diff --git a/drivers/video/udlfb.c b/drivers/video/udlfb.c
index c6584c9f235a..4e133754ba2b 100644
--- a/drivers/video/udlfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/udlfb.c
@@ -49,13 +49,22 @@ static const u32 udlfb_info_flags = FBINFO_DEFAULT | FBINFO_READS_FAST |
 		FBINFO_HWACCEL_COPYAREA | FBINFO_MISC_ALWAYS_SETPAR;
 
 /*
- * There are many DisplayLink-based products, all with unique PIDs. We are able
- * to support all volume ones (circa 2009) with a single driver, so we match
- * globally on VID. TODO: Probe() needs to detect when we might be running
- * "future" chips, and bail on those, so a compatible driver can match.
+ * There are many DisplayLink-based graphics products, all with unique PIDs.
+ * So we match on DisplayLink's VID + Vendor-Defined Interface Class (0xff)
+ * We also require a match on SubClass (0x00) and Protocol (0x00),
+ * which is compatible with all known USB 2.0 era graphics chips and firmware,
+ * but allows DisplayLink to increment those for any future incompatible chips
  */
 static struct usb_device_id id_table[] = {
-	{.idVendor = 0x17e9, .match_flags = USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_VENDOR,},
+	{.idVendor = 0x17e9,
+	 .bInterfaceClass = 0xff,
+	 .bInterfaceSubClass = 0x00,
+	 .bInterfaceProtocol = 0x00,
+	 .match_flags = USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_VENDOR |
+		USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_CLASS |
+		USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_SUBCLASS |
+		USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_PROTOCOL,
+	},
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, id_table);