drm/i915: Properly sort MI coomand table
In the future, we may want to speed up command/register searching using a bisection and so we require them to be in ascending order respectively by command value or register address. However, this was not true for one pair in the MI table; make it so. Signed-off-by: Hanno Boeck <hanno@hboeck.de> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> [danvet: Hand-assemble patch from raw patch from Hanno and commit message from Chris.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dcc13bcb48
commit
9f58582c7a
|
@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static const struct drm_i915_cmd_descriptor render_cmds[] = {
|
|||
CMD( MI_ARB_ON_OFF, SMI, F, 1, R ),
|
||||
CMD( MI_PREDICATE, SMI, F, 1, S ),
|
||||
CMD( MI_TOPOLOGY_FILTER, SMI, F, 1, S ),
|
||||
CMD( MI_DISPLAY_FLIP, SMI, !F, 0xFF, R ),
|
||||
CMD( MI_SET_APPID, SMI, F, 1, S ),
|
||||
CMD( MI_DISPLAY_FLIP, SMI, !F, 0xFF, R ),
|
||||
CMD( MI_SET_CONTEXT, SMI, !F, 0xFF, R ),
|
||||
CMD( MI_URB_CLEAR, SMI, !F, 0xFF, S ),
|
||||
CMD( MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM, SMI, !F, 0x3F, B,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue