1
0
Fork 0

drivers/ata: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair

There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair.  This commit therefore eliminates the spin_unlock_wait() call and
associated else-clause and hoists the then-clause's lock and unlock out of
the "if" statement.  This should be safe from a performance perspective
because according to Tejun there should be few if any drivers that don't
set their own error handler.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
Paul E. McKenney 2017-06-29 13:10:47 -07:00
parent e0892e086a
commit a4f08141d0
1 changed files with 3 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -645,12 +645,11 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap,
* completions are honored. A scmd is determined to have
* timed out iff its associated qc is active and not failed.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags);
if (ap->ops->error_handler) {
struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *tmp;
int nr_timedout = 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags);
/* This must occur under the ap->lock as we don't want
a polled recovery to race the real interrupt handler
@ -700,12 +699,11 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap,
if (nr_timedout)
__ata_port_freeze(ap);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
/* initialize eh_tries */
ap->eh_tries = ATA_EH_MAX_TRIES;
} else
spin_unlock_wait(ap->lock);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler);