From b783e62d9620445d1ca3de76badf0468cdd329ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:03:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: don't print the leaf if we had an error In __btrfs_free_extent we will print the leaf if we fail to find the extent we wanted, but the problem is if we get an error we won't have a leaf so often this leads to a NULL pointer dereference and we lose the error that actually occurred. So only print the leaf if ret > 0, which means we didn't find the item we were looking for but we didn't error either. This way the error is preserved. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index b172b7fa4889..66bac226944e 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -4462,7 +4462,9 @@ static int __btrfs_free_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, printk(KERN_ERR "umm, got %d back from search" ", was looking for %llu\n", ret, (unsigned long long)bytenr); - btrfs_print_leaf(extent_root, path->nodes[0]); + if (ret > 0) + btrfs_print_leaf(extent_root, + path->nodes[0]); } BUG_ON(ret); extent_slot = path->slots[0];