drm/i915/guc: Use consistent name for scratch register count

We should be consistent on naming of similar definitions.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171124170239.29360-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Michal Wajdeczko 2017-11-24 17:02:39 +00:00 committed by Chris Wilson
parent 3452fa3095
commit 53fa54a6ef
3 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -130,14 +130,14 @@ static int guc_xfer_rsa(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_vma *vma)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw = &guc->fw;
struct sg_table *sg = vma->pages;
u32 rsa[UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_MAX_COUNT];
u32 rsa[UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_COUNT];
int i;
if (sg_pcopy_to_buffer(sg->sgl, sg->nents, rsa, sizeof(rsa),
guc_fw->rsa_offset) != sizeof(rsa))
return -EINVAL;
for (i = 0; i < UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_MAX_COUNT; i++)
for (i = 0; i < UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_COUNT; i++)
I915_WRITE(UOS_RSA_SCRATCH(i), rsa[i]);
return 0;

View file

@ -52,7 +52,8 @@
#define SOFT_SCRATCH_COUNT 16
#define UOS_RSA_SCRATCH(i) _MMIO(0xc200 + (i) * 4)
#define UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_MAX_COUNT 64
#define UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_COUNT 64
#define DMA_ADDR_0_LOW _MMIO(0xc300)
#define DMA_ADDR_0_HIGH _MMIO(0xc304)
#define DMA_ADDR_1_LOW _MMIO(0xc308)

View file

@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void intel_uc_fw_fetch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
}
/* now RSA */
if (css->key_size_dw != UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_MAX_COUNT) {
if (css->key_size_dw != UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_COUNT) {
DRM_WARN("%s: Mismatched firmware RSA key size (%u)\n",
intel_uc_fw_type_repr(uc_fw->type), css->key_size_dw);
err = -ENOEXEC;