Documentation/workqueue.txt: convert to ReST markup
... and move to Documentation/core-api folder. Signed-off-by: Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>hifive-unleashed-5.1
Silvio Fricke
Jonathan Corbet
parent
24755a55b0
commit
e7f08ffb18
|
|
@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ Kernel and driver related documentation.
|
|||
.. toctree::
|
||||
:maxdepth: 1
|
||||
|
||||
workqueue
|
||||
|
||||
.. only:: subproject
|
||||
|
||||
Indices
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,21 +1,14 @@
|
|||
|
||||
====================================
|
||||
Concurrency Managed Workqueue (cmwq)
|
||||
====================================
|
||||
|
||||
September, 2010 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
|
||||
Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
|
||||
|
||||
CONTENTS
|
||||
|
||||
1. Introduction
|
||||
2. Why cmwq?
|
||||
3. The Design
|
||||
4. Application Programming Interface (API)
|
||||
5. Example Execution Scenarios
|
||||
6. Guidelines
|
||||
7. Debugging
|
||||
:Date: September, 2010
|
||||
:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
|
||||
:Author: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1. Introduction
|
||||
Introduction
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
There are many cases where an asynchronous process execution context
|
||||
is needed and the workqueue (wq) API is the most commonly used
|
||||
|
|
@ -32,7 +25,8 @@ there is no work item left on the workqueue the worker becomes idle.
|
|||
When a new work item gets queued, the worker begins executing again.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2. Why cmwq?
|
||||
Why cmwq?
|
||||
=========
|
||||
|
||||
In the original wq implementation, a multi threaded (MT) wq had one
|
||||
worker thread per CPU and a single threaded (ST) wq had one worker
|
||||
|
|
@ -71,7 +65,8 @@ focus on the following goals.
|
|||
the API users don't need to worry about such details.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3. The Design
|
||||
The Design
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
In order to ease the asynchronous execution of functions a new
|
||||
abstraction, the work item, is introduced.
|
||||
|
|
@ -102,7 +97,7 @@ aspects of the way the work items are executed by setting flags on the
|
|||
workqueue they are putting the work item on. These flags include
|
||||
things like CPU locality, concurrency limits, priority and more. To
|
||||
get a detailed overview refer to the API description of
|
||||
alloc_workqueue() below.
|
||||
``alloc_workqueue()`` below.
|
||||
|
||||
When a work item is queued to a workqueue, the target worker-pool is
|
||||
determined according to the queue parameters and workqueue attributes
|
||||
|
|
@ -136,7 +131,7 @@ them.
|
|||
|
||||
For unbound workqueues, the number of backing pools is dynamic.
|
||||
Unbound workqueue can be assigned custom attributes using
|
||||
apply_workqueue_attrs() and workqueue will automatically create
|
||||
``apply_workqueue_attrs()`` and workqueue will automatically create
|
||||
backing worker pools matching the attributes. The responsibility of
|
||||
regulating concurrency level is on the users. There is also a flag to
|
||||
mark a bound wq to ignore the concurrency management. Please refer to
|
||||
|
|
@ -151,94 +146,95 @@ pressure. Else it is possible that the worker-pool deadlocks waiting
|
|||
for execution contexts to free up.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
4. Application Programming Interface (API)
|
||||
Application Programming Interface (API)
|
||||
=======================================
|
||||
|
||||
alloc_workqueue() allocates a wq. The original create_*workqueue()
|
||||
functions are deprecated and scheduled for removal. alloc_workqueue()
|
||||
takes three arguments - @name, @flags and @max_active. @name is the
|
||||
name of the wq and also used as the name of the rescuer thread if
|
||||
there is one.
|
||||
``alloc_workqueue()`` allocates a wq. The original
|
||||
``create_*workqueue()`` functions are deprecated and scheduled for
|
||||
removal. ``alloc_workqueue()`` takes three arguments - @``name``,
|
||||
``@flags`` and ``@max_active``. ``@name`` is the name of the wq and
|
||||
also used as the name of the rescuer thread if there is one.
|
||||
|
||||
A wq no longer manages execution resources but serves as a domain for
|
||||
forward progress guarantee, flush and work item attributes. @flags
|
||||
and @max_active control how work items are assigned execution
|
||||
forward progress guarantee, flush and work item attributes. ``@flags``
|
||||
and ``@max_active`` control how work items are assigned execution
|
||||
resources, scheduled and executed.
|
||||
|
||||
@flags:
|
||||
|
||||
WQ_UNBOUND
|
||||
``flags``
|
||||
---------
|
||||
|
||||
Work items queued to an unbound wq are served by the special
|
||||
worker-pools which host workers which are not bound to any
|
||||
specific CPU. This makes the wq behave as a simple execution
|
||||
context provider without concurrency management. The unbound
|
||||
worker-pools try to start execution of work items as soon as
|
||||
possible. Unbound wq sacrifices locality but is useful for
|
||||
the following cases.
|
||||
``WQ_UNBOUND``
|
||||
Work items queued to an unbound wq are served by the special
|
||||
worker-pools which host workers which are not bound to any
|
||||
specific CPU. This makes the wq behave as a simple execution
|
||||
context provider without concurrency management. The unbound
|
||||
worker-pools try to start execution of work items as soon as
|
||||
possible. Unbound wq sacrifices locality but is useful for
|
||||
the following cases.
|
||||
|
||||
* Wide fluctuation in the concurrency level requirement is
|
||||
expected and using bound wq may end up creating large number
|
||||
of mostly unused workers across different CPUs as the issuer
|
||||
hops through different CPUs.
|
||||
* Wide fluctuation in the concurrency level requirement is
|
||||
expected and using bound wq may end up creating large number
|
||||
of mostly unused workers across different CPUs as the issuer
|
||||
hops through different CPUs.
|
||||
|
||||
* Long running CPU intensive workloads which can be better
|
||||
managed by the system scheduler.
|
||||
* Long running CPU intensive workloads which can be better
|
||||
managed by the system scheduler.
|
||||
|
||||
WQ_FREEZABLE
|
||||
``WQ_FREEZABLE``
|
||||
A freezable wq participates in the freeze phase of the system
|
||||
suspend operations. Work items on the wq are drained and no
|
||||
new work item starts execution until thawed.
|
||||
|
||||
A freezable wq participates in the freeze phase of the system
|
||||
suspend operations. Work items on the wq are drained and no
|
||||
new work item starts execution until thawed.
|
||||
``WQ_MEM_RECLAIM``
|
||||
All wq which might be used in the memory reclaim paths **MUST**
|
||||
have this flag set. The wq is guaranteed to have at least one
|
||||
execution context regardless of memory pressure.
|
||||
|
||||
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
|
||||
``WQ_HIGHPRI``
|
||||
Work items of a highpri wq are queued to the highpri
|
||||
worker-pool of the target cpu. Highpri worker-pools are
|
||||
served by worker threads with elevated nice level.
|
||||
|
||||
All wq which might be used in the memory reclaim paths _MUST_
|
||||
have this flag set. The wq is guaranteed to have at least one
|
||||
execution context regardless of memory pressure.
|
||||
Note that normal and highpri worker-pools don't interact with
|
||||
each other. Each maintain its separate pool of workers and
|
||||
implements concurrency management among its workers.
|
||||
|
||||
WQ_HIGHPRI
|
||||
``WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE``
|
||||
Work items of a CPU intensive wq do not contribute to the
|
||||
concurrency level. In other words, runnable CPU intensive
|
||||
work items will not prevent other work items in the same
|
||||
worker-pool from starting execution. This is useful for bound
|
||||
work items which are expected to hog CPU cycles so that their
|
||||
execution is regulated by the system scheduler.
|
||||
|
||||
Work items of a highpri wq are queued to the highpri
|
||||
worker-pool of the target cpu. Highpri worker-pools are
|
||||
served by worker threads with elevated nice level.
|
||||
Although CPU intensive work items don't contribute to the
|
||||
concurrency level, start of their executions is still
|
||||
regulated by the concurrency management and runnable
|
||||
non-CPU-intensive work items can delay execution of CPU
|
||||
intensive work items.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that normal and highpri worker-pools don't interact with
|
||||
each other. Each maintain its separate pool of workers and
|
||||
implements concurrency management among its workers.
|
||||
This flag is meaningless for unbound wq.
|
||||
|
||||
WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE
|
||||
Note that the flag ``WQ_NON_REENTRANT`` no longer exists as all
|
||||
workqueues are now non-reentrant - any work item is guaranteed to be
|
||||
executed by at most one worker system-wide at any given time.
|
||||
|
||||
Work items of a CPU intensive wq do not contribute to the
|
||||
concurrency level. In other words, runnable CPU intensive
|
||||
work items will not prevent other work items in the same
|
||||
worker-pool from starting execution. This is useful for bound
|
||||
work items which are expected to hog CPU cycles so that their
|
||||
execution is regulated by the system scheduler.
