1
0
Fork 0

sh: fix seq_file memory leak

When using single_open(), single_release() should be used instead
of seq_release(), otherwise there is a memory leak.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
Li Zefan 2008-06-24 13:30:23 +08:00 committed by Paul Mundt
parent c9272c4f9f
commit 45dabf1427
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static const struct file_operations cache_debugfs_fops = {
.open = cache_debugfs_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release,
.release = single_release,
};
static int __init cache_debugfs_init(void)

View File

@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static const struct file_operations pmb_debugfs_fops = {
.open = pmb_debugfs_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release,
.release = single_release,
};
static int __init pmb_debugfs_init(void)