1
0
Fork 0
alistair23-linux/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c

1563 lines
45 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
/*
* Copyright(c) 2013-2015 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* General Public License for more details.
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
#include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
#include <linux/ndctl.h>
#include <linux/sizes.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <nfit.h>
#include <nd.h>
#include "nfit_test.h"
/*
* Generate an NFIT table to describe the following topology:
*
* BUS0: Interleaved PMEM regions, and aliasing with BLK regions
*
* (a) (b) DIMM BLK-REGION
* +----------+--------------+----------+---------+
* +------+ | blk2.0 | pm0.0 | blk2.1 | pm1.0 | 0 region2
* | imc0 +--+- - - - - region0 - - - -+----------+ +
* +--+---+ | blk3.0 | pm0.0 | blk3.1 | pm1.0 | 1 region3
* | +----------+--------------v----------v v
* +--+---+ | |
* | cpu0 | region1
* +--+---+ | |
* | +-------------------------^----------^ ^
* +--+---+ | blk4.0 | pm1.0 | 2 region4
* | imc1 +--+-------------------------+----------+ +
* +------+ | blk5.0 | pm1.0 | 3 region5
* +-------------------------+----------+-+-------+
*
* +--+---+
* | cpu1 |
* +--+---+ (Hotplug DIMM)
* | +----------------------------------------------+
* +--+---+ | blk6.0/pm7.0 | 4 region6/7
* | imc0 +--+----------------------------------------------+
* +------+
*
*
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
* *) In this layout we have four dimms and two memory controllers in one
* socket. Each unique interface (BLK or PMEM) to DPA space
* is identified by a region device with a dynamically assigned id.
*
* *) The first portion of dimm0 and dimm1 are interleaved as REGION0.
* A single PMEM namespace "pm0.0" is created using half of the
* REGION0 SPA-range. REGION0 spans dimm0 and dimm1. PMEM namespace
* allocate from from the bottom of a region. The unallocated
* portion of REGION0 aliases with REGION2 and REGION3. That
* unallacted capacity is reclaimed as BLK namespaces ("blk2.0" and
* "blk3.0") starting at the base of each DIMM to offset (a) in those
* DIMMs. "pm0.0", "blk2.0" and "blk3.0" are free-form readable
* names that can be assigned to a namespace.
*
* *) In the last portion of dimm0 and dimm1 we have an interleaved
* SPA range, REGION1, that spans those two dimms as well as dimm2
* and dimm3. Some of REGION1 allocated to a PMEM namespace named
* "pm1.0" the rest is reclaimed in 4 BLK namespaces (for each
* dimm in the interleave set), "blk2.1", "blk3.1", "blk4.0", and
* "blk5.0".
*
* *) The portion of dimm2 and dimm3 that do not participate in the
* REGION1 interleaved SPA range (i.e. the DPA address below offset
* (b) are also included in the "blk4.0" and "blk5.0" namespaces.
* Note, that BLK namespaces need not be contiguous in DPA-space, and
* can consume aliased capacity from multiple interleave sets.
*
* BUS1: Legacy NVDIMM (single contiguous range)
*
* region2
* +---------------------+
* |---------------------|
* || pm2.0 ||
* |---------------------|
* +---------------------+
*
* *) A NFIT-table may describe a simple system-physical-address range
* with no BLK aliasing. This type of region may optionally
* reference an NVDIMM.
*/
enum {
NUM_PM = 3,
NUM_DCR = 5,
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
NUM_BDW = NUM_DCR,
NUM_SPA = NUM_PM + NUM_DCR + NUM_BDW,
NUM_MEM = NUM_DCR + NUM_BDW + 2 /* spa0 iset */ + 4 /* spa1 iset */,
DIMM_SIZE = SZ_32M,
LABEL_SIZE = SZ_128K,
SPA0_SIZE = DIMM_SIZE,
SPA1_SIZE = DIMM_SIZE*2,
SPA2_SIZE = DIMM_SIZE,
BDW_SIZE = 64 << 8,
DCR_SIZE = 12,
NUM_NFITS = 2, /* permit testing multiple NFITs per system */
};
struct nfit_test_dcr {
__le64 bdw_addr;
__le32 bdw_status;
__u8 aperature[BDW_SIZE];
};
#define NFIT_DIMM_HANDLE(node, socket, imc, chan, dimm) \
(((node & 0xfff) << 16) | ((socket & 0xf) << 12) \
| ((imc & 0xf) << 8) | ((chan & 0xf) << 4) | (dimm & 0xf))
static u32 handle[NUM_DCR] = {
[0] = NFIT_DIMM_HANDLE(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
[1] = NFIT_DIMM_HANDLE(0, 0, 0, 0, 1),
[2] = NFIT_DIMM_HANDLE(0, 0, 1, 0, 0),
[3] = NFIT_DIMM_HANDLE(0, 0, 1, 0, 1),
[4] = NFIT_DIMM_HANDLE(0, 1, 0, 0, 0),
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
};
struct nfit_test {
struct acpi_nfit_desc acpi_desc;
struct platform_device pdev;
struct list_head resources;
void *nfit_buf;
dma_addr_t nfit_dma;
size_t nfit_size;
int num_dcr;
int num_pm;
void **dimm;
dma_addr_t *dimm_dma;
void **flush;
dma_addr_t *flush_dma;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
void **label;
dma_addr_t *label_dma;
void **spa_set;
dma_addr_t *spa_set_dma;
struct nfit_test_dcr **dcr;
dma_addr_t *dcr_dma;
int (*alloc)(struct nfit_test *t);
void (*setup)(struct nfit_test *t);
int setup_hotplug;
struct ars_state {
struct nd_cmd_ars_status *ars_status;
unsigned long deadline;
spinlock_t lock;
} ars_state;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
};
static struct nfit_test *to_nfit_test(struct device *dev)
{
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
return container_of(pdev, struct nfit_test, pdev);
}
static int nfit_test_cmd_get_config_size(struct nd_cmd_get_config_size *nd_cmd,
unsigned int buf_len)
{
if (buf_len < sizeof(*nd_cmd))
return -EINVAL;
nd_cmd->status = 0;
nd_cmd->config_size = LABEL_SIZE;
nd_cmd->max_xfer = SZ_4K;
return 0;
}
static int nfit_test_cmd_get_config_data(struct nd_cmd_get_config_data_hdr
*nd_cmd, unsigned int buf_len, void *label)
{
unsigned int len, offset = nd_cmd->in_offset;
int rc;
if (buf_len < sizeof(*nd_cmd))
return -EINVAL;
if (offset >= LABEL_SIZE)
return -EINVAL;
if (nd_cmd->in_length + sizeof(*nd_cmd) > buf_len)
return -EINVAL;
nd_cmd->status = 0;
len = min(nd_cmd->in_length, LABEL_SIZE - offset);
memcpy(nd_cmd->out_buf, label + offset, len);
rc = buf_len - sizeof(*nd_cmd) - len;
return rc;
}
static int nfit_test_cmd_set_config_data(struct nd_cmd_set_config_hdr *nd_cmd,
unsigned int buf_len, void *label)
{
unsigned int len, offset = nd_cmd->in_offset;
u32 *status;
int rc;
if (buf_len < sizeof(*nd_cmd))
return -EINVAL;
if (offset >= LABEL_SIZE)
return -EINVAL;
if (nd_cmd->in_length + sizeof(*nd_cmd) + 4 > buf_len)
return -EINVAL;
status = (void *)nd_cmd + nd_cmd->in_length + sizeof(*nd_cmd);
*status = 0;
len = min(nd_cmd->in_length, LABEL_SIZE - offset);
memcpy(label + offset, nd_cmd->in_buf, len);
rc = buf_len - sizeof(*nd_cmd) - (len + 4);
return rc;
}
#define NFIT_TEST_ARS_RECORDS 4
#define NFIT_TEST_CLEAR_ERR_UNIT 256
static int nfit_test_cmd_ars_cap(struct nd_cmd_ars_cap *nd_cmd,
unsigned int buf_len)
{
if (buf_len < sizeof(*nd_cmd))
return -EINVAL;
nd_cmd->max_ars_out = sizeof(struct nd_cmd_ars_status)
+ NFIT_TEST_ARS_RECORDS * sizeof(struct nd_ars_record);
nd_cmd->status = (ND_ARS_PERSISTENT | ND_ARS_VOLATILE) << 16;
nd_cmd->clear_err_unit = NFIT_TEST_CLEAR_ERR_UNIT;
return 0;
}
/*
* Initialize the ars_state to return an ars_result 1 second in the future with
* a 4K error range in the middle of the requested address range.
*/
static void post_ars_status(struct ars_state *ars_state, u64 addr, u64 len)
{
struct nd_cmd_ars_status *ars_status;
struct nd_ars_record *ars_record;
ars_state->deadline = jiffies + 1*HZ;
ars_status = ars_state->ars_status;
ars_status->status = 0;
ars_status->out_length = sizeof(struct nd_cmd_ars_status)
+ sizeof(struct nd_ars_record);
ars_status->address = addr;
ars_status->length = len;
ars_status->type = ND_ARS_PERSISTENT;
ars_status->num_records = 1;
ars_record = &ars_status->records[0];
ars_record->handle = 0;
ars_record->err_address = addr + len / 2;
ars_record->length = SZ_4K;
}
static int nfit_test_cmd_ars_start(struct ars_state *ars_state,
struct nd_cmd_ars_start *ars_start, unsigned int buf_len,
int *cmd_rc)
{
if (buf_len < sizeof(*ars_start))
return -EINVAL;
spin_lock(&ars_state->lock);
if (time_before(jiffies, ars_state->deadline)) {
ars_start->status = NFIT_ARS_START_BUSY;
*cmd_rc = -EBUSY;
} else {
ars_start->status = 0;
ars_start->scrub_time = 1;
post_ars_status(ars_state, ars_start->address,
ars_start->length);
*cmd_rc = 0;
}
spin_unlock(&ars_state->lock);
return 0;
}
static int nfit_test_cmd_ars_status(struct ars_state *ars_state,
struct nd_cmd_ars_status *ars_status, unsigned int buf_len,
int *cmd_rc)
{
if (buf_len < ars_state->ars_status->out_length)
return -EINVAL;
spin_lock(&ars_state->lock);
if (time_before(jiffies, ars_state->deadline)) {
memset(ars_status, 0, buf_len);
ars_status->status = NFIT_ARS_STATUS_BUSY;
ars_status->out_length = sizeof(*ars_status);
*cmd_rc = -EBUSY;
} else {
memcpy(ars_status, ars_state->ars_status,
ars_state->ars_status->out_length);
*cmd_rc = 0;
}
spin_unlock(&ars_state->lock);
return 0;
}
static int nfit_test_cmd_clear_error(struct nd_cmd_clear_error *clear_err,
unsigned int buf_len, int *cmd_rc)
{
const u64 mask = NFIT_TEST_CLEAR_ERR_UNIT - 1;
if (buf_len < sizeof(*clear_err))
return -EINVAL;
if ((clear_err->address & mask) || (clear_err->length & mask))
return -EINVAL;
/*
* Report 'all clear' success for all commands even though a new
* scrub will find errors again. This is enough to have the
* error removed from the 'badblocks' tracking in the pmem
* driver.
*/
clear_err->status = 0;
clear_err->cleared = clear_err->length;
*cmd_rc = 0;
return 0;
}
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
static int nfit_test_ctl(struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor *nd_desc,
struct nvdimm *nvdimm, unsigned int cmd, void *buf,
unsigned int buf_len, int *cmd_rc)
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
{
struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc = to_acpi_desc(nd_desc);
struct nfit_test *t = container_of(acpi_desc, typeof(*t), acpi_desc);
int i, rc = 0, __cmd_rc;
if (!cmd_rc)
cmd_rc = &__cmd_rc;
*cmd_rc = 0;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
if (nvdimm) {
struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem = nvdimm_provider_data(nvdimm);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
if (!nfit_mem || !test_bit(cmd, &nfit_mem->dsm_mask))
return -ENOTTY;
/* lookup label space for the given dimm */
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(handle); i++)
if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->device_handle ==
handle[i])
break;
if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(handle))
return -ENXIO;
switch (cmd) {
case ND_CMD_GET_CONFIG_SIZE:
rc = nfit_test_cmd_get_config_size(buf, buf_len);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
break;
case ND_CMD_GET_CONFIG_DATA:
rc = nfit_test_cmd_get_config_data(buf, buf_len,
t->label[i]);
break;
case ND_CMD_SET_CONFIG_DATA:
rc = nfit_test_cmd_set_config_data(buf, buf_len,
t->label[i]);
break;
default:
return -ENOTTY;
}
} else {
struct ars_state *ars_state = &t->ars_state;
if (!nd_desc || !test_bit(cmd, &nd_desc->dsm_mask))
return -ENOTTY;
switch (cmd) {
case ND_CMD_ARS_CAP:
rc = nfit_test_cmd_ars_cap(buf, buf_len);
break;
case ND_CMD_ARS_START:
rc = nfit_test_cmd_ars_start(ars_state, buf, buf_len,
cmd_rc);
break;
case ND_CMD_ARS_STATUS:
rc = nfit_test_cmd_ars_status(ars_state, buf, buf_len,
cmd_rc);
break;
case ND_CMD_CLEAR_ERROR:
rc = nfit_test_cmd_clear_error(buf, buf_len, cmd_rc);
break;
default:
return -ENOTTY;
}
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
}
return rc;
}
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nfit_test_lock);
static struct nfit_test *instances[NUM_NFITS];
static void release_nfit_res(void *data)
{
struct nfit_test_resource *nfit_res = data;
struct resource *res = nfit_res->res;
spin_lock(&nfit_test_lock);
list_del(&nfit_res->list);
spin_unlock(&nfit_test_lock);
if (is_vmalloc_addr(nfit_res->buf))
vfree(nfit_res->buf);
else
dma_free_coherent(nfit_res->dev, resource_size(res),
nfit_res->buf, res->start);
kfree(res);
kfree(nfit_res);
}
static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
void *buf)
{
struct device *dev = &t->pdev.dev;
struct resource *res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res) * 2, GFP_KERNEL);
struct nfit_test_resource *nfit_res = kzalloc(sizeof(*nfit_res),
GFP_KERNEL);
int rc;
if (!res || !buf || !nfit_res)
goto err;
rc = devm_add_action(dev, release_nfit_res, nfit_res);
if (rc)
goto err;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfit_res->list);
memset(buf, 0, size);
nfit_res->dev = dev;
nfit_res->buf = buf;
nfit_res->res = res;
res->start = *dma;
res->end = *dma + size - 1;
res->name = "NFIT";
spin_lock(&nfit_test_lock);
list_add(&nfit_res->list, &t->resources);
spin_unlock(&nfit_test_lock);
return nfit_res->buf;
err:
if (buf && !is_vmalloc_addr(buf))
dma_free_coherent(dev, size, buf, *dma);
else if (buf)
vfree(buf);
kfree(res);
kfree(nfit_res);
return NULL;
}
static void *test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma)
{
void *buf = vmalloc(size);
*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
return __test_alloc(t, size, dma, buf);
}
static void *test_alloc_coherent(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size,
dma_addr_t *dma)
{
struct device *dev = &t->pdev.dev;
void *buf = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma, GFP_KERNEL);
return __test_alloc(t, size, dma, buf);
}
static struct nfit_test_resource *nfit_test_lookup(resource_size_t addr)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(instances); i++) {
struct nfit_test_resource *n, *nfit_res = NULL;
struct nfit_test *t = instances[i];
if (!t)
continue;
spin_lock(&nfit_test_lock);
list_for_each_entry(n, &t->resources, list) {
if (addr >= n->res->start && (addr < n->res->start
+ resource_size(n->res))) {
nfit_res = n;
break;
} else if (addr >= (unsigned long) n->buf
&& (addr < (unsigned long) n->buf
+ resource_size(n->res))) {
nfit_res = n;
break;
}
}
spin_unlock(&nfit_test_lock);
if (nfit_res)
return nfit_res;
}
return NULL;
}
static int ars_state_init(struct device *dev, struct ars_state *ars_state)
{
ars_state->ars_status = devm_kzalloc(dev,
sizeof(struct nd_cmd_ars_status)
+ sizeof(struct nd_ars_record) * NFIT_TEST_ARS_RECORDS,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ars_state->ars_status)
return -ENOMEM;
spin_lock_init(&ars_state->lock);
return 0;
}
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
static int nfit_test0_alloc(struct nfit_test *t)
{
size_t nfit_size = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_system_address) * NUM_SPA
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * NUM_MEM
+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * NUM_DCR
+ offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size) * NUM_DCR
+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region) * NUM_BDW
+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address) * NUM_DCR;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
int i;
t->nfit_buf = test_alloc(t, nfit_size, &t->nfit_dma);
if (!t->nfit_buf)
return -ENOMEM;
t->nfit_size = nfit_size;
t->spa_set[0] = test_alloc_coherent(t, SPA0_SIZE, &t->spa_set_dma[0]);
if (!t->spa_set[0])
return -ENOMEM;
t->spa_set[1] = test_alloc_coherent(t, SPA1_SIZE, &t->spa_set_dma[1]);
if (!t->spa_set[1])
return -ENOMEM;
t->spa_set[2] = test_alloc_coherent(t, SPA0_SIZE, &t->spa_set_dma[2]);
if (!t->spa_set[2])
return -ENOMEM;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
for (i = 0; i < NUM_DCR; i++) {
t->dimm[i] = test_alloc(t, DIMM_SIZE, &t->dimm_dma[i]);
if (!t->dimm[i])
return -ENOMEM;
t->label[i] = test_alloc(t, LABEL_SIZE, &t->label_dma[i]);
if (!t->label[i])
return -ENOMEM;
sprintf(t->label[i], "label%d", i);
t->flush[i] = test_alloc(t, 8, &t->flush_dma[i]);
if (!t->flush[i])
return -ENOMEM;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
}
for (i = 0; i < NUM_DCR; i++) {
t->dcr[i] = test_alloc(t, LABEL_SIZE, &t->dcr_dma[i]);
if (!t->dcr[i])
return -ENOMEM;
}
return ars_state_init(&t->pdev.dev, &t->ars_state);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
}
static int nfit_test1_alloc(struct nfit_test *t)
{
size_t nfit_size = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_system_address)
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map)
+ offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region, window_size);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
t->nfit_buf = test_alloc(t, nfit_size, &t->nfit_dma);
if (!t->nfit_buf)
return -ENOMEM;
t->nfit_size = nfit_size;
t->spa_set[0] = test_alloc_coherent(t, SPA2_SIZE, &t->spa_set_dma[0]);
if (!t->spa_set[0])
return -ENOMEM;
return ars_state_init(&t->pdev.dev, &t->ars_state);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
}
static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
{
struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc;
struct acpi_nfit_memory_map *memdev;
void *nfit_buf = t->nfit_buf;
struct acpi_nfit_system_address *spa;
struct acpi_nfit_control_region *dcr;
struct acpi_nfit_data_region *bdw;
struct acpi_nfit_flush_address *flush;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
unsigned int offset;
/*
* spa0 (interleave first half of dimm0 and dimm1, note storage
* does not actually alias the related block-data-window
* regions)
*/
spa = nfit_buf;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_PM), 16);
spa->range_index = 0+1;
spa->address = t->spa_set_dma[0];
spa->length = SPA0_SIZE;
/*
* spa1 (interleave last half of the 4 DIMMS, note storage
* does not actually alias the related block-data-window
* regions)
*/
spa = nfit_buf + sizeof(*spa);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_PM), 16);
spa->range_index = 1+1;
spa->address = t->spa_set_dma[1];
spa->length = SPA1_SIZE;
/* spa2 (dcr0) dimm0 */
spa = nfit_buf + sizeof(*spa) * 2;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_DCR), 16);
spa->range_index = 2+1;
spa->address = t->dcr_dma[0];
spa->length = DCR_SIZE;
/* spa3 (dcr1) dimm1 */
spa = nfit_buf + sizeof(*spa) * 3;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_DCR), 16);
spa->range_index = 3+1;
spa->address = t->dcr_dma[1];
spa->length = DCR_SIZE;
/* spa4 (dcr2) dimm2 */
spa = nfit_buf + sizeof(*spa) * 4;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_DCR), 16);
spa->range_index = 4+1;
spa->address = t->dcr_dma[2];
spa->length = DCR_SIZE;
/* spa5 (dcr3) dimm3 */
spa = nfit_buf + sizeof(*spa) * 5;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_DCR), 16);
spa->range_index = 5+1;
spa->address = t->dcr_dma[3];
spa->length = DCR_SIZE;
/* spa6 (bdw for dcr0) dimm0 */
spa = nfit_buf + sizeof(*spa) * 6;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_BDW), 16);
spa->range_index = 6+1;
spa->address = t->dimm_dma[0];
spa->length = DIMM_SIZE;
/* spa7 (bdw for dcr1) dimm1 */
spa = nfit_buf + sizeof(*spa) * 7;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_BDW), 16);
spa->range_index = 7+1;
spa->address = t->dimm_dma[1];
spa->length = DIMM_SIZE;
/* spa8 (bdw for dcr2) dimm2 */
spa = nfit_buf + sizeof(*spa) * 8;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_BDW), 16);
spa->range_index = 8+1;
spa->address = t->dimm_dma[2];
spa->length = DIMM_SIZE;
/* spa9 (bdw for dcr3) dimm3 */
spa = nfit_buf + sizeof(*spa) * 9;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_BDW), 16);
spa->range_index = 9+1;
spa->address = t->dimm_dma[3];
spa->length = DIMM_SIZE;
offset = sizeof(*spa) * 10;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
/* mem-region0 (spa0, dimm0) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[0];
memdev->physical_id = 0;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 0+1;
memdev->region_index = 4+1;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0];
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 2;
/* mem-region1 (spa0, dimm1) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map);
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[1];
memdev->physical_id = 1;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 0+1;
memdev->region_index = 5+1;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0] + SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 2;
/* mem-region2 (spa1, dimm0) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 2;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[0];
memdev->physical_id = 0;
memdev->region_id = 1;
memdev->range_index = 1+1;
memdev->region_index = 4+1;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1];
memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
/* mem-region3 (spa1, dimm1) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 3;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[1];
memdev->physical_id = 1;
memdev->region_id = 1;
memdev->range_index = 1+1;
memdev->region_index = 5+1;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
/* mem-region4 (spa1, dimm2) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 4;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[2];
memdev->physical_id = 2;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 1+1;
memdev->region_index = 6+1;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 2*SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
/* mem-region5 (spa1, dimm3) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 5;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[3];
memdev->physical_id = 3;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 1+1;
memdev->region_index = 7+1;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 3*SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
/* mem-region6 (spa/dcr0, dimm0) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 6;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[0];
memdev->physical_id = 0;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 2+1;
memdev->region_index = 0+1;
memdev->region_size = 0;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
/* mem-region7 (spa/dcr1, dimm1) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 7;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[1];
memdev->physical_id = 1;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 3+1;
memdev->region_index = 1+1;
memdev->region_size = 0;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
/* mem-region8 (spa/dcr2, dimm2) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 8;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[2];
memdev->physical_id = 2;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 4+1;
memdev->region_index = 2+1;
memdev->region_size = 0;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
/* mem-region9 (spa/dcr3, dimm3) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 9;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[3];
memdev->physical_id = 3;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 5+1;
memdev->region_index = 3+1;
memdev->region_size = 0;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
/* mem-region10 (spa/bdw0, dimm0) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 10;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[0];
memdev->physical_id = 0;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 6+1;
memdev->region_index = 0+1;
memdev->region_size = 0;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
/* mem-region11 (spa/bdw1, dimm1) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 11;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[1];
memdev->physical_id = 1;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 7+1;
memdev->region_index = 1+1;
memdev->region_size = 0;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
/* mem-region12 (spa/bdw2, dimm2) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 12;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[2];
memdev->physical_id = 2;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 8+1;
memdev->region_index = 2+1;
memdev->region_size = 0;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
/* mem-region13 (spa/dcr3, dimm3) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 13;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[3];
memdev->physical_id = 3;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 9+1;
memdev->region_index = 3+1;
memdev->region_size = 0;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 14;
/* dcr-descriptor0: blk */
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
dcr->region_index = 0+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~handle[0];
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
dcr->windows = 1;
dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
dcr->command_offset = 0;
dcr->command_size = 8;
dcr->status_offset = 8;
dcr->status_size = 4;
/* dcr-descriptor1: blk */
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
dcr = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
dcr->region_index = 1+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~handle[1];
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
dcr->windows = 1;
dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
dcr->command_offset = 0;
dcr->command_size = 8;
dcr->status_offset = 8;
dcr->status_size = 4;
/* dcr-descriptor2: blk */
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
dcr = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * 2;
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
dcr->region_index = 2+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~handle[2];
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
dcr->windows = 1;
dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
dcr->command_offset = 0;
dcr->command_size = 8;
dcr->status_offset = 8;
dcr->status_size = 4;
/* dcr-descriptor3: blk */
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
dcr = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * 3;
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
dcr->region_index = 3+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~handle[3];
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
dcr->windows = 1;
dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
dcr->command_offset = 0;
dcr->command_size = 8;
dcr->status_offset = 8;
dcr->status_size = 4;
offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * 4;
/* dcr-descriptor0: pmem */
dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size);
dcr->region_index = 4+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~handle[0];
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
dcr->windows = 0;
/* dcr-descriptor1: pmem */
dcr = nfit_buf + offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size);
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size);
dcr->region_index = 5+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~handle[1];
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
dcr->windows = 0;
/* dcr-descriptor2: pmem */
dcr = nfit_buf + offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size) * 2;
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size);
dcr->region_index = 6+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~handle[2];
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
dcr->windows = 0;
/* dcr-descriptor3: pmem */
dcr = nfit_buf + offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size) * 3;
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size);
dcr->region_index = 7+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~handle[3];
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
dcr->windows = 0;
offset = offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size) * 4;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
/* bdw0 (spa/dcr0, dimm0) */
bdw = nfit_buf + offset;
bdw->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_DATA_REGION;
bdw->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region);
bdw->region_index = 0+1;
bdw->windows = 1;
bdw->offset = 0;
bdw->size = BDW_SIZE;
bdw->capacity = DIMM_SIZE;
bdw->start_address = 0;
/* bdw1 (spa/dcr1, dimm1) */
bdw = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region);
bdw->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_DATA_REGION;
bdw->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region);
bdw->region_index = 1+1;
bdw->windows = 1;
bdw->offset = 0;
bdw->size = BDW_SIZE;
bdw->capacity = DIMM_SIZE;
bdw->start_address = 0;
/* bdw2 (spa/dcr2, dimm2) */
bdw = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region) * 2;
bdw->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_DATA_REGION;
bdw->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region);
bdw->region_index = 2+1;
bdw->windows = 1;
bdw->offset = 0;
bdw->size = BDW_SIZE;
bdw->capacity = DIMM_SIZE;
bdw->start_address = 0;
/* bdw3 (spa/dcr3, dimm3) */
bdw = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region) * 3;
bdw->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_DATA_REGION;
bdw->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region);
bdw->region_index = 3+1;
bdw->windows = 1;
bdw->offset = 0;
bdw->size = BDW_SIZE;
bdw->capacity = DIMM_SIZE;
bdw->start_address = 0;
offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region) * 4;
/* flush0 (dimm0) */
flush = nfit_buf + offset;
flush->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_FLUSH_ADDRESS;
flush->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address);
flush->device_handle = handle[0];
flush->hint_count = 1;
flush->hint_address[0] = t->flush_dma[0];
/* flush1 (dimm1) */
flush = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address) * 1;
flush->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_FLUSH_ADDRESS;
flush->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address);
flush->device_handle = handle[1];
flush->hint_count = 1;
flush->hint_address[0] = t->flush_dma[1];
/* flush2 (dimm2) */
flush = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address) * 2;
flush->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_FLUSH_ADDRESS;
flush->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address);
flush->device_handle = handle[2];
flush->hint_count = 1;
flush->hint_address[0] = t->flush_dma[2];
/* flush3 (dimm3) */
flush = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address) * 3;
flush->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_FLUSH_ADDRESS;
flush->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address);
flush->device_handle = handle[3];
flush->hint_count = 1;
flush->hint_address[0] = t->flush_dma[3];
if (t->setup_hotplug) {
offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address) * 4;
/* dcr-descriptor4: blk */
dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
dcr->region_index = 8+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~handle[4];
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
dcr->windows = 1;
dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
dcr->command_offset = 0;
dcr->command_size = 8;
dcr->status_offset = 8;
dcr->status_size = 4;
offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
/* dcr-descriptor4: pmem */
dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size);
dcr->region_index = 9+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~handle[4];
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
dcr->windows = 0;
offset = offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size);
/* bdw4 (spa/dcr4, dimm4) */
bdw = nfit_buf + offset;
bdw->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_DATA_REGION;
bdw->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region);
bdw->region_index = 8+1;
bdw->windows = 1;
bdw->offset = 0;
bdw->size = BDW_SIZE;
bdw->capacity = DIMM_SIZE;
bdw->start_address = 0;
offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region);
/* spa10 (dcr4) dimm4 */
spa = nfit_buf + offset;
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_DCR), 16);
spa->range_index = 10+1;
spa->address = t->dcr_dma[4];
spa->length = DCR_SIZE;
/*
* spa11 (single-dimm interleave for hotplug, note storage
* does not actually alias the related block-data-window
* regions)
*/
spa = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(*spa);
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_PM), 16);
spa->range_index = 11+1;
spa->address = t->spa_set_dma[2];
spa->length = SPA0_SIZE;
/* spa12 (bdw for dcr4) dimm4 */
spa = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(*spa) * 2;
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_BDW), 16);
spa->range_index = 12+1;
spa->address = t->dimm_dma[4];
spa->length = DIMM_SIZE;
offset = offset + sizeof(*spa) * 3;
/* mem-region14 (spa/dcr4, dimm4) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[4];
memdev->physical_id = 4;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 10+1;
memdev->region_index = 8+1;
memdev->region_size = 0;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
/* mem-region15 (spa0, dimm4) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset +
sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map);
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[4];
memdev->physical_id = 4;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 11+1;
memdev->region_index = 9+1;
memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[2];
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
/* mem-region16 (spa/bdw4, dimm4) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset +
sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 2;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = handle[4];
memdev->physical_id = 4;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 12+1;
memdev->region_index = 8+1;
memdev->region_size = 0;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 3;
/* flush3 (dimm4) */
flush = nfit_buf + offset;
flush->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_FLUSH_ADDRESS;
flush->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address);
flush->device_handle = handle[4];
flush->hint_count = 1;
flush->hint_address[0] = t->flush_dma[4];
}
post_ars_status(&t->ars_state, t->spa_set_dma[0], SPA0_SIZE);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
acpi_desc = &t->acpi_desc;
set_bit(ND_CMD_GET_CONFIG_SIZE, &acpi_desc->dimm_dsm_force_en);
set_bit(ND_CMD_GET_CONFIG_DATA, &acpi_desc->dimm_dsm_force_en);
set_bit(ND_CMD_SET_CONFIG_DATA, &acpi_desc->dimm_dsm_force_en);
set_bit(ND_CMD_ARS_CAP, &acpi_desc->bus_dsm_force_en);
set_bit(ND_CMD_ARS_START, &acpi_desc->bus_dsm_force_en);
set_bit(ND_CMD_ARS_STATUS, &acpi_desc->bus_dsm_force_en);
set_bit(ND_CMD_CLEAR_ERROR, &acpi_desc->bus_dsm_force_en);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
}
static void nfit_test1_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
{
size_t offset;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
void *nfit_buf = t->nfit_buf;
struct acpi_nfit_memory_map *memdev;
struct acpi_nfit_control_region *dcr;
struct acpi_nfit_system_address *spa;
struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
offset = 0;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
/* spa0 (flat range with no bdw aliasing) */
spa = nfit_buf + offset;
spa->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_SYSTEM_ADDRESS;
spa->header.length = sizeof(*spa);
memcpy(spa->range_guid, to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_SPA_PM), 16);
spa->range_index = 0+1;
spa->address = t->spa_set_dma[0];
spa->length = SPA2_SIZE;
offset += sizeof(*spa);
/* mem-region0 (spa0, dimm0) */
memdev = nfit_buf + offset;
memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
memdev->header.length = sizeof(*memdev);
memdev->device_handle = 0;
memdev->physical_id = 0;
memdev->region_id = 0;
memdev->range_index = 0+1;
memdev->region_index = 0+1;
memdev->region_size = SPA2_SIZE;
memdev->region_offset = 0;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
memdev->flags = ACPI_NFIT_MEM_SAVE_FAILED | ACPI_NFIT_MEM_RESTORE_FAILED
| ACPI_NFIT_MEM_FLUSH_FAILED | ACPI_NFIT_MEM_HEALTH_OBSERVED
| ACPI_NFIT_MEM_NOT_ARMED;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
offset += sizeof(*memdev);
/* dcr-descriptor0 */
dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
window_size);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
dcr->region_index = 0+1;
dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
dcr->device_id = 0;
dcr->revision_id = 1;
dcr->serial_number = ~0;
dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTE;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
dcr->windows = 0;
post_ars_status(&t->ars_state, t->spa_set_dma[0], SPA2_SIZE);
acpi_desc = &t->acpi_desc;
set_bit(ND_CMD_ARS_CAP, &acpi_desc->bus_dsm_force_en);
set_bit(ND_CMD_ARS_START, &acpi_desc->bus_dsm_force_en);
set_bit(ND_CMD_ARS_STATUS, &acpi_desc->bus_dsm_force_en);
set_bit(ND_CMD_CLEAR_ERROR, &acpi_desc->bus_dsm_force_en);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
}
static int nfit_test_blk_do_io(struct nd_blk_region *ndbr, resource_size_t dpa,
void *iobuf, u64 len, int rw)
{
struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk = ndbr->blk_provider_data;
struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[BDW];
struct nd_region *nd_region = &ndbr->nd_region;
unsigned int lane;
lane = nd_region_acquire_lane(nd_region);
if (rw)
nd_blk: change aperture mapping from WC to WB This should result in a pretty sizeable performance gain for reads. For rough comparison I did some simple read testing using PMEM to compare reads of write combining (WC) mappings vs write-back (WB). This was done on a random lab machine. PMEM reads from a write combining mapping: # dd of=/dev/null if=/dev/pmem0 bs=4096 count=100000 100000+0 records in 100000+0 records out 409600000 bytes (410 MB) copied, 9.2855 s, 44.1 MB/s PMEM reads from a write-back mapping: # dd of=/dev/null if=/dev/pmem0 bs=4096 count=1000000 1000000+0 records in 1000000+0 records out 4096000000 bytes (4.1 GB) copied, 3.44034 s, 1.2 GB/s To be able to safely support a write-back aperture I needed to add support for the "read flush" _DSM flag, as outlined in the DSM spec: http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DSM_Interface_Example.pdf This flag tells the ND BLK driver that it needs to flush the cache lines associated with the aperture after the aperture is moved but before any new data is read. This ensures that any stale cache lines from the previous contents of the aperture will be discarded from the processor cache, and the new data will be read properly from the DIMM. We know that the cache lines are clean and will be discarded without any writeback because either a) the previous aperture operation was a read, and we never modified the contents of the aperture, or b) the previous aperture operation was a write and we must have written back the dirtied contents of the aperture to the DIMM before the I/O was completed. In order to add support for the "read flush" flag I needed to add a generic routine to invalidate cache lines, mmio_flush_range(). This is protected by the ARCH_HAS_MMIO_FLUSH Kconfig variable, and is currently only supported on x86. Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-08-27 13:14:20 -06:00
memcpy(mmio->addr.base + dpa, iobuf, len);
else {
memcpy(iobuf, mmio->addr.base + dpa, len);
/* give us some some coverage of the mmio_flush_range() API */
mmio_flush_range(mmio->addr.base + dpa, len);
}
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
nd_region_release_lane(nd_region, lane);
return 0;
}
static int nfit_test_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor *nd_desc;
struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct nfit_test *nfit_test;
int rc;
nfit_test = to_nfit_test(&pdev->dev);
/* common alloc */
if (nfit_test->num_dcr) {
int num = nfit_test->num_dcr;
nfit_test->dimm = devm_kcalloc(dev, num, sizeof(void *),
GFP_KERNEL);
nfit_test->dimm_dma = devm_kcalloc(dev, num, sizeof(dma_addr_t),
GFP_KERNEL);
nfit_test->flush = devm_kcalloc(dev, num, sizeof(void *),
GFP_KERNEL);
nfit_test->flush_dma = devm_kcalloc(dev, num, sizeof(dma_addr_t),
GFP_KERNEL);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
nfit_test->label = devm_kcalloc(dev, num, sizeof(void *),
GFP_KERNEL);
nfit_test->label_dma = devm_kcalloc(dev, num,
sizeof(dma_addr_t), GFP_KERNEL);
nfit_test->dcr = devm_kcalloc(dev, num,
sizeof(struct nfit_test_dcr *), GFP_KERNEL);
nfit_test->dcr_dma = devm_kcalloc(dev, num,
sizeof(dma_addr_t), GFP_KERNEL);
if (nfit_test->dimm && nfit_test->dimm_dma && nfit_test->label
&& nfit_test->label_dma && nfit_test->dcr
&& nfit_test->dcr_dma && nfit_test->flush
&& nfit_test->flush_dma)
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
/* pass */;
else
return -ENOMEM;
}
if (nfit_test->num_pm) {
int num = nfit_test->num_pm;
nfit_test->spa_set = devm_kcalloc(dev, num, sizeof(void *),
GFP_KERNEL);
nfit_test->spa_set_dma = devm_kcalloc(dev, num,
sizeof(dma_addr_t), GFP_KERNEL);
