From b41352a93c163afafd29f56bb18fd3c0fef1120c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 18:42:26 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] net: skbuff: disambiguate argument and member for skb_list_walk_safe helper commit 5eee7bd7e245914e4e050c413dfe864e31805207 upstream. This worked before, because we made all callers name their next pointer "next". But in trying to be more "drop-in" ready, the silliness here is revealed. This commit fixes the problem by making the macro argument and the member use different names. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/linux/skbuff.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h index 03cf61e8a43f..6493c98c8631 100644 --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h @@ -1481,9 +1481,9 @@ static inline void skb_mark_not_on_list(struct sk_buff *skb) } /* Iterate through singly-linked GSO fragments of an skb. */ -#define skb_list_walk_safe(first, skb, next) \ - for ((skb) = (first), (next) = (skb) ? (skb)->next : NULL; (skb); \ - (skb) = (next), (next) = (skb) ? (skb)->next : NULL) +#define skb_list_walk_safe(first, skb, next_skb) \ + for ((skb) = (first), (next_skb) = (skb) ? (skb)->next : NULL; (skb); \ + (skb) = (next_skb), (next_skb) = (skb) ? (skb)->next : NULL) static inline void skb_list_del_init(struct sk_buff *skb) {