redonkable
/
alistair23-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

fcntl: Fix potential deadlock in send_sig{io, urg}() 

commit 8d1ddb5e79 upstream.

Syzbot reports a potential deadlock found by the newly added recursive
read deadlock detection in lockdep:

[...] ========================================================
[...] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
[...] 5.9.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
[...] --------------------------------------------------------
[...] syz-executor.1/10214 just changed the state of lock:
[...] ffff88811f506338 (&f->f_owner.lock){.+..}-{2:2}, at: send_sigurg+0x1d/0x200
[...] but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past:
[...]  (&dev->event_lock){-...}-{2:2}
[...]
[...]
[...] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
[...]
[...]
[...] other info that might help us debug this:
[...] Chain exists of:
[...]   &dev->event_lock --> &new->fa_lock --> &f->f_owner.lock
[...]
[...]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[...]
[...]        CPU0                    CPU1
[...]        ----                    ----
[...]   lock(&f->f_owner.lock);
[...]                                local_irq_disable();
[...]                                lock(&dev->event_lock);
[...]                                lock(&new->fa_lock);
[...]   <Interrupt>
[...]     lock(&dev->event_lock);
[...]
[...]  *** DEADLOCK ***

The corresponding deadlock case is as followed:

	CPU 0		CPU 1		CPU 2
	read_lock(&fown->lock);
			spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, ...)
					write_lock_irq(&filp->f_owner.lock); // wait for the lock
			read_lock(&fown-lock); // have to wait until the writer release
					       // due to the fairness
	<interrupted>
	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock); // wait for the lock

The lock dependency on CPU 1 happens if there exists a call sequence:

	input_inject_event():
	  spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock,...);
	  input_handle_event():
	    input_pass_values():
	      input_to_handler():
	        handler->event(): // evdev_event()
	          evdev_pass_values():
	            spin_lock(&client->buffer_lock);
	            __pass_event():
	              kill_fasync():
	                kill_fasync_rcu():
	                  read_lock(&fa->fa_lock);
	                  send_sigio():
	                    read_lock(&fown->lock);

To fix this, make the reader in send_sigurg() and send_sigio() use
read_lock_irqsave() and read_lock_irqrestore().

Reported-by: syzbot+22e87cdf94021b984aa6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+c5e32344981ad9f33750@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5.4-rM2-2.2.x-imx-squashed
Boqun Feng 2020-11-05 14:23:51 +08:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 5b2f1ad6b1
commit 642c2d74c3
1 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
fs/fcntl.c
View File

@ -779,9 +779,10 @@ void send_sigio(struct fown_struct *fown, int fd, int band)
{
struct task_struct *p;
enum pid_type type;
unsigned long flags;
struct pid *pid;
read_lock(&fown->lock);
read_lock_irqsave(&fown->lock, flags);
type = fown->pid_type;
pid = fown->pid;
@ -802,7 +803,7 @@ void send_sigio(struct fown_struct *fown, int fd, int band)
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
out_unlock_fown:
read_unlock(&fown->lock);
read_unlock_irqrestore(&fown->lock, flags);
}
static void send_sigurg_to_task(struct task_struct *p,
@ -817,9 +818,10 @@ int send_sigurg(struct fown_struct *fown)
struct task_struct *p;
enum pid_type type;
struct pid *pid;
unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
read_lock(&fown->lock);
read_lock_irqsave(&fown->lock, flags);
type = fown->pid_type;
pid = fown->pid;
@ -842,7 +844,7 @@ int send_sigurg(struct fown_struct *fown)
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
out_unlock_fown:
read_unlock(&fown->lock);
read_unlock_irqrestore(&fown->lock, flags);
return ret;
}