if (nfit_test->spa_set && nfit_test->spa_set_dma)
/* pass */;
else
return -ENOMEM;
}
/* per-nfit specific alloc */
if (nfit_test->alloc(nfit_test))
return -ENOMEM;
nfit_test->setup(nfit_test);
acpi_desc = &nfit_test->acpi_desc;
acpi_nfit_desc_init(acpi_desc, &pdev->dev);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
acpi_desc->nfit = nfit_test->nfit_buf;
acpi_desc->blk_do_io = nfit_test_blk_do_io;
nd_desc = &acpi_desc->nd_desc;
nd_desc->provider_name = NULL;
nd_desc->ndctl = nfit_test_ctl;
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
acpi_desc->nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus_register(&pdev->dev, nd_desc);
if (!acpi_desc->nvdimm_bus)
return -ENXIO;
rc = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, nfit_test->nfit_size);
if (rc) {
nvdimm_bus_unregister(acpi_desc->nvdimm_bus);
return rc;
}
if (nfit_test->setup != nfit_test0_setup)
return 0;
nfit_test->setup_hotplug = 1;
nfit_test->setup(nfit_test);
tools/testing/nvdimm: libnvdimm unit test infrastructure 'libnvdimm' is the first driver sub-system in the kernel to implement mocking for unit test coverage. The nfit_test module gets built as an external module and arranges for external module replacements of nfit, libnvdimm, nd_pmem, and nd_blk. These replacements use the linker --wrap option to redirect calls to ioremap() + request_mem_region() to custom defined unit test resources. The end result is a fully functional nvdimm_bus, as far as userspace is concerned, but with the capability to perform otherwise destructive tests on emulated resources. Q: Why not use QEMU for this emulation? QEMU is not suitable for unit testing. QEMU's role is to faithfully emulate the platform. A unit test's role is to unfaithfully implement the platform with the goal of triggering bugs in the corners of the sub-system implementation. As bugs are discovered in platforms, or the sub-system itself, the unit tests are extended to backstop a fix with a reproducer unit test. Another problem with QEMU is that it would require coordination of 3 software projects instead of 2 (kernel + libndctl [1]) to maintain and execute the tests. The chances for bit rot and the difficulty of getting the tests running goes up non-linearly the more components involved. Q: Why submit this to the kernel tree instead of external modules in libndctl? Simple, to alleviate the same risk that out-of-tree external modules face. Updates to drivers/nvdimm/ can be immediately evaluated to see if they have any impact on tools/testing/nvdimm/. Q: What are the negative implications of merging this? It is a unique maintenance burden because the purpose of mocking an interface to enable a unit test is to purposefully short circuit the semantics of a routine to enable testing. For example __wrap_ioremap_cache() fakes the pmem driver into "ioremap()'ing" a test resource buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). The future maintenance burden hits when someone changes the semantics of ioremap_cache() and wonders what the implications are for the unit test. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2015-06-17 15:23:32 -06:00
rc = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, nfit_test->nfit_size);
if (rc) {
nvdimm_bus_unregister(acpi_desc->nvdimm_bus);
return rc;
}
return 0;
}
static int nfit_test_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct nfit_test *nfit_test = to_nfit_test(&pdev->dev);
struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc = &nfit_test->acpi_desc;
nvdimm_bus_unregister(acpi_desc->nvdimm_bus);
return 0;
}
static void nfit_test_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct nfit_test *nfit_test = to_nfit_test(dev);
kfree(nfit_test);
}
static const struct platform_device_id nfit_test_id[] = {
{ KBUILD_MODNAME },
{ },
};
static struct platform_driver nfit_test_driver = {
.probe = nfit_test_probe,
.remove = nfit_test_remove,
.driver = {
.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
},
.id_table = nfit_test_id,
};
#ifdef CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_MBYTES
#define CMA_SIZE_MBYTES CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_MBYTES
#else
#define CMA_SIZE_MBYTES 0
#endif
static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
{
int rc, i;
nfit_test_setup(nfit_test_lookup);
for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++) {
struct nfit_test *nfit_test;
struct platform_device *pdev;
static int once;
nfit_test = kzalloc(sizeof(*nfit_test), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nfit_test) {
rc = -ENOMEM;
goto err_register;
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfit_test->resources);
switch (i) {
case 0:
nfit_test->num_pm = NUM_PM;
nfit_test->num_dcr = NUM_DCR;
nfit_test->alloc = nfit_test0_alloc;
nfit_test->setup = nfit_test0_setup;
break;
case 1:
nfit_test->num_pm = 1;
nfit_test->alloc = nfit_test1_alloc;
nfit_test->setup = nfit_test1_setup;
break;
default:
rc = -EINVAL;
goto err_register;
}
pdev = &nfit_test->pdev;
pdev->name = KBUILD_MODNAME;
pdev->id = i;
pdev->dev.release = nfit_test_release;
rc = platform_device_register(pdev);
if (rc) {
put_device(&pdev->dev);
goto err_register;
}
rc = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
if (rc)
goto err_register;
instances[i] = nfit_test;
if (!once++) {
dma_addr_t dma;
void *buf;
buf = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev, SZ_128M, &dma,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf) {
rc = -ENOMEM;
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "need 128M of free cma\n");
goto err_register;
}
dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, SZ_128M, buf, dma);
}
}
rc = platform_driver_register(&nfit_test_driver);
if (rc)
goto err_register;
return 0;
err_register:
for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
if (instances[i])
platform_device_unregister(&instances[i]->pdev);
nfit_test_teardown();
return rc;
}
static __exit void nfit_test_exit(void)
{
int i;
platform_driver_unregister(&nfit_test_driver);
for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
platform_device_unregister(&instances[i]->pdev);
nfit_test_teardown();
}
module_init(nfit_test_init);
module_exit(nfit_test_exit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");