1
0
Fork 0

perf lock: Don't free "lock_seq_stat" if read_count isn't zero

[ Upstream commit b0e5a05cc9 ]

When execute command "perf lock report", it hits failure and outputs log
as follows:

  perf: builtin-lock.c:623: report_lock_release_event: Assertion `!(seq->read_count < 0)' failed.
  Aborted

This is an imbalance issue.  The locking sequence structure
"lock_seq_stat" contains the reader counter and it is used to check if
the locking sequence is balance or not between acquiring and releasing.

If the tool wrongly frees "lock_seq_stat" when "read_count" isn't zero,
the "read_count" will be reset to zero when allocate a new structure at
the next time; thus it causes the wrong counting for reader and finally
results in imbalance issue.

To fix this issue, if detects "read_count" is not zero (means still have
read user in the locking sequence), goto the "end" tag to skip freeing
structure "lock_seq_stat".

Fixes: e4cef1f650 ("perf lock: Fix state machine to recognize lock sequence")
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201104094229.17509-2-leo.yan@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
5.4-rM2-2.2.x-imx-squashed
Leo Yan 2020-11-04 17:42:29 +08:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 4c954fe28a
commit 6eadbc3b7a
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ static int report_lock_release_event(struct evsel *evsel,
case SEQ_STATE_READ_ACQUIRED:
seq->read_count--;
BUG_ON(seq->read_count < 0);
if (!seq->read_count) {
if (seq->read_count) {
ls->nr_release++;
goto end;
}