|
||||
|
||||
Although CPU intensive work items don't contribute to the
|
||||
concurrency level, start of their executions is still
|
||||
regulated by the concurrency management and runnable
|
||||
non-CPU-intensive work items can delay execution of CPU
|
||||
intensive work items.
|
||||
``max_active``
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
This flag is meaningless for unbound wq.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the flag WQ_NON_REENTRANT no longer exists as all workqueues
|
||||
are now non-reentrant - any work item is guaranteed to be executed by
|
||||
at most one worker system-wide at any given time.
|
||||
|
||||
@max_active:
|
||||
|
||||
@max_active determines the maximum number of execution contexts per
|
||||
CPU which can be assigned to the work items of a wq. For example,
|
||||
with @max_active of 16, at most 16 work items of the wq can be
|
||||
``@max_active`` determines the maximum number of execution contexts
|
||||
per CPU which can be assigned to the work items of a wq. For example,
|
||||
with ``@max_active`` of 16, at most 16 work items of the wq can be
|
||||
executing at the same time per CPU.
|
||||
|
||||
Currently, for a bound wq, the maximum limit for @max_active is 512
|
||||
and the default value used when 0 is specified is 256. For an unbound
|
||||
wq, the limit is higher of 512 and 4 * num_possible_cpus(). These
|
||||
values are chosen sufficiently high such that they are not the
|
||||
limiting factor while providing protection in runaway cases.
|
||||
Currently, for a bound wq, the maximum limit for ``@max_active`` is
|
||||
512 and the default value used when 0 is specified is 256. For an
|
||||
unbound wq, the limit is higher of 512 and 4 *
|
||||
``num_possible_cpus()``. These values are chosen sufficiently high
|
||||
such that they are not the limiting factor while providing protection
|
||||
in runaway cases.
|
||||
|
||||
The number of active work items of a wq is usually regulated by the
|
||||
users of the wq, more specifically, by how many work items the users
|
||||
|
|
@ -247,13 +243,14 @@ throttling the number of active work items, specifying '0' is
|
|||
recommended.
|
||||
|
||||
Some users depend on the strict execution ordering of ST wq. The
|
||||
combination of @max_active of 1 and WQ_UNBOUND is used to achieve this
|
||||
behavior. Work items on such wq are always queued to the unbound
|
||||
worker-pools and only one work item can be active at any given time thus
|
||||
achieving the same ordering property as ST wq.
|
||||
combination of ``@max_active`` of 1 and ``WQ_UNBOUND`` is used to
|
||||
achieve this behavior. Work items on such wq are always queued to the
|
||||
unbound worker-pools and only one work item can be active at any given
|
||||
time thus achieving the same ordering property as ST wq.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5. Example Execution Scenarios
|
||||
Example Execution Scenarios
|
||||
===========================
|
||||
|
||||
The following example execution scenarios try to illustrate how cmwq
|
||||
behave under different configurations.
|
||||
|
|
@ -265,7 +262,7 @@ behave under different configurations.
|
|||
|
||||
Ignoring all other tasks, works and processing overhead, and assuming
|
||||
simple FIFO scheduling, the following is one highly simplified version
|
||||
of possible sequences of events with the original wq.
|
||||
of possible sequences of events with the original wq. ::
|
||||
|
||||
TIME IN MSECS EVENT
|
||||
0 w0 starts and burns CPU
|
||||
|
|
@ -279,7 +276,7 @@ of possible sequences of events with the original wq.
|
|||
40 w2 sleeps
|
||||
50 w2 wakes up and finishes
|
||||
|
||||
And with cmwq with @max_active >= 3,
|
||||
And with cmwq with ``@max_active`` >= 3, ::
|
||||
|
||||
TIME IN MSECS EVENT
|
||||
0 w0 starts and burns CPU
|
||||
|
|
@ -293,7 +290,7 @@ And with cmwq with @max_active >= 3,
|
|||
20 w1 wakes up and finishes
|
||||
25 w2 wakes up and finishes
|
||||
|
||||
If @max_active == 2,
|
||||
If ``@max_active`` == 2, ::
|
||||
|
||||
TIME IN MSECS EVENT
|
||||
0 w0 starts and burns CPU
|
||||
|
|
@ -308,7 +305,7 @@ If @max_active == 2,
|
|||
35 w2 wakes up and finishes
|
||||
|
||||
Now, let's assume w1 and w2 are queued to a different wq q1 which has
|
||||
WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE set,
|
||||
``WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE`` set, ::
|
||||
|
||||
TIME IN MSECS EVENT
|
||||
0 w0 starts and burns CPU
|
||||
|
|
@ -322,13 +319,15 @@ WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE set,
|
|||
25 w2 wakes up and finishes
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
6. Guidelines
|
||||
Guidelines
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
* Do not forget to use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM if a wq may process work items
|
||||
which are used during memory reclaim. Each wq with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
|
||||
set has an execution context reserved for it. If there is
|
||||
dependency among multiple work items used during memory reclaim,
|
||||
they should be queued to separate wq each with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM.
