From 00c9755524fbaa28117be774d7c92fddb5ca02f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:33:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: iop-adma: use correct printk format strings When compile-testing on other architectures, we get lots of warnings about incorrect format strings, like: drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function 'iop_adma_alloc_slots': drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:307:6: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function 'iop_adma_prep_dma_memcpy': >> drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:518:40: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'size_t {aka long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] Use %zu for printing size_t as required, and cast the dma_addr_t arguments to 'u64' for printing with %llx. Ideally this should use the %pad format string, but that requires an lvalue argument that doesn't work here. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809163334.489360-3-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Vinod Koul Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- drivers/dma/iop-adma.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c index 7857b54770d1..aebdd671651a 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c @@ -117,9 +117,9 @@ static void __iop_adma_slot_cleanup(struct iop_adma_chan *iop_chan) list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, _iter, &iop_chan->chain, chain_node) { pr_debug("\tcookie: %d slot: %d busy: %d " - "this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#x ack: %d\n", + "this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#llx ack: %d\n", iter->async_tx.cookie, iter->idx, busy, - iter->async_tx.phys, iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter), + iter->async_tx.phys, (u64)iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter), async_tx_test_ack(&iter->async_tx)); prefetch(_iter); prefetch(&_iter->async_tx); @@ -307,9 +307,9 @@ retry: int i; dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "allocated slot: %d " - "(desc %p phys: %#x) slots_per_op %d\n", + "(desc %p phys: %#llx) slots_per_op %d\n", iter->idx, iter->hw_desc, - iter->async_tx.phys, slots_per_op); + (u64)iter->async_tx.phys, slots_per_op); /* pre-ack all but the last descriptor */ if (num_slots != slots_per_op) @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dma_dest, return NULL; BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_MAX_BYTE_COUNT); - dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s len: %u\n", + dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s len: %zu\n", __func__, len); spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock); @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_xor(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dma_dest, BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT); dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, - "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u flags: %lx\n", + "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu flags: %lx\n", __func__, src_cnt, len, flags); spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock); @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_xor_val(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t *dma_src, if (unlikely(!len)) return NULL; - dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u\n", + dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu\n", __func__, src_cnt, len); spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock); @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_pq(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t *dst, dma_addr_t *src, BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT); dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, - "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u flags: %lx\n", + "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu flags: %lx\n", __func__, src_cnt, len, flags); if (dmaf_p_disabled_continue(flags)) @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_pq_val(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t *pq, dma_addr_t *src, return NULL; BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT); - dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u\n", + dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu\n", __func__, src_cnt, len); spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock);