apparmor: fix aa_xattrs_match() may sleep while holding a RCU lock

aa_xattrs_match() is unfortunately calling vfs_getxattr_alloc() from a
context protected by an rcu_read_lock. This can not be done as
vfs_getxattr_alloc() may sleep regardles of the gfp_t value being
passed to it.

Fix this by breaking the rcu_read_lock on the policy search when the
xattr match feature is requested and restarting the search if a policy
changes occur.

Fixes: 8e51f9087f ("apparmor: Add support for attaching profiles via xattr, presence and value")
Reported-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c

@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static __poll_t ns_revision_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *pt)
 
 void __aa_bump_ns_revision(struct aa_ns *ns)
 {
-	ns->revision++;
+	WRITE_ONCE(ns->revision, ns->revision + 1);
 	wake_up_interruptible(&ns->wait);
 }
 

security/apparmor/domain.c

@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static int aa_xattrs_match(const struct linux_binprm *bprm,
 
 	if (!bprm || !profile->xattr_count)
 		return 0;
+	might_sleep();
 
 	/* transition from exec match to xattr set */
 	state = aa_dfa_null_transition(profile->xmatch, state);
@@ -361,10 +362,11 @@ out:
 }
 
 /**
- * __attach_match_ - find an attachment match
+ * find_attach - do attachment search for unconfined processes
  * @bprm - binprm structure of transitioning task
- * @name - to match against  (NOT NULL)
+ * @ns: the current namespace  (NOT NULL)
  * @head - profile list to walk  (NOT NULL)
+ * @name - to match against  (NOT NULL)
  * @info - info message if there was an error (NOT NULL)
  *
  * Do a linear search on the profiles in the list.  There is a matching
@@ -374,12 +376,11 @@ out:
  *
  * Requires: @head not be shared or have appropriate locks held
  *
- * Returns: profile or NULL if no match found
+ * Returns: label or NULL if no match found
  */
-static struct aa_profile *__attach_match(const struct linux_binprm *bprm,
+static struct aa_label *find_attach(const struct linux_binprm *bprm,
-					 const char *name,
+				    struct aa_ns *ns, struct list_head *head,
-					 struct list_head *head,
+				    const char *name, const char **info)
-					 const char **info)
 {
 	int candidate_len = 0, candidate_xattrs = 0;
 	bool conflict = false;
@@ -388,6 +389,8 @@ static struct aa_profile *__attach_match(const struct linux_binprm *bprm,
 	AA_BUG(!name);
 	AA_BUG(!head);
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+restart:
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(profile, head, base.list) {
 		if (profile->label.flags & FLAG_NULL &&
 		    &profile->label == ns_unconfined(profile->ns))
@@ -413,16 +416,32 @@ static struct aa_profile *__attach_match(const struct linux_binprm *bprm,
 			perm = dfa_user_allow(profile->xmatch, state);
 			/* any accepting state means a valid match. */
 			if (perm & MAY_EXEC) {
-				int ret;
+				int ret = 0;
 
 				if (count < candidate_len)
 					continue;
 
-				ret = aa_xattrs_match(bprm, profile, state);
+				if (bprm && profile->xattr_count) {
-				/* Fail matching if the xattrs don't match */
+					long rev = READ_ONCE(ns->revision);
-				if (ret < 0)
-					continue;
 
+					if (!aa_get_profile_not0(profile))
+						goto restart;
+					rcu_read_unlock();
+					ret = aa_xattrs_match(bprm, profile,
+							      state);
+					rcu_read_lock();
+					aa_put_profile(profile);
+					if (rev !=
+					    READ_ONCE(ns->revision))
+						/* policy changed */
+						goto restart;
+					/*
+					 * Fail matching if the xattrs don't
+					 * match
+					 */
+					if (ret < 0)
+						continue;
+				}
 				/*
 				 * TODO: allow for more flexible best match
 				 *
@@ -445,43 +464,28 @@ static struct aa_profile *__attach_match(const struct linux_binprm *bprm,
 				candidate_xattrs = ret;
 				conflict = false;
 			}
-		} else if (!strcmp(profile->base.name, name))
+		} else if (!strcmp(profile->base.name, name)) {
 			/*
 			 * old exact non-re match, without conditionals such
 			 * as xattrs. no more searching required
 			 */
-			return profile;
+			candidate = profile;
+			goto out;
+		}
 	}
 
-	if (conflict) {
+	if (!candidate || conflict) {
-		*info = "conflicting profile attachments";
+		if (conflict)
+			*info = "conflicting profile attachments";
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	return candidate;
+out:
-}
+	candidate = aa_get_newest_profile(candidate);
-
-/**
- * find_attach - do attachment search for unconfined processes
- * @bprm - binprm structure of transitioning task
- * @ns: the current namespace  (NOT NULL)
- * @list: list to search  (NOT NULL)
- * @name: the executable name to match against  (NOT NULL)
- * @info: info message if there was an error
- *
- * Returns: label or NULL if no match found
- */
-static struct aa_label *find_attach(const struct linux_binprm *bprm,
-				    struct aa_ns *ns, struct list_head *list,
-				    const char *name, const char **info)
-{
-	struct aa_profile *profile;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	profile = aa_get_profile(__attach_match(bprm, name, list, info));
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	return profile ? &profile->label : NULL;
+	return &candidate->label;
 }
 
 static const char *next_name(int xtype, const char *name)

security/apparmor/policy.c

@@ -1125,8 +1125,8 @@ ssize_t aa_remove_profiles(struct aa_ns *policy_ns, struct aa_label *subj,
 	if (!name) {
 		/* remove namespace - can only happen if fqname[0] == ':' */
 		mutex_lock_nested(&ns->parent->lock, ns->level);
-		__aa_remove_ns(ns);
 		__aa_bump_ns_revision(ns);
+		__aa_remove_ns(ns);
 		mutex_unlock(&ns->parent->lock);
 	} else {
 		/* remove profile */
@@ -1138,9 +1138,9 @@ ssize_t aa_remove_profiles(struct aa_ns *policy_ns, struct aa_label *subj,
 			goto fail_ns_lock;
 		}
 		name = profile->base.hname;
+		__aa_bump_ns_revision(ns);
 		__remove_profile(profile);
 		__aa_labelset_update_subtree(ns);
-		__aa_bump_ns_revision(ns);
 		mutex_unlock(&ns->lock);
 	}