drm/i915: Remove redundant parameter to i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail()
An earlier commit (c8725f3dc0
: Do not call
retire_requests from wait_for_rendering) removed the use of the ring parameter
within wait_rendering__tail() but did not remove the parameter itself. As the
plan is to remove obj->ring which is where this parameter comes from, it is
simpler to just remove the parameter completely than to update it with a new
source.
For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fac6adb06a
commit
8e63954903
|
@ -1281,8 +1281,7 @@ i915_wait_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, uint32_t seqno)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
|
||||
struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
|
||||
i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!obj->active)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -1319,7 +1318,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_rendering(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
|
|||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj, ring);
|
||||
return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* A nonblocking variant of the above wait. This is a highly dangerous routine
|
||||
|
@ -1359,7 +1358,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__nonblocking(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
|
|||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj, ring);
|
||||
return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue