1
0
Fork 0

sched: better rt-group documentation

Viktor was nice enough to enhance the document based on my replies to
his questions on the subject.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
Viktor Radnai 2008-04-19 19:45:01 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent c24b7c5244
commit b9b158fe1c
2 changed files with 165 additions and 40 deletions

View File

@ -1,59 +1,177 @@
Real-Time group scheduling
--------------------------
CONTENTS
========
1. Overview
1.1 The problem
1.2 The solution
2. The interface
2.1 System-wide settings
2.2 Default behaviour
2.3 Basis for grouping tasks
3. Future plans
Real-Time group scheduling.
The problem space:
In order to schedule multiple groups of realtime tasks each group must
be assigned a fixed portion of the CPU time available. Without a minimum
guarantee a realtime group can obviously fall short. A fuzzy upper limit
is of no use since it cannot be relied upon. Which leaves us with just
the single fixed portion.
CPU time is divided by means of specifying how much time can be spent
running in a given period. Say a frame fixed realtime renderer must
deliver 25 frames a second, which yields a period of 0.04s. Now say
it will also have to play some music and respond to input, leaving it
with around 80% for the graphics. We can then give this group a runtime
of 0.8 * 0.04s = 0.032s.
This way the graphics group will have a 0.04s period with a 0.032s runtime
limit.
Now if the audio thread needs to refill the DMA buffer every 0.005s, but
needs only about 3% CPU time to do so, it can do with a 0.03 * 0.005s
= 0.00015s.
1. Overview
===========
The Interface:
1.1 The problem
---------------
system wide:
Realtime scheduling is all about determinism, a group has to be able to rely on
the amount of bandwidth (eg. CPU time) being constant. In order to schedule
multiple groups of realtime tasks, each group must be assigned a fixed portion
of the CPU time available. Without a minimum guarantee a realtime group can
obviously fall short. A fuzzy upper limit is of no use since it cannot be
relied upon. Which leaves us with just the single fixed portion.
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_ms
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
1.2 The solution
----------------
CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED
CPU time is divided by means of specifying how much time can be spent running
in a given period. We allocate this "run time" for each realtime group which
the other realtime groups will not be permitted to use.
/sys/kernel/uids/<uid>/cpu_rt_runtime_us
Any time not allocated to a realtime group will be used to run normal priority
tasks (SCHED_OTHER). Any allocated run time not used will also be picked up by
SCHED_OTHER.
or
Let's consider an example: a frame fixed realtime renderer must deliver 25
frames a second, which yields a period of 0.04s per frame. Now say it will also
have to play some music and respond to input, leaving it with around 80% CPU
time dedicated for the graphics. We can then give this group a run time of 0.8
* 0.04s = 0.032s.
CONFIG_FAIR_CGROUP_SCHED
This way the graphics group will have a 0.04s period with a 0.032s run time
limit. Now if the audio thread needs to refill the DMA buffer every 0.005s, but
needs only about 3% CPU time to do so, it can do with a 0.03 * 0.005s =
0.00015s. So this group can be scheduled with a period of 0.005s and a run time
of 0.00015s.
/cgroup/<cgroup>/cpu.rt_runtime_us
The remaining CPU time will be used for user input and other tass. Because
realtime tasks have explicitly allocated the CPU time they need to perform
their tasks, buffer underruns in the graphocs or audio can be eliminated.
[ time is specified in us because the interface is s32; this gives an
operating range of ~35m to 1us ]
NOTE: the above example is not fully implemented as of yet (2.6.25). We still
lack an EDF scheduler to make non-uniform periods usable.
The period takes values in [ 1, INT_MAX ], runtime in [ -1, INT_MAX - 1 ].
A runtime of -1 specifies runtime == period, ie. no limit.
2. The Interface
================
New groups get the period from /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us and
a runtime of 0.
Settings are constrained to:
2.1 System wide settings
------------------------
The system wide settings are configured under the /proc virtual file system:
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us:
The scheduling period that is equivalent to 100% CPU bandwidth
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us:
A global limit on how much time realtime scheduling may use. Even without
CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED enabled, this will limit time reserved to realtime
processes. With CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED it signifies the total bandwidth
available to all realtime groups.
* Time is specified in us because the interface is s32. This gives an
operating range from 1us to about 35 minutes.
* sched_rt_period_us takes values from 1 to INT_MAX.
* sched_rt_runtime_us takes values from -1 to (INT_MAX - 1).
* A run time of -1 specifies runtime == period, ie. no limit.
2.2 Default behaviour
---------------------
The default values for sched_rt_period_us (1000000 or 1s) and
sched_rt_runtime_us (950000 or 0.95s). This gives 0.05s to be used by
SCHED_OTHER (non-RT tasks). These defaults were chosen so that a run-away
realtime tasks will not lock up the machine but leave a little time to recover
it. By setting runtime to -1 you'd get the old behaviour back.
By default all bandwidth is assigned to the root group and new groups get the
period from /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us and a run time of 0. If you
want to assign bandwidth to another group, reduce the root group's bandwidth
and assign some or all of the difference to another group.
Realtime group scheduling means you have to assign a portion of total CPU
bandwidth to the group before it will accept realtime tasks. Therefore you will
not be able to run realtime tasks as any user other than root until you have
done that, even if the user has the rights to run processes with realtime
priority!
2.3 Basis for grouping tasks
----------------------------
There are two compile-time settings for allocating CPU bandwidth. These are
configured using the "Basis for grouping tasks" multiple choice menu under
General setup > Group CPU Scheduler:
a. CONFIG_USER_SCHED (aka "Basis for grouping tasks" = "user id")
This lets you use the virtual files under
"/sys/kernel/uids/<uid>/cpu_rt_runtime_us" to control he CPU time reserved for
each user .
The other option is:
.o CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED (aka "Basis for grouping tasks" = "Control groups")
This uses the /cgroup virtual file system and "/cgroup/<cgroup>/cpu.rt_runtime_us"
to control the CPU time reserved for each control group instead.
For more information on working with control groups, you should read
Documentation/cgroups.txt as well.
Group settings are checked against the following limits in order to keep the configuration
schedulable:
\Sum_{i} runtime_{i} / global_period <= global_runtime / global_period
in order to keep the configuration schedulable.
For now, this can be simplified to just the following (but see Future plans):
\Sum_{i} runtime_{i} <= global_runtime
3. Future plans
===============
There is work in progress to make the scheduling period for each group
("/sys/kernel/uids/<uid>/cpu_rt_period_us" or
"/cgroup/<cgroup>/cpu.rt_period_us" respectively) configurable as well.
The constraint on the period is that a subgroup must have a smaller or
equal period to its parent. But realistically its not very useful _yet_
as its prone to starvation without deadline scheduling.
Consider two sibling groups A and B; both have 50% bandwidth, but A's
period is twice the length of B's.
* group A: period=100000us, runtime=10000us
- this runs for 0.01s once every 0.1s
* group B: period= 50000us, runtime=10000us
- this runs for 0.01s twice every 0.1s (or once every 0.05 sec).
This means that currently a while (1) loop in A will run for the full period of
B and can starve B's tasks (assuming they are of lower priority) for a whole
period.
The next project will be SCHED_EDF (Earliest Deadline First scheduling) to bring
full deadline scheduling to the linux kernel. Deadline scheduling the above
groups and treating end of the period as a deadline will ensure that they both
get their allocated time.
Implementing SCHED_EDF might take a while to complete. Priority Inheritance is
the biggest challenge as the current linux PI infrastructure is geared towards
the limited static priority levels 0-139. With deadline scheduling you need to
do deadline inheritance (since priority is inversely proportional to the
deadline delta (deadline - now).
This means the whole PI machinery will have to be reworked - and that is one of
the most complex pieces of code we have.

View File

@ -328,6 +328,13 @@ config RT_GROUP_SCHED
depends on EXPERIMENTAL
depends on GROUP_SCHED
default n
help
This feature lets you explicitly allocate real CPU bandwidth
to users or control groups (depending on the "Basis for grouping tasks"
setting below. If enabled, it will also make it impossible to
schedule realtime tasks for non-root users until you allocate
realtime bandwidth for them.
See Documentation/sched-rt-group.txt for more information.
choice
depends on GROUP_SCHED