1
0
Fork 0
alistair23-linux/arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h

196 lines
4.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (C) 2008-2009 Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
* Copyright (C) 2008-2009 PetaLogix
* Copyright (C) 2006 Atmark Techno, Inc.
*
* This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
* License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
* for more details.
*/
#ifndef _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PGALLOC_H
#define _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PGALLOC_H
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
#include <linux/kernel.h> /* For min/max macros */
#include <linux/highmem.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/cache.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
#define PGDIR_ORDER 0
/*
* This is handled very differently on MicroBlaze since out page tables
* are all 0's and I want to be able to use these zero'd pages elsewhere
* as well - it gives us quite a speedup.
* -- Cort
*/
extern struct pgtable_cache_struct {
unsigned long *pgd_cache;
unsigned long *pte_cache;
unsigned long pgtable_cache_sz;
} quicklists;
#define pgd_quicklist (quicklists.pgd_cache)
#define pmd_quicklist ((unsigned long *)0)
#define pte_quicklist (quicklists.pte_cache)
#define pgtable_cache_size (quicklists.pgtable_cache_sz)
extern unsigned long *zero_cache; /* head linked list of pre-zero'd pages */
extern atomic_t zero_sz; /* # currently pre-zero'd pages */
extern atomic_t zeropage_hits; /* # zero'd pages request that we've done */
extern atomic_t zeropage_calls; /* # zero'd pages request that've been made */
extern atomic_t zerototal; /* # pages zero'd over time */
#define zero_quicklist (zero_cache)
#define zero_cache_sz (zero_sz)
#define zero_cache_calls (zeropage_calls)
#define zero_cache_hits (zeropage_hits)
#define zero_cache_total (zerototal)
/*
* return a pre-zero'd page from the list,
* return NULL if none available -- Cort
*/
extern unsigned long get_zero_page_fast(void);
extern void __bad_pte(pmd_t *pmd);
microblaze: Change extern inline to static inline With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and clang), "extern inline" does the opposite thing from older versions of gcc (emits code for an externally linkable version of the inline function). "static inline" does the intended behavior in all cases instead. Description taken from: "staging, rtl8192e, LLVMLinux: Change extern inline to static inline" (sha1: 6d91857d4826b382b3fd4fad95f52713be646f96) The patch removes compilation warnings W=1: ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:18:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__delay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __delay(unsigned long loops) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:46:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__udelay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __udelay(unsigned int x) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:63:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_slow(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:73:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_fast(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:87:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_fast(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:94:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_slow(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:149:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_fast(pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:156:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_kernel' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:161:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_slow(struct page *ptepage) Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
2014-12-18 07:51:30 -07:00
static inline pgd_t *get_pgd_slow(void)
{
pgd_t *ret;
ret = (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, PGDIR_ORDER);
if (ret != NULL)
clear_page(ret);
return ret;
}
microblaze: Change extern inline to static inline With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and clang), "extern inline" does the opposite thing from older versions of gcc (emits code for an externally linkable version of the inline function). "static inline" does the intended behavior in all cases instead. Description taken from: "staging, rtl8192e, LLVMLinux: Change extern inline to static inline" (sha1: 6d91857d4826b382b3fd4fad95f52713be646f96) The patch removes compilation warnings W=1: ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:18:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__delay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __delay(unsigned long loops) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:46:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__udelay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __udelay(unsigned int x) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:63:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_slow(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:73:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_fast(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:87:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_fast(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:94:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_slow(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:149:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_fast(pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:156:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_kernel' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:161:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_slow(struct page *ptepage) Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
2014-12-18 07:51:30 -07:00
static inline pgd_t *get_pgd_fast(void)
{
unsigned long *ret;
ret = pgd_quicklist;
if (ret != NULL) {
pgd_quicklist = (unsigned long *)(*ret);
ret[0] = 0;
pgtable_cache_size--;
} else
ret = (unsigned long *)get_pgd_slow();
return (pgd_t *)ret;
}
microblaze: Change extern inline to static inline With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and clang), "extern inline" does the opposite thing from older versions of gcc (emits code for an externally linkable version of the inline function). "static inline" does the intended behavior in all cases instead. Description taken from: "staging, rtl8192e, LLVMLinux: Change extern inline to static inline" (sha1: 6d91857d4826b382b3fd4fad95f52713be646f96) The patch removes compilation warnings W=1: ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:18:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__delay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __delay(unsigned long loops) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:46:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__udelay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __udelay(unsigned int x) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:63:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_slow(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:73:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_fast(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:87:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_fast(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:94:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_slow(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:149:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_fast(pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:156:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_kernel' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:161:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_slow(struct page *ptepage) Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
2014-12-18 07:51:30 -07:00
static inline void free_pgd_fast(pgd_t *pgd)
{
*(unsigned long **)pgd = pgd_quicklist;
pgd_quicklist = (unsigned long *) pgd;
pgtable_cache_size++;
}
microblaze: Change extern inline to static inline With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and clang), "extern inline" does the opposite thing from older versions of gcc (emits code for an externally linkable version of the inline function). "static inline" does the intended behavior in all cases instead. Description taken from: "staging, rtl8192e, LLVMLinux: Change extern inline to static inline" (sha1: 6d91857d4826b382b3fd4fad95f52713be646f96) The patch removes compilation warnings W=1: ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:18:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__delay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __delay(unsigned long loops) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:46:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__udelay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __udelay(unsigned int x) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:63:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_slow(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:73:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_fast(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:87:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_fast(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:94:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_slow(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:149:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_fast(pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:156:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_kernel' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:161:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_slow(struct page *ptepage) Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
2014-12-18 07:51:30 -07:00
static inline void free_pgd_slow(pgd_t *pgd)
{
free_page((unsigned long)pgd);
}
#define pgd_free(mm, pgd) free_pgd_fast(pgd)
#define pgd_alloc(mm) get_pgd_fast()
#define pmd_pgtable(pmd) pmd_page(pmd)
/*
* We don't have any real pmd's, and this code never triggers because
* the pgd will always be present..
*/
#define pmd_alloc_one_fast(mm, address) ({ BUG(); ((pmd_t *)1); })
#define pmd_alloc_one(mm, address) ({ BUG(); ((pmd_t *)2); })
extern pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr);
static inline struct page *pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address)
{
struct page *ptepage;
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
tree wide: get rid of __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 allocations part I This is the third version of the patchset previously sent [1]. I have basically only rebased it on top of 4.7-rc1 tree and dropped "dm: get rid of superfluous gfp flags" which went through dm tree. I am sending it now because it is tree wide and chances for conflicts are reduced considerably when we want to target rc2. I plan to send the next step and rename the flag and move to a better semantic later during this release cycle so we will have a new semantic ready for 4.8 merge window hopefully. Motivation: While working on something unrelated I've checked the current usage of __GFP_REPEAT in the tree. It seems that a majority of the usage is and always has been bogus because __GFP_REPEAT has always been about costly high order allocations while we are using it for order-0 or very small orders very often. It seems that a big pile of them is just a copy&paste when a code has been adopted from one arch to another. I think it makes some sense to get rid of them because they are just making the semantic more unclear. Please note that GFP_REPEAT is documented as * __GFP_REPEAT: Try hard to allocate the memory, but the allocation attempt * _might_ fail. This depends upon the particular VM implementation. while !costly requests have basically nofail semantic. So one could reasonably expect that order-0 request with __GFP_REPEAT will not loop for ever. This is not implemented right now though. I would like to move on with __GFP_REPEAT and define a better semantic for it. $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT origin/master | wc -l 111 $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT | wc -l 36 So we are down to the third after this patch series. The remaining places really seem to be relying on __GFP_REPEAT due to large allocation requests. This still needs some double checking which I will do later after all the simple ones are sorted out. I am touching a lot of arch specific code here and I hope I got it right but as a matter of fact I even didn't compile test for some archs as I do not have cross compiler for them. Patches should be quite trivial to review for stupid compile mistakes though. The tricky parts are usually hidden by macro definitions and thats where I would appreciate help from arch maintainers. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461849846-27209-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org This patch (of 19): __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations. Yet we have the full kernel tree with its usage for apparently order-0 allocations. This is really confusing because __GFP_REPEAT is explicitly documented to allow allocation failures which is a weaker semantic than the current order-0 has (basically nofail). Let's simply drop __GFP_REPEAT from those places. This would allow to identify place which really need allocator to retry harder and formulate a more specific semantic for what the flag is supposed to do actually. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> [for tile] Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-06-24 15:48:47 -06:00
int flags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HIGHMEM;
#else
tree wide: get rid of __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 allocations part I This is the third version of the patchset previously sent [1]. I have basically only rebased it on top of 4.7-rc1 tree and dropped "dm: get rid of superfluous gfp flags" which went through dm tree. I am sending it now because it is tree wide and chances for conflicts are reduced considerably when we want to target rc2. I plan to send the next step and rename the flag and move to a better semantic later during this release cycle so we will have a new semantic ready for 4.8 merge window hopefully. Motivation: While working on something unrelated I've checked the current usage of __GFP_REPEAT in the tree. It seems that a majority of the usage is and always has been bogus because __GFP_REPEAT has always been about costly high order allocations while we are using it for order-0 or very small orders very often. It seems that a big pile of them is just a copy&paste when a code has been adopted from one arch to another. I think it makes some sense to get rid of them because they are just making the semantic more unclear. Please note that GFP_REPEAT is documented as * __GFP_REPEAT: Try hard to allocate the memory, but the allocation attempt * _might_ fail. This depends upon the particular VM implementation. while !costly requests have basically nofail semantic. So one could reasonably expect that order-0 request with __GFP_REPEAT will not loop for ever. This is not implemented right now though. I would like to move on with __GFP_REPEAT and define a better semantic for it. $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT origin/master | wc -l 111 $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT | wc -l 36 So we are down to the third after this patch series. The remaining places really seem to be relying on __GFP_REPEAT due to large allocation requests. This still needs some double checking which I will do later after all the simple ones are sorted out. I am touching a lot of arch specific code here and I hope I got it right but as a matter of fact I even didn't compile test for some archs as I do not have cross compiler for them. Patches should be quite trivial to review for stupid compile mistakes though. The tricky parts are usually hidden by macro definitions and thats where I would appreciate help from arch maintainers. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461849846-27209-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org This patch (of 19): __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations. Yet we have the full kernel tree with its usage for apparently order-0 allocations. This is really confusing because __GFP_REPEAT is explicitly documented to allow allocation failures which is a weaker semantic than the current order-0 has (basically nofail). Let's simply drop __GFP_REPEAT from those places. This would allow to identify place which really need allocator to retry harder and formulate a more specific semantic for what the flag is supposed to do actually. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> [for tile] Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-06-24 15:48:47 -06:00
int flags = GFP_KERNEL;
#endif
ptepage = alloc_pages(flags, 0);
if (!ptepage)
return NULL;
clear_highpage(ptepage);
if (!pgtable_page_ctor(ptepage)) {
__free_page(ptepage);
return NULL;
}
return ptepage;
}
static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_fast(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address)
{
unsigned long *ret;
ret = pte_quicklist;
if (ret != NULL) {
pte_quicklist = (unsigned long *)(*ret);
ret[0] = 0;
pgtable_cache_size--;
}
return (pte_t *)ret;
}
microblaze: Change extern inline to static inline With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and clang), "extern inline" does the opposite thing from older versions of gcc (emits code for an externally linkable version of the inline function). "static inline" does the intended behavior in all cases instead. Description taken from: "staging, rtl8192e, LLVMLinux: Change extern inline to static inline" (sha1: 6d91857d4826b382b3fd4fad95f52713be646f96) The patch removes compilation warnings W=1: ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:18:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__delay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __delay(unsigned long loops) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:46:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__udelay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __udelay(unsigned int x) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:63:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_slow(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:73:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_fast(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:87:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_fast(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:94:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_slow(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:149:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_fast(pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:156:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_kernel' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:161:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_slow(struct page *ptepage) Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
2014-12-18 07:51:30 -07:00
static inline void pte_free_fast(pte_t *pte)
{
*(unsigned long **)pte = pte_quicklist;
pte_quicklist = (unsigned long *) pte;
pgtable_cache_size++;
}
microblaze: Change extern inline to static inline With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and clang), "extern inline" does the opposite thing from older versions of gcc (emits code for an externally linkable version of the inline function). "static inline" does the intended behavior in all cases instead. Description taken from: "staging, rtl8192e, LLVMLinux: Change extern inline to static inline" (sha1: 6d91857d4826b382b3fd4fad95f52713be646f96) The patch removes compilation warnings W=1: ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:18:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__delay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __delay(unsigned long loops) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:46:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__udelay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __udelay(unsigned int x) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:63:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_slow(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:73:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_fast(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:87:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_fast(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:94:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_slow(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:149:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_fast(pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:156:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_kernel' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:161:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_slow(struct page *ptepage) Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
2014-12-18 07:51:30 -07:00
static inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte)
{
free_page((unsigned long)pte);
}
microblaze: Change extern inline to static inline With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and clang), "extern inline" does the opposite thing from older versions of gcc (emits code for an externally linkable version of the inline function). "static inline" does the intended behavior in all cases instead. Description taken from: "staging, rtl8192e, LLVMLinux: Change extern inline to static inline" (sha1: 6d91857d4826b382b3fd4fad95f52713be646f96) The patch removes compilation warnings W=1: ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:18:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__delay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __delay(unsigned long loops) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/delay.h:46:20: warning: no previous prototype for '__udelay' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void __udelay(unsigned int x) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:63:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_slow(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:73:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline pgd_t *get_pgd_fast(void) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:87:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_fast(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:94:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pgd_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void free_pgd_slow(pgd_t *pgd) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:149:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_fast' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_fast(pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:156:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_kernel' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte) ./arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgalloc.h:161:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'pte_free_slow' [-Wmissing-prototypes] extern inline void pte_free_slow(struct page *ptepage) Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
2014-12-18 07:51:30 -07:00
static inline void pte_free_slow(struct page *ptepage)
{
__free_page(ptepage);
}
static inline void pte_free(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page *ptepage)
{
pgtable_page_dtor(ptepage);
__free_page(ptepage);
}
#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, addr) pte_free((tlb)->mm, (pte))
#define pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pte) \
(pmd_val(*(pmd)) = (unsigned long)page_address(pte))
#define pmd_populate_kernel(mm, pmd, pte) \
(pmd_val(*(pmd)) = (unsigned long) (pte))
/*
* We don't have any real pmd's, and this code never triggers because
* the pgd will always be present..
*/
#define pmd_alloc_one(mm, address) ({ BUG(); ((pmd_t *)2); })
#define pmd_free(mm, x) do { } while (0)
#define __pmd_free_tlb(tlb, x, addr) pmd_free((tlb)->mm, x)
#define pgd_populate(mm, pmd, pte) BUG()
extern int do_check_pgt_cache(int, int);
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
#define check_pgt_cache() do { } while (0)
#endif /* _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PGALLOC_H */