1
0
Fork 0

drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c: fix error caused by shifted mask

During the development of this driver an in-house register documentation
was used.  The last week some integration tests were done and this
problem was found.  It turned out that the released register
documentation is wrong.

The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one.

Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
Christian Gmeiner 2013-05-24 15:55:22 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 7c3425123d
commit 4b949b8af1
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -47,37 +47,37 @@ static struct ot200_led leds[] = {
{
.name = "led_1",
.port = 0x49,
.mask = BIT(7),
.mask = BIT(6),
},
{
.name = "led_2",
.port = 0x49,
.mask = BIT(6),
.mask = BIT(5),
},
{
.name = "led_3",
.port = 0x49,
.mask = BIT(5),
.mask = BIT(4),
},
{
.name = "led_4",
.port = 0x49,
.mask = BIT(4),
.mask = BIT(3),
},
{
.name = "led_5",
.port = 0x49,
.mask = BIT(3),
.mask = BIT(2),
},
{
.name = "led_6",
.port = 0x49,
.mask = BIT(2),
.mask = BIT(1),
},
{
.name = "led_7",
.port = 0x49,
.mask = BIT(1),
.mask = BIT(0),
}
};