redonkable
/
alistair23-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

selftests/bpf: Fix usleep() implementation 

nanosleep syscall expects pointer to struct timespec, not nanoseconds
directly. Current implementation fulfills its purpose of invoking nanosleep
syscall, but doesn't really provide sleeping capabilities, which can cause
flakiness for tests relying on usleep() to wait for something.

Fixes: ec12a57b822c ("selftests/bpf: Guarantee that useep() calls nanosleep() syscall")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200313061837.3685572-1-andriin@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
alistair/sensors
Andrii Nakryiko 2020-03-12 23:18:37 -07:00 committed by Alexei Starovoitov
parent 1afbcd9466
commit 4e1fd25d19
1 changed files with 10 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
View File

@ -35,7 +35,16 @@ struct prog_test_def {
*/
int usleep(useconds_t usec)
{
return syscall(__NR_nanosleep, usec * 1000UL);
struct timespec ts;
if (usec > 999999) {
ts.tv_sec = usec / 1000000;
ts.tv_nsec = usec % 1000000;
} else {
ts.tv_sec = 0;
ts.tv_nsec = usec;
}
return nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
}
static bool should_run(struct test_selector *sel, int num, const char *name)