1
0
Fork 0

btrfs: remove stale comments about fs_mutex

The fs_mutex has been killed in 2008, a213501153 ("Btrfs: Replace
the big fs_mutex with a collection of other locks"), still remembered in
some comments.

We don't have any extra needs for locking in the ACL handlers.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
hifive-unleashed-5.1
David Sterba 2018-03-27 20:08:28 +02:00
parent 88c14590cd
commit e7ab0af6c3
1 changed files with 0 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -65,9 +65,6 @@ struct posix_acl *btrfs_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type)
return acl;
}
/*
* Needs to be called with fs_mutex held
*/
static int __btrfs_set_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type)
{
@ -127,11 +124,6 @@ int btrfs_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type)
return ret;
}
/*
* btrfs_init_acl is already generally called under fs_mutex, so the locking
* stuff has been fixed to work with that. If the locking stuff changes, we
* need to re-evaluate the acl locking stuff.
*/
int btrfs_init_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir)
{