redonkable
/
alistair23-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

i40evf: remove needless min_t() on num_online_cpus()*2 

We already set pairs to the value of adapter->num_active_queues. This
value is limited by vsi_res->num_queue_pairs and num_online_cpus(). This
means that pairs by definition is already smaller than
num_online_cpus()*2, so we don't even need to bother with this check.

Lets just remove it and update the comment.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
Jacob Keller 2017-04-19 09:25:56 -04:00 committed by Jeff Kirsher
parent 0da36b9774
commit 789f38ca70
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
View File

@ -1271,13 +1271,13 @@ static int i40evf_set_interrupt_capability(struct i40evf_adapter *adapter)
}
pairs = adapter->num_active_queues;
/* It's easy to be greedy for MSI-X vectors, but it really
* doesn't do us much good if we have a lot more vectors
* than CPU's. So let's be conservative and only ask for
* (roughly) twice the number of vectors as there are CPU's.
/* It's easy to be greedy for MSI-X vectors, but it really doesn't do
* us much good if we have more vectors than CPUs. However, we already
* limit the total number of queues by the number of CPUs so we do not
* need any further limiting here.
*/
v_budget = min_t(int, pairs, (int)(num_online_cpus() * 2)) + NONQ_VECS;
v_budget = min_t(int, v_budget, (int)adapter->vf_res->max_vectors);
v_budget = min_t(int, pairs + NONQ_VECS,
(int)adapter->vf_res->max_vectors);
adapter->msix_entries = kcalloc(v_budget,
sizeof(struct msix_entry), GFP_KERNEL);