From 25ab0bc334b43bbbe4eabc255006ce42a9424da2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 03:23:09 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: sched/wait: Add wait_event_lock_irq_timeout for
 TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE usage

Short of reverting commit 00d909a10710 ("scsi: target: Make the session
shutdown code also wait for commands that are being aborted") for v4.19,
target-core needs a wait_event_t macro can be executed using
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE to function correctly with existing fabric drivers that
expect to run with signals pending during session shutdown and active se_cmd
I/O quiesce.

The most notable is iscsi-target/iser-target, while ibmvscsi_tgt invokes
session shutdown logic from userspace via configfs attribute that could also
potentially have signals pending.

So go ahead and introduce wait_event_lock_irq_timeout() to achieve this, and
update + rename __wait_event_lock_irq_timeout() to make it accept 'state' as a
parameter.

Fixes: 00d909a10710 ("scsi: target: Make the session shutdown code also wait for commands that are being aborted")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Bryant G. Ly <bryantly@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryant G. Ly <bly@catalogicsoftware.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
---
 include/linux/wait.h | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
index d9f131ecf708..ed7c122cb31f 100644
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -1052,10 +1052,9 @@ do {										\
 	__ret;									\
 })
 
-#define __wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout(wq_head, condition,		\
-						    lock, timeout)		\
+#define __wait_event_lock_irq_timeout(wq_head, condition, lock, timeout, state)	\
 	___wait_event(wq_head, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition),			\
-		      TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, timeout,				\
+		      state, 0, timeout,					\
 		      spin_unlock_irq(&lock);					\
 		      __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret);				\
 		      spin_lock_irq(&lock));
@@ -1089,8 +1088,19 @@ do {										\
 ({										\
 	long __ret = timeout;							\
 	if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition))					\
-		__ret = __wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout(		\
-					wq_head, condition, lock, timeout);	\
+		__ret = __wait_event_lock_irq_timeout(				\
+					wq_head, condition, lock, timeout,	\
+					TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);			\
+	__ret;									\
+})
+
+#define wait_event_lock_irq_timeout(wq_head, condition, lock, timeout)		\
+({										\
+	long __ret = timeout;							\
+	if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition))					\
+		__ret = __wait_event_lock_irq_timeout(				\
+					wq_head, condition, lock, timeout,	\
+					TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);			\
 	__ret;									\
 })