From d5286a92ea76a124d6cfa1e261394da858125d99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikolay Borisov Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:24:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: remove useless return value statement in split_node At the point when we set 'ret = 0' it's guaranteed that the function is going to return 0 so directly return 0. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c index 778a6d580545..60135f6e6441 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c @@ -3459,7 +3459,6 @@ static noinline int split_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, (c_nritems - mid) * sizeof(struct btrfs_key_ptr)); btrfs_set_header_nritems(split, c_nritems - mid); btrfs_set_header_nritems(c, mid); - ret = 0; btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(c); btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(split); @@ -3477,7 +3476,7 @@ static noinline int split_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, btrfs_tree_unlock(split); free_extent_buffer(split); } - return ret; + return 0; } /*