The Devicetree Specification has superseded the ePAPR as the
base specification for bindings. Update files in Documentation
to reference the new document.
First reference to ePAPR in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt
is generic, remove it.
Some files are not updated because there is no hypervisor chapter
in the Devicetree Specification:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/msi-pic.txt
Documenation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
Documenation/virtual/kvm/ppc-pv.txt
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Add ARM CoreLink CCI-550 cache coherent interconnect PMU
driver support. The CCI-550 PMU shares all the attributes of CCI-500
PMU, except for an additional master interface (MI-6 - 0xe).
CCI-550 requires the same work around as for CCI-500 to
write to the PMU counter.
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
CCI-500 provides 8 event counters which can count any of the
supported events independently. The PMU event id is a 9-bit
value made of two parts.
bits [8:5] - Source port
0x0-0x6 Slave Ports
0x8-0xD Master Ports
0xf Global Events to CCI
0x7,0xe Reserved
bits [0:4] - Event code (specific to each type of port)
The generic CCI-500 controlling interface remains the same with CCI-400.
However there are some differences in the PMU event counters.
- No cycle counter
- Upto 8 counters(4 in CCI-400)
- Each counter area is 64K(4K in CCI400)
- The counter0 starts at offset 0x10000 from the base of CCI
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Acked-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Avoid secure transactions while probing the CCI PMU. The
existing code makes use of the Peripheral ID2 (PID2) register
to determine the revision of the CCI400, which requires a
secure transaction. This puts a limitation on the usage of the
driver on systems running non-secure Linux(e.g, ARM64).
Updated the device-tree binding for cci pmu node to add the explicit
revision number for the compatible field.
The supported strings are :
arm,cci-400-pmu,r0
arm,cci-400-pmu,r1
arm,cci-400-pmu - DEPRECATED. See NOTE below
NOTE: If the revision is not mentioned, we need to probe the cci revision,
which could be fatal on a platform running non-secure. We need a reliable way
to know if we can poke the CCI registers at runtime on ARM32. We depend on
'mcpm_is_available()' when it is available. mcpm_is_available() returns true
only when there is a registered driver for mcpm. Otherwise, we assume that we
don't have secure access, and skips probing the revision number(ARM64 case).
The MCPM should figure out if it is safe to access the CCI. Unfortunately
there isn't a reliable way to indicate the same via dtb. This patch doesn't
address/change the current situation. It only deals with the CCI-PMU, leaving
the assumptions about the secure access as it has been, prior to this patch.
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
The CCI PMU can profile bus transactions at the master and slave
interfaces of the CCI. The PMU can be used to observe an aggregated
view of the bus traffic between the various components connected to the
CCI.
Introduce a binding for the CCI PMU. The PMU node will be a sub-node of
the CCI node.
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Improve the description of the value types used in the CCI binding.
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
On ARM multi-cluster systems coherency between cores running on
different clusters is managed by the cache-coherent interconnect (CCI).
It allows broadcasting of TLB invalidates and memory barriers and it
guarantees cache coherency at system level through snooping of slave
interfaces connected to it.
This patch enables the basic infrastructure required in Linux to handle and
programme the CCI component.
Non-local variables used by the CCI management functions called by power
down function calls after disabling the cache must be flushed out to main
memory in advance, otherwise incoherency of those values may occur if they
are sitting in the cache of some other CPU when power down functions
execute. Driver code ensures that relevant data structures are flushed
from inner and outer caches after the driver probe is completed.
CCI slave port resources are linked to set of CPUs through bus masters
phandle properties that link the interface resources to masters node in
the device tree.
Documentation describing the CCI DT bindings is provided with the patch.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Frank Rowand