|
||||
* Do not forget to use ``WQ_MEM_RECLAIM`` if a wq may process work
|
||||
items which are used during memory reclaim. Each wq with
|
||||
``WQ_MEM_RECLAIM`` set has an execution context reserved for it. If
|
||||
there is dependency among multiple work items used during memory
|
||||
reclaim, they should be queued to separate wq each with
|
||||
``WQ_MEM_RECLAIM``.
|
||||
|
||||
* Unless strict ordering is required, there is no need to use ST wq.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -337,30 +336,31 @@ WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE set,
|
|||
well under the default limit.
|
||||
|
||||
* A wq serves as a domain for forward progress guarantee
|
||||
(WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, flush and work item attributes. Work items which
|
||||
are not involved in memory reclaim and don't need to be flushed as a
|
||||
part of a group of work items, and don't require any special
|
||||
attribute, can use one of the system wq. There is no difference in
|
||||
execution characteristics between using a dedicated wq and a system
|
||||
wq.
|
||||
(``WQ_MEM_RECLAIM``, flush and work item attributes. Work items
|
||||
which are not involved in memory reclaim and don't need to be
|
||||
flushed as a part of a group of work items, and don't require any
|
||||
special attribute, can use one of the system wq. There is no
|
||||
difference in execution characteristics between using a dedicated wq
|
||||
and a system wq.
|
||||
|
||||
* Unless work items are expected to consume a huge amount of CPU
|
||||
cycles, using a bound wq is usually beneficial due to the increased
|
||||
level of locality in wq operations and work item execution.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
7. Debugging
|
||||
Debugging
|
||||
=========
|
||||
|
||||
Because the work functions are executed by generic worker threads
|
||||
there are a few tricks needed to shed some light on misbehaving
|
||||
workqueue users.
|
||||
|
||||
Worker threads show up in the process list as:
|
||||
Worker threads show up in the process list as: ::
|
||||
|
||||
root 5671 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:07 0:00 [kworker/0:1]
|
||||
root 5672 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:07 0:00 [kworker/1:2]
|
||||
root 5673 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:12 0:00 [kworker/0:0]
|
||||
root 5674 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:13 0:00 [kworker/1:0]
|
||||
root 5671 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:07 0:00 [kworker/0:1]
|
||||
root 5672 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:07 0:00 [kworker/1:2]
|
||||
root 5673 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:12 0:00 [kworker/0:0]
|
||||
root 5674 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:13 0:00 [kworker/1:0]
|
||||
|
||||
If kworkers are going crazy (using too much cpu), there are two types
|
||||
of possible problems:
|
||||
|
|
@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ of possible problems:
|
|||
1. Something being scheduled in rapid succession
|
||||
2. A single work item that consumes lots of cpu cycles
|
||||
|
||||
The first one can be tracked using tracing:
|
||||
The first one can be tracked using tracing: ::
|
||||
|
||||
$ echo workqueue:workqueue_queue_work > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_event
|
||||
$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe > out.txt
|
||||
|
|
@ -380,9 +380,15 @@ the output and the offender can be determined with the work item
|
|||
function.
|
||||
|
||||
For the second type of problems it should be possible to just check
|
||||
the stack trace of the offending worker thread.
|
||||
the stack trace of the offending worker thread. ::
|
||||
|
||||
$ cat /proc/THE_OFFENDING_KWORKER/stack
|
||||
|
||||
The work item's function should be trivially visible in the stack
|
||||
trace.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Kernel Inline Documentations Reference
|
||||
======================================
|
||||
|
||||
.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/workqueue.h
|
||||
|
|
@ -13101,7 +13101,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git
|
|||
S: Maintained
|
||||
F: include/linux/workqueue.h
|
||||
F: kernel/workqueue.c
|
||||
F: Documentation/workqueue.txt
|
||||
F: Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
|
||||
|
||||
X-POWERS MULTIFUNCTION PMIC DEVICE DRIVERS
|
||||
M: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue