redonkable
/
alistair23-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

md/raid5: add a missing 'continue' in a loop. 

As the comment says, the tail of this loop only applies to devices
that are not fully in sync, so if In_sync was set, we should avoid
the rest of the loop.

This bug will hardly ever cause an actual problem.  The worst it
can do is allow an array to be assembled that is dirty and degraded,
which is not generally a good idea (without warning the sysadmin
first).

This will only happen if the array is RAID4 or a RAID5/6 in an
intermediate state during a reshape and so has one drive that is
all 'parity' - no data - while some other device has failed.

This is certainly possible, but not at all common.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
NeilBrown 2010-06-17 17:41:03 +10:00
parent 415e72d034
commit 2f11588249
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
drivers/md/raid5.c
View File

@ -5057,8 +5057,10 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) {
if (rdev->raid_disk < 0)
continue;
if (test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags))
if (test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)) {
working_disks++;
continue;
}
/* This disc is not fully in-sync. However if it
* just stored parity (beyond the recovery_offset),
* when we don't need to be concerned about the