From a9467fa3cd2d5bf39e7cb7d0706d29d7ef4df212 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dongsheng Yang Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 18:35:15 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] sched: Use clamp() and clamp_val() to make sys_nice() more readable Suggested-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1399541715-19568-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/core.c | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 6340c601475d..f5605b6deea4 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -3057,17 +3057,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(nice, int, increment) * We don't have to worry. Conceptually one call occurs first * and we have a single winner. */ - if (increment < -40) - increment = -40; - if (increment > 40) - increment = 40; - + increment = clamp(increment, -NICE_WIDTH, NICE_WIDTH); nice = task_nice(current) + increment; - if (nice < MIN_NICE) - nice = MIN_NICE; - if (nice > MAX_NICE) - nice = MAX_NICE; + nice = clamp_val(nice, MIN_NICE, MAX_NICE); if (increment < 0 && !can_nice(current, nice)) return -EPERM;