redonkable
/
alistair23-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

ima: detect violations for mmaped files 

This patch fixes the detection of the 'open_writers' violation for mmaped
files.

before) an 'open_writers' violation is detected if the policy contains
        a rule with the criteria: func=FILE_CHECK mask=MAY_READ

after) an 'open_writers' violation is detected if the current event
       matches one of the policy rules.

With the old behaviour, the 'open_writers' violation is not detected
in the following case:

policy:
measure func=FILE_MMAP mask=MAY_EXEC

steps:
1) open a shared library for writing
2) execute a binary that links that shared library
3) during the binary execution, modify the shared library and save
   the change

result:
the 'open_writers' violation measurement is not present in the IMA list.

Only binaries executed are protected from writes. For libraries mapped
in memory there is the flag MAP_DENYWRITE for this purpose, but according
to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap flag is ignored.

Since ima_rdwr_violation_check() is now called by process_measurement()
the information about if the inode must be measured is already provided
by ima_get_action(). Thus the unnecessary function ima_must_measure()
has been removed.

Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin):
- Violation for MMAP_CHECK function are verified since this patch
- Changed patch description a bit

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
Roberto Sassu 2014-09-12 19:35:56 +02:00 committed by Mimi Zohar
parent f7a859ff73
commit 1b68bdf9cd
2 changed files with 5 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
View File

@ -179,11 +179,6 @@ int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, int mask, int function)
return ima_match_policy(inode, function, mask, flags);
}
int ima_must_measure(struct inode *inode, int mask, int function)
{
return ima_match_policy(inode, function, mask, IMA_MEASURE);
}
/*
* ima_collect_measurement - collect file measurement
*

9
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
View File

@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ __setup("ima_hash=", hash_setup);
*/
static void ima_rdwr_violation_check(struct file *file,
struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
int must_measure,
char **pathbuf,
const char **pathname)
{
@ -95,8 +96,7 @@ static void ima_rdwr_violation_check(struct file *file,
send_tomtou = true;
}
} else {
if ((atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0) &&
ima_must_measure(inode, MAY_READ, FILE_CHECK))
if ((atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0) && must_measure)
send_writers = true;
}
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, int mask, int function,
* Included is the appraise submask.
*/
action = ima_get_action(inode, mask, function);
violation_check = (function == FILE_CHECK &&
violation_check = ((function == FILE_CHECK || function == MMAP_CHECK) &&
(ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE));
if (!action && !violation_check)
return 0;
@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, int mask, int function,
}
if (violation_check) {
ima_rdwr_violation_check(file, iint, &pathbuf, &pathname);
ima_rdwr_violation_check(file, iint, action & IMA_MEASURE,
&pathbuf, &pathname);
if (!action) {
rc = 0;
goto out_free;