diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h index 4393278666d9..e880f2408e29 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h @@ -396,5 +396,6 @@ #define X86_BUG_L1TF X86_BUG(18) /* CPU is affected by L1 Terminal Fault */ #define X86_BUG_MDS X86_BUG(19) /* CPU is affected by Microarchitectural data sampling */ #define X86_BUG_MSBDS_ONLY X86_BUG(20) /* CPU is only affected by the MSDBS variant of BUG_MDS */ +#define X86_BUG_SWAPGS X86_BUG(21) /* CPU is affected by speculation through SWAPGS */ #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPUFEATURES_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index 992f832c447b..6383f0db098c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -284,18 +284,6 @@ static const char * const spectre_v1_strings[] = { [SPECTRE_V1_MITIGATION_AUTO] = "Mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization", }; -static bool is_swapgs_serializing(void) -{ - /* - * Technically, swapgs isn't serializing on AMD (despite it previously - * being documented as such in the APM). But according to AMD, %gs is - * updated non-speculatively, and the issuing of %gs-relative memory - * operands will be blocked until the %gs update completes, which is - * good enough for our purposes. - */ - return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD; -} - /* * Does SMAP provide full mitigation against speculative kernel access to * userspace? @@ -346,9 +334,11 @@ static void __init spectre_v1_select_mitigation(void) * PTI as the CR3 write in the Meltdown mitigation * is serializing. * - * If neither is there, mitigate with an LFENCE. + * If neither is there, mitigate with an LFENCE to + * stop speculation through swapgs. */ - if (!is_swapgs_serializing() && !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI)) + if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SWAPGS) && + !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI)) setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_FENCE_SWAPGS_USER); /* diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index 309b6b9b49d4..300dcf00d287 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -970,6 +970,7 @@ static void identify_cpu_without_cpuid(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) #define NO_L1TF BIT(3) #define NO_MDS BIT(4) #define MSBDS_ONLY BIT(5) +#define NO_SWAPGS BIT(6) #define VULNWL(_vendor, _family, _model, _whitelist) \ { X86_VENDOR_##_vendor, _family, _model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, _whitelist } @@ -996,30 +997,38 @@ static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_whitelist[] = { VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_BONNELL, NO_SPECULATION), VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_BONNELL_MID, NO_SPECULATION), - VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_SILVERMONT, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY), - VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_SILVERMONT_X, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY), - VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY), - VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_AIRMONT, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY), - VULNWL_INTEL(XEON_PHI_KNL, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY), - VULNWL_INTEL(XEON_PHI_KNM, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_SILVERMONT, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_SILVERMONT_X, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_AIRMONT, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_INTEL(XEON_PHI_KNL, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_INTEL(XEON_PHI_KNM, NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY | NO_SWAPGS), VULNWL_INTEL(CORE_YONAH, NO_SSB), - VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_AIRMONT_MID, NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_AIRMONT_MID, NO_L1TF | MSBDS_ONLY | NO_SWAPGS), - VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_GOLDMONT, NO_MDS | NO_L1TF), - VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_GOLDMONT_X, NO_MDS | NO_L1TF), - VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_GOLDMONT_PLUS, NO_MDS | NO_L1TF), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_GOLDMONT, NO_MDS | NO_L1TF | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_GOLDMONT_X, NO_MDS | NO_L1TF | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_GOLDMONT_PLUS, NO_MDS | NO_L1TF | NO_SWAPGS), + + /* + * Technically, swapgs isn't serializing on AMD (despite it previously + * being documented as such in the APM). But according to AMD, %gs is + * updated non-speculatively, and the issuing of %gs-relative memory + * operands will be blocked until the %gs update completes, which is + * good enough for our purposes. + */ /* AMD Family 0xf - 0x12 */ - VULNWL_AMD(0x0f, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS), - VULNWL_AMD(0x10, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS), - VULNWL_AMD(0x11, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS), - VULNWL_AMD(0x12, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS), + VULNWL_AMD(0x0f, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_AMD(0x10, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_AMD(0x11, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_AMD(0x12, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS | NO_SWAPGS), /* FAMILY_ANY must be last, otherwise 0x0f - 0x12 matches won't work */ - VULNWL_AMD(X86_FAMILY_ANY, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS), - VULNWL_HYGON(X86_FAMILY_ANY, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS), + VULNWL_AMD(X86_FAMILY_ANY, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS | NO_SWAPGS), + VULNWL_HYGON(X86_FAMILY_ANY, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS | NO_SWAPGS), {} }; @@ -1056,6 +1065,9 @@ static void __init cpu_set_bug_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_MSBDS_ONLY); } + if (!cpu_matches(NO_SWAPGS)) + setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_SWAPGS); + if (cpu_matches(NO_MELTDOWN)) return;