1
0
Fork 0
alistair23-linux/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c

105 lines
2.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* ARM64 CPU idle arch support
*
* Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Ltd.
* Author: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
*/
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/psci.h>
#include <asm/cpuidle.h>
#include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
int arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu)
{
int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (cpu_ops[cpu] && cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_suspend &&
cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_init_idle)
ARM64: kernel: make cpu_ops hooks DT agnostic ARM64 CPU operations such as cpu_init and cpu_init_idle take a struct device_node pointer as a parameter, which corresponds to the device tree node of the logical cpu on which the operation has to be applied. With the advent of ACPI on arm64, where MADT static table entries are used to initialize cpus, the device tree node parameter in cpu_ops hooks become useless when booting with ACPI, since in that case cpu device tree nodes are not present and can not be used for cpu initialization. The current cpu_init hook requires a struct device_node pointer parameter because it is called while parsing the device tree to initialize CPUs, when the cpu_logical_map (that is used to match a cpu node reg property to a device tree node) for a given logical cpu id is not set up yet. This means that the cpu_init hook cannot rely on the of_get_cpu_node function to retrieve the device tree node corresponding to the logical cpu id passed in as parameter, so the cpu device tree node must be passed in as a parameter to fix this catch-22 dependency cycle. This patch reshuffles the cpu_logical_map initialization code so that the cpu_init cpu_ops hook can safely use the of_get_cpu_node function to retrieve the cpu device tree node, removing the need for the device tree node pointer parameter. In the process, the patch removes device tree node parameters from all cpu_ops hooks, in preparation for SMP DT/ACPI cpus initialization consolidation. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [DT] Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-05-13 07:12:46 -06:00
ret = cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_init_idle(cpu);
return ret;
}
arm64: kernel: remove ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option was introduced to make code providing context save/restore selectable only on platforms requiring power management capabilities. Currently ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND depends on the PM_SLEEP config option which in turn is set by the SUSPEND config option. The introduction of CPU_IDLE for arm64 requires that code configured by ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND (context save/restore) should be compiled in in order to enable the CPU idle driver to rely on CPU operations carrying out context save/restore. The ARM64_CPUIDLE config option (ARM64 generic idle driver) is therefore forced to select ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND, even if there may be (ie PM_SLEEP) failed dependencies, which is not a clean way of handling the kernel configuration option. For these reasons, this patch removes the ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option and makes the context save/restore dependent on CPU_PM, which is selected whenever either SUSPEND or CPU_IDLE are configured, cleaning up dependencies in the process. This way, code previously configured through ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND is compiled in whenever a power management subsystem requires it to be present in the kernel (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE), which is the behaviour expected on ARM64 kernels. The cpu_suspend and cpu_init_idle CPU operations are added only if CPU_IDLE is selected, since they are CPU_IDLE specific methods and should be grouped and defined accordingly. PSCI CPU operations are updated to reflect the introduced changes. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-01-26 11:33:44 -07:00
/**
* arm_cpuidle_suspend() - function to enter a low-power idle state
arm64: kernel: remove ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option was introduced to make code providing context save/restore selectable only on platforms requiring power management capabilities. Currently ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND depends on the PM_SLEEP config option which in turn is set by the SUSPEND config option. The introduction of CPU_IDLE for arm64 requires that code configured by ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND (context save/restore) should be compiled in in order to enable the CPU idle driver to rely on CPU operations carrying out context save/restore. The ARM64_CPUIDLE config option (ARM64 generic idle driver) is therefore forced to select ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND, even if there may be (ie PM_SLEEP) failed dependencies, which is not a clean way of handling the kernel configuration option. For these reasons, this patch removes the ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option and makes the context save/restore dependent on CPU_PM, which is selected whenever either SUSPEND or CPU_IDLE are configured, cleaning up dependencies in the process. This way, code previously configured through ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND is compiled in whenever a power management subsystem requires it to be present in the kernel (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE), which is the behaviour expected on ARM64 kernels. The cpu_suspend and cpu_init_idle CPU operations are added only if CPU_IDLE is selected, since they are CPU_IDLE specific methods and should be grouped and defined accordingly. PSCI CPU operations are updated to reflect the introduced changes. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-01-26 11:33:44 -07:00
* @arg: argument to pass to CPU suspend operations
*
* Return: 0 on success, -EOPNOTSUPP if CPU suspend hook not initialized, CPU
* operations back-end error code otherwise.
*/
int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index)
arm64: kernel: remove ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option was introduced to make code providing context save/restore selectable only on platforms requiring power management capabilities. Currently ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND depends on the PM_SLEEP config option which in turn is set by the SUSPEND config option. The introduction of CPU_IDLE for arm64 requires that code configured by ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND (context save/restore) should be compiled in in order to enable the CPU idle driver to rely on CPU operations carrying out context save/restore. The ARM64_CPUIDLE config option (ARM64 generic idle driver) is therefore forced to select ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND, even if there may be (ie PM_SLEEP) failed dependencies, which is not a clean way of handling the kernel configuration option. For these reasons, this patch removes the ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option and makes the context save/restore dependent on CPU_PM, which is selected whenever either SUSPEND or CPU_IDLE are configured, cleaning up dependencies in the process. This way, code previously configured through ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND is compiled in whenever a power management subsystem requires it to be present in the kernel (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE), which is the behaviour expected on ARM64 kernels. The cpu_suspend and cpu_init_idle CPU operations are added only if CPU_IDLE is selected, since they are CPU_IDLE specific methods and should be grouped and defined accordingly. PSCI CPU operations are updated to reflect the introduced changes. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-01-26 11:33:44 -07:00
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
return cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_suspend(index);
arm64: kernel: remove ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option was introduced to make code providing context save/restore selectable only on platforms requiring power management capabilities. Currently ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND depends on the PM_SLEEP config option which in turn is set by the SUSPEND config option. The introduction of CPU_IDLE for arm64 requires that code configured by ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND (context save/restore) should be compiled in in order to enable the CPU idle driver to rely on CPU operations carrying out context save/restore. The ARM64_CPUIDLE config option (ARM64 generic idle driver) is therefore forced to select ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND, even if there may be (ie PM_SLEEP) failed dependencies, which is not a clean way of handling the kernel configuration option. For these reasons, this patch removes the ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option and makes the context save/restore dependent on CPU_PM, which is selected whenever either SUSPEND or CPU_IDLE are configured, cleaning up dependencies in the process. This way, code previously configured through ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND is compiled in whenever a power management subsystem requires it to be present in the kernel (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE), which is the behaviour expected on ARM64 kernels. The cpu_suspend and cpu_init_idle CPU operations are added only if CPU_IDLE is selected, since they are CPU_IDLE specific methods and should be grouped and defined accordingly. PSCI CPU operations are updated to reflect the introduced changes. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-01-26 11:33:44 -07:00
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
#include <acpi/processor.h>
#define ARM64_LPI_IS_RETENTION_STATE(arch_flags) (!(arch_flags))
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 05:03:12 -06:00
static int psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
{
int i, count;
struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
/*
* If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized
* idle states must not be enabled, so bail out
*/
if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
return -EINVAL;
count = pr->power.count - 1;
if (count <= 0)
return -ENODEV;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
u32 state;
lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i + 1];
/*
* Only bits[31:0] represent a PSCI power_state while
* bits[63:32] must be 0x0 as per ARM ACPI FFH Specification
*/
state = lpi->address;
if (!psci_power_state_is_valid(state)) {
pr_warn("Invalid PSCI power state %#x\n", state);
return -EINVAL;
}
}
return 0;
}
int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
{
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 05:03:12 -06:00
return psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
}
int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
{
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 05:03:12 -06:00
u32 state = lpi->address;
if (ARM64_LPI_IS_RETENTION_STATE(lpi->arch_flags))
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 05:03:12 -06:00
return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter,
lpi->index, state);
else
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 05:03:12 -06:00
return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter,
lpi->index, state);
}
#endif