam_qos_feature_cap_mask {
u8 qcam_qos_feature_cap_mask_127_to_1[0x7F];
u8 qpts_trust_both[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qcam_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 feature_group[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 access_reg_group[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
union {
struct mlx5_ifc_qcam_access_reg_cap_mask reg_cap;
u8 reserved_at_0[0x80];
} qos_access_reg_cap_mask;
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x80];
union {
struct mlx5_ifc_qcam_qos_feature_cap_mask feature_cap;
u8 reserved_at_0[0x80];
} qos_feature_cap_mask;
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0x80];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_core_dump_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x18];
u8 core_dump_type[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x30];
u8 vhca_id[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x8];
u8 qpn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x180];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pcap_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 port_capability_mask[4][0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_paos_reg_bits {
u8 swid[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x4];
u8 admin_status[0x4];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_18[0x4];
u8 oper_status[0x4];
u8 ase[0x1];
u8 ee[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_22[0x1c];
u8 e[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pamp_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 opamp_group[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0xc];
u8 opamp_group_type[0x4];
u8 start_index[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_30[0x4];
u8 num_of_indices[0xc];
u8 index_data[18][0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pcmr_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 entropy_force_cap[0x1];
u8 entropy_calc_cap[0x1];
u8 entropy_gre_calc_cap[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_23[0x1b];
u8 fcs_cap[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_3f[0x1];
u8 entropy_force[0x1];
u8 entropy_calc[0x1];
u8 entropy_gre_calc[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_43[0x1b];
u8 fcs_chk[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_5f[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_lane_2_module_mapping_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x6];
u8 rx_lane[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x6];
u8 tx_lane[0x2];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 module[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_bufferx_reg_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x6];
u8 lossy[0x1];
u8 epsb[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0xc];
u8 size[0xc];
u8 xoff_threshold[0x10];
u8 xon_threshold[0x10];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_node_in_bits {
u8 node_description[64][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_register_power_settings_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x18];
u8 power_settings_level[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_register_host_endianness_bits {
u8 he[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1[0x1f];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_umr_pointer_desc_argument_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
u8 mkey[0x20];
u8 addressh_63_32[0x20];
u8 addressl_31_0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ud_adrs_vector_bits {
u8 dc_key[0x40];
u8 ext[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_41[0x7];
u8 destination_qp_dct[0x18];
u8 static_rate[0x4];
u8 sl_eth_prio[0x4];
u8 fl[0x1];
u8 mlid[0x7];
u8 rlid_udp_sport[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80[0x20];
u8 rmac_47_16[0x20];
u8 rmac_15_0[0x10];
u8 tclass[0x8];
u8 hop_limit[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x1];
u8 grh[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e2[0x2];
u8 src_addr_index[0x8];
u8 flow_label[0x14];
u8 rgid_rip[16][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pages_req_event_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x10];
u8 function_id[0x10];
u8 num_pages[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0xa0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_eqe_bits {
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 event_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 event_sub_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0xe0];
union mlx5_ifc_event_auto_bits event_data;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1e0[0x10];
u8 signature[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1f8[0x7];
u8 owner[0x1];
};
enum {
MLX5_CMD_QUEUE_ENTRY_TYPE_PCIE_CMD_IF_TRANSPORT = 0x7,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_queue_entry_bits {
u8 type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 input_length[0x20];
u8 input_mailbox_pointer_63_32[0x20];
u8 input_mailbox_pointer_31_9[0x17];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_77[0x9];
u8 command_input_inline_data[16][0x8];
u8 command_output_inline_data[16][0x8];
u8 output_mailbox_pointer_63_32[0x20];
u8 output_mailbox_pointer_31_9[0x17];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1b7[0x9];
u8 output_length[0x20];
u8 token[0x8];
u8 signature[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1f0[0x8];
u8 status[0x7];
u8 ownership[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 command_output[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 command[][0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_if_box_bits {
u8 mailbox_data[512][0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1000[0x180];
u8 next_pointer_63_32[0x20];
u8 next_pointer_31_10[0x16];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_11b6[0xa];
u8 block_number[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_11e0[0x8];
u8 token[0x8];
u8 ctrl_signature[0x8];
u8 signature[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mtt_bits {
u8 ptag_63_32[0x20];
u8 ptag_31_8[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_38[0x6];
u8 wr_en[0x1];
u8 rd_en[0x1];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_wol_rol_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 rol_mode[0x8];
u8 wol_mode[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_wol_rol_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_wol_rol_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_wol_rol_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 rol_mode_valid[0x1];
u8 wol_mode_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_42[0xe];
u8 rol_mode[0x8];
u8 wol_mode[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_NIC_INTERFACE_FULL_DRIVER = 0x0,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_NIC_INTERFACE_DISABLED = 0x1,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_NIC_INTERFACE_NO_DRAM_NIC = 0x2,
};
enum {
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_NIC_INTERFACE_SUPPORTED_FULL_DRIVER = 0x0,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_NIC_INTERFACE_SUPPORTED_DISABLED = 0x1,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_NIC_INTERFACE_SUPPORTED_NO_DRAM_NIC = 0x2,
};
enum {
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_FW_INTERNAL_ERR = 0x1,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_DEAD_IRISC = 0x7,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_HW_FATAL_ERR = 0x8,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_FW_CRC_ERR = 0x9,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_ICM_FETCH_PCI_ERR = 0xa,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_ICM_PAGE_ERR = 0xb,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_ASYNCHRONOUS_EQ_BUF_OVERRUN = 0xc,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_EQ_IN_ERR = 0xd,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_EQ_INV = 0xe,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_FFSER_ERR = 0xf,
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_HEALTH_SYNDROME_HIGH_TEMP_ERR = 0x10,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_initial_seg_bits {
u8 fw_rev_minor[0x10];
u8 fw_rev_major[0x10];
u8 cmd_interface_rev[0x10];
u8 fw_rev_subminor[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 cmdq_phy_addr_63_32[0x20];
u8 cmdq_phy_addr_31_12[0x14];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_b4[0x2];
u8 nic_interface[0x2];
u8 log_cmdq_size[0x4];
u8 log_cmdq_stride[0x4];
u8 command_doorbell_vector[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_e0[0xf00];
u8 initializing[0x1];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_fe1[0x4];
u8 nic_interface_supported[0x3];
net/mlx5: Introduce Mellanox SmartNIC and modify page management logic Mellanox's SmartNIC combines embedded CPU(e.g, ARM) processing power with advanced network offloads to accelerate a multitude of security, networking and storage applications. With the introduction of the SmartNIC, there is a new PCI function called Embedded CPU Physical Function(ECPF). And it's possible for a PF to get its ICM pages from the ECPF PCI function. Driver shall identify if it is running on such a function by reading a bit in the initialization segment. When firmware asks for pages, it would issue a page request event specifying how many pages it requests and for which function. That driver responds with a manage_pages command providing the requested pages along with an indication for which function it is providing these pages. The encoding before this patch was as follows: function_id == 0: pages are requested for the function receiving the EQE. function_id != 0: pages are requested for VF identified by the function_id value A new one bit field in the EQE identifies that pages are requested for the ECPF. The notion of page_supplier can be introduced here and to support that, manage pages and query pages were modified so firmware can distinguish the following cases: 1. Function provides pages for itself 2. PF provides pages for its VF 3. ECPF provides pages to itself 4. ECPF provides pages for another function This distinction is possible through the introduction of the bit "embedded_cpu_function" in query_pages, manage_pages and page request EQE. Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2019-02-12 23:55:35 -07:00
u8 embedded_cpu[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_fe9[0x17];
struct mlx5_ifc_health_buffer_bits health_buffer;
u8 no_dram_nic_offset[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_1220[0x6e40];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8060[0x1f];
u8 clear_int[0x1];
u8 health_syndrome[0x8];
u8 health_counter[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_80a0[0x17fc0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mtpps_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0xc];
u8 cap_number_of_pps_pins[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x4];
u8 cap_max_num_of_pps_in_pins[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_18[0x4];
u8 cap_max_num_of_pps_out_pins[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x24];
u8 cap_pin_3_mode[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_48[0x4];
u8 cap_pin_2_mode[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_50[0x4];
u8 cap_pin_1_mode[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_58[0x4];
u8 cap_pin_0_mode[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x4];
u8 cap_pin_7_mode[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_68[0x4];
u8 cap_pin_6_mode[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_70[0x4];
u8 cap_pin_5_mode[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_78[0x4];
u8 cap_pin_4_mode[0x4];
u8 field_select[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x60];
u8 enable[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_101[0xb];
u8 pattern[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_110[0x4];
u8 pin_mode[0x4];
u8 pin[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_120[0x20];
u8 time_stamp[0x40];
u8 out_pulse_duration[0x10];
u8 out_periodic_adjustment[0x10];
u8 enhanced_out_periodic_adjustment[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mtppse_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x18];
u8 pin[0x8];
u8 event_arm[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_21[0x1b];
u8 event_generation_mode[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcqs_reg_bits {
u8 last_index_flag[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1[0x7];
u8 fw_device[0x8];
u8 component_index[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 identifier[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x17];
u8 component_status[0x5];
u8 component_update_state[0x4];
u8 last_update_state_changer_type[0x4];
u8 last_update_state_changer_host_id[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_68[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcqi_cap_bits {
u8 supported_info_bitmask[0x20];
u8 component_size[0x20];
u8 max_component_size[0x20];
u8 log_mcda_word_size[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_64[0xc];
u8 mcda_max_write_size[0x10];
u8 rd_en[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_81[0x1];
u8 match_chip_id[0x1];
u8 match_psid[0x1];
u8 check_user_timestamp[0x1];
u8 match_base_guid_mac[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_86[0x1a];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcqi_version_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x2];
u8 build_time_valid[0x1];
u8 user_defined_time_valid[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_4[0x14];
u8 version_string_length[0x8];
u8 version[0x20];
u8 build_time[0x40];
u8 user_defined_time[0x40];
u8 build_tool_version[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x20];
u8 version_string[92][0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcqi_activation_method_bits {
u8 pending_server_ac_power_cycle[0x1];
u8 pending_server_dc_power_cycle[0x1];
u8 pending_server_reboot[0x1];
u8 pending_fw_reset[0x1];
u8 auto_activate[0x1];
u8 all_hosts_sync[0x1];
u8 device_hw_reset[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_7[0x19];
};
union mlx5_ifc_mcqi_reg_data_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_mcqi_cap_bits mcqi_caps;
struct mlx5_ifc_mcqi_version_bits mcqi_version;
struct mlx5_ifc_mcqi_activation_method_bits mcqi_activation_mathod;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcqi_reg_bits {
u8 read_pending_component[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1[0xf];
u8 component_index[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x1b];
u8 info_type[0x5];
u8 info_size[0x20];
u8 offset[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x10];
u8 data_size[0x10];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
union mlx5_ifc_mcqi_reg_data_bits data[];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcc_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x4];
u8 time_elapsed_since_last_cmd[0xc];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 instruction[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 component_index[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x8];
u8 update_handle[0x18];
u8 handle_owner_type[0x4];
u8 handle_owner_host_id[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_68[0x1];
u8 control_progress[0x7];
u8 error_code[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_78[0x4];
u8 control_state[0x4];
u8 component_size[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x60];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcda_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 update_handle[0x18];
u8 offset[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 size[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 data[0][0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_MFRL_REG_RESET_TYPE_FULL_CHIP = BIT(0),
MLX5_MFRL_REG_RESET_TYPE_NET_PORT_ALIVE = BIT(1),
};
enum {
MLX5_MFRL_REG_RESET_LEVEL0 = BIT(0),
MLX5_MFRL_REG_RESET_LEVEL3 = BIT(3),
MLX5_MFRL_REG_RESET_LEVEL6 = BIT(6),
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mfrl_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x2];
u8 pci_sync_for_fw_update_start[0x1];
u8 pci_sync_for_fw_update_resp[0x2];
u8 rst_type_sel[0x3];
u8 reserved_at_28[0x8];
u8 reset_type[0x8];
u8 reset_level[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mirc_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x18];
u8 status_code[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
};
union mlx5_ifc_ports_control_registers_document_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_bufferx_reg_bits bufferx_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_2819_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits eth_2819_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_2863_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits eth_2863_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_3635_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits eth_3635_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_802_3_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits eth_802_3_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_extended_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits eth_extended_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_per_prio_grp_data_layout_bits eth_per_prio_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_per_tc_prio_grp_data_layout_bits eth_per_tc_prio_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_eth_per_tc_congest_prio_grp_data_layout_bits eth_per_tc_congest_prio_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_lane_2_module_mapping_bits lane_2_module_mapping;
struct mlx5_ifc_pamp_reg_bits pamp_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_paos_reg_bits paos_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pcap_reg_bits pcap_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_peir_reg_bits peir_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pelc_reg_bits pelc_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pfcc_reg_bits pfcc_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_ib_port_cntrs_grp_data_layout_bits ib_port_cntrs_grp_data_layout;
struct mlx5_ifc_phys_layer_cntrs_bits phys_layer_cntrs;
struct mlx5_ifc_pifr_reg_bits pifr_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pipg_reg_bits pipg_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_plbf_reg_bits plbf_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_plib_reg_bits plib_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_plpc_reg_bits plpc_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pmaos_reg_bits pmaos_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pmlp_reg_bits pmlp_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pmlpn_reg_bits pmlpn_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pmpc_reg_bits pmpc_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pmpe_reg_bits pmpe_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pmpr_reg_bits pmpr_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pmtu_reg_bits pmtu_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_ppad_reg_bits ppad_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_ppcnt_reg_bits ppcnt_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_mpein_reg_bits mpein_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_mpcnt_reg_bits mpcnt_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pplm_reg_bits pplm_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pplr_reg_bits pplr_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_ppsc_reg_bits ppsc_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pqdr_reg_bits pqdr_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pspa_reg_bits pspa_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_ptas_reg_bits ptas_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_ptys_reg_bits ptys_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_mlcr_reg_bits mlcr_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pude_reg_bits pude_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_pvlc_reg_bits pvlc_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_slrg_reg_bits slrg_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_sltp_reg_bits sltp_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_mtpps_reg_bits mtpps_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_mtppse_reg_bits mtppse_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_fpga_access_reg_bits fpga_access_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_fpga_ctrl_bits fpga_ctrl_bits;
struct mlx5_ifc_fpga_cap_bits fpga_cap_bits;
struct mlx5_ifc_mcqi_reg_bits mcqi_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_mcc_reg_bits mcc_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_mcda_reg_bits mcda_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_mirc_reg_bits mirc_reg;
struct mlx5_ifc_mfrl_reg_bits mfrl_reg;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x60e0];
};
union mlx5_ifc_debug_enhancements_document_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_health_buffer_bits health_buffer;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x200];
};
union mlx5_ifc_uplink_pci_interface_document_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_initial_seg_bits initial_seg;
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_0[0x20060];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_flow_table_root_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_set_flow_table_root_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8];
u8 underlay_qpn[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x120];
};
enum {
MLX5_MODIFY_FLOW_TABLE_MISS_TABLE_ID = (1UL << 0),
MLX5_MODIFY_FLOW_TABLE_LAG_NEXT_TABLE_ID = (1UL << 15),
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_flow_table_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_flow_table_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 other_vport[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0xf];
u8 vport_number[0x10];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 modify_field_select[0x10];
