redonkable
/
alistair23-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

sched/preempt: Remove PREEMPT_ACTIVE unmasking off in_atomic() 

Now that PREEMPT_ACTIVE implies PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET, ignoring
PREEMPT_ACTIVE from in_atomic() check isn't useful anymore.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431441711-29753-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
Frederic Weisbecker 2015-05-12 16:41:51 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent e017cf21ae
commit 3e51f3c400
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
include/linux/preempt.h
View File

@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
* used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible.
* Do not use in_atomic() in driver code.
*/
#define in_atomic() ((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != 0)
#define in_atomic() (preempt_count() != 0)
/*
* Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable():