alistair23-linux/tools/perf/util/block-info.c

499 lines
12 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <linux/zalloc.h>
#include "block-info.h"
#include "sort.h"
#include "annotate.h"
#include "symbol.h"
#include "dso.h"
#include "map.h"
#include "srcline.h"
#include "evlist.h"
#include "hist.h"
perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for tui Previous patch has implemented a new option "--total-cycles". But only stdio mode is supported. This patch supports the tui mode and support '--percent-limit'. For example, perf record -b ./div perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 1 # Samples: 2753248 of event 'cycles' Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so -------------------------------------------------- v7: --- 1. Since we have used use_browser in report__browse_block_hists to support stdio mode, now we also add supporting for tui. 2. Move block tui browser code from ui/browsers/hists.c to block-info.c. v6: --- Create report__tui_browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). v5: --- Fix a crash issue when running perf report without '--total-cycles'. The issue is because the internal flag is renamed from 'total_cycles' to 'total_cycles_mode' in previous patch but this patch still uses 'total_cycles' to check if the '--total-cycles' option is enabled, which causes the code to be inconsistent. v4: --- Since the block collection is moved out of printing in previous patch, this patch is updated accordingly for tui supporting. v3: --- Minor change since the function name is changed: block_total_cycles_percent -> block_info__total_cycles_percent Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-8-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07 00:47:19 -07:00
#include "ui/browsers/hists.h"
static struct block_header_column {
const char *name;
int width;
} block_columns[PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_MAX_INDEX] = {
[PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_TOTAL_CYCLES_PCT] = {
.name = "Sampled Cycles%",
.width = 15,
},
[PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_LBR_CYCLES] = {
.name = "Sampled Cycles",
.width = 14,
},
[PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_CYCLES_PCT] = {
.name = "Avg Cycles%",
.width = 11,
},
[PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_AVG_CYCLES] = {
.name = "Avg Cycles",
.width = 10,
},
[PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_RANGE] = {
.name = "[Program Block Range]",
.width = 70,
},
[PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_DSO] = {
.name = "Shared Object",
.width = 20,
}
};
struct block_info *block_info__get(struct block_info *bi)
{
if (bi)
refcount_inc(&bi->refcnt);
return bi;
}
void block_info__put(struct block_info *bi)
{
if (bi && refcount_dec_and_test(&bi->refcnt))
free(bi);
}
struct block_info *block_info__new(void)
{
struct block_info *bi = zalloc(sizeof(*bi));
if (bi)
refcount_set(&bi->refcnt, 1);
return bi;
}
int64_t __block_info__cmp(struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
{
struct block_info *bi_l = left->block_info;
struct block_info *bi_r = right->block_info;
int cmp;
if (!bi_l->sym || !bi_r->sym) {
if (!bi_l->sym && !bi_r->sym)
return -1;
else if (!bi_l->sym)
return -1;
else
return 1;
}
cmp = strcmp(bi_l->sym->name, bi_r->sym->name);
if (cmp)
return cmp;
if (bi_l->start != bi_r->start)
return (int64_t)(bi_r->start - bi_l->start);
return (int64_t)(bi_r->end - bi_l->end);
}
int64_t block_info__cmp(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused,
struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
{
return __block_info__cmp(left, right);
}
static void init_block_info(struct block_info *bi, struct symbol *sym,
struct cyc_hist *ch, int offset,
u64 total_cycles)
{
bi->sym = sym;
bi->start = ch->start;
bi->end = offset;
bi->cycles = ch->cycles;
bi->cycles_aggr = ch->cycles_aggr;
bi->num = ch->num;
bi->num_aggr = ch->num_aggr;
bi->total_cycles = total_cycles;
memcpy(bi->cycles_spark, ch->cycles_spark,
NUM_SPARKS * sizeof(u64));
}
int block_info__process_sym(struct hist_entry *he, struct block_hist *bh,
u64 *block_cycles_aggr, u64 total_cycles)
{
struct annotation *notes;
struct cyc_hist *ch;
static struct addr_location al;
u64 cycles = 0;
if (!he->ms.map || !he->ms.sym)
return 0;
memset(&al, 0, sizeof(al));
al.map = he->ms.map;
al.sym = he->ms.sym;
notes = symbol__annotation(he->ms.sym);
if (!notes || !notes->src || !notes->src->cycles_hist)
return 0;
ch = notes->src->cycles_hist;
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < symbol__size(he->ms.sym); i++) {
if (ch[i].num_aggr) {
struct block_info *bi;
struct hist_entry *he_block;
bi = block_info__new();
if (!bi)
return -1;
init_block_info(bi, he->ms.sym, &ch[i], i,
total_cycles);
cycles += bi->cycles_aggr / bi->num_aggr;
he_block = hists__add_entry_block(&bh->block_hists,
&al, bi);
if (!he_block) {
block_info__put(bi);
return -1;
}
}
}
if (block_cycles_aggr)
*block_cycles_aggr += cycles;
return 0;
}
static int block_column_header(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
struct perf_hpp *hpp,
struct hists *hists __maybe_unused,
int line __maybe_unused,
int *span __maybe_unused)
{
struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt, struct block_fmt, fmt);
return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s", block_fmt->width,
block_fmt->header);
}
static int block_column_width(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
struct perf_hpp *hpp __maybe_unused,
struct hists *hists __maybe_unused)
{
struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt, struct block_fmt, fmt);
return block_fmt->width;
}
static int color_pct(struct perf_hpp *hpp, int width, double pct)
{
#ifdef HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT
if (use_browser) {
return __hpp__slsmg_color_printf(hpp, "%*.2f%%",
width - 1, pct);
}
#endif
return hpp_color_scnprintf(hpp, "%*.2f%%", width - 1, pct);
}
static int block_total_cycles_pct_entry(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
struct perf_hpp *hpp,
struct hist_entry *he)
{
struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt, struct block_fmt, fmt);
struct block_info *bi = he->block_info;
double ratio = 0.0;
if (block_fmt->total_cycles)
ratio = (double)bi->cycles / (double)block_fmt->total_cycles;
return color_pct(hpp, block_fmt->width, 100.0 * ratio);
}
static int64_t block_total_cycles_pct_sort(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
struct hist_entry *left,
struct hist_entry *right)
{
struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt, struct block_fmt, fmt);
struct block_info *bi_l = left->block_info;
struct block_info *bi_r = right->block_info;
double l, r;
if (block_fmt->total_cycles) {
l = ((double)bi_l->cycles /
(double)block_fmt->total_cycles) * 100000.0;
r = ((double)bi_r->cycles /
(double)block_fmt->total_cycles) * 100000.0;
return (int64_t)l - (int64_t)r;
}
return 0;
}
static void cycles_string(u64 cycles, char *buf, int size)
{
if (cycles >= 1000000)
scnprintf(buf, size, "%.1fM", (double)cycles / 1000000.0);
else if (cycles >= 1000)
scnprintf(buf, size, "%.1fK", (double)cycles / 1000.0);
else
scnprintf(buf, size, "%1d", cycles);
}
static int block_cycles_lbr_entry(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he)
{
struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt, struct block_fmt, fmt);
struct block_info *bi = he->block_info;
char cycles_buf[16];
cycles_string(bi->cycles_aggr, cycles_buf, sizeof(cycles_buf));
return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s", block_fmt->width,
cycles_buf);
}
static int block_cycles_pct_entry(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he)
{
struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt, struct block_fmt, fmt);
struct block_info *bi = he->block_info;
double ratio = 0.0;
u64 avg;
if (block_fmt->block_cycles && bi->num_aggr) {
avg = bi->cycles_aggr / bi->num_aggr;
ratio = (double)avg / (double)block_fmt->block_cycles;
}
return color_pct(hpp, block_fmt->width, 100.0 * ratio);
}
static int block_avg_cycles_entry(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
struct perf_hpp *hpp,
struct hist_entry *he)
{
struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt, struct block_fmt, fmt);
struct block_info *bi = he->block_info;
char cycles_buf[16];
cycles_string(bi->cycles_aggr / bi->num_aggr, cycles_buf,
sizeof(cycles_buf));
return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s", block_fmt->width,
cycles_buf);
}
static int block_range_entry(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt, struct perf_hpp *hpp,
struct hist_entry *he)
{
struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt, struct block_fmt, fmt);
struct block_info *bi = he->block_info;
char buf[128];
char *start_line, *end_line;
symbol_conf.disable_add2line_warn = true;
start_line = map__srcline(he->ms.map, bi->sym->start + bi->start,
he->ms.sym);
end_line = map__srcline(he->ms.map, bi->sym->start + bi->end,
he->ms.sym);
perf diff: Fix undefined string comparison spotted by clang's -Wstring-compare clang warns: util/block-info.c:298:18: error: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare] if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) { ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ util/block-info.c:298:51: error: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare] if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) { ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ util/block-info.c:298:18: error: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare] if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) { ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ util/block-info.c:298:51: error: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare] if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) { ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ util/map.c:434:15: error: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare] if (srcline != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Reviewer Notes: Looks good to me. Some more context: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wstring-compare The spec says: J.1 Unspecified behavior The following are unspecified: .. Whether two string literals result in distinct arrays (6.4.5). Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/900 Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200223193456.25291-1-nick.desaulniers@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-02-23 12:34:49 -07:00
if ((strncmp(start_line, SRCLINE_UNKNOWN, strlen(SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) != 0) &&
(strncmp(end_line, SRCLINE_UNKNOWN, strlen(SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) != 0)) {
scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "[%s -> %s]",
start_line, end_line);
} else {
scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "[%7lx -> %7lx]",
bi->start, bi->end);
}
free_srcline(start_line);
free_srcline(end_line);
return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s", block_fmt->width, buf);
}
static int block_dso_entry(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt, struct perf_hpp *hpp,
struct hist_entry *he)
{
struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt, struct block_fmt, fmt);
struct map *map = he->ms.map;
if (map && map->dso) {
return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s", block_fmt->width,
map->dso->short_name);
}
return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s", block_fmt->width,
"[unknown]");
}
static void init_block_header(struct block_fmt *block_fmt)
{
struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt = &block_fmt->fmt;
BUG_ON(block_fmt->idx >= PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_MAX_INDEX);
block_fmt->header = block_columns[block_fmt->idx].name;
block_fmt->width = block_columns[block_fmt->idx].width;
fmt->header = block_column_header;
fmt->width = block_column_width;
}
static void hpp_register(struct block_fmt *block_fmt, int idx,
struct perf_hpp_list *hpp_list)
{
struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt = &block_fmt->fmt;
block_fmt->idx = idx;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fmt->list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fmt->sort_list);
switch (idx) {
case PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_TOTAL_CYCLES_PCT:
fmt->color = block_total_cycles_pct_entry;
fmt->cmp = block_info__cmp;
fmt->sort = block_total_cycles_pct_sort;
break;
case PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_LBR_CYCLES:
fmt->entry = block_cycles_lbr_entry;
break;
case PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_CYCLES_PCT:
fmt->color = block_cycles_pct_entry;
break;
case PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_AVG_CYCLES:
fmt->entry = block_avg_cycles_entry;
break;
case PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_RANGE:
fmt->entry = block_range_entry;
break;
case PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_DSO:
fmt->entry = block_dso_entry;
break;
default:
return;
}
init_block_header(block_fmt);
perf_hpp_list__column_register(hpp_list, fmt);
}
static void register_block_columns(struct perf_hpp_list *hpp_list,
struct block_fmt *block_fmts,
int *block_hpps, int nr_hpps)
{
for (int i = 0; i < nr_hpps; i++)
hpp_register(&block_fmts[i], block_hpps[i], hpp_list);
}
static void init_block_hist(struct block_hist *bh, struct block_fmt *block_fmts,
int *block_hpps, int nr_hpps)
{
__hists__init(&bh->block_hists, &bh->block_list);
perf_hpp_list__init(&bh->block_list);
bh->block_list.nr_header_lines = 1;
register_block_columns(&bh->block_list, block_fmts,
block_hpps, nr_hpps);
/* Sort by the first fmt */
perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(&bh->block_list, &block_fmts[0].fmt);
}
static int process_block_report(struct hists *hists,
struct block_report *block_report,
u64 total_cycles, int *block_hpps,
int nr_hpps)
{
struct rb_node *next = rb_first_cached(&hists->entries);
struct block_hist *bh = &block_report->hist;
struct hist_entry *he;
if (nr_hpps > PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_MAX_INDEX)
return -1;
block_report->nr_fmts = nr_hpps;
init_block_hist(bh, block_report->fmts, block_hpps, nr_hpps);
while (next) {
he = rb_entry(next, struct hist_entry, rb_node);
block_info__process_sym(he, bh, &block_report->cycles,
total_cycles);
next = rb_next(&he->rb_node);
}
for (int i = 0; i < nr_hpps; i++) {
block_report->fmts[i].total_cycles = total_cycles;
block_report->fmts[i].block_cycles = block_report->cycles;
}
hists__output_resort(&bh->block_hists, NULL);
return 0;
}
struct block_report *block_info__create_report(struct evlist *evlist,
u64 total_cycles,
int *block_hpps, int nr_hpps,
int *nr_reps)
{
struct block_report *block_reports;
int nr_hists = evlist->core.nr_entries, i = 0;
struct evsel *pos;
block_reports = calloc(nr_hists, sizeof(struct block_report));
if (!block_reports)
return NULL;
evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, pos) {
struct hists *hists = evsel__hists(pos);
process_block_report(hists, &block_reports[i], total_cycles,
block_hpps, nr_hpps);
i++;
}
*nr_reps = nr_hists;
return block_reports;
}
perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for stdio It would be useful to support sorting for all blocks by the sampled cycles percent per block. This is useful to concentrate on the globally hottest blocks. This patch implements a new option "--total-cycles" which sorts all blocks by 'Sampled Cycles%'. The 'Sampled Cycles%' is the percent: percent = block sampled cycles aggregation / total sampled cycles Note that, this patch only supports "--stdio" mode. For example, # perf record -b ./div # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 2753248 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................ ................. # 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so 0.25% 182.5K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:391] libc-2.27.so 0.00% 48 1.07% 48 [x86_pmu_enable+284 -> x86_pmu_enable+298] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 74 1.64% 74 [vm_mmap_pgoff+0 -> vm_mmap_pgoff+92] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 73 1.62% 73 [vm_mmap+0 -> vm_mmap+48] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 63 0.69% 31 [up_write+0 -> up_write+34] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 13 0.29% 13 [setup_arg_pages+396 -> setup_arg_pages+413] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 3 0.07% 3 [setup_arg_pages+418 -> setup_arg_pages+450] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 616 6.84% 308 [security_mmap_file+0 -> security_mmap_file+72] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 23 0.51% 23 [security_mmap_file+77 -> security_mmap_file+87] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+0 -> sched_clock+4] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+9 -> sched_clock+12] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 1 0.02% 1 [rcu_nmi_exit+0 -> rcu_nmi_exit+9] [kernel.kallsyms] Committer testing: This should provide material for hours of endless joy, both from looking for suspicious things in the implementation of this patch, such as the top one: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] As well from things that look legit: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] :-) Very short system wide taken branches session: # perf record -h -b Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>] or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>] -b, --branch-any sample any taken branches # # perf record -b ^C[ perf record: Woken up 595 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 156.672 MB perf.data (196873 samples) ] # # perf evlist -v cycles: size: 112, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|CPU|PERIOD|BRANCH_STACK, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, freq: 1, task: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1, branch_sample_type: ANY # # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 6M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 6299936 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ...................................................................... .................... # 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] 1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so 0.72% 544.5K 0.03% 230 [entry_64.S:657 -> entry_64.S:662] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.56% 541.8K 0.09% 672 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:300] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.39% 293.2K 0.01% 104 [list_debug.c:43 -> list_debug.c:61] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.36% 278.6K 0.03% 272 [entry_64.S:1289 -> entry_64.S:1308] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.30% 260.8K 0.07% 564 [clear_page_64.S:47 -> clear_page_64.S:50] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.28% 215.3K 0.05% 369 [traps.c:623 -> traps.c:628] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.23% 178.1K 0.04% 278 [entry_64.S:271 -> entry_64.S:275] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 152.6K 0.09% 706 [paravirt.c:177 -> paravirt.c:179] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 155.8K 0.05% 373 [entry_64.S:153 -> entry_64.S:175] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.18% 136.6K 0.03% 222 [msr.h:105 -> msr.h:166] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 118.3K 0.01% 44 [entry_64.S:632 -> entry_64.S:657] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.14% 104.5K 0.00% 28 [rwsem.c:1541 -> rwsem.c:1544] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 99.2K 0.01% 53 [spinlock.c:150 -> spinlock.c:152] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 95.5K 0.00% 35 [swap.c:456 -> swap.c:471] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.12% 96.2K 0.05% 407 [copy_user_64.S:175 -> copy_user_64.S:209] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.11% 85.9K 0.00% 31 [swap.c:400 -> page-flags.h:188] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.10% 73.0K 0.01% 52 [paravirt.h:763 -> list.h:131] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 56.2K 0.03% 214 [filemap.c:1524 -> filemap.c:1557] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 54.2K 0.02% 145 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1049] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 50.3K 0.00% 39 [mmzone.c:49 -> mmzone.c:69] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 48.3K 0.01% 40 [paravirt.h:768 -> page_alloc.c:3304] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.7K 0.02% 155 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1056] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.9K 0.01% 103 [swap.c:867 -> swap.c:902] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 47.8K 0.00% 34 [entry_64.S:1201 -> entry_64.S:1202] [kernel.vmlinux] ----------------------------------------------------------- v7: --- Use use_browser in report__browse_block_hists for supporting stdio and potential tui mode. v6: --- Create report__browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). It's called from perf_evlist__tty_browse_hists. v5: --- 1. Move all block functions to block-info.c 2. Move the code of setting ms in block hist_entry to other patch. v4: --- 1. Use new option '--total-cycles' to replace '-s total_cycles' in v3. 2. Move block info collection out of block info printing. v3: --- 1. Use common function block_info__process_sym to process the blocks per symbol. 2. Remove the nasty hack for skipping calculation of column length 3. Some minor cleanup Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-6-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07 00:47:17 -07:00
void block_info__free_report(struct block_report *reps, int nr_reps)
{
for (int i = 0; i < nr_reps; i++)
hists__delete_entries(&reps[i].hist.block_hists);
free(reps);
}
perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for stdio It would be useful to support sorting for all blocks by the sampled cycles percent per block. This is useful to concentrate on the globally hottest blocks. This patch implements a new option "--total-cycles" which sorts all blocks by 'Sampled Cycles%'. The 'Sampled Cycles%' is the percent: percent = block sampled cycles aggregation / total sampled cycles Note that, this patch only supports "--stdio" mode. For example, # perf record -b ./div # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 2753248 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................ ................. # 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so 0.25% 182.5K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:391] libc-2.27.so 0.00% 48 1.07% 48 [x86_pmu_enable+284 -> x86_pmu_enable+298] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 74 1.64% 74 [vm_mmap_pgoff+0 -> vm_mmap_pgoff+92] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 73 1.62% 73 [vm_mmap+0 -> vm_mmap+48] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 63 0.69% 31 [up_write+0 -> up_write+34] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 13 0.29% 13 [setup_arg_pages+396 -> setup_arg_pages+413] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 3 0.07% 3 [setup_arg_pages+418 -> setup_arg_pages+450] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 616 6.84% 308 [security_mmap_file+0 -> security_mmap_file+72] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 23 0.51% 23 [security_mmap_file+77 -> security_mmap_file+87] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+0 -> sched_clock+4] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+9 -> sched_clock+12] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 1 0.02% 1 [rcu_nmi_exit+0 -> rcu_nmi_exit+9] [kernel.kallsyms] Committer testing: This should provide material for hours of endless joy, both from looking for suspicious things in the implementation of this patch, such as the top one: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] As well from things that look legit: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] :-) Very short system wide taken branches session: # perf record -h -b Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>] or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>] -b, --branch-any sample any taken branches # # perf record -b ^C[ perf record: Woken up 595 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 156.672 MB perf.data (196873 samples) ] # # perf evlist -v cycles: size: 112, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|CPU|PERIOD|BRANCH_STACK, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, freq: 1, task: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1, branch_sample_type: ANY # # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 6M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 6299936 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ...................................................................... .................... # 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] 1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so 0.72% 544.5K 0.03% 230 [entry_64.S:657 -> entry_64.S:662] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.56% 541.8K 0.09% 672 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:300] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.39% 293.2K 0.01% 104 [list_debug.c:43 -> list_debug.c:61] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.36% 278.6K 0.03% 272 [entry_64.S:1289 -> entry_64.S:1308] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.30% 260.8K 0.07% 564 [clear_page_64.S:47 -> clear_page_64.S:50] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.28% 215.3K 0.05% 369 [traps.c:623 -> traps.c:628] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.23% 178.1K 0.04% 278 [entry_64.S:271 -> entry_64.S:275] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 152.6K 0.09% 706 [paravirt.c:177 -> paravirt.c:179] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 155.8K 0.05% 373 [entry_64.S:153 -> entry_64.S:175] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.18% 136.6K 0.03% 222 [msr.h:105 -> msr.h:166] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 118.3K 0.01% 44 [entry_64.S:632 -> entry_64.S:657] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.14% 104.5K 0.00% 28 [rwsem.c:1541 -> rwsem.c:1544] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 99.2K 0.01% 53 [spinlock.c:150 -> spinlock.c:152] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 95.5K 0.00% 35 [swap.c:456 -> swap.c:471] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.12% 96.2K 0.05% 407 [copy_user_64.S:175 -> copy_user_64.S:209] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.11% 85.9K 0.00% 31 [swap.c:400 -> page-flags.h:188] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.10% 73.0K 0.01% 52 [paravirt.h:763 -> list.h:131] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 56.2K 0.03% 214 [filemap.c:1524 -> filemap.c:1557] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 54.2K 0.02% 145 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1049] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 50.3K 0.00% 39 [mmzone.c:49 -> mmzone.c:69] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 48.3K 0.01% 40 [paravirt.h:768 -> page_alloc.c:3304] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.7K 0.02% 155 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1056] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.9K 0.01% 103 [swap.c:867 -> swap.c:902] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 47.8K 0.00% 34 [entry_64.S:1201 -> entry_64.S:1202] [kernel.vmlinux] ----------------------------------------------------------- v7: --- Use use_browser in report__browse_block_hists for supporting stdio and potential tui mode. v6: --- Create report__browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). It's called from perf_evlist__tty_browse_hists. v5: --- 1. Move all block functions to block-info.c 2. Move the code of setting ms in block hist_entry to other patch. v4: --- 1. Use new option '--total-cycles' to replace '-s total_cycles' in v3. 2. Move block info collection out of block info printing. v3: --- 1. Use common function block_info__process_sym to process the blocks per symbol. 2. Remove the nasty hack for skipping calculation of column length 3. Some minor cleanup Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-6-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07 00:47:17 -07:00
int report__browse_block_hists(struct block_hist *bh, float min_percent,
struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_env *env,
struct annotation_options *annotation_opts)
perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for stdio It would be useful to support sorting for all blocks by the sampled cycles percent per block. This is useful to concentrate on the globally hottest blocks. This patch implements a new option "--total-cycles" which sorts all blocks by 'Sampled Cycles%'. The 'Sampled Cycles%' is the percent: percent = block sampled cycles aggregation / total sampled cycles Note that, this patch only supports "--stdio" mode. For example, # perf record -b ./div # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 2753248 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................ ................. # 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so 0.25% 182.5K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:391] libc-2.27.so 0.00% 48 1.07% 48 [x86_pmu_enable+284 -> x86_pmu_enable+298] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 74 1.64% 74 [vm_mmap_pgoff+0 -> vm_mmap_pgoff+92] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 73 1.62% 73 [vm_mmap+0 -> vm_mmap+48] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 63 0.69% 31 [up_write+0 -> up_write+34] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 13 0.29% 13 [setup_arg_pages+396 -> setup_arg_pages+413] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 3 0.07% 3 [setup_arg_pages+418 -> setup_arg_pages+450] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 616 6.84% 308 [security_mmap_file+0 -> security_mmap_file+72] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 23 0.51% 23 [security_mmap_file+77 -> security_mmap_file+87] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+0 -> sched_clock+4] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+9 -> sched_clock+12] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 1 0.02% 1 [rcu_nmi_exit+0 -> rcu_nmi_exit+9] [kernel.kallsyms] Committer testing: This should provide material for hours of endless joy, both from looking for suspicious things in the implementation of this patch, such as the top one: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] As well from things that look legit: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] :-) Very short system wide taken branches session: # perf record -h -b Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>] or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>] -b, --branch-any sample any taken branches # # perf record -b ^C[ perf record: Woken up 595 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 156.672 MB perf.data (196873 samples) ] # # perf evlist -v cycles: size: 112, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|CPU|PERIOD|BRANCH_STACK, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, freq: 1, task: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1, branch_sample_type: ANY # # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 6M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 6299936 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ...................................................................... .................... # 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] 1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so 0.72% 544.5K 0.03% 230 [entry_64.S:657 -> entry_64.S:662] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.56% 541.8K 0.09% 672 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:300] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.39% 293.2K 0.01% 104 [list_debug.c:43 -> list_debug.c:61] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.36% 278.6K 0.03% 272 [entry_64.S:1289 -> entry_64.S:1308] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.30% 260.8K 0.07% 564 [clear_page_64.S:47 -> clear_page_64.S:50] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.28% 215.3K 0.05% 369 [traps.c:623 -> traps.c:628] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.23% 178.1K 0.04% 278 [entry_64.S:271 -> entry_64.S:275] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 152.6K 0.09% 706 [paravirt.c:177 -> paravirt.c:179] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 155.8K 0.05% 373 [entry_64.S:153 -> entry_64.S:175] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.18% 136.6K 0.03% 222 [msr.h:105 -> msr.h:166] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 118.3K 0.01% 44 [entry_64.S:632 -> entry_64.S:657] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.14% 104.5K 0.00% 28 [rwsem.c:1541 -> rwsem.c:1544] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 99.2K 0.01% 53 [spinlock.c:150 -> spinlock.c:152] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 95.5K 0.00% 35 [swap.c:456 -> swap.c:471] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.12% 96.2K 0.05% 407 [copy_user_64.S:175 -> copy_user_64.S:209] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.11% 85.9K 0.00% 31 [swap.c:400 -> page-flags.h:188] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.10% 73.0K 0.01% 52 [paravirt.h:763 -> list.h:131] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 56.2K 0.03% 214 [filemap.c:1524 -> filemap.c:1557] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 54.2K 0.02% 145 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1049] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 50.3K 0.00% 39 [mmzone.c:49 -> mmzone.c:69] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 48.3K 0.01% 40 [paravirt.h:768 -> page_alloc.c:3304] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.7K 0.02% 155 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1056] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.9K 0.01% 103 [swap.c:867 -> swap.c:902] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 47.8K 0.00% 34 [entry_64.S:1201 -> entry_64.S:1202] [kernel.vmlinux] ----------------------------------------------------------- v7: --- Use use_browser in report__browse_block_hists for supporting stdio and potential tui mode. v6: --- Create report__browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). It's called from perf_evlist__tty_browse_hists. v5: --- 1. Move all block functions to block-info.c 2. Move the code of setting ms in block hist_entry to other patch. v4: --- 1. Use new option '--total-cycles' to replace '-s total_cycles' in v3. 2. Move block info collection out of block info printing. v3: --- 1. Use common function block_info__process_sym to process the blocks per symbol. 2. Remove the nasty hack for skipping calculation of column length 3. Some minor cleanup Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-6-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07 00:47:17 -07:00
{
perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for tui Previous patch has implemented a new option "--total-cycles". But only stdio mode is supported. This patch supports the tui mode and support '--percent-limit'. For example, perf record -b ./div perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 1 # Samples: 2753248 of event 'cycles' Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so -------------------------------------------------- v7: --- 1. Since we have used use_browser in report__browse_block_hists to support stdio mode, now we also add supporting for tui. 2. Move block tui browser code from ui/browsers/hists.c to block-info.c. v6: --- Create report__tui_browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). v5: --- Fix a crash issue when running perf report without '--total-cycles'. The issue is because the internal flag is renamed from 'total_cycles' to 'total_cycles_mode' in previous patch but this patch still uses 'total_cycles' to check if the '--total-cycles' option is enabled, which causes the code to be inconsistent. v4: --- Since the block collection is moved out of printing in previous patch, this patch is updated accordingly for tui supporting. v3: --- Minor change since the function name is changed: block_total_cycles_percent -> block_info__total_cycles_percent Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-8-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07 00:47:19 -07:00
int ret;
perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for stdio It would be useful to support sorting for all blocks by the sampled cycles percent per block. This is useful to concentrate on the globally hottest blocks. This patch implements a new option "--total-cycles" which sorts all blocks by 'Sampled Cycles%'. The 'Sampled Cycles%' is the percent: percent = block sampled cycles aggregation / total sampled cycles Note that, this patch only supports "--stdio" mode. For example, # perf record -b ./div # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 2753248 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................ ................. # 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so 0.25% 182.5K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:391] libc-2.27.so 0.00% 48 1.07% 48 [x86_pmu_enable+284 -> x86_pmu_enable+298] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 74 1.64% 74 [vm_mmap_pgoff+0 -> vm_mmap_pgoff+92] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 73 1.62% 73 [vm_mmap+0 -> vm_mmap+48] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 63 0.69% 31 [up_write+0 -> up_write+34] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 13 0.29% 13 [setup_arg_pages+396 -> setup_arg_pages+413] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 3 0.07% 3 [setup_arg_pages+418 -> setup_arg_pages+450] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 616 6.84% 308 [security_mmap_file+0 -> security_mmap_file+72] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 23 0.51% 23 [security_mmap_file+77 -> security_mmap_file+87] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+0 -> sched_clock+4] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+9 -> sched_clock+12] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 1 0.02% 1 [rcu_nmi_exit+0 -> rcu_nmi_exit+9] [kernel.kallsyms] Committer testing: This should provide material for hours of endless joy, both from looking for suspicious things in the implementation of this patch, such as the top one: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] As well from things that look legit: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] :-) Very short system wide taken branches session: # perf record -h -b Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>] or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>] -b, --branch-any sample any taken branches # # perf record -b ^C[ perf record: Woken up 595 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 156.672 MB perf.data (196873 samples) ] # # perf evlist -v cycles: size: 112, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|CPU|PERIOD|BRANCH_STACK, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, freq: 1, task: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1, branch_sample_type: ANY # # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 6M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 6299936 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ...................................................................... .................... # 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] 1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so 0.72% 544.5K 0.03% 230 [entry_64.S:657 -> entry_64.S:662] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.56% 541.8K 0.09% 672 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:300] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.39% 293.2K 0.01% 104 [list_debug.c:43 -> list_debug.c:61] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.36% 278.6K 0.03% 272 [entry_64.S:1289 -> entry_64.S:1308] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.30% 260.8K 0.07% 564 [clear_page_64.S:47 -> clear_page_64.S:50] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.28% 215.3K 0.05% 369 [traps.c:623 -> traps.c:628] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.23% 178.1K 0.04% 278 [entry_64.S:271 -> entry_64.S:275] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 152.6K 0.09% 706 [paravirt.c:177 -> paravirt.c:179] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 155.8K 0.05% 373 [entry_64.S:153 -> entry_64.S:175] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.18% 136.6K 0.03% 222 [msr.h:105 -> msr.h:166] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 118.3K 0.01% 44 [entry_64.S:632 -> entry_64.S:657] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.14% 104.5K 0.00% 28 [rwsem.c:1541 -> rwsem.c:1544] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 99.2K 0.01% 53 [spinlock.c:150 -> spinlock.c:152] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 95.5K 0.00% 35 [swap.c:456 -> swap.c:471] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.12% 96.2K 0.05% 407 [copy_user_64.S:175 -> copy_user_64.S:209] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.11% 85.9K 0.00% 31 [swap.c:400 -> page-flags.h:188] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.10% 73.0K 0.01% 52 [paravirt.h:763 -> list.h:131] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 56.2K 0.03% 214 [filemap.c:1524 -> filemap.c:1557] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 54.2K 0.02% 145 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1049] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 50.3K 0.00% 39 [mmzone.c:49 -> mmzone.c:69] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 48.3K 0.01% 40 [paravirt.h:768 -> page_alloc.c:3304] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.7K 0.02% 155 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1056] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.9K 0.01% 103 [swap.c:867 -> swap.c:902] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 47.8K 0.00% 34 [entry_64.S:1201 -> entry_64.S:1202] [kernel.vmlinux] ----------------------------------------------------------- v7: --- Use use_browser in report__browse_block_hists for supporting stdio and potential tui mode. v6: --- Create report__browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). It's called from perf_evlist__tty_browse_hists. v5: --- 1. Move all block functions to block-info.c 2. Move the code of setting ms in block hist_entry to other patch. v4: --- 1. Use new option '--total-cycles' to replace '-s total_cycles' in v3. 2. Move block info collection out of block info printing. v3: --- 1. Use common function block_info__process_sym to process the blocks per symbol. 2. Remove the nasty hack for skipping calculation of column length 3. Some minor cleanup Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-6-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07 00:47:17 -07:00
switch (use_browser) {
case 0:
symbol_conf.report_individual_block = true;
hists__fprintf(&bh->block_hists, true, 0, 0, min_percent,
stdout, true);
return 0;
perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for tui Previous patch has implemented a new option "--total-cycles". But only stdio mode is supported. This patch supports the tui mode and support '--percent-limit'. For example, perf record -b ./div perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 1 # Samples: 2753248 of event 'cycles' Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so -------------------------------------------------- v7: --- 1. Since we have used use_browser in report__browse_block_hists to support stdio mode, now we also add supporting for tui. 2. Move block tui browser code from ui/browsers/hists.c to block-info.c. v6: --- Create report__tui_browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). v5: --- Fix a crash issue when running perf report without '--total-cycles'. The issue is because the internal flag is renamed from 'total_cycles' to 'total_cycles_mode' in previous patch but this patch still uses 'total_cycles' to check if the '--total-cycles' option is enabled, which causes the code to be inconsistent. v4: --- Since the block collection is moved out of printing in previous patch, this patch is updated accordingly for tui supporting. v3: --- Minor change since the function name is changed: block_total_cycles_percent -> block_info__total_cycles_percent Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-8-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07 00:47:19 -07:00
case 1:
symbol_conf.report_individual_block = true;
ret = block_hists_tui_browse(bh, evsel, min_percent,
env, annotation_opts);
perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for tui Previous patch has implemented a new option "--total-cycles". But only stdio mode is supported. This patch supports the tui mode and support '--percent-limit'. For example, perf record -b ./div perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 1 # Samples: 2753248 of event 'cycles' Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so -------------------------------------------------- v7: --- 1. Since we have used use_browser in report__browse_block_hists to support stdio mode, now we also add supporting for tui. 2. Move block tui browser code from ui/browsers/hists.c to block-info.c. v6: --- Create report__tui_browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). v5: --- Fix a crash issue when running perf report without '--total-cycles'. The issue is because the internal flag is renamed from 'total_cycles' to 'total_cycles_mode' in previous patch but this patch still uses 'total_cycles' to check if the '--total-cycles' option is enabled, which causes the code to be inconsistent. v4: --- Since the block collection is moved out of printing in previous patch, this patch is updated accordingly for tui supporting. v3: --- Minor change since the function name is changed: block_total_cycles_percent -> block_info__total_cycles_percent Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-8-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07 00:47:19 -07:00
return ret;
perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for stdio It would be useful to support sorting for all blocks by the sampled cycles percent per block. This is useful to concentrate on the globally hottest blocks. This patch implements a new option "--total-cycles" which sorts all blocks by 'Sampled Cycles%'. The 'Sampled Cycles%' is the percent: percent = block sampled cycles aggregation / total sampled cycles Note that, this patch only supports "--stdio" mode. For example, # perf record -b ./div # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 2753248 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................ ................. # 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so 0.25% 182.5K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:391] libc-2.27.so 0.00% 48 1.07% 48 [x86_pmu_enable+284 -> x86_pmu_enable+298] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 74 1.64% 74 [vm_mmap_pgoff+0 -> vm_mmap_pgoff+92] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 73 1.62% 73 [vm_mmap+0 -> vm_mmap+48] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 63 0.69% 31 [up_write+0 -> up_write+34] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 13 0.29% 13 [setup_arg_pages+396 -> setup_arg_pages+413] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 3 0.07% 3 [setup_arg_pages+418 -> setup_arg_pages+450] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 616 6.84% 308 [security_mmap_file+0 -> security_mmap_file+72] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 23 0.51% 23 [security_mmap_file+77 -> security_mmap_file+87] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+0 -> sched_clock+4] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+9 -> sched_clock+12] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 1 0.02% 1 [rcu_nmi_exit+0 -> rcu_nmi_exit+9] [kernel.kallsyms] Committer testing: This should provide material for hours of endless joy, both from looking for suspicious things in the implementation of this patch, such as the top one: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] As well from things that look legit: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] :-) Very short system wide taken branches session: # perf record -h -b Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>] or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>] -b, --branch-any sample any taken branches # # perf record -b ^C[ perf record: Woken up 595 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 156.672 MB perf.data (196873 samples) ] # # perf evlist -v cycles: size: 112, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|CPU|PERIOD|BRANCH_STACK, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, freq: 1, task: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1, branch_sample_type: ANY # # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 6M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 6299936 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ...................................................................... .................... # 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] 1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so 0.72% 544.5K 0.03% 230 [entry_64.S:657 -> entry_64.S:662] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.56% 541.8K 0.09% 672 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:300] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.39% 293.2K 0.01% 104 [list_debug.c:43 -> list_debug.c:61] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.36% 278.6K 0.03% 272 [entry_64.S:1289 -> entry_64.S:1308] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.30% 260.8K 0.07% 564 [clear_page_64.S:47 -> clear_page_64.S:50] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.28% 215.3K 0.05% 369 [traps.c:623 -> traps.c:628] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.23% 178.1K 0.04% 278 [entry_64.S:271 -> entry_64.S:275] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 152.6K 0.09% 706 [paravirt.c:177 -> paravirt.c:179] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 155.8K 0.05% 373 [entry_64.S:153 -> entry_64.S:175] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.18% 136.6K 0.03% 222 [msr.h:105 -> msr.h:166] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 118.3K 0.01% 44 [entry_64.S:632 -> entry_64.S:657] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.14% 104.5K 0.00% 28 [rwsem.c:1541 -> rwsem.c:1544] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 99.2K 0.01% 53 [spinlock.c:150 -> spinlock.c:152] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 95.5K 0.00% 35 [swap.c:456 -> swap.c:471] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.12% 96.2K 0.05% 407 [copy_user_64.S:175 -> copy_user_64.S:209] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.11% 85.9K 0.00% 31 [swap.c:400 -> page-flags.h:188] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.10% 73.0K 0.01% 52 [paravirt.h:763 -> list.h:131] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 56.2K 0.03% 214 [filemap.c:1524 -> filemap.c:1557] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 54.2K 0.02% 145 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1049] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 50.3K 0.00% 39 [mmzone.c:49 -> mmzone.c:69] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 48.3K 0.01% 40 [paravirt.h:768 -> page_alloc.c:3304] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.7K 0.02% 155 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1056] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.9K 0.01% 103 [swap.c:867 -> swap.c:902] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 47.8K 0.00% 34 [entry_64.S:1201 -> entry_64.S:1202] [kernel.vmlinux] ----------------------------------------------------------- v7: --- Use use_browser in report__browse_block_hists for supporting stdio and potential tui mode. v6: --- Create report__browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). It's called from perf_evlist__tty_browse_hists. v5: --- 1. Move all block functions to block-info.c 2. Move the code of setting ms in block hist_entry to other patch. v4: --- 1. Use new option '--total-cycles' to replace '-s total_cycles' in v3. 2. Move block info collection out of block info printing. v3: --- 1. Use common function block_info__process_sym to process the blocks per symbol. 2. Remove the nasty hack for skipping calculation of column length 3. Some minor cleanup Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-6-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07 00:47:17 -07:00
default:
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
perf report: Support --percent-limit for --total-cycles We have already supported the '--total-cycles' option in previous patch. It's also useful to show entries only above a threshold percent. This patch enables '--percent-limit' for not showing entries under that percent. For example: perf report --total-cycles --stdio --percent-limit 1 # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 2753248 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................................. .................... # 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so Committer testing: From second exapmple onwards slightly edited for brevity: # perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 2 --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 6M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 6299936 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ...................................................................... .................... # 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] # # (Tip: Create an archive with symtabs to analyse on other machine: perf archive) # # perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 1 --stdio # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] 1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so # # perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 0.7 --stdio # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] 1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so 0.72% 544.5K 0.03% 230 [entry_64.S:657 -> entry_64.S:662] [kernel.vmlinux] # ------------------------------------------- It only shows the entries which 'Sampled Cycles%' > 1%. v7: --- No functional change. Only fix the conflict issue because previous patches are changed. v6: --- No functional change. Only fix the conflict issue because previous patches are changed. v5: --- No functional change. Only fix the conflict issue because previous patches are changed. v4: --- No functional change. Only fix the build issue because previous patches are changed. Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-7-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07 00:47:18 -07:00
float block_info__total_cycles_percent(struct hist_entry *he)
{
struct block_info *bi = he->block_info;
if (bi->total_cycles)
return bi->cycles * 100.0 / bi->total_cycles;
return 0.0;
}