redonkable
/
alistair23-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

[PATCH] low performance of lib/sort.c 

It is a non-standard heap-sort algorithm implementation because the index
of child node is wrong .  The sort function still outputs right result, but
the performance is O( n * ( log(n) + 1 ) ) , about 10% ~ 20% worse than
standard algorithm.

Signed-off-by: keios <keios.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Acked-by: Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
keios 2006-10-03 01:13:49 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent ffc5089196
commit d3717bdf8f
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
lib/sort.c
View File

@ -49,15 +49,15 @@ void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
void (*swap)(void *, void *, int size))
{
/* pre-scale counters for performance */
int i = (num/2) * size, n = num * size, c, r;
int i = (num/2 - 1) * size, n = num * size, c, r;
if (!swap)
swap = (size == 4 ? u32_swap : generic_swap);
/* heapify */
for ( ; i >= 0; i -= size) {
for (r = i; r * 2 < n; r = c) {
c = r * 2;
for (r = i; r * 2 + size < n; r = c) {
c = r * 2 + size;
if (c < n - size && cmp(base + c, base + c + size) < 0)
c += size;
if (cmp(base + r, base + c) >= 0)
@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
/* sort */
for (i = n - size; i >= 0; i -= size) {
swap(base, base + i, size);
for (r = 0; r * 2 < i; r = c) {
c = r * 2;
for (r = 0; r * 2 + size < i; r = c) {
c = r * 2 + size;
if (c < i - size && cmp(base + c, base + c + size) < 0)
c += size;
if (cmp(base + r, base + c) >= 0)