1
0
Fork 0

ecryptfs: re-order a condition for static checkers

Static checkers complain that we are using "s->i" as an offset before
we check whether it is within bounds.  It doesn't matter much but we
can easily swap the order of the checks to make everyone happy.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
alistair/sunxi64-5.4-dsi
Dan Carpenter 2018-08-22 13:43:59 +03:00 committed by Tyler Hicks
parent 0bdf8a8245
commit 4b47a8b51e
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1063,8 +1063,9 @@ ecryptfs_parse_tag_70_packet(char **filename, size_t *filename_size,
"rc = [%d]\n", __func__, rc);
goto out_free_unlock;
}
while (s->decrypted_filename[s->i] != '\0'
&& s->i < s->block_aligned_filename_size)
while (s->i < s->block_aligned_filename_size &&
s->decrypted_filename[s->i] != '\0')
s->i++;
if (s->i == s->block_aligned_filename_size) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Invalid tag 70 packet; could not "