xHCI: use gfp flags from caller instead of GFP_ATOMIC

The caller is allowed to specify the GFP flags for these functions.
We should prefer their flags unless we have good reason.  For
example, if we take a spin_lock ourselves we'd need to use
GFP_ATOMIC.  But in this case it's safe to use the callers GFP
flags.

The callers all pass GFP_ATOMIC here, so this change doesn't affect
how the kernel behaves but we may add other callers later and this
is a cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Dan Carpenter 2012-03-28 10:30:26 +03:00 committed by Sarah Sharp
parent 457a4f61f9
commit 3fc8206d3d

View file

@ -2734,7 +2734,7 @@ int xhci_queue_intr_tx(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t mem_flags,
urb->dev->speed == USB_SPEED_FULL)
urb->interval /= 8;
}
return xhci_queue_bulk_tx(xhci, GFP_ATOMIC, urb, slot_id, ep_index);
return xhci_queue_bulk_tx(xhci, mem_flags, urb, slot_id, ep_index);
}
/*
@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ int xhci_queue_isoc_tx_prepare(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t mem_flags,
}
ep_ring->num_trbs_free_temp = ep_ring->num_trbs_free;
return xhci_queue_isoc_tx(xhci, GFP_ATOMIC, urb, slot_id, ep_index);
return xhci_queue_isoc_tx(xhci, mem_flags, urb, slot_id, ep_index);
}
/**** Command Ring Operations ****/