net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Make SF2_IO64_MACRO() utilize 32-bit macro
There is no point inlining the 32-bit direct register read/write part, just infer it from the existing macro. This will make it easier to centralize the address rewriting that we are going to introduce later on. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b20b564b95
commit
329b5c58f8
|
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline u64 name##_readq(struct bcm_sf2_priv *priv, u32 off) \
|
|||
{ \
|
||||
u32 indir, dir; \
|
||||
spin_lock(&priv->indir_lock); \
|
||||
dir = __raw_readl(priv->name + off); \
|
||||
dir = name##_readl(priv, off); \
|
||||
indir = reg_readl(priv, REG_DIR_DATA_READ); \
|
||||
spin_unlock(&priv->indir_lock); \
|
||||
return (u64)indir << 32 | dir; \
|
||||
|
@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static inline void name##_writeq(struct bcm_sf2_priv *priv, u64 val, \
|
|||
{ \
|
||||
spin_lock(&priv->indir_lock); \
|
||||
reg_writel(priv, upper_32_bits(val), REG_DIR_DATA_WRITE); \
|
||||
__raw_writel(lower_32_bits(val), priv->name + off); \
|
||||
name##_writel(priv, lower_32_bits(val), off); \
|
||||
spin_unlock(&priv->indir_lock); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue