From 40dc4a42b97ef5a52ef34a73093a7992faaab15e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wei Yang Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:11:04 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ftrace: ftrace_global_list is renamed to ftrace_ops_list Fix the comment to comply with the code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200831031104.23322-7-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Wei Yang Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- include/linux/ftrace.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h index b1f56e3410dc..1bd3a0356ae4 100644 --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h @@ -217,11 +217,11 @@ extern struct ftrace_ops __rcu *ftrace_ops_list; extern struct ftrace_ops ftrace_list_end; /* - * Traverse the ftrace_global_list, invoking all entries. The reason that we + * Traverse the ftrace_ops_list, invoking all entries. The reason that we * can use rcu_dereference_raw_check() is that elements removed from this list * are simply leaked, so there is no need to interact with a grace-period * mechanism. The rcu_dereference_raw_check() calls are needed to handle - * concurrent insertions into the ftrace_global_list. + * concurrent insertions into the ftrace_ops_list. * * Silly Alpha and silly pointer-speculation compiler optimizations! */