redonkable
/
alistair23-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

rxrpc: Use skb->len not skb->data_len 

skb->len should be used rather than skb->data_len when referring to the
amount of data in a packet.  This will only cause a malfunction in the
following cases:

 (1) We receive a jumbo packet (validation and splitting both are wrong).

 (2) We see if there's extra ACK info in an ACK packet (we think it's not
     there and just ignore it).

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
David Howells 2016-09-13 22:36:22 +01:00
parent b25de36053
commit 89a80ed4c0
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
net/rxrpc/input.c
View File

@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static bool rxrpc_validate_jumbo(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp = rxrpc_skb(skb);
unsigned int offset = sp->offset;
unsigned int len = skb->data_len;
unsigned int len = skb->len;
int nr_jumbo = 1;
u8 flags = sp->hdr.flags;
@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void rxrpc_input_data(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb,
u8 ack = 0, flags, annotation = 0;
_enter("{%u,%u},{%u,%u}",
call->rx_hard_ack, call->rx_top, skb->data_len, seq);
call->rx_hard_ack, call->rx_top, skb->len, seq);
_proto("Rx DATA %%%u { #%u f=%02x }",
sp->hdr.serial, seq, sp->hdr.flags);
@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static void rxrpc_input_data(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb,
next_subpacket:
queued = false;
ix = seq & RXRPC_RXTX_BUFF_MASK;
len = skb->data_len;
len = skb->len;
if (flags & RXRPC_JUMBO_PACKET)
len = RXRPC_JUMBO_DATALEN;
@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static void rxrpc_input_ack(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb,
}
offset = sp->offset + nr_acks + 3;
if (skb->data_len >= offset + sizeof(buf.info)) {
if (skb->len >= offset + sizeof(buf.info)) {
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, &buf.info, sizeof(buf.info)) < 0)
return rxrpc_proto_abort("XAI", call, 0);
rxrpc_input_ackinfo(call, skb, &buf.info);