diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 462a7dbd6350..206f52b36ffb 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2063,8 +2063,8 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 	 * free), userland could trigger a small page size TLB miss on the
 	 * small sized TLB while the hugepage TLB entry is still established in
 	 * the huge TLB. Some CPU doesn't like that.
-	 * See http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/41322.pdf, Erratum
-	 * 383 on page 93. Intel should be safe but is also warns that it's
+	 * See http://support.amd.com/TechDocs/41322_10h_Rev_Gd.pdf, Erratum
+	 * 383 on page 105. Intel should be safe but is also warns that it's
 	 * only safe if the permission and cache attributes of the two entries
 	 * loaded in the two TLB is identical (which should be the case here).
 	 * But it is generally safer to never allow small and huge TLB entries