redonkable
/
alistair23-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

block: loop: set discard granularity and alignment for block device backed loop 

commit bcb21c8cc9 upstream.

In case of block device backend, if the backend supports write zeros, the
loop device will set queue flag of QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD. However,
limits.discard_granularity isn't setup, and this way is wrong,
see the following description in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block:

	A discard_granularity of 0 means that the device does not support
	discard functionality.

Especially 9b15d109a6 ("block: improve discard bio alignment in
__blkdev_issue_discard()") starts to take q->limits.discard_granularity
for computing max discard sectors. And zero discard granularity may cause
kernel oops, or fail discard request even though the loop queue claims
discard support via QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD.

Fix the issue by setup discard granularity and alignment.

Fixes: c52abf5630 ("loop: Better discard support for block devices")
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Cc: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5.4-rM2-2.2.x-imx-squashed
Ming Lei 2020-08-17 18:01:30 +08:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent f09dbec9c0
commit db4542b661
1 changed files with 18 additions and 15 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

33
drivers/block/loop.c
View File

@ -863,6 +863,7 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
struct request_queue *q = lo->lo_queue;
u32 granularity, max_discard_sectors;
/*
* If the backing device is a block device, mirror its zeroing
@ -875,11 +876,10 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
struct request_queue *backingq;
backingq = bdev_get_queue(inode->i_bdev);
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q,
backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors);
blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q,
backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors);
max_discard_sectors = backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors;
granularity = backingq->limits.discard_granularity ?:
queue_physical_block_size(backingq);
/*
* We use punch hole to reclaim the free space used by the
@ -888,23 +888,26 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
* useful information.
*/
} else if (!file->f_op->fallocate || lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) {
q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
q->limits.discard_alignment = 0;
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, 0);
max_discard_sectors = 0;
granularity = 0;
} else {
q->limits.discard_granularity = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
q->limits.discard_alignment = 0;
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX >> 9;
granularity = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
}
if (q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors)
if (max_discard_sectors) {
q->limits.discard_granularity = granularity;
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, max_discard_sectors);
blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, max_discard_sectors);
blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
else
} else {
q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, 0);
blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
}
q->limits.discard_alignment = 0;
}
static void loop_unprepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)