RDMA/cxgb3: Use AF_INET for sin_family field
Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values of PF_INET and AF_INET are the same. The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: // <smpl> @@ struct sockaddr_in sip; @@ ( sip.sin_family == - PF_INET + AF_INET | sip.sin_family != - PF_INET + AF_INET | sip.sin_family = - PF_INET + AF_INET ) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
56b2eca3fe
commit
3b8fb4b86c
|
@ -1396,10 +1396,10 @@ static int pass_accept_req(struct t3cdev *tdev, struct sk_buff *skb, void *ctx)
|
|||
state_set(&child_ep->com, CONNECTING);
|
||||
child_ep->com.tdev = tdev;
|
||||
child_ep->com.cm_id = NULL;
|
||||
child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_family = PF_INET;
|
||||
child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
|
||||
child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_port = req->local_port;
|
||||
child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = req->local_ip;
|
||||
child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_family = PF_INET;
|
||||
child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
|
||||
child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_port = req->peer_port;
|
||||
child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = req->peer_ip;
|
||||
get_ep(&parent_ep->com);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue