drm/i915: reduce eDP VDD message verbose
Now we only print messages when we actually enable VDD and when we actually disable VDD. The changes in the last commit triggered a big number of messages while the driver was being initialized, and I thought we were toggling things on/off too many times, but that was not really true: we were just being too verbose. Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8a5e6aeb30
commit
b0665d57cf
|
@ -1077,17 +1077,16 @@ void ironlake_edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|||
|
||||
if (!is_edp(intel_dp))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Turn eDP VDD on\n");
|
||||
|
||||
WARN(intel_dp->want_panel_vdd,
|
||||
"eDP VDD already requested on\n");
|
||||
|
||||
intel_dp->want_panel_vdd = true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ironlake_edp_have_panel_vdd(intel_dp)) {
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("eDP VDD already on\n");
|
||||
if (ironlake_edp_have_panel_vdd(intel_dp))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Turning eDP VDD on\n");
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ironlake_edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp))
|
||||
ironlake_wait_panel_power_cycle(intel_dp);
|
||||
|
@ -1121,6 +1120,8 @@ static void ironlake_panel_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|||
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->mode_config.mutex));
|
||||
|
||||
if (!intel_dp->want_panel_vdd && ironlake_edp_have_panel_vdd(intel_dp)) {
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Turning eDP VDD off\n");
|
||||
|
||||
pp = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);
|
||||
pp &= ~EDP_FORCE_VDD;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1153,7 +1154,6 @@ void ironlake_edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync)
|
|||
if (!is_edp(intel_dp))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Turn eDP VDD off %d\n", intel_dp->want_panel_vdd);
|
||||
WARN(!intel_dp->want_panel_vdd, "eDP VDD not forced on");
|
||||
|
||||
intel_dp->want_panel_vdd = false;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue