redonkable
/
alistair23-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

ssb: sprom: fix block comments coding style issues 

Fixed coding style issues

Signed-off-by: John Oldman <john.oldman@polehill.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200424175043.16261-1-john.oldman@polehill.co.uk
alistair/sunxi64-5.8
John Oldman 2020-04-24 18:50:43 +01:00 committed by Kalle Valo
parent 3d8bf50860
commit 2aad9f81d3
1 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
drivers/ssb/sprom.c
View File

@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_show(struct ssb_bus *bus, char *buf,
/* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might
* be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace
* to cancel operation. */
* to cancel operation.
*/
err = -ERESTARTSYS;
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex))
goto out_kfree;
@ -121,7 +122,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_store(struct ssb_bus *bus,
/* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might
* be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace
* to cancel operation. */
* to cancel operation.
*/
err = -ERESTARTSYS;
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex))
goto out_kfree;
@ -188,9 +190,11 @@ int ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct ssb_sprom *out)
bool ssb_is_sprom_available(struct ssb_bus *bus)
{
/* status register only exists on chipcomon rev >= 11 and we need check
for >= 31 only */
* for >= 31 only
*/
/* this routine differs from specs as we do not access SPROM directly
on PCMCIA */
* on PCMCIA
*/
if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI &&
bus->chipco.dev && /* can be unavailable! */
bus->chipco.dev->id.revision >= 31)