u8 table_type[0x8];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_88[0x18];
net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-02-09 05:57:42 -07:00
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x8];
u8 table_id[0x18];
struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_context_bits flow_table_context;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ets_tcn_config_reg_bits {
u8 g[0x1];
u8 b[0x1];
u8 r[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_3[0x9];
u8 group[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x9];
u8 bw_allocation[0x7];
u8 reserved_at_20[0xc];
u8 max_bw_units[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_30[0x8];
u8 max_bw_value[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ets_global_config_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x2];
u8 r[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_3[0x1d];
u8 reserved_at_20[0xc];
u8 max_bw_units[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_30[0x8];
u8 max_bw_value[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qetc_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 port_number[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x30];
struct mlx5_ifc_ets_tcn_config_reg_bits tc_configuration[0x8];
struct mlx5_ifc_ets_global_config_reg_bits global_configuration;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qpdpm_dscp_reg_bits {
u8 e[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_01[0x0b];
u8 prio[0x04];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qpdpm_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
struct mlx5_ifc_qpdpm_dscp_reg_bits dscp[64];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qpts_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x2d];
u8 trust_state[0x3];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pptb_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x2];
u8 mm[0x2];
u8 reserved_at_4[0x4];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x6];
u8 cm[0x1];
u8 um[0x1];
u8 pm[0x8];
u8 prio_x_buff[0x20];
u8 pm_msb[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_48[0x10];
u8 ctrl_buff[0x4];
u8 untagged_buff[0x4];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sbcam_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 feature_group[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 access_reg_group[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
u8 sb_access_reg_cap_mask[4][0x20];
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x80];
u8 sb_feature_cap_mask[4][0x20];
u8 reserved_at_1c0[0x40];
u8 cap_total_buffer_size[0x20];
u8 cap_cell_size[0x10];
u8 cap_max_pg_buffers[0x8];
u8 cap_num_pool_supported[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_240[0x8];
u8 cap_sbsr_stat_size[0x8];
u8 cap_max_tclass_data[0x8];
u8 cap_max_cpu_ingress_tclass_sb[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_pbmc_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 local_port[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 xoff_timer_value[0x10];
u8 xoff_refresh[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x9];
u8 fullness_threshold[0x7];
u8 port_buffer_size[0x10];
struct mlx5_ifc_bufferx_reg_bits buffer[10];
u8 reserved_at_2e0[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_qtct_reg_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 port_number[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0xd];
u8 prio[0x3];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x1d];
u8 tclass[0x3];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mcia_reg_bits {
u8 l[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_1[0x7];
u8 module[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x8];
u8 status[0x8];
u8 i2c_device_address[0x8];
u8 page_number[0x8];
u8 device_address[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 size[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 dword_0[0x20];
u8 dword_1[0x20];
u8 dword_2[0x20];
u8 dword_3[0x20];
u8 dword_4[0x20];
u8 dword_5[0x20];
u8 dword_6[0x20];
u8 dword_7[0x20];
u8 dword_8[0x20];
u8 dword_9[0x20];
u8 dword_10[0x20];
u8 dword_11[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dcbx_param_bits {
u8 dcbx_cee_cap[0x1];
u8 dcbx_ieee_cap[0x1];
u8 dcbx_standby_cap[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_3[0x5];
u8 port_number[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_10[0xa];
u8 max_application_table_size[6];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x15];
u8 version_oper[0x3];
u8 reserved_at_38[5];
u8 version_admin[0x3];
u8 willing_admin[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0x3];
u8 pfc_cap_oper[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_48[0x4];
u8 pfc_cap_admin[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_50[0x4];
u8 num_of_tc_oper[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_58[0x4];
u8 num_of_tc_admin[0x4];
u8 remote_willing[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_61[3];
u8 remote_pfc_cap[4];
u8 reserved_at_68[0x14];
u8 remote_num_of_tc[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x18];
u8 error[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_a0[0x160];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_lagc_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x1d];
u8 lag_state[0x3];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x14];
u8 tx_remap_affinity_2[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_38[0x4];
u8 tx_remap_affinity_1[0x4];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_lag_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_lag_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
struct mlx5_ifc_lagc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_lag_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_lag_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x20];
u8 field_select[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_lagc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_lag_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_lagc_bits ctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_lag_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_lag_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_lag_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_vport_lag_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_vport_lag_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_vport_lag_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_vport_lag_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_memic_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_30[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 log_memic_addr_alignment[0x8];
u8 range_start_addr[0x40];
u8 range_size[0x20];
u8 memic_size[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_memic_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 memic_start_addr[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_memic_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
u8 memic_start_addr[0x40];
u8 memic_size[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_e0[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_memic_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_general_obj_in_cmd_hdr_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
u8 vhca_tunnel_id[0x10];
u8 obj_type[0x10];
u8 obj_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_general_obj_out_cmd_hdr_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 obj_id[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_umem_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x80];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x1b];
u8 log_page_size[0x5];
u8 page_offset[0x20];
u8 num_of_mtt[0x40];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
struct mlx5_ifc_mtt_bits mtt[];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_uctx_bits {
u8 cap[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x160];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sw_icm_bits {
u8 modify_field_select[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 log_sw_icm_size[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
u8 sw_icm_start_addr[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_c0[0x140];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_geneve_tlv_option_bits {
u8 modify_field_select[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 geneve_option_fte_index[0x8];
u8 option_class[0x10];
u8 option_type[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_78[0x3];
u8 option_data_length[0x5];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x180];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_umem_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_umem_bits umem;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_uctx_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_uctx_bits uctx;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_destroy_uctx_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 uid[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_sw_icm_in_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_general_obj_in_cmd_hdr_bits hdr;
struct mlx5_ifc_sw_icm_bits sw_icm;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_geneve_tlv_option_in_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_general_obj_in_cmd_hdr_bits hdr;
struct mlx5_ifc_geneve_tlv_option_bits geneve_tlv_opt;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mtrc_string_db_param_bits {
u8 string_db_base_address[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x8];
u8 string_db_size[0x18];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mtrc_cap_bits {
u8 trace_owner[0x1];
u8 trace_to_memory[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_2[0x4];
u8 trc_ver[0x2];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x14];
u8 num_string_db[0x4];
u8 first_string_trace[0x8];
u8 num_string_trace[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_30[0x28];
u8 log_max_trace_buffer_size[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
struct mlx5_ifc_mtrc_string_db_param_bits string_db_param[8];
u8 reserved_at_280[0x180];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mtrc_conf_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x1c];
u8 trace_mode[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x18];
u8 log_trace_buffer_size[0x8];
u8 trace_mkey[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x3a0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mtrc_stdb_bits {
u8 string_db_index[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_4[0x4];
u8 read_size[0x18];
u8 start_offset[0x20];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 string_db_data[];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_mtrc_ctrl_bits {
u8 trace_status[0x2];
u8 reserved_at_2[0x2];
u8 arm_event[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_5[0xb];
u8 modify_field_select[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x2b];
u8 current_timestamp52_32[0x15];
u8 current_timestamp31_0[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x180];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_host_params_context_bits {
u8 host_number[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x7];
u8 host_pf_disabled[0x1];
u8 host_num_of_vfs[0x10];
u8 host_total_vfs[0x10];
u8 host_pci_bus[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 host_pci_device[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x10];
u8 host_pci_function[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x180];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_esw_functions_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_esw_functions_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
struct mlx5_ifc_host_params_context_bits host_params_context;
u8 reserved_at_280[0x180];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
u8 host_sf_enable[][0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_sf_partition_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x10];
u8 log_num_sf[0x8];
u8 log_sf_bar_size[0x8];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_sf_partitions_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x18];
u8 num_sf_partitions[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
2020-05-07 12:59:35 -06:00
struct mlx5_ifc_sf_partition_bits sf_partition[];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_sf_partitions_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_sf_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_dealloc_sf_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 function_id[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_sf_out_bits {
u8 status[0x8];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x18];
u8 syndrome[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x40];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_alloc_sf_in_bits {
u8 opcode[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_10[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x10];
u8 op_mod[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x10];
u8 function_id[0x10];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x20];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_affiliated_event_header_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x10];
u8 obj_type[0x10];
u8 obj_id[0x20];
};
enum {
MLX5_HCA_CAP_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_ENCRYPTION_KEY = BIT(0xc),
MLX5_HCA_CAP_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_IPSEC = BIT(0x13),
};
enum {
MLX5_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_ENCRYPTION_KEY = 0xc,
MLX5_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_IPSEC = 0x13,
};
enum {
MLX5_IPSEC_OBJECT_ICV_LEN_16B,
MLX5_IPSEC_OBJECT_ICV_LEN_12B,
MLX5_IPSEC_OBJECT_ICV_LEN_8B,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_ipsec_obj_bits {
u8 modify_field_select[0x40];
u8 full_offload[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_41[0x1];
u8 esn_en[0x1];
u8 esn_overlap[0x1];
u8 reserved_at_44[0x2];
u8 icv_length[0x2];
u8 reserved_at_48[0x4];
u8 aso_return_reg[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_50[0x10];
u8 esn_msb[0x20];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x8];
u8 dekn[0x18];
u8 salt[0x20];
u8 implicit_iv[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_100[0x700];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_ipsec_obj_in_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_general_obj_in_cmd_hdr_bits general_obj_in_cmd_hdr;
struct mlx5_ifc_ipsec_obj_bits ipsec_object;
};
enum {
MLX5_MODIFY_IPSEC_BITMASK_ESN_OVERLAP = BIT(0),
MLX5_MODIFY_IPSEC_BITMASK_ESN_MSB = BIT(1),
};
struct mlx5_ifc_query_ipsec_obj_out_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_general_obj_out_cmd_hdr_bits general_obj_out_cmd_hdr;
struct mlx5_ifc_ipsec_obj_bits ipsec_object;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_modify_ipsec_obj_in_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_general_obj_in_cmd_hdr_bits general_obj_in_cmd_hdr;
struct mlx5_ifc_ipsec_obj_bits ipsec_object;
};
struct mlx5_ifc_encryption_key_obj_bits {
u8 modify_field_select[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_40[0x14];
u8 key_size[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_58[0x4];
u8 key_type[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_60[0x8];
u8 pd[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_80[0x180];
u8 key[8][0x20];
u8 reserved_at_300[0x500];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_create_encryption_key_in_bits {
struct mlx5_ifc_general_obj_in_cmd_hdr_bits general_obj_in_cmd_hdr;
struct mlx5_ifc_encryption_key_obj_bits encryption_key_object;
};
enum {
MLX5_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_KEY_SIZE_128 = 0x0,
MLX5_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_KEY_SIZE_256 = 0x1,
};
enum {
MLX5_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_TYPE_TLS = 0x1,
MLX5_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_TYPE_IPSEC = 0x2,
};
struct mlx5_ifc_tls_static_params_bits {
u8 const_2[0x2];
u8 tls_version[0x4];
u8 const_1[0x2];
u8 reserved_at_8[0x14];
u8 encryption_standard[0x4];
u8 reserved_at_20[0x20];
u8 initial_record_number[0x40];
u8 resync_tcp_sn[0x20];
u8 gcm_iv[0x20];
u8 implicit_iv[0x40];
u8 reserved_at_100[0x8];
u8 dek_index[0x18];
u8 reserved_at_120[0xe0];
};
struct mlx5_ifc_tls_progress_params_bits {
u8 reserved_at_0[0x8];
u8 tisn[0x18];
u8 next_record_tcp_sn[0x20];
u8 hw_resync_tcp_sn[0x20];
u8 record_tracker_state[0x2];
u8 auth_state[0x2];
u8 reserved_at_64[0x4];
u8 hw_offset_record_number[0x18];
};
#endif /* MLX5_IFC_H */